This letter I am sending to the British Authorities local and national WIRELESS POLLUTION + 5G DEVELOPMENTS
Through exposure to wireless traffic children and young people especially are being exposed to risk of jamming of their brains. The very low frequency pulses which carry information and pictures correspond with brain wave frequencies and may interfere with normal functions or affect the brain development of children and young people. People react individually but the stress caused is inevitable and universal – everyone is inhabiting an environment prejudiced by invisible pollution traffic.Everyone is being bombarded, strafed and invaded by the pulses and the microwave carrier beams. Some people according to constitution are having their brains seriously interfered with, disrupted in normal function and are being in effect taken over – they are losing their minds under the fact of assault. This can accentuate personal and temperamental traits and lead, perhaps, to loss of control of temper or sex drive and produce aggression and violence; or, in another type of person, mental confusion, states of anxiety, depression and crippling introversion.
Wi-Fi transmission at 2.4 GHz even at very low power densities affects the water molecules in our tissues and particularly in the brain and central nervous system. It causes accelerated wear and tear on our cells and dissolution of cell membranes. The result of this inevitably is illness and provocation of chronic maladies both physiological and psychological. This effect is on top of the traffic interference at 10hz from Wi-Fi transmission which disturbs and inhibits the Alpha wave resonance of the brain. What this means is – it is difficult for the person being irradiated to relax leading to stress, fatigue, cognitive inefficiency etc etc.
If the 5G deployments – already proceeding – continue without remission – we can expect rapid deterioration in the conditions described above. There will be exacerbation of brain and CNS malfunctions, accelerated cell paralysis and morbidity and thus intensification of all the pathological effects already happening – especially to children, young people and women of child-bearing age. There will be intensified synergy with the other toxic agents assaulting babies, toddlers, infants and teenagers.
We can expect increased incidence of manias and mental heath destruction, cancers and Autoimmune diseases, heart and cardiovascular debilities and progressive signs of degeneration in all biological systems – and most grievously, perhaps, of the reproductive systems in children and women of child-bearing age.
The children surviving in this pollution flood are likely to receive genetic impairments which could deliver many of them into Autistic Spectrum conditions; and in the case of females to suffer corruption of their ovaries with chromosome derangement which eventually will produce offspring with either Autism or other new conditions affecting both psychological and physiological expression. There are likely to be defects in all the biological systems of the individuals submitted to the toxic environment now being manufactured. Scarcely anyone will be healthy in the sense of the word as it was understood. Human beings are creatures of their environment. When the environment changes so do we. We are now in the process of imprinting into the human genome disorder, distortions and a consequential future where sickness and pain are ever present and inescapable.
On our present course we are heading towards a time of manifold and relatively infinite conditions of malady where our normal state will exhibit chronic pain and be marked by a consequent and irredeemable experience of both physical and psychological torture. It may then be the case that “men shall seek death and not find it and desire to die and death shall flee from them.”
The new transmission signified by the title 5G will allow irradiation of the public with so-called millimeter waves up to 60, 80 or 100 Ggz. This commission cannot other than be experimental. It is quite possible the new environment created by a millimeter wave bath in addition to the present microwave deluge with compound effect in the radiation field – will in all probability generate new diseases and new abnormalities in the expression of the subjects being treated – us humans – with pathogenic agents.
Needless to say – such a proposition in the first place and in any degree of commission transgresses the Nuremberg Code. Everyone proposing such a future – conceiving, constructing or executing plans or omitting to oppose it where they have a duty to speak – everyone of them is guilty of crimes against Man and Nature either directly or in complicity.
As a concerned member of the public I wanted to find ‘experts’ who could explain to myself and others, exactly what was happening in Gateshead, with claims being made that the lampposts were operating with 5G signals.
I contacted a man who was a member of an organisation called BEMRI which stands for Bio-Electromagnetic Research Initiative.
That man was named Mr David Webb.
I sent him this email.
To which I received the above reply.
As you can clearly see, this reply shows that this man was replying as a member of BEMRI.
He also states that himself and another member of that group had phoned Steele on several occasions to offer their services freely.
I then arranged in May, for this man to meet up with a lady who lived close to the area that had been tested in Gateshead, her name is Lizbeth.
She spent several hours with the man from BEMRI and the lampposts were tested with equipment that was professional and up to the job.
This email was sent to me after David had visited Gateshead and Stockport.
That email clearly states that I should mention BEMRI but not David personally.
So why am I mentioning his name now? Because last month, March 2019 which is nearly a year after these tests were completed, BEMRI have issued a public statement to Mark Steele in which they state that BEMRI is NOT responsible for any of the test results, and that anyone who makes claims that BEMRI are involved are misleading the public.
David has since retired from BEMRI.
Does that negate the fact that he corresponded with me as part of BEMRI?
I do not feel that it does. So after hearing of this latest development, I wrote a letter to the founder of BEMRI and informed them that David had conducted the tests on behalf of BEMRI, which I have in writing. I also told them that I believed that they had acted inappropriately to release a public statement claiming that it was nothing to do with BEMRI.
I was then threatened with legal action If I pursued this.
Back in May I also sent this email.
The above is a copy of the original report sent by David. He informed me on the phone previously that he made made a report for BEMRI as he does with every test he carries out.
I then received this email.
I have no choice but to make these emails public because of the actions of BEMRI in releasing a public statement claiming that they are not in any way responsible for the tests carried out by their own member, a member who has consulted and communicated with both myself and the lady who accompanied him whilst the test were being carried out, and has done so and clearly informed us that he was testing as a member of this group and NOT as an independent person.
Alasdair is a renowned scientist and expert who has links to BEMRI but is not a member.
After asking David to give a more updated and comprehensive report he stated that he was very busy so I summed it up and asked for his approval.
Here is his reply.
Do you see? I tried to sum it for him as he was too busy, I specifically stated that I had contacted BEMRI, I shared his original report again, (written by him) and had summed up that BEMRI wished to cease contact in any further matters relating to Steele and his findings, and he replied that this was fine.
He offered to provide more information when he had the time.
Some months went by with us both corresponding on different aspects of 5G and he often sent me information to include on my website.
5 months later, I was being asked to provide the report that was official, so I contacted David again.
He agreed to provide a report on the phone, then sent me this.
So after communicating with myself and Lizbeth and testing Gateshead lampposts and doing so as a member of BEMRI, he then informs us that members of BEMRI do not want this information to be shared and he cannot go against the rest of his group.
This was my reply.
This was his reply.
He then sent the test results to Lizbeth who had accompanied him on the day of the testing but not to me.
As you can see from that report it clearly states that BEMRI visited Gateshead to test, so where does that leave us?
BEMRI spokesperson is insisting that it was never done by their organisation, the member of BEMRI who corresponded on their behalf has retired and I am being called a liar.
So, you can decide for yourself and I will gladly face any legal action that members of BEMRI decide to take on this matter because as far as I am concerned, the testing was carried out by a member of BEMRI which clearly is shown by the correspondence.
Radiation concerns halt Brussels 5G development, for now
Plans for a pilot project to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet in Brussels have been halted due to fears for the health of citizens, according to reports.In July, the government concluded an agreement with three telecom operators to relax the strict radiation standards in Brussels. But according to the Region, it is now impossible to estimate the radiation from the antennas required for the service.
“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,” she added.
In order to understand an organisation or entity, one must first come to an understanding of its founders. Dr Gail Marie Bradbrook, along with Julian ‘Roger’ Hallam, appear to be the two primary instigators of the Extinction Rebellion (XR) movement.
The following is an investigation into Bradbrook, her background, professional associations, ideology and influences.
Gail and the other budding public figures involved in XR have chosen to enter the public eye by asking millions of people to stand with them in a campaign of non-violent civil disobedience, aimed at making profound changes to an economic and political system which millions of people rely on to stay warm, and obtain basic things like food and water. Due to the serious nature of the changes they are proposing (albeit without mentioning that they’re all taken straight from the UN’s ‘Sustainable Development Goals’), they should welcome criticism and scrutiny of their activities. If they are sincere, they should demonstrate integrity, and not dismiss dissenting voices, but instead engage openly with people who question their motives and stated objectives.
The Mother of Extinction
Often called “the Mother” by members of Extinction Rebellion, Gail is a molecular biophysicist by training, though she hasn’t worked in that capacity for quite some time. Not long after finishing her post-doctoral research into ‘protein saccharide interactions’, she became a consultant for several ‘political charities’ and has, for the past 18 years worked exclusively as a professional campaigner – a role which, during a talk at Off-Grid Festival, she admits is “mostly about securing your own pay-check.”
Gail epitomises the new generation of ‘professional activists’, having positioned herself at the epicentre of the revolving door between big business, government bureaucracies and establishment-friendly NGOs, campaign groups and charitable organisations, all of which increasingly function as the public face of international corporate and financial power.
Acting through proxy organisations permits these forces to obscure the fact that government policies are being swayed by corporate entities that fund entire networks of charities and non-governmental organisations to interact with government on their behalf. NGOs and charities tend to be seen as more caring and less corrupt than their corporate sponsors; and are presented as such in the media, even when their staff and financials reveal them to be entirely monetarily dependent on the corporate entities and supranational bureaucracies that they covertly campaign on behalf of. There appears to be no remedy or legal redress we can use to reveal the true nature of these NGOs and charities, or hold them to even the most basic ethical and moral standards.
As described in our introduction, corporate entities have previously paid firms such as Stratfor to disrupt and neutralise inconvenient campaign groups. It would seem that in recent years they’ve increasingly taken to the expedient of simply funding the ‘right ones’ into existence in the first place, and then nudging less amenable competitors out from (as they no doubt see it) the ‘marketplace’ of causes. Worse still, these ostensibly ‘independent’ NGOs, charities and professional ‘campaign groups’ are increasingly tasked with stewarding government policy and objectives.
It is unclear precisely when, or more importantly how Gail transitioned from molecular biophysicist to collecting causes like a declining civilisation accumulates laws; but what we do know is that for the past two decades, she has been a favoured ‘activist’ of the British State, at least when it comes to their ‘digital inclusion’ and ‘universal internet access’ agendas. These euphemisms today refer to the 5G / Internet of Things roll-out; aimed at making sure that absolutely everybody, without exception, gets plugged-in to the emerging smart-grid, which incorporates both military hardware – used for crowd control, as well as psychological operations with next-generation mind-control, surveillance and communications systems. In other words, a full-spectrum cybernetic control apparatus which “if fully exploited could make Orwell’s 1984 seem like a benevolent utopia” (-William Burroughs, “Limits of Control“).
As well as having the ear of government, many of the directors and trustees of Gail’s Citizens Online charity just so happen to be people whose companies stand to make an absolute killing from the 5G roll-out – which is covertly promoted by Extinction Rebellion, due to its coming under the auspices of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 (the current rebranding of Agenda 21), which is most often referred to with deceptive simplicity, as ‘Sustainable Development’ [SD]. Indeed, the smart grid / 5G infrastructure roll-out and the United Nation’s ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDG) are entirely inseparable.
[SD] When you hear governments or NGOs use the phrase ‘Sustainable Development’, they do not simply mean development that is sustainable – they are, in fact, referring to a very specific series of policy documents, all of which were designed by the United Nations. Climate policies are one aspect of the UN’s SD goals.
“Government must enact legally-binding policy measures to reduce carbon emissions in the UK to zero by 2025 and take further action to remove the excess of atmospheric greenhouse gases.” – XR demands.
Extinction Rebellion’s demands (above) were in-fact taken straight from the objectives laid out by Hallam and Bradbrook in their Campaign Overview document of October of 2018, back when the pair were still calling themselves the “coordination group coordinators”.
We’re curious to know which “legally-binding policy measures” you had in mind, Gail? (And by the way, what kind of arrangement were you imagining where the “Government” is to be “work(ing) alongside the media”?)
There is only one policy framework to this effect, developed by the UN’s technocratic ‘global governance’ bureaucracy; and it involves establishing world-wide CO2 taxation – which we’re being told (by the corporate-industrial elite), is ‘necessary to save the planet.’
We’ll explore these topics more, and expose the treasonous and subversive activities of the UN and their vast networks of industry sponsored ‘change agents’ later on. For now, let us return to that spear-head of ‘Sustainable Development’, Dr Gail Bradbrook.
Much of Gail’s career seems to have been spent sat in air-conditioned corporate conference centres with the likes of John Varney, Chief Technology Officer of the BBC, and any number of government and industry talking heads. Here’s the guest list from a standard ’roundtable’ meeting, the kind which Gail has spent nearly two decades attending. The document begins, “On Monday 7th June 2004 the IPPR’s Digital Society team hosted a private roundtable seminar to discuss forthcoming reforms to central Government IT.” (Original)
Gail even had dinner at Number 10 Downing Street to ‘brainstorm on digital inclusion’.
The fact of the matter is, Dr Gail Bradbrook is one of the UK State’s go-to ‘experts’, chosen to give (the right kind of) evidence at various parliamentary hearings and committees (which we’ll get to). Her job also has her attending high-level private sector meetings where she frequently rubs shoulders with telecommunications oligarchs, international business moguls and the whole autocratic circular-jerkular of highly politicised ‘scientists’ and other ‘experts’ who are invariably presented to us in the media as impartial and unbiased, but who (in reality) float like a layer of congealed scum on the surface of the EU and UN gravy-boat [*].
[*] Gravy-boat: “it’s bigger, slower and you can help yourself as often as you like.” -Sir Greville McDonald, The New Statesman (TV Series).
Sustainable compliance and inclusive surveillance
Before she was engaged in (pre-approved) rabble rousing, or pretending to glue herself [*] to the Department of Energy Headquarters, Gail was more likely to be found attending meetings held under Chatham House Rules, sat alongside people like Anthony Walker, former communications officer for the American Chamber of Commerce, who previously worked for the European Commission’s PR firm Rowland Company (owned by Saatchi & Saatchi)
According to his LinkedIn profile, Antony Walker “was responsible for providing PR and communications consultancy to the European Commission on environment, information society and social fund policy areas. I was also responsible for supporting DG[*] Environment’s Local Agenda 21 sustainable development initiative.” [*] DG refers to the EU’s Directorate-General for Environment.
As you’ll see, there’s a fine line between Agenda 21/ 2030, or ‘Sustainable Development’ as they like to call it, and the techno-corporate oligarchy behind the 5G roll-out. When Gail met him, Walker was CEO of the Broadband Stakeholder Group; and he remains deputy CEO of TechUK (the Trade & Industry Association of GCHQ and the wider ‘information technology industry’).
Here’s Walker promoting Greta Thunberg’s ‘School Climate Strike’:
Walker’s Broadband Stakeholder Group (BSG) recently published a report tellingly entitled ‘Lowering barriers to 5G deployment’, which makes ‘recommendations’ to industry, central government and local authorities. Seeing as how the BSG is comprised of all of the biggest telecommunications and mobile network providers, you can be sure that their ‘recommendations’ are going to be enshrined in policy by the central government. The BSG report even suggests a dedicated ‘task force’ to hunt down any non-complying local authorities and to make sure that they’re all keeping in line with the government’s desire for the UK to be a ‘5G leader’.
In the course of its 65 pages, the report mentions neither the mounting scientific evidence pointing to serious health implications of microwave exposure for both humans and animals, and especially those used by the 5G infrastructure, nor the multiple surveillance and privacy concerns.
Why? Because the scientists studying and raising awareness of the dangers of the millimetre and microwave radiation used by 5G, are simply the ‘wrong sort’ of scientists – meaning those without their biscuits in the gravy-boat.
They’re getting away with pushing 5G and military-grade ‘smart-grid’ surveillance hardware, by wrapping it up in platitudes about ‘Sustainable Development’ and claiming that we need these technologies for environmental monitoring. Everything from air-quality control to climate prediction and modelling (a quack science if ever there was one). What they fail to mention, is that these applications are secondary to the mass-surveillance and electronic warfare capabilities; and that 5G uses the same hardware (just re-branded) as is currently deployed by coalition forces in the Middle East as crowd control weaponry.
Inclusion = there is no escape!
The Orwellian ‘Digital Inclusion Unit’ (DIU), comprised of Gail, J. D. Fisher (the former Air Force officer who started Gail’s ‘CitizensOnline’ charity) and their whole cadre of industry-sponsored activists and academics, have previously suggested that they, as the DIU, be given powers to “influence the funding streams” of Local Authorities (already strapped for cash and struggling to provide front-line services, like housing and waste collection) as punishment for non-compliance with the central government’s Digital Inclusion Agenda. An agenda, largely written by NGOs and charities like Gail’s who’re funded by internet and mobile phone infrastructure providers.
No doubt similar penalties await any Local Authority who dares to resist the roll out of military-grade surveillance hardware and ‘crowd-control’ weaponry into the residential areas of their constituents.
Astroturfing for Justice and Money
Professional activism also works in the inverse: lobbying and campaigning within the ‘corporate world’ on behalf of governments and supranational bureaucracies. Gail’s career effortlessly transitions from industry-funded roles to government ones, and more often than not, there is no meaningful separation between the two. An example of this is her involvement with the EU/ UN proxy known as the ‘Tax Justice Network’ (TJN). We’ll be delving much deeper into this subversive economic ‘think-tank’ later on in ‘Red Gail and the Borderless Tax Collectors’; for now, a brief overview of the organisation will serve as a good example of how ‘astroturfing’ works.
A star-struck Gail alongside astroturfer extraordinaire John Christensen.
John Christensen, described by the ever-critical Guardian as “the unlikely figurehead of a worldwide campaign against tax avoidance.”
The reason the TJN provides such a good case study is because, whereas many such NGOs go to the trouble of disguising themselves, with the TJN there isn’t even a pretence of separation between them and the EU/ UN, whose people brazenly sit on its board as Trustees and Directors alongside ‘tax justice activists’ who audaciously present themselves as ‘reformed tax avoiders’ – owing to the fact that they previously held high-ranking positions within some of the world’s largest ‘offshore’ accountancy firms.
The TJN’s founder, John Christensen, previously worked for the offshore financial services firm Touche Ross & Co; and for 11 years he was economic adviser to the government of the British Channel Island of Jersey. This is another reason why the TJN and its subsidiary organisations provide such a clear example of what has become known as ‘controlled opposition’ – the process whereby an entity, be it an industry giant or government agency, actually creates and funds its own opposition groups.
Take, for example Greenpeace, whose two largest donors are the Rockefellers (whose money paid for the land on which the UN headquarters in New York was built), and the foundation of Ted Turner, media mogul, largest land owner in the U.S., and creator of Captain Planet, who in 1997 donated 1 billion dollars to the UN. Or the 100+ ‘environmental’, ‘social justice’ and ‘sustainable development’ groups that are funded by the oil barons and arch-eugenicists of the Rockefeller clan.
The most advanced and pernicious form of these tactics is known as ‘astroturfing’, which is the creation of fake ‘grass-roots’ (hence, astroturf) campaigns, then used to push for, or smother authentic opposition to industry and/or government policies and agendas. Astroturfing uses networks of paid, ‘professional activists’ who operate through the various proxy organisations. We hope this demonstrates the cold, calculative efficiency with which these people operate. Anyhow, there’s much more to come on the TJN, in the strand entitled “Red Gail and the Borderless Tax Collectors.”
Throughout this investigation into the creators of Extinction Rebellion, we’ll be delving deep into world of the ‘professional activist’. Along the way we’ll explore many of the think-tanks, NGOs and campaign groups involved in astroturfing the environmental movement, as well as dredging up some of the sharks and bottom feeders that lurk in their depths.
You’ll see many individuals cropping up again and again, with some members of the NGOligarchy presiding over vast constellations of charities, think-tanks and lobby groups, all designed to create the appearance of an organic ‘ground-swell’ of concerned citizens, academics and ‘thinkers’ who all (coincidently enough) push for near-identical policies and reforms; most of which mirror, perfectly, the objectives and policies of the EU, UN and their foundation, trust and funding body puppetmasters. One merely has to look at who funds these NGOs and charities to conduct their ‘research’ and to promote their toothless campaigns or quack economic theories cum technocratic, globalist ideology. Follow the money, as the saying goes!
We’ve traced the development of these ideas within the academic-intelligence apparatus, back to (at least) the early 90s, and to a new generation of internet-savvy intelligentsia – keen to leverage their understanding of emerging technologies by studying their sociological and political implications, and then ‘selling’ what they learn back to the corporate-state (as a means of preserving their monopoly on cultural and intellectual expression, increasingly threatened by the advent of more horizontal, network orientated information technologies). Gail, her mentors and employers, have been on the peripheries of these concepts since their genesis. We will explore these networks more in the strand entitled: Digital Citizenship in the New Dark Age.
Gail Bradbrook has spent the past 18 years on the pay-roll of charities, NGOs and political ‘think-tanks’ (like the Blairite/New Labour IPPR), being funded by J. P. Morgan Chase (which happens to be the UN’s bank), BT, Shell, Microsoft, CISCO, Panasonic, Goldman Sachs, BAE Systems, NEON Communications (whose ‘Director of Global Sales’, Lord Anthony Tudor St John, is heavily invested in 5G technology and also sits as trustee of Citizens Online), IBM, Unilever, N. M. Rothschild & Sons… you name it: the whole ‘in the club’ of corporate funny-handshake hegemony – to give ‘independent advice’ to government and help develop government strategies, policies and to define their objectives.
This, we can prove beyond any doubt: the paper trail exists and will be presented throughout this series – the question which yet remains unanswered is whether or not Gail’s latest project, Extinction Rebellion, should be seen simply as a continuation of this work, or whether she has genuinely ‘gone rogue’ and is now biting the hand that has been (and still is) feeding her, quite handsomely, for the vast majority of her adult life.
It does not matter whether you voted to leave or remain in the EU, we have ALL been conned, lied to and manipulated.
Brexit has also been used as an opportunity to forward the next planned stage of the agenda for globalists.
Our political system is being dismantled to the advantage of the rich and powerful and the detriment of majority. MP,s and people in positions of power have been deliberately chosen and shown to be incompetent, untrustworthy and in some cases, downright criminal in their activities, for a reason. So that the public welcome the disintegration of the political system in favour of a new system.
“far from being the result of representative
democracy, this is in fact, a campaign of covert intervention by foreign
billionaires to bring about economic chaos in Britain in order
to create the circumstances for making huge profits. This is not the
stuff of mere conspiracy theories. Clear evidence has emerged that
Brexit was engineered and is already proving to be a catastrophe.”
Many voted for or against because they held strong beliefs in one way or another, none could have been aware of the deregulation programme that is about to hit us which will replace the British Constitution.
Brexit was sold to the general public as freedom from EU bureaucracy, but the erosion of public protections put in place over decades to ensure civil liberties was the real goal of the think tanks and billionaires behind the scenes.
THE SHAM OF THE PROCEDURE AND THE VOTES
The whole sham can be seen by the fact that this referendum broke the EU guidelines on referendums which the UK signed up to in Venice in 2007 on three key counts. 1) Governments are explicitly instructed to provide detail information laying out all the implications of the vote in full detail long before campaigning begins, so that voters know fully what they’re voting for. This should be in all official languages plus all significant minority languages. This is not a matter of whim but a key requirement.
There were 10 weeks from the call for a referendum to a vote whilst the Scottish referendum was debated in detail for two years
2) In a referendum initiated by the executive (ie the government), Parliament must make it absolutely clear well in advance the course of action it recommends to the public. (Since 500 out of 650 MPs were in favour of remain, it should have been clear what they recommended)
3) The government must also make it very clear to the public whether the result is legally binding or simply consultative.
What has become crystal clear is that the public are being programmed to accept that the only way forward is to riot.
According to the votes, the public is nearly 50/50 in opposition. Divide and rule is the order of the day.
Yet, when we examine the voting process, who was behind it and what it points to, we realise how sinister this whole Brexit agenda really is.
I would like to draw your attention to this video in which I point out that the company behind the voting software, Civica, are also the same company involved in many other ‘reported’ events such as Grenfell, Manchester council during the reported attacks, Brussels airport during those attacks and Westminster council during those reported attacks.
They are also funding the 5G/Smart City agenda, fracking, smart meters and have more financial interests in the UK Infrastructure than in their own country, Canadian Pension funded Organisation- see YT video here –https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLhsrVJqODY
So the same company can affect the EU referendum votes AND the
petition that is being reported to have had 4 million Anti-Brexit votes
in just days.
The same company has recently created the Civica Innovation Partners programme which was open to UK SMEs with an innovative solution in the area of machine intelligence, including analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), automation and connected devices. “These emerging technologies are recognised as being critical for the transformation of public services, and form a key part of the Government’s Transformation Strategy” https://www.information-age.com/civica-innovation-partners…/
Do you see how one organisation can not only dictate the overall outcome of the EU referendum, but they can use AI software to create a petition to claim that 4 million people signed an online petition.
By purchasing the Electroral Reform Services just 4 months ago they are in control of Govt online petitions.
Whilst Govt officials claim that leaving Brexit could lead to food shortages, medicines shortages and chaos, the overall plan is to cause the very same, this in turn will put people at loggerheads as to who is to blame, protests could turn to social unrest and hey presto… the plans to bring in foreign troops will be viable, meanwhile all the hard fought rights that we have relied on to ensure our protection from an evil and manipulating minority will be eroded and the global agenda of those who wish to control humanity will be realised.
Do not let them play you like a fool, be aware, community based groups need to discuss in safety, what is REALLY going on and stop our descent into chaos, courtesy of those who plan to bring chaos to further their agenda.
In a recent article, I shared the links to what I believe will be a false flag event on 22nd June 2019 which will occur at Broadgate circle in London. I came to this conclusion by looking at predictive programming by main stream media, an online cartoon in a newspaper depicting the event and many other dots that I have connected.
Since publishing this article, I have looked at some of the architecture used at Broadgate circle and compared it others and have found what I believe to be a theme, which makes me suspect even more that this is a site that is destined to become a memorial site of its own.
You can make your own mind up.
The San Juan Holocaust Memorial, completed in 2012, stands directly across the street from the Capitol. The joint project between the government and Jewish community features a sculpture designed by New York-based artists Michael Berkowicz and Bonnie Srolovitz entitled In the Shadow of Their Absence.
At Liverpool Street station in London.
Frank Meisler, the sculptor has his work at Liverpool Street station that was co-commissioned by the Association of Jewish Refugees (AJR) and World Jewish Relief.
This station is 4 mins walk to Broadgate Circle.
In Prague this statue is also a war memorial.
The statue was created by Ales Vesely and is called the gate of infinity.
It is a 20-metres long statue made of rails. It is a paraphrase to Jacob’s ladder, so there are 36 steps. It is standing on the site from which the Prague Jewish transports were reportedly departed.
It was also commemorating those reportedly exterminated in 1944.
Compare this to a tower that has popped up in Broadgate Circle, it is also 20 meters high called Chromorama. It has 35 illuminated light boxes which face strategically in all directions by London-based artist David Batchelor. The tower sits on another box which gives it the same number, 36.
Set within Sun Street Square at the key intersection with Crown Place, this is a new Gateway to Broadgate.
Another strange sculpture at Broadgate – this features neon pulses.
Many people have heard of Mark Steele, seen his YT video,s and listened to his many interviews in which he claims that he is fighting the council in Gateshead, has an ongoing Crown court case and that Gateshead lamp posts are emitting 5G.
What if you learn through evidence that none of this is true?
Before you question my views on 5G, I have been keeping this website specifically to share research on the dangers of 5G, updating it to show which areas have been testing, which companies are involved, which Govt and EU agencies have been pushing it and who has been financing the roll out of this Smart Agenda, which we all know is far from Smart and is a danger to us all.
I have also been running a 5G Mass Action campaign on my website and FB in which over 200 areas around the UK have been reached with over 50,000 leaflets. So I can hardly be called a ‘5G denier’ which is the term used by Steele to try and discredit me, but, forget about he said, she said etc, as the following Information can be verified with evidence and facts.
I first came into contact with him at the beginning of my campaign, at that time he was challenging the council in a YT video, I thought that it was great that someone was standing up to them, I made contact with him and after my Ritchie Allen interview, I mentioned this man to Ritchie as someone he might want to talk to about 5G.
He had many interviews after that,although he seemed reluctant to mention the leaflet campaign which was promoting his new political group called Save Us Now or SUN.
I often commented on the issue of ” how could a political party actually save us now, given that it would take a long time to establish and 5G was already upon us and in many areas.”
I decided that I should get some experts involved so I contacted members of an EMF research group to ask about Gateshead and the 5G connection.
To my astonishment, I was informed that they had offered to go to Gateshead after talking to Mark, that they had offered to test the lamp posts and the people who had been affected, all free of charge.
This was offered several times and was refused by Mark. He called them Charlatans and was aggressive on the phone claiming later that they had made claims that were untrue, he claimed that this well know Anti EMR had stated on the phone that Gateshead was not 5G, even before they tested it so he used that as his reason for disrespecting them.
He was abusive to them on the phone and called them Charlatans, he also accused them of working for the Govt. I would like to share with you, who these people are and evidence that they DID not state in advance that Gateshead was not using 5G. In fact quite the contrary is true.
Firstly, I will share with you, who this group are.
Alasdair Philips is one of the UK,s leading voices on Electro-Magnetic fields and RF, he has run Powerwatch which has been researching the links between electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and health risks for about 30 years, and is completely independent of government and industry. https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/docs/aboutus.asp
Alasdair Philips is also a member of SSITA, Safe Schools Information Technology Alliance which addresses the concerns of Wi-Fi in schools.https://ssita.org.uk/about-us/
He is also known to members of BEMRI although not a member.
The Bio-Electromagnetic Research Initiative (BEMRI) has been formed to create a research portal, for the scientific community and interested members of the lay public, which helps to rapidly disseminate international research findings, best practice measures and scientific hypotheses on matters related to electromagnetic (EM) phenomena.http://www.bemri.org/
He is also an advisor to Radiation Research Trust and was once the news letter editor for Electronics and Computing for peace. He has also been involved in investigations into the misuse of electromagnetic weapons by the military.
Alasdair Philips is a scientist who has been involved in research in this area for the past 50 years.
He also is involved in two companies that supply equipment to test EMR and RF and protective shielding items.
In June 2018, he had a study published in the peer reviewed Journal of Environmental and Public Health, in which he studied the rise of brain tumours between 1995 to 2015 and concluded that one possible factor is the widespread use of cell phones.https://microwavenews.com/news-center/gbms-rising-uk
Alasdair Philips has chaired and presented at international conferences on these topics.
EMFields was established to provide high quality measurement equipment and screening products to protect people from the ever-increasing levels of Electromagnetic radiation, or electrosmog, in our environment designed by Alasdair Philips. https://emfields-solutions.com/aboutus.asp
Alasdair Philips is also one of the 230 scientists and doctors who have signed a moratorium to stop the 5G roll out.
And yet when reports came out from Mark Steele in Gateshead that the lampposts were emitting 5G, Mark was contacted by Alasdair Philips.
Does this man and his background come across as a charlatan to you?
Steele claimed that they had stated that Gateshead lampposts were NOT 5G, and that is the reason he did not entertain them.
Here is a copy of the email that shows this is NOT the case.
I have been in contact with Mark Steele and also offered to visit Gateshead with a range of more professional test equipment than he used. He used a very basic “broad band” [isotropic] meter that would pick up any signal within 50MHz – 3.5GHz coming from all directions. He would need equipment that includes a Log Per [Directional] antenna and indeed covers a wider range of frequencies. Did you see the video clip of waving his meter pointing towards a street light he claimed was producing 4,000 millivolts, but afraid not possible coming from the small transmitter where he was pointing his meter. [Not suitable meter for the particular task]
Along with another member of our group, have phoned him several times to offer my services freely if he could arrange for me to carry out a free survey for members of the public of whom he has contact who are suffering heath issues that is suggested are coming from these lamp post transmitters that he claims are 5G. Mark may be correct about 5G, but until proper measurements are carried out I cannot make comment. We would like to take measurements at Gateshead, though must ensure we have with contact someone like Mark and most importantly independent folk who suffer the effects of ELF pollution living in close proximity to these transmitters.
We find it very strange he has not taken us up on our offer. I told him it could help him with his very worthy campaign and we certainly need more people like Mark to bring about awareness.
If you know of anyone living in Gateshead please let me know. As a scientific research group [bemri.org] we welcome people such as you sharing information mutually beneficial.
Of course, I found this information rather startling and questioned Steele, when he lied about the experts and what they had actually said, alarms bells went off for me. Why not get as many experts on side as possible?
At this point, I made contact with a member of the public who lived near Gateshead and arranged for her to meet with the expert to measure the very same lamp posts in Gateshead.
A private report was sent on the findings,here is a copy of that report.
Report on Gateshead Lampposts to investigate alleged 5G signals
In May 2018 Bemri visited Gateshead at locations where it had been suggested 5G transmitters’ were mounted on lamp posts and were operating and producing around 4,000 m/V. [4 mV/m] These were said to be found at locations such as the shopping arcade [by bus stop] at Whickham from video recordings by a certain third party. The instrument used by the third party was an isotropic RF meter that records signals received from all directions not simply the direction the meter is pointing.
We used professional Gigahertz RF test meters and spectrum analyzer and the strongest signal recorded at this location was 1.4V/m emitted from an array of mobile phone transmitters located a few hundred yards down the opposite side of the Main Rd from the shopping arcade. After testing around a five mile radius from Whickham readings ranged from 0.25 V/m to 6.5 V/m.
It could be seen from the video recordings of the said third party RF meter readings consistently ranged around a 4V/m mark wherever any measurements were taken, even from the inside of a car travelling along a main carriageway, which is really not possible unless perhaps a Smart phone was nearby or used to video the RF meter readings. Trying to monitor signals from the inside of a car [especially moving vehicles] is a rather pointless exercise.
A Smart phone easily produces readings around levels shown in these video recordings, even when it’s not in transmission mode. All RF meters monitor frequencies from sources with the highest power density, not lower, or accumulation of other signals.
We could not find 5G signals coming from street lighting at any location we surveyed.
Bemri is an independent self funded research group strongly apposed to 5G and other electromagnetic pollution, of which long proven causes harm to all biological systems.
I then contacted a lady who was part of the 5G campaign and who had also supported Steele in his early days, she was instrumental in getting him online interviews. Living very close to Gateshead, she agreed to meet up with the experts to test the same lampposts that Steele had shown in his YT videos.
The following is a statement from Lizbeth, the lady who accompanied the researcher.
At this point, an argument ensued between myself and Steele and I decided to use my skills as a researcher to find out more about him, his twin brother Graham who goes by the name Ben Travis and their company known as Reevu and Reevu Worldwide Ltd.
This is when I discovered that his company had been one of the many companies consulted by the : North East Local Economic Partnership Smart Specialisation Report.
The North East LEP covers the local authority (LA) areas of County Durham, Gateshead, Newcastle, North Tyneside, Northumberland, South Tyneside and Sunderland.
In this context, ‘smart specialisation’ has been described as “a process of developing a vision, identifying competitive advantage, setting strategic priorities and making use of smart policies to maximise the knowledge-based development potential of any region, strong or weak, high-tech or low-tech”. This report seeks to assist the North East LEP and its partners to define a starting point for developing a smart specialisation process and build on this foundation through ‘smart’ intervention strategies to bring the ‘international exemplar’ ambitions to a credible fruition. The smart specialisation research project has been part-financed by Technical Assistance through the North East of England European Regional Development Fund Programme. This is part of a Technical Assistance project supporting the North East LEP to prepare for the 2014-2020 programme of European Funding.
Here we have a copy of that report and we see that Reevu Worldwide were mentioned as one of the collaborators named by the council.
This document names Mark Steele,s company as one of the collaborators that the council consulted on this Smart Specialisation report on page 55.
According to the document, the report states the exemplars, (those companies that have been consulted, one of which is Steeles) have been assessed in light of their strategic fit with the national industrial strategy, the national innovation and research strategy, the economic development priorities of the seven local authority (LA7) and Horizon2020. The EU,s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.
So, if Steele has his own company as a collaborator with the council on the smart agenda, a company that is run by himself and his brother, then this raises many questions. How can he be a collaborator on the Smart Agenda alongside Gateshead Council whilst fighting them about 5G?
It also raises questions on his story about how he came to be charged by the council which involved two female councillors, one of whom was the deputy leader of the council. He claims to have not known the identity of the women which prompted him to go back indoors twice to google who they were whilst they patiently waited outside? This is same woman who he stood in front of during his very first YT video that was filmed, of himself confronting the same council in the council chambers?
So, are we to believe that this man has been collaborating with the council on the Smart Specialisation programme yet is in dispute with them over 5G?
Now it appears that not only is he unwilling to get expert help to test Gateshead lampposts but he is actually known to have collaborated with the the council. The North East Local Economic Partnership also states that it is also part funded by the EU development fund which is Horizon2020.
This project was to prepare the North East Region to prepare for the 2014-2020 programme of EU funding for the roll out of the Smart agenda.
Horizon 2020 is the EU funding body that is pushing the Smart agenda.
Horizon2020 is the EU funding body that has over 2300 UK organisations,agencies govt bodies,councils and education centres on its payroll.
This is part of a Technical Assistance project supporting the North East LEP to prepare for the 2014-2020 programme of European Funding.
The payroll includes the North East Combined Authority which Newcastle and Gateshead are part of.
Horizon 2020 is no stranger to Steele, it appears, his Linkedin profile lists it as one of his chosen groups.
See his profile here:
So, whilst we have Horizon2020 being the EU,s biggest funding body for 5G and the Smart City agenda, Gateshead council are holding meetings with companies (exemplars) to discuss how to implement the next stage of funding and Steeles company is included?
This now prompted myself and many others to question his stance.
Upon further investigations, links between Gateshead council and Mark Steele were undeniable. Fo instance, Steele also shares the group Civitas Urban Mobility on his Linkedin profile.
So the Civitas Initiative supports demonstration and research projects to implement innovative measures on Smart Cities and Communities.
And in an extraordinary coincidence one of the initiatives is called the SUNrise project.
And the following is an extract from the Sunrise project.
One of the initiatives of the Civitas projects funded by Horizon2020 involves local councils and local partners, trialling the concept of ‘Living labs’ integrating research and implementation processes. They even state that they intend to create a campaign around the project using street trial events which will involve the use of street kit. To enable local stakeholders to test the solutions of the project.
With both Gateshead council and Steele proven to be linked to this same EU funded Horizon2020 project called Civitas Urban Mobility and its agenda using neighbourhoods as street labs with street furniture to test solutions, his credibility as a 5G campaigner is now open to dispute.
And the following information should also be shown.
According to the SUN rise initiative, which stands for Sustainable Urban Neighbourhoods,
In this passage it states that each of the core group can share a similar logo resembling the mother-logo.
Then we have Steele creating a political party called SUN, Save Us Now as a platform to fight 5G.
Rather reminiscent of the SUN mother-logo in my estimation.
I then began to question the validity of the political party known as SUN. Why does Steele hardly give it a mention in his numerous interviews? Why does his party political group website never discuss all the many areas that 5G is being trialled and tested in? Why only Gateshead? (Even after the experts have shown there is NO 5G in the lampposts in Gateshead)Why is Mark Steele,s twin brother Graham, named as a candidate for the party yet he appears on FB as Ben Travis, is that not illegal? Why does Steele have another SUN party candidate who also uses several different names and verbally attacks anyone who dares to question Steele or the narrative of the non verifiable claims made by him? How can a political party establish itself within the short period that the roll out of 5G is due?
One of the noticeable traits of those who wish to complicate and create false opportunities for activism is the sharing of advice on how to campaign against it, this is apparent in the websites FOI letter that is being foisted on people to enable them to question our local councils.
This FOI letter contains requests for information that no council would even be able to answer to without massive amounts of time and manpower involved, just one of the many questions asked for every email, letter and correspondence for 2,3 and 4G, which has now been removed from the FOI as a bit too obvious in its ruse. Needless to say, people have contacted this website to state that they have been met with blanks from their council who have replied to them stating that they do not have the manpower to answer such a long winded request. Jobs a good un!
FYI There are many letters that can be utilised by this website that are short and precise and can be sent to your local council and more importantly, they are not fobbed off as being too much work for any council employee.
It transpires that the Durban,Gateshead,Newcastle upon tyne, Northumberland and Sunderland Combined Authority are on the payroll of H2020 as are the Home Office, Newcastle County council, Tavistock and the MET office, so organising a court case would not be beyond the realms of impossibility.
In the first instance, a case was heard in the magistrates court and was reportedly adjourned because the magistrate was familiar with the local councillor, a witness in this case claimed that his counsul was Ian Crane although this has never been reported.
A second case was then reported in which he was reportedly fined for his actions against the councillors. In this case he reports that he earns only £5000 a year, really? A man with his own company?
And this is where it gets highly unbelievable, he then asks for the same case to be heard in a Crown court case,which is reportedly heard in front of Judge Nolan who proclaims that he is a 5G expert.
According to Ian Crane, whom I corresponded with about the authenticity of this case, when I asked for the crown court case number, he sent me this.
Now, the problem with this information is that this is NOT a Crown court case, in fact, every Crown court case has to be listed in the law pages, this case nor any other case involving Steele is listed for the date they claim that it occurred. It also transpires that the Judge in question is also a known advocacy trainer named Judge Nolan, which means that he is used to sitting in front of cases that are used as training exercises.
And let us be honest here, why would a Crown court be hearing a case as trivial as this?
Even the story of the council workers that he reportedly shouted at does not ring true, why? Because he claims that he went indoors twice to google who they were whilst they patiently waited outside, this man had already stood in front of this deputy leader of the council in his so called ‘council chamber’ episode, in the first instance, when he first became known in public. Remember his first video which shows him when he first came onto the scene as a 5G activist was at the council chambers.
And now it all make sense that he has collaborated with them previously, because between the EU, Horizon2020 and Gateshead council,the Sunrise project, the SUN political party and Steele, gatekeeping starts with Gateshead.
Since this mans claims about Gateshead lampposts came out last year, many people have doubted his claims and asked for proof, people who are knowledgable about trees have stated that his claims made on YT claiming the trees have been affected by 5G are false and have explained to him why he is mistaken, others who are knowledgable on other topics have also confronted him, asking why does he post pictures of frostbite victims and claim its from 5G, or claim that Gateshead has more deaths from Brain cancers than the national average when that information is nowhere to be found via the usual channels such as national statistics or Public health England.
They are all met with the same response as the initial experts who offered to help to prove what he was saying by using expert methods or their own expertise, they are called 5G deniers, govt agents,and even worse.
I think that given the evidence presented here, the public can have a better understanding of why many people are questioning his credibility and his dubious links and hopefully this enables them to make their own minds up about Steele and his political party, Save us Now.
About Street lights and 5G
The following 48 page pdf is a document discussing the future of street lighting and how it relates to the IoT and Smart Agenda.This report will discuss the progression of smart lighting infrastructure from the adoption of LED bulbs, to the creation of a distributed smart city platform. It will investigate a number of applications that can be hosted through street lights, detailing use cases, benefits and potential business models, as well as providing examples of real-life case-studies wherever possible.
The deployment of smart street lighting infrastructure and the integration of the additional solutions described throughout this report often involve multiple vendors, numerous independent systems and complex technological interactions. This creates a number of barriers to the successful use of smart lighting infrastructure as the technological foundation of a smart city.
Cooperation of multiple stakeholders
Looking more widely at the actors involved in deploying these solutions, implementations will inevitably require the cooperation of different industries with diverse skills, competencies and working methods. In addition to manufacturers of lighting infrastructure, hardware vendors, software providers and connectivity service providers will all come together. Furthermore, business agreements will need to be negotiated with each of these providers based on the value of the service provided.
Through the addition of multiple solutions to smart lighting infrastructure, there is a real possibility that systems will become overwhelmingly complex. A lack of integrated standards, mismatched interfaces and multiple proprietary systems that are unable to accommodate third-party applications could make connected lighting systems too difficult to implement. Additional solutions will need to be easy for the city or operator to manage and will need to be easily accessible and intuitive for end-users in order to be successful. To mitigate this complexity risk, cities are deploying additional solutions in a modular, incremental fashion, ensuring they see value from one solution before adding another.
Lifespan of Lighting Infrastructure Smart lighting infrastructure is likely be in operation for at least 20 years, therefore the embedded systems need to be adaptable over long periods of time and need to be able to support new applications. Cities are having to plan ahead in order to be prepared for options that are not currently available. For example, ensuring bandwidth is left available for unknown future applications. By planning ahead, cities will be able to leverage their smart lighting infrastructure to roll out an entire smart city blueprint over a period of time.
In order to do this, cities require that software system used by smart lighting solutions needs to be remotely upgradable and based on open standards so that third-party solutions can be added over extended periods. Cities do not have the resources or money to upgrade software systems every couple of years, and are increasingly wary of vendor lock-in. Similarly, the applications developed will need to be compatible with the range of software programs that operate a city-wide lighting network.https://www.vigiliae.org/street-lighting-the-progression…/
NTRODUCING: HARVARD’S LEAFNUT CMS Harvard has an advanced and robust wireless control, management and reporting system for outdoor lighting, named LeafNut. Fitted either into an existing lighting system, or a brand new set up, the LeafNut system enables the user to directly control lighting levels.
LeafNut uses a TrunkNode central web server to communicate by GSM mobile phone to the BranchNode control units mounted in the light. The BranchNodes are in wireless communication with up to 256 LeafNodes, which are linked directly to an electronic ballast or driver in each street light. The system manages the light output, allowing the dimming of street lights to match specific requirements of a location at different times of night and uniquely provides light management individually, in groups or as a whole throughout the infrastructure. The programmable two-way process also gathers information regarding energy consumption and maintenance requirements.
Carrier, supposedly, a greener future, the autonomous vehicle could also be an environmental fiasco, because of the explosion of induced digital exchanges …
Electric motor, shared use, driving more economical than that of the average motorist … autonomous driving carries with it all these changes, promise of less atmospheric pollution and climate. Still, the equation is not so simple.
AFP has published a report based on a study by consulting firm AT Kearney , which interviewed 150 industry executives on the consequences of developing autonomous driving. One of Tesla’s main selling points (in particular) may prove to be an environmental disaster.
Among the impacts of the autonomous vehicle, there is the footprint, in terms of energy consumption and raw materials, of the on-board electronics. Automated driving devotes the reign of the digital world: algorithms, sensors, radars, lasers analyze in real time road and surroundings (classification of lanes, traffic, car parks, weather, price of gasoline etc). Other content also allows passengers to be entertained.
THE HOAX: In the PG&E FAKE Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E caused the recent fires in California by beaming energy beams from satellites in space at California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.
Pacific Gas & Electric (“PG&E”) is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.
But, PG&E’s conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.
Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.
Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has publically opposed PG&E because of its “smart meters”. So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist.
SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.
Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE “PROOF” that PG&E used this future beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. Tavares did not know what “space weather” actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). “Solar flares” on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called “space weather” (like a “rain” or “storm” OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth’s atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such “space weather” is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why “space weather” would be of concern to PG&E. During “damaging space weather”, PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.
DEBORAH TAVARES’ MISTAKE: But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that “space weather” was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) that was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
In FORGING the phrase “…then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]” in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that “damaging space weather” is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from “damaging space weather” is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be “blamed” for the “consequences” of “damaging space weather”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E’s contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any such satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, all PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this.
HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:
So, in FORGING the sentence, “WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol” in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually “targeted” her with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E “smart meters”. See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!
Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E had no ability to aim Solaren’s energy beams or to move Solaren’s receptor station from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren’s actual receptor site is in Fresno, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).
Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).
Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren’s receptor site as “OUR” receptor site, would know that Solaren’s receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren’s receptor site. The foregoing mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.
3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a “reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren’s technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E’s use of Solaren’s technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer’s money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a “reminder” of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren’s technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This “reminder” serves NO PURPOSE.
4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E’s customers as “EARTHLINGS” in connection with an email about a “COVER UP” of “damaging space weather” which can cause nothing but power outages?
5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS “AKA EARTHLINGS” FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF “DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER”, WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS. This mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:
1. The sentence, “You as a California resident have every right to know what your “public utilities” are doing with their (sic) “RATE DOLLARS”, was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no “rate dollars” from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren’s technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren’s technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.
8. BOTH “comment ONE:” and “comment TWO:” contain hyphenated terms (” – “), a writing custom rare in today’s world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.
PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!
ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH: Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares’ role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”, Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.
The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a “good reason” to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.