Wi-Fi transmission at 2.4 GHz even at very low power densities affects the water molecules in our tissues and particularly in the brain and central nervous system. It causes accelerated wear and tear on our cells and dissolution of cell membranes.
The result of this inevitably is provocation of chronic illnesses both physiological and psychological. In assessing the potential health risks of 5G, the government has safety guidelines which claim that:
1. There are no proven health effects from current levels of radio frequency radiation.
2. There are no health effects other than thermal effects. From these positions, the government concludes that radio frequency radiation, including 5G RF radiation, poses no perceived
threat to health. this is totally incorrect and that it has been scientifically proven, repeatedly, that radio frequency radiation well below guidelines, and related to non-thermal effects, can inflict biological harm.
A large body of research, going back at least as far as the 1950s, has shown that RF radiation causes negative biological effects.
With 5G antennae… ‘We can expect humans to suffer from massive increases in blindness, from cataracts, macular degeneration and retinal detachment. and a host of health related problems such as hearing loss, very large increase in male infertility, melanoma skin cancer; peripheral nervous system impacts with neuropathic pain. Impacts on immune cells; impacts on red blood cells leading to very low oxygen in the tissues and impaired transport of nutrients in the tissues. The impact on insects, including bees and other pollinators, on birds, small mammals, almost all the plants, will be even more severe than the impact on humans.’
The Electronic Communications Code was replaced on 28 December 2017 with a brand new Code, designed to support the rollout of a telecommunications network throughout the UK,the government has reformed the existing Code and introduced the new Digital Economy Act 2017.
The new Code expands on the rights already granted to telecom operators.
The new automatic rights for operators to upgrade, assign and share the use of apparatus.
Aside from the lack of financial benefit, landowners will also face various practical challenges if operators choose to exercise these rights. This could include problems with roof overloading if extensive additional kit is installed, security issues with maintenance personnel trying to access parts of their properties and, generally, a feeling of a lack of control over who is occupying their property.
The addiction to mobile phones is the hook that they are using to get this smart city agenda up and running, people are under the mistaken view that there is no other way than to use 5G to deal with faster downloads and better connectivity, but this has been proven to be false information as shown by the ex Director of OfCom, Prof William Webb.
There already exists, software called Odent, which stands for Optimized Data Environment for Network-Centric Operations-T that is available from a company called TIMMES, which is a mobile data compression and transport acceleration technology designed to improve the efficiency of the RF spectrum and reduce the wait time at the cellular handset.
At minimum they have the capability to make the average of 15 customers (Android mobile phones) Data Footprint requirements on your network look like ONE cell phone on average.
The CIA uses its venture capital company In-Q-Tel to fund 5G companies, a partnership between the CIA and private companies.
Qualcomm is the leading developer of microchips and processors for mobile communication networks, they developed the first generation of 5G after buying out an Israeli company called DesignArt in 2012. Qualcomm is just one of many companies connected to the CIA.
5G IS FRACKING HUMANITY!
190530 Moskowitz Interview On BBC Radio 5 By Rhod Sharp On Up All Night
Green and Blackcross the legal team which has assisted many anti frackers with legal assistance and training in knowing your rights, has issued a statement withdrawing support to Extinction Rebellion due to the organisers lack of care in putting their supporters in jeopardy.
For Green and Blackcross to issue this statement is unprecedented and shows how ER is negligent to those innocent supporters who will have no legal challenge for their actions which they did in good faith. Wake up folks and ask questions, dont blindly follow.
Over the last several months, GBC has worked closely with XR to offer help, advice and training in “know your rights”, legal observing and back office support. We have reviewed XR materials and helped with questions from the XR legal team. We are no longer wiling to continue that work, for the following reasons:
XR has provided its own training to legal observers which we believe to be inadequate and inconsistent.
We are concerned that inadequately trained legal observers could be worse than no legal observers.
It is important for legal and safety reasons that legal observers remain independent on actions and demonstrations they attend. The way in which XR has used LOs does not properly recognise the need for independence – they have been expected to act as XR stewards (often wearing insignia), relaying information from police to participants, or talking to the media, in contradiction to the established role.
Statements detailing conditions imposed on demonstrations by the police (section 14) were promoted in press releases and social media. This can put people at risk of prosecution as it creates an evidence trail that people who read these posts were aware of the conditions.
We believe that the way XR stores personal data is inadequately secure (for example, in google documents and forms). This means that personal data belonging to LOs is likely to be accessed by police.
We believe that the communication channels XR uses for legal observers are inadequately secure (for example, Whatsapp and Facebook messenger groups, public Facebook events and email lists with no bcc). This also means that communication through these channels is likely to be accessed by police.
We continue to identify misleading and inaccurate information in arrestee support and prison material published by XR, which means that people do not fully understand the risks that they are being asked to take.
We have heard consistently poor accounts of XR actions and communication from legal observers.
Many people have heard of Mark Steele, seen his YT video,s and listened to his many interviews in which he claims that he is fighting the council in Gateshead, has an ongoing Crown court case and that Gateshead lamp posts are emitting 5G.
What if you learn through evidence that none of this is true?
Before you question my views on 5G, I have been keeping this website specifically to share research on the dangers of 5G, updating it to show which areas have been testing, which companies are involved, which Govt and EU agencies have been pushing it and who has been financing the roll out of this Smart Agenda, which we all know is far from Smart and is a danger to us all.
I have also been running a 5G Mass Action campaign on my website and FB in which hundreds of areas around the UK have been reached with over 120,000 leaflets. So I can hardly be called a ‘5G denier’ which is the term used by Steele to try and discredit me, but, forget about he said, she said etc, as the following Information can be verified with evidence and facts.
I first came into contact with him at the beginning of my campaign, at that time he was challenging the council in a YT video, I thought that it was great that someone was standing up to them, I made contact with him and after my Ritchie Allen interview, I mentioned this man to Ritchie as someone he might want to talk to about 5G.
He had many interviews after that,although he seemed reluctant to mention the leaflet campaign which was promoting his new political group called Save Us Now or SUN.
I often commented on the issue of ” how could a political party actually save us now, given that it would take a long time to establish and 5G was already upon us and in many areas.”
I decided that I should get some experts involved so I contacted members of an EMF research group to ask about Gateshead and the 5G connection.
To my astonishment, I was informed that they had offered to go to Gateshead after talking to Mark, that they had offered to test the lamp posts and the people who had been affected, all free of charge.
This was offered several times and was refused by Mark. He called them Charlatans and was aggressive on the phone claiming later that they had made claims that were untrue, he claimed that this well know Anti EMR had stated on the phone that Gateshead was not 5G, even before they tested it so he used that as his reason for disrespecting them.
He was abusive to them on the phone and called them Charlatans, he also accused them of working for the Govt. I would like to share with you, who these people are and evidence that they DID not state in advance that Gateshead was not using 5G. In fact quite the contrary is true.
Firstly, I will share with you, who this group are.
Alasdair Philips is one of the UK,s leading voices on Electro-Magnetic fields and RF, he has run Powerwatch which has been researching the links between electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and health risks for about 30 years, and is completely independent of government and industry. https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/docs/aboutus.asp
Alasdair Philips is also a member of SSITA, Safe Schools Information Technology Alliance which addresses the concerns of Wi-Fi in schools.https://ssita.org.uk/about-us/
He is also known to members of BEMRI although not a member.
The Bio-Electromagnetic Research Initiative (BEMRI) has been formed to create a research portal, for the scientific community and interested members of the lay public, which helps to rapidly disseminate international research findings, best practice measures and scientific hypotheses on matters related to electromagnetic (EM) phenomena.http://www.bemri.org/
He is also an advisor to Radiation Research Trust and was once the news letter editor for Electronics and Computing for peace. He has also been involved in investigations into the misuse of electromagnetic weapons by the military.
Alasdair Philips is a scientist who has been involved in research in this area for the past 50 years.
He also is involved in two companies that supply equipment to test EMR and RF and protective shielding items.
In June 2018, he had a study published in the peer reviewed Journal of Environmental and Public Health, in which he studied the rise of brain tumours between 1995 to 2015 and concluded that one possible factor is the widespread use of cell phones.https://microwavenews.com/news-center/gbms-rising-uk
Alasdair Philips has chaired and presented at international conferences on these topics.
EMFields was established to provide high quality measurement equipment and screening products to protect people from the ever-increasing levels of Electromagnetic radiation, or electrosmog, in our environment designed by Alasdair Philips. https://emfields-solutions.com/aboutus.asp
Alasdair Philips is also one of the 230 scientists and doctors who have signed a moratorium to stop the 5G roll out.
And yet when reports came out from Mark Steele in Gateshead that the lampposts were emitting 5G, Mark was contacted by Alasdair Philips.
Does this man and his background come across as a charlatan to you?
Steele claimed that they had stated that Gateshead lampposts were NOT 5G, and that is the reason he did not entertain them.
Here is a copy of the email that shows this is NOT the case.
I have been in contact with Mark Steele and also offered to visit Gateshead with a range of more professional test equipment than he used. He used a very basic “broad band” [isotropic] meter that would pick up any signal within 50MHz – 3.5GHz coming from all directions. He would need equipment that includes a Log Per [Directional] antenna and indeed covers a wider range of frequencies. Did you see the video clip of waving his meter pointing towards a street light he claimed was producing 4,000 millivolts, but afraid not possible coming from the small transmitter where he was pointing his meter. [Not suitable meter for the particular task]
Along with another member of our group, have phoned him several times to offer my services freely if he could arrange for me to carry out a free survey for members of the public of whom he has contact who are suffering heath issues that is suggested are coming from these lamp post transmitters that he claims are 5G. Mark may be correct about 5G, but until proper measurements are carried out I cannot make comment. We would like to take measurements at Gateshead, though must ensure we have with contact someone like Mark and most importantly independent folk who suffer the effects of ELF pollution living in close proximity to these transmitters.
We find it very strange he has not taken us up on our offer. I told him it could help him with his very worthy campaign and we certainly need more people like Mark to bring about awareness.
If you know of anyone living in Gateshead please let me know. As a scientific research group [bemri.org] we welcome people such as you sharing information mutually beneficial.
Of course, I found this information rather startling and questioned Steele, when he lied about the experts and what they had actually said, alarms bells went off for me. Why not get as many experts on side as possible?
At this point, I made contact with a member of the public who lived near Gateshead and arranged for her to meet with the expert to measure the very same lamp posts in Gateshead.
A private report was sent on the findings,here is a copy of that report.
Report on Gateshead Lampposts to investigate alleged 5G signals
In May 2018 Bemri visited Gateshead at locations where it had been suggested 5G transmitters’ were mounted on lamp posts and were operating and producing around 4,000 m/V. [4 mV/m] These were said to be found at locations such as the shopping arcade [by bus stop] at Whickham from video recordings by a certain third party. The instrument used by the third party was an isotropic RF meter that records signals received from all directions not simply the direction the meter is pointing.
We used professional Gigahertz RF test meters and spectrum analyzer and the strongest signal recorded at this location was 1.4V/m emitted from an array of mobile phone transmitters located a few hundred yards down the opposite side of the Main Rd from the shopping arcade. After testing around a five mile radius from Whickham readings ranged from 0.25 V/m to 6.5 V/m.
It could be seen from the video recordings of the said third party RF meter readings consistently ranged around a 4V/m mark wherever any measurements were taken, even from the inside of a car travelling along a main carriageway, which is really not possible unless perhaps a Smart phone was nearby or used to video the RF meter readings. Trying to monitor signals from the inside of a car [especially moving vehicles] is a rather pointless exercise.
A Smart phone easily produces readings around levels shown in these video recordings, even when it’s not in transmission mode. All RF meters monitor frequencies from sources with the highest power density, not lower, or accumulation of other signals.
We could not find 5G signals coming from street lighting at any location we surveyed.
Bemri is an independent self funded research group strongly apposed to 5G and other electromagnetic pollution, of which long proven causes harm to all biological systems.
I then contacted a lady who was part of the 5G campaign and who had also supported Steele in his early days, she was instrumental in getting him online interviews. Living very close to Gateshead, she agreed to meet up with the experts to test the same lampposts that Steele had shown in his YT videos.
The following is a statement from Lizbeth, the lady who accompanied the researcher.
UPDATE on BEMRI Involvementa year later
A year after David Webb of BEMRI completed his testing of Gateshead lampposts, I asked him for an up date and a further report which he had told me that he had given his colleagues at BEMRI.
He then sent me an email stating that he could NOT get involved as the rest of the organisation had asked him NOT to. He told me that he would deny being a part of this which I was infuriated at this and told him I would release all of his emails. I did this and shared this YT video with the screen shots of all the emails.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMXlSlGyMVo&t=179s
This YT video was shared because later Webb either left BEMRI of his own accord or was booted out because of his involvement, but the founder of BEMRI was in a video with Mark Steele claiming that it was NOT a test that was carried out by BEMRI but rather a private test by David Webb. As you can clearly see by the screenshots of the video above, this was NOT the case at all, one can only imagine why this woman had agreed to lie on camera when the evidence shows via David Webb that BEMRI asked him not to be involved a year later.Here is the video that Steele created with the help of another known gatekeeper, John Kitson. That being said, it does not negate the fact that the test results proved negative for 5G in Gateshead.
At this point, an argument ensued between myself and Steele and I decided to use my skills as a researcher to find out more about him, his twin brother Graham who goes by the name Ben Travis and their company known as Reevu and Reevu Worldwide Ltd.
This is when I discovered that his company had been one of the many companies consulted by the : North East Local Economic Partnership Smart Specialisation Report.
The North East LEP covers the local authority (LA) areas of County Durham, Gateshead, Newcastle, North Tyneside, Northumberland, South Tyneside and Sunderland.
In this context, ‘smart specialisation’ has been described as “a process of developing a vision, identifying competitive advantage, setting strategic priorities and making use of smart policies to maximise the knowledge-based development potential of any region, strong or weak, high-tech or low-tech”. This report seeks to assist the North East LEP and its partners to define a starting point for developing a smart specialisation process and build on this foundation through ‘smart’ intervention strategies to bring the ‘international exemplar’ ambitions to a credible fruition. The smart specialisation research project has been part-financed by Technical Assistance through the North East of England European Regional Development Fund Programme. This is part of a Technical Assistance project supporting the North East LEP to prepare for the 2014-2020 programme of European Funding.
Here we have a copy of that report and we see that Reevu Worldwide were mentioned as one of the collaborators named by the council.
This document names Mark Steele,s company as one of the collaborators that the council consulted on this Smart Specialisation report on page 55.
According to the document, the report states the exemplars, (those companies that have been consulted, one of which is Steeles) have been assessed in light of their strategic fit with the national industrial strategy, the national innovation and research strategy, the economic development priorities of the seven local authority (LA7) and Horizon2020. The EU,s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.
So, if Steele has his own company as a collaborator with the council on the smart agenda, a company that is run by himself and his brother, then this raises many questions. How can he be a collaborator on the Smart Agenda alongside Gateshead Council whilst fighting them about 5G?
It also raises questions on his story about how he came to be charged by the council which involved two female councillors, one of whom was the deputy leader of the council. He claims to have not known the identity of the women which prompted him to go back indoors twice to google who they were whilst they patiently waited outside? This is same woman who he stood in front of during his very first YT video that was filmed, of himself confronting the same council in the council chambers?
So, are we to believe that this man has been collaborating with the council on the Smart Specialisation programme yet is in dispute with them over 5G?
Now it appears that not only is he unwilling to get expert help to test Gateshead lampposts but he is actually known to have collaborated with the the council. The North East Local Economic Partnership also states that it is also part funded by the EU development fund which is Horizon2020.
This project was to prepare the North East Region to prepare for the 2014-2020 programme of EU funding for the roll out of the Smart agenda.
Horizon 2020 is the EU funding body that is pushing the Smart agenda.
Horizon2020 is the EU funding body that has over 2300 UK organisations,agencies govt bodies,councils and education centres on its payroll.
Horizon 2020 is no stranger to Steele, it appears, his Linkedin profile lists it as one of his chosen groups.
See his profile here:
So, whilst we have Horizon2020 being the EU,s biggest funding body for 5G and the Smart City agenda, Gateshead council are holding meetings with companies (exemplars) to discuss how to implement the next stage of funding and Steeles company is included?
This now prompted myself and many others to question his stance.
Upon further investigations, links between Gateshead council and Mark Steele were undeniable. Fo instance, Steele also shares the group Civitas Urban Mobility on his Linkedin profile.
So the Civitas Initiative supports demonstration and research projects to implement innovative measures on Smart Cities and Communities.
And in an extraordinary coincidence one of the initiatives is called the SUNrise project.
And the following is an extract from the Sunrise project.
One of the initiatives of the Civitas projects funded by Horizon2020 involves local councils and local partners, trialling the concept of ‘Living labs’ integrating research and implementation processes. They even state that they intend to create a campaign around the project using street trial events which will involve the use of street kit. To enable local stakeholders to test the solutions of the project.
With both Gateshead council and Steele proven to be linked to this same EU funded Horizon2020 project called Civitas Urban Mobility and its agenda using neighbourhoods as street labs with street furniture to test solutions, his credibility as a 5G campaigner is now open to dispute.
And the following information should also be shown.
According to the SUN rise initiative, which stands for Sustainable Urban Neighbourhoods,
In this passage it states that each of the core group can share a similar logo resembling the mother-logo.
Then we have Steele creating a political party called SUN, Save Us Now as a platform to fight 5G.
Rather reminiscent of the SUN mother-logo in my estimation.
I then began to question the validity of the political party known as SUN. Why does Steele hardly give it a mention in his numerous interviews? Why does his party political group website never discuss all the many areas that 5G is being trialled and tested in? Why only Gateshead? (Even after the experts have shown there is NO 5G in the lampposts in Gateshead)Why is Mark Steele,s twin brother Graham, named as a candidate for the party yet he appears on FB as Ben Travis, is that not illegal? Why does Steele have another SUN party candidate who also uses several different names and verbally attacks anyone who dares to question Steele or the narrative of the non verifiable claims made by him? How can a political party establish itself within the short period that the roll out of 5G is due?
One of the noticeable traits of those who wish to complicate and create false opportunities for activism is the sharing of advice on how to campaign against it, this is apparent in the websites FOI letter that is being foisted on people to enable them to question our local councils.
This FOI letter contains requests for information that no council would even be able to answer to without massive amounts of time and manpower involved, just one of the many questions asked for every email, letter and correspondence for 2,3 and 4G, which has now been removed from the FOI as a bit too obvious in its ruse. Needless to say, people have contacted this website to state that they have been met with blanks from their council who have replied to them stating that they do not have the manpower to answer such a long winded request. Jobs a good un!
FYI There are many letters that can be utilised by this website that are short and precise and can be sent to your local council and more importantly, they are not fobbed off as being too much work for any council employee.
It transpires that the Durban,Gateshead,Newcastle upon tyne, Northumberland and Sunderland Combined Authority are on the payroll of H2020 as are the Home Office, Newcastle County council, Tavistock and the MET office, so organising a court case would not be beyond the realms of impossibility.
In the first instance, a case was heard in the magistrates court and was reportedly adjourned because the magistrate was familiar with the local councillor, a witness in this case claimed that his counsul was Ian Crane although this has never been reported.
A second case was then reported in which he was reportedly fined for his actions against the councillors. In this case he reports that he earns only £5000 a year, really? A man with his own company?
And this is where it gets highly unbelievable, he then asks for the same case to be heard in a Crown court case,which is reportedly heard in front of Judge Nolan who proclaims that he is a 5G expert.
According to Ian Crane, whom I corresponded with about the authenticity of this case, when I asked for the crown court case number, he sent me this.
Now, the problem with this information is that this is NOT a Crown court case, in fact, every Crown court case has to be listed in the law pages, this case nor any other case involving Steele is listed for the date they claim that it occurred. It also transpires that the Judge in question is also a known advocacy trainer named Judge Nolan, which means that he is used to sitting in front of cases that are used as training exercises.
And let us be honest here, why would a Crown court be hearing a case as trivial as this?
Even the story of the council workers that he reportedly shouted at does not ring true, why? Because he claims that he went indoors twice to google who they were whilst they patiently waited outside, this man had already stood in front of this deputy leader of the council in his so called ‘council chamber’ episode, in the first instance, when he first became known in public. Remember his first video which shows him when he first came onto the scene as a 5G activist was at the council chambers.
And now it all make sense that he has collaborated with them previously, because between the EU, Horizon2020 and Gateshead council,the Sunrise project, the SUN political party and Steele, gatekeeping starts with Gateshead.
Since this mans claims about Gateshead lampposts came out last year, many people have doubted his claims and asked for proof, people who are knowledgable about trees have stated that his claims made on YT claiming the trees have been affected by 5G are false and have explained to him why he is mistaken, others who are knowledgable on other topics have also confronted him, asking why does he post pictures of frostbite victims and claim its from 5G, or claim that Gateshead has more deaths from Brain cancers than the national average when that information is nowhere to be found via the usual channels such as national statistics or Public health England.
They are all met with the same response as the initial experts who offered to help to prove what he was saying by using expert methods or their own expertise, they are called 5G deniers, govt agents,and even worse.
I think that given the evidence presented here, the public can have a better understanding of why many people are questioning his credibility and his dubious links and hopefully this enables them to make their own minds up about Steele and his political party, Save us Now.
About Street lights and 5G
The following 48 page pdf is a document discussing the future of street lighting and how it relates to the IoT and Smart Agenda.This report will discuss the progression of smart lighting infrastructure from the adoption of LED bulbs, to the creation of a distributed smart city platform. It will investigate a number of applications that can be hosted through street lights, detailing use cases, benefits and potential business models, as well as providing examples of real-life case-studies wherever possible.
The deployment of smart street lighting infrastructure and the integration of the additional solutions described throughout this report often involve multiple vendors, numerous independent systems and complex technological interactions. This creates a number of barriers to the successful use of smart lighting infrastructure as the technological foundation of a smart city.
Cooperation of multiple stakeholders
Looking more widely at the actors involved in deploying these solutions, implementations will inevitably require the cooperation of different industries with diverse skills, competencies and working methods. In addition to manufacturers of lighting infrastructure, hardware vendors, software providers and connectivity service providers will all come together. Furthermore, business agreements will need to be negotiated with each of these providers based on the value of the service provided.
Through the addition of multiple solutions to smart lighting infrastructure, there is a real possibility that systems will become overwhelmingly complex. A lack of integrated standards, mismatched interfaces and multiple proprietary systems that are unable to accommodate third-party applications could make connected lighting systems too difficult to implement. Additional solutions will need to be easy for the city or operator to manage and will need to be easily accessible and intuitive for end-users in order to be successful. To mitigate this complexity risk, cities are deploying additional solutions in a modular, incremental fashion, ensuring they see value from one solution before adding another.
Lifespan of Lighting Infrastructure Smart lighting infrastructure is likely be in operation for at least 20 years, therefore the embedded systems need to be adaptable over long periods of time and need to be able to support new applications. Cities are having to plan ahead in order to be prepared for options that are not currently available. For example, ensuring bandwidth is left available for unknown future applications. By planning ahead, cities will be able to leverage their smart lighting infrastructure to roll out an entire smart city blueprint over a period of time.
In order to do this, cities require that software system used by smart lighting solutions needs to be remotely upgradable and based on open standards so that third-party solutions can be added over extended periods. Cities do not have the resources or money to upgrade software systems every couple of years, and are increasingly wary of vendor lock-in. Similarly, the applications developed will need to be compatible with the range of software programs that operate a city-wide lighting network.https://www.vigiliae.org/street-lighting-the-progression…/
Some pictures of 5G lampposts: Notice the difference between real 5G lampposts and those reported to be 5G by Steele.
NTRODUCING: HARVARD’S LEAFNUT CMS Harvard has an advanced and robust wireless control, management and reporting system for outdoor lighting, named LeafNut. Fitted either into an existing lighting system, or a brand new set up, the LeafNut system enables the user to directly control lighting levels.
LeafNut uses a TrunkNode central web server to communicate by GSM mobile phone to the BranchNode control units mounted in the light. The BranchNodes are in wireless communication with up to 256 LeafNodes, which are linked directly to an electronic ballast or driver in each street light. The system manages the light output, allowing the dimming of street lights to match specific requirements of a location at different times of night and uniquely provides light management individually, in groups or as a whole throughout the infrastructure. The programmable two-way process also gathers information regarding energy consumption and maintenance requirements.
And has anyone ever seen any evidence that he was ever a weapons expert/scientist? This is what he advertises. Studied Open University Psychology and Social Sciences at College. So where is the mention of his qualifications that make him a scientist or can you become a scientist now from Open University courses? Surely with such amazing achievements you would happily share those qualifications?
This roadmap from the European Commission also presented a non-legislative measure in its Communication ‘5G for Europe: an action plan’, which foresaw a common EU calendar for a coordinated 5G commercial launch in 2020, as well as joint work with Member States and industry stakeholders to identify and allocate spectrum bands for 5G, organise pan-European 5G trials as of 2018.
How was it possible for Gateshead to be testing 5G BEFORE the rest of the EU including the UK had decided on the spectrum to be used?
Ofcom’s first 5G spectrum auction was completed in April 2018, with EE, O2, Vodafone and Three all winning some spectrum. So how could Gateshead lampposts have been using 5G before the spectrum for its use was even on sale?
Given that Steele was first introduced to the public via his council video and that he was also known by council members after being a exemplar for the smart specialisation programme via his company, is it not rather odd that none of the councillors told him that the spectrum for 5G had not even been decided upon at that point?
UPDATE JUNE 3RD 2019
During the last ‘reported’ court case, Steele sat in front of a Judge Philip Kramer in a supposed civil case. This man is a member of the Trinity Chambers who represents the local authorities and Trinity Chambers has even given seminars at Gateshead Council.
Gateshead council also complained that they had been overlooked for 5G funding by DCMS back in September 2018.
Unfortunately for our region, the recent DCMS funding for the Testbed and Trials Programme “Urban Connected Community Project” was awarded to the West Midlands, but that does not dampen our ambition.
The North East recognises that it is in a strong position to promote the advancement of 5G technology in this region and is interested in talking to private sector partners about opportunities in this area.
He was reportedly hit with a SUSPENDED £250 fine on the basis that he’s broke… only gets £500 a month.. has no rent to pay and does not own his own house.
So why would he need to beg over £6000 off the public in a Gofund me page which claimed that he was fighting a jail term? He was found guilty and given a suspended fine? This was a civil case and once again, an obvious advocacy training case as a phone call prior to the case had no mention of Steele on the computer.
The last accounts for Steeles Reevu company shown a turnover of £211,000.
The solicitor for the council was Roderick Curry who was also a witness for the claimant. So a case in which the witness and the solicitor were one and the same, have you ever heard anything so ridiculous?
So when the solicitor was a witness did he jump into the witness stand and answer himself by jumping out to become the solicitor??
And witnesses to the case stated that the discussion was about whether he had caused harassment to the councillors and the solicitor, yet all the evidence discussed was from last November/December which can only mean there was NO new evidence so why was a case even being held?
A case in which Steele was advertising for supporters to attend via Event Brite?
There are MANY areas that are 5G already, the media is quite happy to inform us about those areas so why would Gateshead have to pretend NOT to have funding and not to have been chosen? Surely they would quite happily state that they were also chosen?
Who pays for funding the tests and trials? Department Digital, Culture, Media and Sport. A man named Alan Welby was appointed as the Innovation Director for the North East Combined Authorities (NECA) in 2018,which includes Gateshead council.
In this article dated June 2018, he states that in the next few weeks, a city will be chosen for the 5G testbed and trial and that the combined authority had applied for funding.
They clearly lost the bid!
There is also a council meeting with the overview and scrutiny committee involving all the combined authorities that was dated 20th September 2018 in which they discuss making a bid for funding for 5G tests and trials for the next round.
In a recent YT video, Steele claimed that his court cases had been removed from public scrutiny by those in Govt who were trying to silence him.
This is clearly damage control and does NOT explain why they were never in the public domain in the first place and why it has taken him over a year to come up with this poor excuse. Many have questioned this man from the beginning about the lack of evidence of court cases, apart from those that appear to be mock cases for advocacy training purposes, all were accused of being govt agents and blocked, now he finally admits they are not listed.
This video explains that the injunction form that Steele has used was served on him without any seal of the court which means it is fake.
There is an organisation named EKLIPSE who are involved in ‘identifying research needs’ on behalf of govts, planning depts and others and they are funded by Horizon2020 which is the biggest EU funding body for research to implement the smart agenda.
A deadline was set of October 23rd 2017 for the first round for applicants to apply to which a number of capacity building events were to be held between 2017 and 2020.
According to this organisation these events could be facilitated by Town hall meetings.
This included Transversal research needs, one of which was identified as :
Initiate research into 5G technology and LED lamps.
Given that the deadline was 23rd October 2017, this was 6 months before any agreed spectrum/bandwidth had been agreed upon nationally or internationally.
One of the people chosen to take part was Mark Steele.
So according to the research document, those chosen would be informed by mid November 2017 and the research could include the inclusion of Town hall council meetings.
Steele makes his debut just a week later at a council chamber meeting.
Steele was chosen as a researcher BEFORE 5G was allocated a spectrum, before Ofcom sold off the spectrum and before UK funded councils in trials and tests. (Page 33 of a 36 page PDF) http://www.eklipse-mechanism.eu/docum…
William Webb William is a Director at Webb Search Consulting, a company specialising in providing the highest level of advice in matters associated with wireless technology and regulatory matters.
He is also CEO of the Weightless SIG, the standards body developing a new global M2M technology. He was President of the IET – Europe’s largest Professional Engineering body during 14/15.
He was one of the founding directors of Neul, a company developing machine-tomachine technologies and networks, which was formed at the start of 2011 and subsequently sold to Huawei in 2014 for $25m.
Prior to this William was a Director at Ofcom where he managed a team providing technical advice and performing research across all areas of Ofcom’s regulatory remit.
He also led some of the major reviews conducted by Ofcom including the Spectrum Framework Review, the development of Spectrum Usage Rights and most recently cognitive or white space policy. Previously, William worked for a range of communications consultancies in the UK in the fields of hardware design, computer simulation, propagation modelling, spectrum management and strategy development. William also spent three years providing strategic management across Motorola’s entire communications portfolio, based in Chicago.
William has published 14 books, over 100 papers, and 18 patents. He is a Visiting Professor at Surrey and Southampton Universities, an Adjunct Professor at Trinity College Dublin, a Board member of Cambridge Wireless, a member of the Science Advisory Council at DCMS, other oversight Boards and a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the IEEE and the IET. In 2015.
Quite simply, 5G is an over-hyped “bait and switch” tactic by the Wireless Industry to deploy 4G/LTE so–called “Small Cell” cell phone towers everywhere. “Small Cells”are just a marketing/branding lie because “Small Cells” are full-power cell phone towers that the Industry wants to deploy much too close to people and other living organisms in residential neighborhoods — as close as 10-15 feet from 2nd story windows.
Some have suggested that 5G will be whatever interesting developments happen from 2018 onwards. There is much political capital expended in claiming that 5G will be deployed early in a country. MNOs and Governments will simply claim from 2018 onwards that they have 5G even though all that has been deployed is evolved 4G. For all the debate, 5G could be a label, not a technology.
End users will be told that they now have 5G even though they have not changed their handsets nor received any improvements in service. Or alternatively, in the case where 5G is the label applied to the introduction of IoT, consumers may be told that 5G is not about their handset but about the ability to connect their devices. In the US, the term 5G might be applied to fixed wireless deployments, with “5G to the home:. Given the confusion around what 5G is, this second “label whatever we have as 5G: approach could be used in Europe and the US alongside the first “limited millimeter wave deployment” approach happening in Asia Pacific.
This is the chilling observation: these planning documents for the recently installed 4G Palo Alto Small cells, show that even though the RF/MW radiation calculations were made for 6 watts of input power, the actual input power for each small cell antenna is 300 to 500 Watts and the “associated equipment” power supply cabinet is 17.5 cubic feet — one for each antenna! Similar documents for a 2017 Verizon 4G Small Cell deployment in Weston, MA state that each antenna outputs 1,257 Watts of Effective Radiated Power (ERP), a significant RF/MW radiation exposure. These military-grade RF/MW radiation exposures do not belong in residential zones not matter what over-the-rainbow promises are being made about 5G by those who wish to profit for 4G/5G Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) installations everywhere. As SB.649 contains no language for real-time monitoring of the levels of RF/MW radiation and no warning or detection systems if the RF/MW radiation reaches hazardous levels, then the equipment is already in place to easily increase the power input from 6 watts to 500 watts, which constitutes a Microwave Radiation weapon on every block in downtown Palo Alto — not unlike weapons the Federal Government has already designed and deployed.
Discussing the feasibility of using drone-bees in large scale pollination, David Goulson, professor of biology at the University of Sussex and founder of the Bumblebee Conservation Trust in the United Kingdom, wrote a blog post last year. His back-of-the-envelope calculation revealed that if it cost just a single penny to build a single drone-bee (which is a ridiculously impossible assumption), it would cost £32 billion ($45 billion) to replace every honey bee in the world. He wrote:
While I can see the intellectual interest in trying to create robotic bees, I would argue that it is exceedingly unlikely that we could ever produce something as cheap or as effective as bees themselves… Consider just the numbers; there are roughly 80 million honeybee hives in the world, each containing perhaps 40,000 bees through the spring and summer. That adds up to 3.2 trillion bees. They feed themselves for free, breed for free, and even give us honey as a bonus. What would the cost be of replacing them with robots?
Bee populations are being decimated, undoubtedly through human action, and things have reached a point where whole species of bee are likely to be added to the endangered list. How could this be happening?
Bees know which flowers to pollinate and when. They stay with one species at a time so the pollen actually is the right pollen to fertilise the flower. Bees remember where flowers are and can communicate it to other bees. They also make honey and wax.
For many decades, research results showing that the natural electrical and magnetic fields and their variation are a vital precondition for the orientation and navigation of a whole range of animals, have been freely available. What has also been known to science for many decades is that we as humans depend on this natural environment for many of our vital functions. Today, however, this natural information and functional system of humans, animals and plants has been superimposed by an unprecedented dense and energetic mesh of artificial magnetic, electrical and electromagnetic fields, generated by numerous mobile radio and wireless communication technologies. The consequences of this development have also been predicted by the critics for many decades and can now no longer be ignored. Bees and other insects disappear, birds avoid certain areas and are disoriented in other locations. Humans suffer from functional disorders and diseases. And those that are hereditary are passed on to the next generation as existing defects.
“GWEN is a superb system, in combination with cyclotron resonance, for producing behavioral alterations in the civilian population. The average strength of the steady geomagnetic field varies from place to place across the United States. Therefore, if one wished to resonate a specific ion in living things in a specific locality, one would require a specific frequency for that location. The spacing of GWEN transmitters 200 miles apart across the United States would allow such specific frequencies to be ‘tailored’ to the geomagnetic-field strength in each GWEN area.”
The bees seem to be playing the role that canary birds had in the mines, warning us of impending disaster. These insects, by their unprecedented behaviour of flying off without returning to their hives, show us that something insidious is going on.
At Cornell Univ. honeybees in a hive relocated into a new building became disoriented. After extensive research ruled out other causes, someone noticed the hive was next to the building’s electric transformer. The bees were confused by 60 hz magnetism strong enough to interfere with homing and communication to gather nectar and pollen. (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/RofD4.html)
Before we had all of the electro-pollution, animals could simply orient themselves to the earths electromagnetic signature. Additionally animals could store into memory at a subconscious level the discrete signatures of subtle variations in electromagnetic signalling from various regions.
So who are Walmart?
The World,s biggest corporation with 5 family members, the Walton,s classed as 5 of the 10 richest people in the world!
S.Robson Walmart is ranked number 1.
The founder of Walmart, Sam Walton worked for the US Military and was in charge (chief) over the last functioning internment camps in the United States.
He named the stores Walmart, look at the name Walmart = Martial Law backwards.
And as we know many Walmart stores closed down at short notice. They are built like a cinder block prison, few windows, anti-ramming vehicle barricades at the front door, surrounded by dozens of cameras Walmart did not just grow organically as some great corporate idea, they received billions of dollars that built them up as Walton worked for the CIA.
The Masonic Lodge is very connected to Walmart, the Walmart slogan is “Save Money Live Better” copied from the Masonic Lodge Slogan “Masons Live Better.”
Walmart has been involved with Homeland Security for many years, a document shows they have been partners since 2001. Walmart top executives are the private sector partners.
Walmart were the first corporation to use pin hole facial recognition cameras in stores at the entrances and exits and they share data with the Federal Govt. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the expansion of the Department’s national “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country.
Humans and bees are affected by electromagnetic frequencies, how long before the robot bees are joined by robot humans? Well someone has to do the dirty work for those behind this destructive agenda!
Revealed: 5G rollout is being stalled by rows over lampposts
The rollout of the 5G telecommunications network is being stalled by at least two years over legal wrangling about the control of millions of lampposts, the Guardian can reveal.
Lampposts have suddenly become hot property because 5G requires the installation of transmitters on a dense network of masts taller than a double-decker bus. As a result, mobile network operators (MNOs) are clamouring for access to lampposts and other tall structures in cities, and are threatening legal action to any local authorities or landlords who stand in their way.
Guo L, Lin JJ, Xue YZ, An GZ, Zhang JP, Zhang KY, He W, Wang H, Li W, Ding GR. Effects of 220 MHz Pulsed Modulated Radiofrequency Field on the Sperm Quality in Rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 10;16(7). pii: E1286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071286.
Abstract Under some occupational conditions, workers are inevitably exposed to high-intensity radiofrequency (RF) fields.
In this study, we investigated the effects of one-month exposure to a 220 MHz pulsed modulated RF field at the power density of 50 W/m2 on the sperm quality in male adult rats.
The sperm quality was evaluated by measuring the number, abnormality and survival rate of sperm cells. The morphology of testis was examined by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The levels of secreting factors by Sertoli cells (SCs) and Leydig cells (LCs) were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The level of cleaved caspase 3 in the testis was detected by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, the expression levels of the apoptosis- related protein (caspase 3, BAX and BCL2) in the testis were assessed by Western blotting.
Compared with the sham group, the sperm quality in the RF group decreased significantly. The levels of secreting factors of SCs and the morphology of the testis showed an obvious change after RF exposure. The level of the secreting factor of LCs decreased significantly after RF exposure. The levels of cleaved caspase 3, caspase 3, and the BAX/BCL2 ratio in the testis increased markedly after RF exposure.
These data collectively suggested that under the present experimental conditions, 220 MHz pulsed modulated RF exposure could impair sperm quality in rats, and the disruption of the secreting function of LCs and increased apoptosis of testis cells induced by the RF field might be accounted for by this damaging effect.