Swarming drones are just the start. Other Star Wars-like weapons that are raising concerns across the Pacific include laser-guided bombs, “jammers” that disrupt satellite communications, particle-beam armaments, and electromagnetic and microwave instruments of destruction. Richard Fisher, an analyst at the International Assessment and Strategy Centre, spotted Chinese fiber-optic lasers — a technology vital for laser combat satellites — at an exhibition this year in Abu Dhabi. Other experts say China would like to establish base stations on the moon with both military and civilian objectives.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Features/Cover-story/China-gains-in-race-to-develop-AI-enabled-weapons

 

V2K – voice to skull device – is a weapon use for transmitting voices with low or high frequencies. 

Voices can be for commands or harassments attacks that may look like the TI’s own voice. V2K can also use to induce or manipulate dreams or to deprived TI sleeps.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

National Toxicology Program Finds Cell Phone Radiation Causes Cancer

This month the National Toxicology Program (NTP) of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) updated the cell phone information page on its website and the fact sheet which summarizes the NTP cell phone radiation study. See below for a summary of the study and its findings.

The NTP’s website indicates that the NIEHS has warned its “federal regulatory partners” (i.e., the Federal Communications Commission and the Food and Drug Administration) that the NTP’s research found that cell phone radiation caused cancer in male rats to enable these agencies to provide the latest guidance to the public about safe ways to use cell phones and other radiofrequency radiation-emitting devices. 

Following is some of the language which now appears on the NTP website.

The updated NTP fact sheet includes the following two graphics.

Nov 21, 2017

Two-year oncogenicity evaluations of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice

McCormick D. Two-year oncogenicity evaluations of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice. Toxicology Letters. 280 (Suppl. 1): S31. Oct 20, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.07

Epidemiology data concerning possible health effects of exposure to radiofrequency fields (RF) are conflicting. For this reason, well-designed and controlled studies in predictive laboratory animal models provide the best prospective opportunity to identify effects of RF exposure that may translate into human health hazards. 

The U.S. National Toxicology Program supported a program in our laboratory to identify and characterize effects of acute, subchronic, and chronic exposure to non-thermal levels of RF in Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice.

Five-day pilot studies were performed to identify the maximum Specific Absorption Ratios (SARs) to which juvenile, adult, and pregnant rodents can be exposed without increasing body temperature by >1.0 °C. 

Subsequent subchronic (ten-week) toxicity studies failed to identify any toxicologically significant effects of non-thermal RF on survival, body weight, clinical signs, hematology, or gross or microscopic pathology.

Two-year studies were performed to determine if exposure to non-thermal levels of RF increases the incidence of neoplasia in any site. Male rats exposed to RF demonstrated significantly increased incidences of glioma (brain) and schwannoma (heart); these increases were not seen in female rats or in either sex of mice.

Gliomas and schwannomas have been identified in some epidemiology studies as possible RF-induced neoplasms. Considering (a) the conflicting results of RF epidemiology studies and (b) the lack of generally accepted biophysical or molecular mechanisms through which RF could induce or promote neoplasia, data from animal bioassays will play a central role in “weight-of-the-evidence” assessments of the possible health effects of RF exposure.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427417303120?via%3Dihub

Sep 20, 2017

Scientists from the National Toxicology Program presented their data on the genotoxicity of cell phone radiation in rats and mice at the annual meeting of the Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics Society held in Raleigh, North Carolina from September 9-13, 2017.

Male and female rats and mice were exposed to 2G cell phone radiation, either CDMA or GSM, for 18 hours per day in 10 minute intervals. The rats were exposed to cell phone radiation at 1.5, 3, or 6 W/kg specific absorption rate (SAR) for 19 weeks from gestation day 5. The mice were exposed to radiation at 2.5, 5, or 10 W/kg SAR for 13 weeks from postnatal day 5.

DNA damage was assessed in three brain regions, in liver cells and in blood leukocytes using the comet assay. Chromosomal damage was assessed in peripheral blood erythrocytes using the micronucleus assay.

DNA damage was significantly increased:

  • in the frontal cortex of male mice from either CDMA or GSM cell phone radiation exposure, 
  • in peripheral leukocytes of female mice from CDMA exposure, and
  • in the hippocampus of male rats from CDMA exposure.

There were no significant increases in micronucleated red blood cells in rats or mice. 

The authors concluded that, “exposure to RFR [radio frequency radiation] has the potential to induce measurable DNA damage under certain exposure conditions.”

The NTP is scheduled to publish a complete report about its cell phone radiation studies in early 2018. The FDA called for this research in 1999.

Here is the abstract for this presentation.

Link http://www.saferemr.com/2016/05/national-toxicology-progam-finds-cell.html

 

 

The dangers of 5G and what we are not being told!

Governments throughout the world are pushing for the rollout of 5G (Fifth Generation) technology as If it is just an upgrade from 3G and 4G.

THIS IS FALSE.

  • Mobile and Wireless Experts such as Nick Hunn and William Webb state that this technology does NOT guarantee better connectivity,faster speeds or reliability and that the huge amounts of tax payers money being used to fund this would have been better spent upgrading the 4G network AND been far cheaper.
  •  4G is between 1GHZ and 4GHZ whilst 5G Technology is  4GHZ to 100s.
  • .Bandwidths of  26-90 GHZ are to be utilised.
  • This is the equivalent of 90 billion electro magnetic waves hitting the body per second.Bandwidths of  26-90 GHZ are to be utilised.
  • Tens of Billions MORE electromagnetic waves  than what we have been used to.
  • The difference will also be in wave lengths, millimetre wave lengths that are shorter and pulsed and can penetrate the skin easier.
  • There are already over 10,000 studies showing the radiation that we are exposed to using EM radio frequency levels from 3+4G.
  • 220 doctors and scientists in 39 countries have petitioned to stop this technology being used and many citizens world wide are against this being used in this way.
  • There are NO research studies on the long term effects of this onslaught of millimetre wave radiation but govt agencies are going to go ahead regardless.
  • This type of radiation is called non thermal  or non ionising  and govt agencies have tried to deny that there is any danger despite the studies of medical and Independent researchers.
  • The technology is also government sureveillance technology.
  • Millimetre waves in the ultra high bands can affect our  cells and cause higher levels of cancers,strokes, heart problems, all the life threatening diseases that we already suffer from me.
  • According to the Infrastructure Commission in the UK, small cell towers will need to be placed between 100 and 300 meters apart EVERYWHERE.

    The so called ” Internet of Things” means even household appliances will use this technology and smart cars will also contain heavy radars systems that will spew out EMR from all angles, magnify this by millions of cars!

    • Government Agencies and University funded research is being paid for by the  telecommunications Industry who stand to profit.
    • Government can no longer be trusted to put our health before profits.

  • If this technology is supposedly safe, why do the american military use millimetre wave technology  weapons that disperse crowds causing burns to the skin?

    We demand Independent,long term, medical and safety research BEFORE this technology is rolled out in our streets and homes. Those who force this technology on us without proper safety assessments will be served Notices of Liability and will be personally liable for any harm that this technology causes.

  • Further Info at www.inpower.com
  • Annie Logical Uncensored www.vigiliae.org 

Grenfell Tower : UK Privy Council Robbery

September 6, 2017

|

Mel Kelly

There is something far wrong and deeply sinister with how the Grenfell Tower fire happened and how the survivors have been treated ever since.At a meeting between public officials and survivors, the “officials” attempted to stop survivors recording events.

In the call the Red Cross spokesperson confirmed they are giving the money to the  “London Emergencies Trust” (LET) instead and despite repeated attempts to ask them to explain why victims would receive no more assistance the Red Cross spokesperson refused to answer and hung up. 

Yet the London Emergencies Trust website claims it is the Red Cross who distributes the money to victims for them.  

So with Red Cross confirming victims will likely not see any more of the donations this is why survivors are asking where is all the money going? 

London Emergencies Trust 

The London Emergencies Trust (LET) was set up as a “dormant” company in December 2015, registered at the same address as the City of London’s  “London Funders” charity. 

London Funders was made the “secretary” of this dormant company – just waiting on terror attacks or disasters in London to happen – for the money to start rolling in. 

So who controls The London Emergencies Trust, set up to collect all public donations for all terror attacks and disasters, like Grenfell Fire disaster, in London?

Rest of the Article here. https://www.whatthepoliticiansdontsay.com/single-post/2017/09/06/Grenfell-Tower-UK-Privy-Council-Robbery