Papers finding adverse biological effects or damage to health from Wi-Fi signals, Wi-Fi-enabled devices or Wi-Fi frequencies (2.4 or 5 GHz).

Papers listed are those where exposures are below the current ICNIRP guideline values.  If the ICNIRP values were protective, we would not be seeing the damaging effects reported in the studies below.  Children are exposed to Wi-Fi/2.45GHz in schools every day, around the world.  Children are sitting with Wi-Fi-enabled tablet computers on their laps and up against their bodies for prolonged periods of time.  The studies below support the claim that schools giving children wireless devices to use, or exposing them to Wi-Fi signals, are failing to safeguard the health, development or wellbeing of the young people for whom they are responsible.  

Papers are in alphabetical order.  A file of some first pages, for printing, can be found here.

31,487 people with Science degrees, of which 9,029 hold PhD,s have signed a petition saying that the so called science  that claims global warming is caused by humans is flawed and that govt action on this basis will be damaging to our environment as well as humans.

In 2015, the White House claimed that  “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agreed that climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” A few days later, Secretary of State John Kerry announced, “Ninety-seven percent of the world’s scientists tell us this is urgent.”


So, where did this 97% figure come from?

It came from a study conducted in 2013.

97 percent” study was conducted in 2013 by Australian scientist John Cook — author of the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand and creator of the blog Skeptical Science (subtitle: “Getting skeptical about global warming skepticism.”). In an analysis of 12,000 abstracts, he found “a 97% consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature that humans are responsible.” “Among papers taking a position” is a significant qualifier: Only 34 percent of the papers Cook examined expressed any opinion about anthropogenic climate change at all. Since 33 percent appeared to endorse anthropogenic climate change, he divided 33 by 34 and — voilà — 97 percent! When David Legates, a University of Delaware professor who formerly headed the university’s Center for Climatic Research, recreated Cook’s study, he found that “only 41 papers — 0.3 percent of all 11,944 abstracts or 1.0 percent of the 4,014 expressing an opinion, and not 97.1 percent,” endorsed what Cook claimed. Several scientists whose papers were included in Cook’s initial sample also protested that they had been misinterpreted. “Significant questions about anthropogenic influences on climate remain,” Legates concluded.

41 Papers endorsed his claims, 0.3% and yet this claim of 97% is banded about constantly by main stream media. 

 Scientists have been pulling the climate scams for decades, back in the 70,s it was global cooling that was going to cause havoc.

Everything which now gets blamed on global warming, was blamed on global cooling.

Many who now claim global warming or climate change is down to humans also now claim that the global cooling claims were a myth, yet the evidence exists to show that this was not the case at the time.

Al Gore was given authority over the climate agenda and the President’s Council on Sustainable Development. In this document in 1997, the charter included the instructions to,”NOT debate the science behind global warming but to concentrate on implementing the policies” ( Section 4- Paragraph B).

Al Gore has made his fortune from the climate change agenda, it is no wonder that the charter instructed them to NOT debate the science.

It is obviously clear that the science is not settled, Rather, the politically favoured “science” is funded. 

America and around the globe governments have created a multi-billion dollar Climate Change Industrial Complex.

Nobody tracks budgets in a way that allows you to know how much, exactly, is spent on climate change — let alone in a way that breaks that total down into prevention vs. consequences.

Climate change has cost U.S. taxpayers more than $350 billion over the past decade, according to a report released last year from nonpartisan federal watchdog the Government Accountability Office

And the UK, according to the letter, seen by the FT, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy believes it will cost roughly £70bn a year.

Whilst Mr Hammond said: “On the basis of these estimates, the total cost of transitioning to a zero-carbon economy is likely to be well in excess of £1tn.”This  requires cuts to funding for schools, hospitals and the police force. 

650 peer reviewed papers have already been published in scientific  journals that cast doubt on the position that anthropogenic CO2 emissions function as the climate’s fundamental control knob.

90 Italian scientists have signed a petition saying that Climate change is a hoax. 

These scientists go on to state flatly that “the anthropic origin of global warming is an UNPROVEN HYPOTHESIS, deduced only from some climate simulation models.” In other words, the entire catastrophic global warming scare rests on very imprecise and almost invariably wrong simulation models, which cannot account for natural variability. 

It is time we stop this pseudo science, money grabbing agenda before any more damage is done!

The following are observations via Claire Wolfie.

In May 2019, Cambridge University announced the launch of a new research lab, named Centre for Climate Repair. The centre aims to explore ways to reduce emissions, e.g. by further advancing technologies to reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Further geoengineering approaches, such as solar radiation management, BECCS and ocean fertilization will be also researched. The centre is part of the University’s Carbon Neutral Future programme (led by Dr Emily Shuckburgh). Details, as the centre’s financial budget and exact work programme, are not yet available.

Major research project
United Kingdom
Period of time
Launch announced in May 2019.
Not yet available.


Major research projects

Major research and policy institutes focusing on geoengineering (with and without testing).

SRMGI, the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative, aims to expand the discussion of geoengineering around the globe and works to promote SRM by building capacity and understanding around SRM, especially in the developing world. In 2017, the SRMGI created a new research fund: The Decimals Fund (Developing Country Impacts Modelling Analysis for SRM) aims to model the impacts of SRM across the developing world. The fund will support developing country scientists who want to analyse the possible impacts that SRM could have on their regions and will be administered by TWAS.

MCB (Marine Cloud Brightening or Cloud Reflectivity Enhancement)
Capacity building.
United Kingdom
Period of time
Since 2010.
Open Philanthropy Project, Royal Society, Environmental Defence Fund, Third World Academy of Science (TWAS), full list:
Please help us keep the data on this map up-to-date and write to to inform us about any changes.


Solar Radiation Management

Solar Radiation Management (SRM) describes a suite of proposed technologies that aim to reflect sunlight back into space before it warms the Earth’s climate.

Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB)

MCB proposals aim to increase the whiteness of clouds in order to reflect more sunlight back into space. As with other SRM proposals, changing solar radiation can impact weather patterns and there may be impacts on marine and coastal ecosystems as well as agriculture.

Source: ETC Group and HBF “Climate change, smoke and mirrors. A civil society briefing on Geoengineering” (2017).

Source: Based on “The World of Geoengineering” (slightly adapted).
Partner Organizations – SRMGI







In 2013, the Rockefeller Foundation launched the 100 Resilient Cities project, in the UK the cities were Bristol, Belfast, Manchester, Glasgow and London. All areas have adopted the 5G roll out.

According to the Rockefeller Foundation website, the Rockefeller Foundation partnered with the global design firm Arup to create a City Resilience Framework (CRF).

Arup had been appointed  the £1 billion Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme from the Home Office,in 2015.

Working with manufacturers Jaguar Land Rover, Ford, and Tata, Arup led connected and autonomous vehicle trials on the streets of Milton Keynes and Coventry. The largest trials conducted in the UK to date, they explored the benefits of cars ‘talking’ to each other and their surroundings – with connected traffic lights, emergency vehicle warnings, and emergency braking alerts among the technologies tested. Further trials have now been given the green light.

In 2016,Ericsson joined forces with Arup to transform a pilot district in Hong Kong into its first smart and sustainable neighborhood.–sustainable-city-project

The 100 resilient cities is clearly a tool to create Smart cities.

According to reports, Bristol became part of the 100 resilient cities in 2014, one of the aims was to manage flood responses.

In Rio de Janeiro what started off as a  a tool to predict rain and manage flood response morphed into a high-precision control panel for the entire city. With the mayor bragging that “The operations centre allows us to have people looking into every corner of the city, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.”

This blogger describes how his area is funded by the 100 cities initiative and how his local council have used climate change to put pressure on 18,000 private properties which are believed (by the Local Government) to be “in danger of inundation in 100 years time” .

That action was based upon a report commissioned by his City Council which assures  that there will probably/most likely be a 1000mm sea level rise within that 100 years.

The blogger than goes to great lengths to find the evidence of this, which is not forthcoming and recognises that this will not only restrict the living of the affected property owners but is the first step to start “legally” clearing residents out of these areas.

In July 2019, the Rockefeller Foundation decided to disband the 100 cities initiative in favour of a new project called the  Climate and Resilience initiative.The climate and resilience initiative is one arm of the three separate pathways to which the Rockefeller Foundation announced it would transition its urban resilience efforts.

They claim they have made those 100 cities resilient to climate change issues, but, Sher Edling, the law firm representing a number of the litigants in the climate suits, including Baltimore and the state of Rhode Island, used the list of 100 Resilient Cities participants as a target list when pitching their climate suit.

“Emails have shown that plaintiffs’ attorneys used the 100 Resilient Cities as a roadmap of which cities to target as they shopped around their climate liability lawsuits,” Walrath continued. “In some cases, the lawyers were working directly with the Rockefeller-funded Chief Resilience Officers to gain access to city officials.”

That’s going to put some cities, including Boulder, New York City, Oakland, and San Francisco, in a tough spot, as they now have to explain to a judge why they’re suing oil and gas companies to pay for infrastructure upgrades even after they’ve been declared ‘resilient’ to climate change,” says Spencer Walrath, research director for for Energy In Depth, a project of the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

How ironic that the Rockefeller charities were spending large sums to take down a corporation descended from Standard Oil, the very firm that made them rich. The pulling out of the 100 cities initiative will now impact those lawsuits. Job,s a good un! 



Funding is now shifted to the Atlantic Council, a Washington based think tank. When asked why they had shut down the initiative they replied that it had achieved its objectives. What were the objectives?  To create a network of cities to push the climate change agenda apparently.


Atlantic Council Executive Vice Chair Adrienne Arsht  endowed the Adrienne Arsht Center for Resilience. The Center, which recently received a $30-million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, will be renamed the Adrienne Arsht-Rockefeller Foundation Resilience Center effective May 1.


This report shows the Atlantic Council plotting false flags against Russia.

On the website of the Atlantic Council, with the tag Renewing the Alliance for the 21st Century, among the links to other sites provided are those under the heading of think tanks, which are:

 American Enterprise Institute
 American Foreign Policy Council
 Aspen Institute
 Brookings Institution
 Carnegie Endowment
 Cato Institute
 Center for a New American Security
 Center for Strategic and International Studies
 Center for Transatlantic Relations/Johns Hopkins Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
 Council on Foreign Relations
 Foreign Policy Research Institute
 German Marshall Fund of the United States
 Heritage Foundation
 Hudson Institute
 New America Foundation
 Nixon Center
 Rand Corporation
 United States Institute of Peace
 Wilson Center International Center for Scholars

The above organisations contain what was formerly described in the corporate and financial worlds as interlocking directorates; officials and members of one are often also those of several others.

The roster of the Atlantic Council is packed with former Pentagon, State Department and Central Intelligence Agency veterans. Its chairman is former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel. Its president and chief executive officer is Frederick Kempe, a journalist with the Wall Street Journal for thirty years who is now a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and who serves on the Senior Advisory Group of Admiral James Stavridis, commander of U.S. European Command and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

Its senior adviser on international security is Kurt Volker, U.S. ambassador to NATO from 2008-2009 until he was replaced by the Brookings Institution’s Ivo Daalder, and also former analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency, deputy director of NATO Secretary-General George Robertson’s private office, acting director for European and Eurasian Affairs for the National Security Council, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

The board of directors includes: (with former titles) 

 Defense Secretaries Harold Brown and William Perry
 R. Nicholas Burns
 Former NATO top military commanders Joseph Ralston, Wesley Clark and Bantz John Craddock
 Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs from 2001-2009 Paula Dobriansky (an Eastern Europe and former post-Soviet states hand)
 Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman
 Deputy Secretary of the Treasury and U.S. ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat
 Clinton administration envoy to the Balkans Robert Gelbard
 Special Envoy for European Affairs
 Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy and ambassador to the European Union C. Boyden Gray
 Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman
 National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley
 Richard Holbrooke
 National Security Council Director of West European Affairs & Director of Middle East Affairs, ambassador to NATO & RAND Corporation Senior Advisor Robert E. Hunter
 Henry Kissinger
 Assistant Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Deputy U.S. Representative to NATO General Barry McCaffrey
 Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command Charles Wald
 Central Intelligence Agency Director R. James Woolsey
 U.S. Central Command chief Anthony C. Zinni

The Atlantic Council receives funding from numerous foundations, including the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Cuba Policy Foundation. It also receives support from the U.S. Departments of the Air Force, Army, Navy and Energy and from the U.S. Mission to NATO and the U.S. Mission to the European Union.

Its corporate members consist of almost 100 companies which include arms manufacturers Boeing, EADS North America, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon, and other concerns as varied as AT&T, Chevron U.S.A., Daimler, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, MSNBC, Sony, Textron, Time Warner, Toyota and Viacom.

And having given leadership awards to war mongers like Bush and Blair, it is obviously part of the globalists agenda.

The Rockefellers plan to use climate change as a weapon


The Rockefellers finance any group that will help them achieve their goal.  have a search facility which enables one to quickly see where at least some of their funding’s are directed.

By Anna Stormcrow

A while ago I wrote about Extinction Rebellion and the support of some core team members of the agenda 21 smart city 5g roll out. And last week I wrote about their connections to money laundering boiler rooms.

“A connection between Charlie Waterhouse (who was responsible for the Extinction Rebellion name and logo and marketing) and Temple secretaries registered at 788-790 Finchley Rd and the infamous Barbara Kahan of 2 Woodberry grove (same address Blairs Windrush ventures was at)..

Well here’s something to add.. Charlie Waterhouse has another company called Aqueduct Design and Advertising ltd which has Brighton directors as one of its directors. 
Now I’ve been looking into the company CIVICA which has its finger in many pies.. Software and data management for government, local authorities, national security, public safety and law enforcement. 
This is a NWO agenda 21 company if ever there was! They are the company that delivered you the Brexit referendum, NHS data, social housing payouts, libraries, pensions, education defense, DVLA and fines and used by 90% of the police force. ANPR and facial recognition tech . 
But the most important thing to note is their involvement in the roll out of smart cities and 5G! 
There are many branches and over 20 CIVICA companies with mostly the same directors including CIVICA CONNECT LTD. 
Which guess what? Also has on its board of directors Brighton Directors 🤔

This is another conduit money laundering boiler room acting as director for over 9,000 companies!

Another thing to note is that Mathew Paul Jowett a director of many Civica companies including CIVICA SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS is also a director of many of the U Ks major theme parks and attractions…. Alton towers, Thorpe park, Chessington world of adventures, London planetarium and aquarium, London eye, Warwick castle, Madame Tussaud’s… And many more. (In fact he has 192 positions in all these companies!🤔)
Places where many people get their photo taken whilst on rides etc…
places with CCTV everywhere..
Where it would be perfect to trial facial recognition software perhaps? 
How strange that he should have his finger in both those pies !

Ok now here’s another connection to Civica software solutions and the following shady dealings as researched by Gareth Williams ) As they also have Swift Incorporations as a director!!!!

“Hugo James Rifkind, Times Journalist and son of ex Tory MP Sir Malcolm Rifkind is keeping it in the family with his links to Swift Incorporations and Instant Companies (linked to 1 Mitchell Lane, Bristol) I see:

It’s all a distraction, of course, this Brexshit thingymajig. Just a cover for the dodgy handshake brigade.

Here is Sir Malcolm linked to the Dulverton Trust at 5 St. James’s Place:

He shares the Directorship with Tara John Douglas-Home from the fox-hunting group the Countryside Alliance, which had Lady Heseltine and Lady Dulverton on it:…/b4iLZEP8_…/appointments

Also at the Dulverton Trust there is also Lord Charles Andrew Hemphill linked to 21 St. James’s Square:…/ZMkE5xcSc…/appointments

The Dulverton Trust also links it to Dr. Catherine Mary Hamilton Wills and Chipping Norton…David Cameron territory:

It also links it to Dominic Grieve MP:…/ClsvxqYvw…/appointments…/parliament-brexit-second-refe…

I wouldn’t trust any of them.”

Video created by Annie Logical on the subject of Civica and Brexit:

“Establishment Rebellion” – why the protest movement is fullheartedly embraced by governments, big money and celebrities

An establishment rebellion
Why the elite loves the eco-warriors.

Fraser Myers
8th August 2019
An establishment rebellion

London’s Victoria and Albert Museum has acquired a number of artefacts associated with Extinction Rebellion (XR), the protest group campaigning to reduce Britain’s carbon emissions to ‘net zero’ by 2025. Apparently, just nine months since Extinction Rebellion’s first public stunt, its paraphernalia deserves to be housed alongside some of the world’s best art and design works of the past 5,000 years.

It is hard to think of any supposedly radical protest movement in history that has been so readily embraced by the establishment as Extinction Rebellion. And the love-bombing isn’t just coming from the usual luvvies like Dame Emma Thompson and activist celebs like Lily Cole and Charlotte Church. Recently, XR attracted the attention of wealthy philanthropists. Last month, three wealthy Americans (one of whose family wealth comes from the oil industry) donated nearly £500,000 to XR and vowed to raise millions more. Other wealthy backers include a hedge-fund manager, who remains anonymous.

Then, there is the literary establishment – from heavyweight authors like Margaret Atwood and Phillip Pullman to big-name publishers like Penguin, it has thrown its weight behind Extinction Rebellion, too. This Is Not A Drill, XR’s protest handbook, was recently rushed out for release by Penguin. Penguin’s editor breathlessly declared that climate change was so pressing that XR’s book needed to be published several months before its initial release date: ‘This is an emergency, and we have to react like it’s an emergency.’ The book even features a contribution from Rowan Williams, former archbishop of Canterbury – the former head of the established church.

The reason for this establishment love-in is that Extinction Rebellion represents no rebellion at all. It has the appearance of a rebellion, certainly – protesters glue their hands to buildings, block roads and get themselves arrested. But the message is one that affirms and flatters establishment opinion rather than challenging it.

Parliament, for instance, was quick to heed XR’s demand to declare a ‘climate emergency’. More significantly, the group’s main aim of reducing UK emissions to ‘net zero’ is one that is shared not only by the Conservative government, but also by MPs of all stripes. The ‘net zero’ target for 2050 was nodded through parliament with just an hour and a half of debate and without a single vote needing to be cast. XR is only more impatient in its demand, calling for a 2025 deadline.

Many have tried to compare Extinction Rebellion’s climate crusade with past movements for progressive change. Justifying the V&A’s decision to acquire Extinction Rebellion artefacts, senior curator Corinna Gardner compared their punchy colour palette to that of the Suffragettes. Similarly, XR leader Roger Hallam claims his protesting is in the ‘tradition of Gandhi and Martin Luther King’.

These comparisons are delusional, pretentious and insulting. But they unwittingly highlight something important. Whether it was the Chartists, the Suffragettes, the civil-rights movement, or the gay-rights movement, these genuinely progressive campaigns were all despised by the elite at the time. These were campaigns that sought to expand human freedom, to wrest rights and resources from the establishment. By contrast, environmentalist campaigns like Extinction Rebellion are, by their very nature, against freedom. They seek to place new limits on human activity: on industry, on economic growth, on our travel, on our diets, and on childbirth.

For many years, the great and the good have been in broad agreement that something must be done about climate change. But they also seem to agree that the bulk of the costs should not be shouldered by them. Only last week, celebrities, business leaders and politicians descended on Sicily for the 7th annual Google Camp, which this year was dedicated to tackling climate change. After arriving in their private jets, mega yachts and sports cars, delegates were treated to a lecture on climate change by Prince Harry, who delivered it in his bare feet. Earlier this year, 1,500 individual private jets flew to Davos. The highlight of the summit was a conversation between Prince William and Sir David Attenborough… on climate change.

The establishment only seems to care about ‘pollution’ when it is ordinary people doing the polluting. It is always cheap flights, cheap food and cheap fashion which cause the most consternation among environmentalists. In turn, climate change presents the establishment with an opportunity to manage the little people’s habits, tastes and aspirations.

Extinction Rebellion merely provides a faux-radical gloss to this depressing and stultifying prospect.

Fraser Myers is a staff writer at spiked and host of the spiked podcast. Follow him on Twitter: @FraserMyers.


What are DEW? 

directed-energy weapon (DEW) is a ranged weapon that damages its target with highly focused energy including laser,microwave and millimetre waves, particle beams and has the potential to target people,missiles, vehicles and many other devices.

According to Inside Defense website, the Air Force Research Laboratory was looking to contract with industry for research on the bioeffects of radio frequency, high-power microwaves and particle-beam, directed-energy technologies and weapons in March 2019.

AFRL says it is looking to award a contract on August 30 worth $44 million, which will be distributed between fiscal year 2019 and FY-25. The program is being run by AFRL’s Radio Frequency Bioeffects Branch.

Here is a detailed copy of the AFRL research :

PDF document showing that the US Govt are studying  the full RF Spectrum, full spectrum of bioeffects. 


In the UK,  In 2017, the MoD awarded £30 million (US$37 million) to the British Dragonfireconsortium to build a Laser Directed Energy Weapon (LDEW) Capability Demonstrator, which is expected to begin testing this year, and now three more demonstrator projects have been given the green light.

As well as lasers that can destroy targets with heat and thermal shock waves, the new contracts will include radio-frequency weapons that can disrupt electronics and disable computers. According to the MoD, Britain has been researching radio frequency DEWs for over 30 years and is a world leader in the necessary power generation technologies.

In July 2019, the MOD announced it is seeking to develop three new DEW demonstrators to explore the potential of the technology and accelerate its introduction onto the battlefield.

Considering that the development of remote wireless ultrasound and microwave internal voice transmission, human tracking technologies and the use of such technologies against humans has been substantiated then remote manipulation techniques are in need of scientific and legal investigation with protection.

Whilst the effects have been fully understood and practised for many years,  one has to wonder to what aim is research to the tune of $44 Million between now and the next 5/6 years actually for?

Lowrey patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or as directed at an individual.

Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort.” Entrainment technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness”, as accomplished by an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG.  Interstate Industries licensed this patent.

The Norris patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method” produces sound particularly within cavities such as the ear canal.  An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from surfaces.

Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets. Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilised to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. Tracking data automatically aims weapons, and the system even provides remote physiological stress assessment during attack. Granted 16.1.1990.

Given the quote by the US Airforce Lt Col John Forsythe reported in the Defense Daily that ” we are not in a war against nations or big armies, we are in a war against individuals” and the spoken words from the former CIA Director David Patraeus who declared at the CIA venture capital firm In-Q-tel conference in 2012, ” items of interest will be, located, monitored and remotely controlled through radio frequencies” and how it will allow them have to have, “near continuous monitoring virtually anywhere they choose which has made them diabolically clever”… then one can only assume that it is the public themselves who are the intended victims of such powerful and dangerous weaponry.


Allowing a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behaviour without hindrance.

Dangerous times indeed! 

And in the words of Edmund Burke “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” 






In recent articles, I have pointed out the links between ‘reports’ of mass shooting and the link to the testing or implementation of 5G in its many forms.

Here is a link to that article :

Despite concerns from Virginia Beach  leaders about 5G  antennas,dozens of small cell tower applications are currently being approved each month in Virginia Beach. More are expected.

Virginia Beach has five wireless provider franchises and was one of the first cities to adopt laws to allow the roll out.

The office that oversees the applications and permits for the roll out of the small cell towers has 60/90 days to allow the permit for small cell towers and after this any delay means that it can be granted under state law.

Cue the need to stall for time!

The very office that grants the permits was reported to have a mass shooting that slowed down the process for some time afterwards.

The lengths they will go to, to get 5G rolled out?

And we have the obligatory drill taking place at the same time!

Meanwhile the top 3 executives of the Virginia state government were being investigated at the same time. Avoiding resignation in order to be complicit in a false flag event. And using the media to  put more coverage and attention on mass shootings to help them push their anti-gun agenda?

Clearly the timing of this event was crucial for political reasons but the venue? An obvious bonus for the 5G pushers !


Drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)  can take advantage of the capabilities provided by 5G technology. In particular, UAVs are expected to be an important component of 5G networks implementations and support different communication requirements and applications.


According to companies such as Qualcomm, when 5G gets to your neighbourhood, you might be getting your packages – or even pizzas – delivered by drones. The network will enable a multitude of autonomous drones to navigate your local skies safely, and even send notifications to your devices announcing their arrival.

UAVs working together with 5G can potentially facilitate the deployment of standalone or complementary communications infrastructures, and, due to its rapid deployment, these solutions are suitable candidates to provide network services in many scenarios.

This research article covers:

An NFV-Based Energy Scheduling Algorithm for a 5G Enabled Fleet of Programmable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Meanwhile a company called have overcome one of the main obstacles to artificial intelligence getting inside a human’s decision cycle: its ability to accept enormous amounts of data from a variety of sensors, process it and make decisions rapidly.

Software called  ALPHA  can handle over 150 inputs including “all positional, velocity, and acceleration states, estimated missile range data, visibility of each platform, bogey ratio, and number of shots taken by hostile platforms.” The system also controls “the motion and firing capabilities of each  drone/aircraft, with control over more complex sensors planned for future work.”

Drones are becoming more and more powerful. In recent years the possible altitude, range, endurance, air speed and precision of navigation has risen appreciably. In addition, they can transport increasingly more mass.


Most drones are radio-controlled and can be detected with radio sensors. But there are also self-sufficient drones that are automatically started by timers and therefore cannot be detected by means of radio sensors. Apart from visual-optical and infrared sensors, radar technology can also be used, as in the ORAS project of the Fraunhofer FHR. Millimetre wave radar is ideal for monitoring in the immediate vicinity. Unlike cameras, radar is an active sensor that “illuminates” the scene independently and therefore works reliably even in the dark, rain, fog, dust or smoke. Such a system can be permanently installed or employed on a mobile basis.



Drones can also be used  as a way to monitor what we do and where we are. North Yorkshire County Council intend to use drones to spy on people to see if they breach any planning controls and many other councils are following suit.

Is 5G about to enable a ‘dystopian’ ‘Big Brother’ nightmare?

In November 2018, an  Israeli Technology show at the 5th International Homeland Security and Cyber Exhibition exhibited technology that can listen to private conversations when dozens of others are talking in a room, and pick any presence through thermal imaging.

Out of the top 500 cyber companies in the world, 354 are American but Israel is second with 82 – 40 of them registered in the US for tax reasons but nevertheless working in Israel.

The latest US Pegasus drone version is  practically invisible to the naked eye once it’s up in the air. Once programmed it can take off, fly thousands of miles, kill whoever, fly back and land itself without any human interaction.

It’s been coded to be able to bypass laws which state that a human must give a “kill” order in an adaptive situation (as it’s been deemed less likely to make a mistake) and on top of that they receive supplemental orders and information directly from other machines in which to based their actions upon that totally bypasses any chain of human command.

How long before this same technology is used in drones  to wipe out whole areas of people deemed to be renegades?

5G brings with it a whole plethora of dangerous technology that benefits only those in control. Allowing a corrupt and immoral system to thrive with no dissidents.







Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Printable version  

Government to boost 5G and simplify planning to support mobile deployment


£40 million is to be invested in 5G testbed and trial projects across UK industry as part of Government plans to improve mobile connectivity.

Previous investment in the 5G testbeds and trials programme has driven work in the healthcare, tourism, transport and broadcasting sectors. The latest investment will support similar work in the logistics and manufacturing sectors.

Projects will trial ways which can help these sectors increase their productivity and output, boosting the UK economy. The trials could cover different manufacturing processes as well as across road, air, and sea based freight logistics.

The funding was announced by Digital Secretary Jeremy Wright at the 5G World Conference as part of London Tech Week. The latest round of investment is through the £200 million project to test 5G technology that’s up to ten times faster than 4G and able to support more than a million devices per square kilometre.

Digital Secretary Jeremy Wright yesterday said:

As part of our modern Industrial Strategy, we’re making sure that Britain has a telecoms infrastructure that is fit for the future.

5G is about more than mobile phone consumers having a fast and reliable connection anywhere in the country. It’s a vital piece of technology that can be used to improve the productivity and growth of our industrial sectors. That’s why we’re excited to develop new trials in areas such as manufacturing and logistics that can really benefit from 5G.

In addition to the new funding, the Government has confirmed that it will consult on proposals to simplify planning processes in England to both support the further roll-out of 4G and aid the faster introduction of 5G.

Hamish MacLeod, Director at Mobile UK, yesterday said:

Getting the planning system right for future 5G and today’s 4G networks is critical to ensure the UK continues to lead the world in digital connectivity. It is right that the Government has announced it is to look at simplifying planning processes and we stand ready to work in partnership to ensure this can happen as quickly as possible to aid the continued rollout of mobile networks.

This is part of the Government’s long-term strategy for meeting its digital connectivity targets, outlined in the Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review.

The plans involve tackling barriers to deployment and creating the right conditions for investment to deliver better network coverage that supports the way we live and work today.

A key part of this is making new spectrum available to increase capacity for mobile connectivity. The Ministry of Defence, in partnership with DCMS, has committed to making 168MHz of new spectrum available to facilitate the deployment of fixed and mobile networks.

This means the Government has already exceeded its target to make 500MHz of public sector spectrum available for commercial use by 2020, and will continue to work with departments to explore opportunities for more spectrum to be made available.

Notes to editors:

  • We expect a public competition to launch later this year for bids to be made for the next testbed and trials in 5G. The competition will be open for bids from across the whole of the UK.
  • The recent release by the Ministry of Defence of 168 megahertz in the 8 gigahertz band, puts the total spectrum released under PSSRP at 552 MegaHertz.
  • The Government has undertaken a thorough, evidence-based and hard-headed review of the 5G supply chain to ensure the secure and resilient roll-out of 5G. Throughout the review, we have consulted extensively with industry and have been clear from the start on their need to comply with the government’s final decision which will be published in due course.



In this Ofcom document, they clearly state that the dangerous Millimetre waves technology using 26 GHz will NOT mention what applications it will be used for.

Enabling 5G in the UK
1.15 High-frequency (mmWave) spectrum which, to date, has not been used to deliver mobile services, is likely to be used to support new 5G applications, in particular those that require high capacity and very low latency by both MNOs and other players.

6 Latency is the amount of time between a command and its corresponding action, 5G will make this delay unnoticeable.
1.16 While responses to our 26 GHz call for input indicated that the band is likely to be become important for 5G, many suggested that it is too early to say how the band will be used, and for what purposes. We will continue to collate evidence from stakeholders across different
sectors and continue our engagement internationally to inform our understanding given the wide international interest in using high frequency spectrum for mobile. We are particularly keen to encourage trials at 26 GHz, the 5G mmWave pioneer band.