The recent reports of Ebola resurfacing and becoming an epidemic are being brought to the public attention via the DRC Minister of Health, Dr Oly IIunga Kalenga.

Dr Kalenga is also involved with  the Global Financing Facility, GFF which is an UN venture  which began in 2015.The Ministry of Health is leading the response in affected health zones with the support of WHO and partners.

GFF is housed at the  World Bank headquarters and coordinates  all the multi-stakeholders involved in a countries health. It works with external financiers like USAID and International Development Association, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and is also recipient of funds from the Gates Foundation.

The GFF is a multidonor trust fund managed by the World Bank with financial commitments from bilateral donors and private foundations.The GFF is based on the existing Health Results Innovation Trust Fund (HRITF) managed by the World Bank and supported by Norway and the UK through commitments of $575m from 2007 to 2022.

The governance of the GFF gives substantial decision making authority to the bank and the donors. At the heart of this structure is an investors group, which mobilises financing, and within this group is the trust fund committee, that decides which countries and projects are funded.

Private funding turns UN agencies, funds and programmes into contractors for bilateral or public‐private projects.With the adoption of the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals, governments have attributed a prominent role to the private sector in order to achieve the new goals.

By entering into partnerships with the UN, for instance through the Global Compact, companies are ‘blue washing’ their image, while often continuing business practices that violate basic labour, human rights and environmental standards (Berne Declaration et al., 2007).

Important decisions about the financial support of national health strategies are taken at the sole discretion of the GFF Trust Fund Committee (World Bank, 2014). But this committee is a self‐selected, exclusive body and not subject to intergovernmental oversight and mutual accountability mechanisms.

The investors group is chaired by the president of the global development programme of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and comprises one or two representatives from recipient and donor governments, international organisations (Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria), private organisations (Merck for Mothers, Grand Challenges Canada, and Philips), private foundation (Gates), civil society (African Health Budget Network, Plan International, Population Council, RESULTS, and World Vision), and multilateral organisations (Unicef, UNFPA, World Bank, and WHO).

The Gates Foundation exerts influence on the UN policy not only through their direct grant‐making but also through the placement of Foundation staff in decision‐making bodies of international organizations and global partnerships. Three top‐level secondments to the WHO have currently Gates Foundation connections. The Gates Foundation is a board member not only of Gavi, but also of the Global Fund, the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, the Medicines for Malaria Venture, the Roll Back Malaria Partnership, the TB Alliance, the Stop TB Partnership, and many others.

It further uses matching funds, for instance for Gavi, to influence governments’ funding decisions. Funding selected research initiatives is another way of influencing policies at UN‐level and shaping the discourse. In February 2008, Arata Kochi, the former head of WHO’s malaria programme, complained in an internal memorandum to Margaret Chan, Director‐General of the WHO, that the Gates Foundation was dominating research in the area of malaria treatment and risked stifling the diverse views held by others in the scientific community (McNeil, 2008).


A report in the BMJ states that National capacity to manage outbreaks, including workforce development and training, was reiterated as a priority after the west Africa Ebola outbreak. As an important first step, by the end of May 2018, 77 countries had completed joint external evaluation, an assessment of country capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health risks.

The same month that an Ebola outbreak is declared. 

The first ever country that GFF chose to work with was DRC.

Of course,the latest reported ‘epidemic’ which has begun in DRC and is being relayed to the world by  one of their supporters, Dr Kalenga, is mere coincidence.

{The very first paragraph highlights  news that the expected population will double but population reduction is just a conspiracy right?}

A meeting, just a few months before the reported outbreak in May, took place  in February at the World Economic Forum in  Davos  and had  been attended by World Bank’s Global Financing Facility (GFF) focused on the power of mobilising private funding and expertise  and had on its panel Dr. Oly Ilunga Kalenga, Minister of Health of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

What a coincidence then eh!

Dr. Oly Ilunga Kalenga has brought together the leaders of neighbourhoods and avenues in Mangina and later the customary chiefs in Beni to engage in the activities of the response to the reported ‘epidemic’.

And a new Ebola Treatment Center (ETC) will be built in Makeke, Mandima Health Zone, in Ituri province. (Have to make sure that everyone gets vaccinated.


“This epidemic (in north Kivu) is going to bring a lot of surprises. It is not like the epidemic in the Equator that we have known already. This epidemic will bring with it a lot of surprises: the number of cases is going up and the number of infected zones is increasing so it will take a long time to control this epidemic and for the anti-virals which the companies will provide us, they are ready to increase the doses,” 

States Professor Jean-Jacques Muyembe, the INRB’s director-general.

Yes I bet they are ready to increase the doses!

Vaccinations  begun just one week after the announcement of a second outbreak of Ebola this year in the country.

Meanwhile, another five treatments  have been approved by the WHO including Zmapp, Regeneron, Remdesvir and Favipiravir

  • A joint scientific committee has been established at the national level to evaluate existing experimental treatments for Ebola. This committee is composed of experts from the National Institute of Biomedical Research, the University of Kinshasa and partners such as WHO, MSF, UNICEF, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and UCLA. After validation of 5 treatments whose results were promising during the first phases of research, the scientific committee then submitted an application for approval to the ethics committee.
  • On Friday, June 1, 2018, the National Ethics Committee gave a favorable opinion to the request made by the Scientific Committee.
  • In August 2014, the same month that the WHO declared Ebola to be a public health emergency, Canada’s federal government donated a vaccine for use in Africa that it had researched for biodefence purposes. The Public Health Agency of Canada licensed its manufacture to NewLink Genetics and eventually to Merck. This experimental vaccine, called rVSV-ZEBOV is now being used to vaccinate the public.

In 2015, the organisation, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, made a unique offer to all manufacturers that had a vaccine in Phase I clinical trials and beyond. They offered a pre-paid commitment to buy doses of licensed vaccines as and when the vaccine becomes available, confirming to the manufacturers that there was a guaranteed market for an effective Ebola vaccine.

In return they set three conditions: that the manufacturer submits an application for licensure by a set date; that they receive a special classification from the WHO that would allow it to be used in case of a public health emergency; and, most importantly, that they make a stockpile of investigational doses available in case of an outbreak while the vaccine is going through the licensing process.

This is a picture of Democratic Republic of the Congo Minister of Health Dr Oly Ilunga Kalenga reportedly receiving the Ebola vaccine

It appears that Who’s stockpile of 300,000 doses could, this time, be given without WHO declaring the new outbreak a health emergency of international concern, the “signal event” up to now for mass vaccination campaigns with unlicensed and risky jabs.

As of yesterday, 28th August, mass vaccinations were ongoing.

The main media talking points of the Ebola outbreak this time are that it will be difficult to contain because it is in a conflict zone and because the population is in perpetual motion, crossing back and forth into neighbouring countries of Ruanda, Uganda and Burundi.

A report in the BMJ states that National capacity to manage outbreaks, including workforce development and training, was reiterated as a priority after the west Africa Ebola outbreak. As an important first step, by the end of May 2018, 77 countries had completed joint external evaluation, an assessment of country capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to public health risks. (The same month of a reported Ebola outbreak!)

World Bank has created a new Pandemic Insurance policy in 2017.

The World Bank put its new pandemic insurance policies and funding for pandemics into play in May.

In addition to the Cash Window activated today, the PEF also currently has a $425 million Insurance Window with premiums funded by Japan and Germany, consisting of bonds placed on the capital markets. This would be triggered if a much larger, multi-country response is needed.


The Executive Board of the World bank itself is accountable to no one. The Board of Governors, neither as a whole nor through the Development Committee, does not evaluate the performance of the Board as a corporate entity nor of the individual Executive Directors, nor of the Bank’s President.

Advance Purchase Commitment

Davos, 20 January 2016 – Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada) have signed an agreement to support the provision of a vaccine to protect against future deadly Ebola outbreaks. The agreement, announced today at the World Economic Forum in Davos, will help Merck take the vaccine through licensure and WHO prequalification.

Under the Advance Purchase Commitment, Gavi has provided US$ 5 million towards the development of Merck’s rVSV∆G-ZEBOV-GP live attenuated Ebola Zaire vaccine, on the understanding that it will be submitted for licensure by the end of 2017. If approved, it would become one of the world’s first licensed Ebola vaccines and Gavi would be able to begin purchasing the vaccine to create a stockpile for future outbreaks.

Additionally, Merck will ensure that 300,000 doses of the vaccine are available from May 2016 for use in expanded use clinical trials and/or for emergency use as needed while vaccine development continues. Merck has already submitted an application through WHO’s Emergency Use Assessment and Listing (EUAL) procedure. If the EUAL is approved, this will provide an opportunity for the investigational vaccine to be used if another public health emergency with Ebola occurs before the vaccine is licensed.


By announcing that an Ebola epidemic has occurred, the vaccine which has NOT been licensed or put through the proper safety tests can now be used.

Follow The Money : The new currency for smart commodity investors will be cobalt, which is poised to play a growing role in everyone’s life so, the rush is on for cobalt, a relatively rare metal that powers technologies like Tesla vehicles and iPhones. Smartphones use about eight grams of refined cobalt.

About 65% of the global supply comes from one of the world’s poorest countries, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, or DRC.

Read More

SOMMERFRISCHE 2018Ist das nicht herrlich…., auch bei schönem Wetter TOTAL vernetzt zu sein…. ???? Früher lagen die Leute im Sommer am Baggersee, haben gegrillt oder Fahrradtouren unternommen…. Heute ist das ein wenig anders… :-(#Kinder #Jugend #Gesellschaft #Multimedia #Handy #Smartphone #Smombie #Beeinflussung #Verlust #Solitarität #Menschen #Werte #Zukunft #Generation #Vernetzung #Nutzung #Sinnvoll

Posted by Freie Medien – News on Monday, 13 August 2018

On the 4th of April 2018, a reported case of of Ebola was declared in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in a Bikoro health clinic called Ikoko Impenge. On the 4th May 2018 Merck reported to have a vaccine ready, specific to Zaire then four days later, a Zaire Ebola outbreak is announced by WHO and a vaccination programme starts.

The vaccine was originally developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada, which retains non-commercial rights under a 2010 deal granting NewLink Genetics Corp. (NASDAQ:NLNK) rights to the product. Merck has exclusive, worldwide rights to develop, commercialise and manufacture the vaccine from NewLink under a 2014 deal.


WHO who are NOT a health agency, they are  made up of Pharmaceutical and Industry insiders, they have previously set the scene for false pandemics in favour of  vaccination programmes. 

They collaborate with  corporations  to create panic and fear and are solely responsible for facts and figures.

In 2009, Professor Chossudovsky who was a former employee of the WHO, blew the whistle and exposed the corruption of this political body during the H1N1 flu shot campaign.

Showing that H1N1 data was fabricated and exaggerated, including occurrence rates and deaths, whilst any independent testing was discouraged.

WHO  country members are obligated under treaty to instigate its policies.

WHO have now embarked on vaccinating people in DRC with an unlicensed vaccine that has been cleared by them for compassionate use financed by GAVI.


GAVI to which the UK Govt is one of the biggest donors, has on its governing board, many pharma industry representatives, this group sets the price for vaccines, stimulates needs and using public money and money from “donors” is highly involved in the vaccine process.

The pharma industry sell vaccines to other countries, which is paid for by GAVI, the pharma companies can then collect that money back from a special fund called the Advance Market Committment.

So they can set the price of vaccines involving the same companies that stand to profit, a clear example of conflicts of interest.

Global health organisations like this are complicit in ensuring corporate welfare at the expense of the public and the publics health!

The fact that vaccines are usually tested for about ten years before they are given to the public and the fact that many vaccines have been shown to cause adverse affects, in many instances, can only point to a very dangerous experimental vaccine being fast tracked without proper procedures for safety being adhered to. 

Little mention of the `Back Mutations` affect, in which live vaccines have the danger of reverting back to the diseasing causing form as was the case in Nigeria in 2007,mutations within the Polio vaccine led to a Polio epidemic within that country.

The past actions of the  WHO have shown that they are not trustworthy nor do they have the public’s health at heart, they are interested in  profits for the industry and this has been demonstrated previously.

In 2015, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association  charged UNICEF and WHO with sterilising millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

Six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya were sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.

The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age.

UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine in the Philippines after a Super Typhoon devastated Tacolban and surrounding areas. This was in spite of the fact there were no reported cases of polio in the Philippines since 1993, and people who have had the live polio vaccine can “shed” the virus into sewage systems, thereby causing the actual disease it is supposed to be preventing.

In 2016, WHO further eroded its conflict of interest safeguards and is  insufficiently protecting  global public health decision-making from the influence of commercial interests.

EBOLA PANDEMIC 2014 – The Test Run

The last Ebola outbreak was declared a pandemic by WHO on 8.8.14.

Ebola encodes 8 proteins of which 7 have a structural function. It is reported to be 800nm long and 80nm in diametre. It also encodes the soluble glycoprotein that contains c53-c53’.

During the last fake pandemic the number 8 was in constant use via the media.;jsessionid=7908FE76EF01899925BC839766075FFC?sequence=1

MPs in Sierra Leone were paid £8620 to push the Ebola story, whilst journalists were locked up if they refuted the story

Obama sent 8 advisors to the area. 

Obama asks for $6.2 Million for Ebola. 

 17 treatment centres with 1700 beds. 

And of course the incubation period was said to be 3-5 days.

With a 71% fatality rate reported. 

WHO claims that 8 people were infected back in 2014 and 800 were vaccinated in Guinea. 

And even 71% in Sierra Leone 

This report from Indian Times really spells it out: The enormity of the Ebola outbreak hit home on Tuesday as 112 Indians and four Nepalese arrived in the country on different flights from Liberia. Till late in the night, 88 people had arrived — 71 in Mumbai and 17 in Delhi. 

  44 passengers were enrolled for follow-up in their respective states through the state IDSP units. “As on date, 773 passengers are being tracked.  ( Of course 7 + 7+3= 17=8)

80% are reportedly affected after they recover. 

There were  80% reductions in maternal delivery care in Ebola-affected areas. 

With 80 medical people reportedly dead.

Even back in 2003 it was reported that 80% of a Gorilla clan had been wiped out because of Ebola.

(There are numerous references to the number 8 during the last fake pandemic, many of which I reported on my website Ebola Deception, which was sadly hacked and all my years of research links lost, much of what I am going to report in this article is from the notes that I made during that time.)

So you get the picture, the WHO who are NOT a health agency, they are  made up of Pharmaceutical and Industry insiders, set the scene for false pandemics in favour of a vaccination programme that has consistently shown itself to be fraudulent and false.They collaborate with these corporation insiders to  create panic and fear and are solely responsible for facts and figures.

In 2009, Professor Chossudovsky who was a former employee of the WHO, blew the whistle and exposed the corruption of this political body during the H1N1 flu shot campaign.

Showing that H1N1 data was fabricated and exaggerated, including occurrence rates and deaths, whilst any independent testing was discouraged.

WHO  country members are obligated under treaty to instigate its policies.

So on the 4th April 2018, once again, we are informed that another Ebola victim has been named, with an outbreak being declared on the 8th May 2018. (8)5+2+1=(8) (8). 

With 35 confirmed by them.   

Here we go again!

This time its started on 4-4 and on the  8-8, the vaccination launch. And just like the last time we have 4 areas involved, (in the last pandemic it was 4 Countries).

The Ministry of Public Health of the Democratic Republic of the Congo today [8 August] announced the launch of Ebola vaccinations for high risk populations

On this same day a total of 44 cases have been reported so far, of which 17 have been confirmed.

USAID provides $8 Million.

North Kivu, the most affected Province, is located about 2500 kilometers from the Equateur Province, where the just end outbreak was located. It is one of the most densely populated Provinces in DRC with a population of about 8 million inhabitants.

8 Million Inhabitants.

The United States has pledged to provide $8 million to support the global response.

The outbreak is reported to have come a year after the last one that killed 8 people with 17 people affected.

At this point it is becoming obvious that the number 8 and Ebola are not just coincidently linked.

So, what is Ebola and where did it stem from?

When Ebola was first named by Peter Piot in 1976, it was reportedly contracted from a Belgium nun/nurse, coincidently this latest episode is supposedly started with a nurse too.

In 1976,  a week after a Malaria campaign.

Back then the WHO ordered the virus to be sent to Porton Down and then onto the CDC who declared this as a deadly new virus. The CDC are a traded for profit company who own the patent for Ebola.

Let us back track to where this all stems from.

The Rockefeller Foundation set up a research lab for yellow fever in 1937, this was the first time that anything  existed which resulted in haemorrhage fever. The same year the West Nile Virus which closely resembles Ebola, was first reported to have been isolated in a woman in Uganda.

And of course the first vaccine was also produced in 1937 by the Rockefeller Institute in New York.

The research centre was also shared with FIOcruz, the worlds main public health research institute.

The first time that WNV was reported to have killed anyone was in 1957 when it killed elderly patients in four nursing homes.

This clearly points to a link between the yellow fever,WNV and the Rockefeller Institute in 1937, or are we to believe that this is purely coincidental?

How is possible that WNV kills elderly people in four nursing homes? They cannot all be visiting each other, nor can they be out in the bush getting bitten!

But they can all be part of a vaccination campaign.

Whether claims that it is four nursing homes, or four areas or four countries, it is clear that agencies like WHO and GAVI have been involved in declaring and pushing false pandemics for financial gain.

During this latest outbreak, there have been requests from a Pastor Gilbert Kambale, President of the Civil Society of Beni, to vaccinate ALL of the people.

Kambale seems to want not just the circa 80,000 people in the city of Beni to take the jab. He seems to want the circa 250,000 people in the whole province of Beni to become victims of an uncontrolled and potentially life threatening experiment.

Civil Society organisations are a UN agenda.

And the WHO is the United Nations  specialised agency for health.

This time we have a mobile telecommunication company also involved.

Obama claimed that the last Ebola pandemic was a test run.

The radio station being used to spread false news of Ebola is a UN radio station.

This is how the accomplish false accounts of deaths, by getting rid of all the staff and replacing them with their own people who will report on how many are affected.

Meanwhile the propaganda via the UN is in full swing.


Read More
Limits to Electronic Growth: the Internet’s Demands and Solutions to Help It Last Longer
by Katie Singer
The Internet is the largest thing that humanity has built.
 Every online activity (every text message, email, Facebook post, Google search, Amazon purchase, photo exchange, software download, video, smart appliance message, GPS search) requires energy intensive infrastructure. The Internet’s infrastructure includes access networks (cell sites) and data storage centers, which require electricity and water.
Manufacturing every electronic device requires electricity, water and minerals mined under abusive conditions. The world now has more cell phones than toilets or toothbrushes. Per person, electronics users generate 73 pounds of e- waste per year.
 All this—and yet, the Internet’s energy demands, greenhouse gas emissions and waste have kept largely invisible and unknown.
Most people consider Internet access a necessity. If that’s true, then every municipality,
service provider, manufacturer, school, business, household and individual is now challenged
to become informed about the Internet’s impact on climate change, biodiversity and human
health—and to participate in reducing it.
As Bill Torbert, Boston College management professor emeritus says, “If you’re not aware that you’re part of the problem, you can’t be part of the solution.”


By Jeff Chiacchieri

In this presentation James Corbett shows how Non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) are a Trojan Horse because they covertly enter a country and scheme for its downfall within the target’s borders.

Non-governmental organization (NGO’s) came with the establishment of the United Nations in 1945 with provisions in Article 71 of Chapter 10 of the United Nations Charter. The term describes a consultative role for organizations that are neither government nor member states of the UN. NGOs are officially sanctioned by the United Nations. Such status was created by UN Resolution 1296 in 1948, giving NGOs official “Consultative” status to the UN. They sit in on international meetings, participate in creating policy with government representatives serving the globalist plan.

NGO’s are private groups that work to gain influence over our government. Why? To slowly take away power from our elected representatives. Thousands of NGOs seek to implement one specific political agenda. NGO’s do that by working with representatives of the United Nations and representatives of US federal agencies. They all work together behind the scenes making policy toward a predetermined outcome to serve the globalist plan to advance the global Sustainable Development agenda, ultimately leading toward UN global governance.

Sure NGOs openly perform humanitarian duties and that’s all you are supposed to know. The NGOs controlled by deep state agencies like USAID are for World Government implementation. The process for serving the globalist plan is as follows: they create policy ideas from their own private agendas. The idea is then adopted by U.N. organizations presented at a regional conference. Each conference is preceded by an NGO forum to bring in NGO activists who are fully briefed on the predetermined policy and trained to prepare papers and lobby official delegates of the conference.

The result is NGOs control the debate which assures the policy serving the globalist plan is adopted. Once the Convention is adopted by the delegates, it is sent to the national governments for official ratification. Once that is done, the new policy becomes international law. The NGO’s then pressure Congress to write national laws to comply with the treaty. NGOs regularly sue the government and private citizens to force policy and then NGO’s have their legal fees paid by the people from the government treasury.

Criminal NGOs are at work right now in Congress, in every state government and in every local community, advancing the globalist plan, yes that includes wireless deployment since the 1990’s and 5G. This insane process has been going on so long now City governments, county governments and regional councils are staffed by NGO members. The purpose is local representative government is gradually relinquishing its power to the NGOs for the globalist plan.


According to  recent reports, Nipah Virus is the ‘ New Kid On The Block’ phoney possible pandemic virus, claims that it could be the new virus and potentially deadly pathogen that the WHO have been calling Disease X, have been doing the rounds in MSM.

According to the CDC, Nipah is classified as

Category C- Definition

Third highest priority agents include emerging pathogens that could be engineered for mass dissemination in the future because of

  • availability;
  • ease of production and dissemination; and
  • potential for high morbidity and mortality rates and major health impact.


The film Contagion was based on this virus, predictive programming at its finest.

Written by  scriptwriter, Scott Z Burns Contagion is a 2011 U.S. medical thrillerdisaster film directed by Steven Soderbergh.

Soderbergh and screenwriter Scott Z. Burns had collaborated on The Informant! (2009). Following that film’s release, Burns brought up the idea of producing a medical thriller film depicting the rapid spread of a virus, which was inspired by various pandemics such as the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2009 flu pandemic. To devise an accurate perception of a pandemic event, Burns consulted with representatives of the World Health Organization as well as noted medical experts such as W. Ian Lipkin and Lawrence “Larry” Brilliant. He also collaborated with Laurie Garret of the Council On Foreign Relations.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC) also had its credibility tarnished as investigations revealed that the agency misled the public regarding the number of actual cases of H1N1.

Contagion was produced with the active cooperation of the CDC, the WHO and other governmental organisations. Would the World Health Organisation and CDC participate in a movie simply to entertain people?

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (the CDC) also had its credibility tarnished as investigations revealed that the agency misled the public regarding the number of actual cases of H1N1.

The movie was released on DVD at the same time the WHO got accused of exaggerating the death rate of the new H5N1 bird flu

FOIA documents that came out have shown the massive extent of military involvement in TV and film.

A vast swathe of documents revealing the extent of US government influence in Hollywood – including editing scripts, and blocking critical movies from ever being made – have been unearthed, indicating US officials have covertly helped produce at least 800 major movies and 1,000 television shows since 1910.


The film went on general release on September 9th 2011. The  main characters surname is Emhoff (which is an anagram of FF Home!)






According to a report in ‘ UKNew Tech News’ in 2016, smart meter technology is necessary for smart cities to evolve. This was reported   by Claire Maugham who is director of policy and communications at Smart Energy GB, the body responsible for communicating to the public about the smart meter rollout across Great Britain.

This has also been stated in a Government report in 2012 for the Department of Energy and Climate, entitled ‘ Smart Metering Implementation Programme.’

In section 1.8 It states, ‘Smart meters in homes and businesses will sit at the interface between energy supply and demand, helping to modernise the energy industry. Smart meters are a critical part of the platform for the development of a smart grid and demand-side measures.’

So we can see how Important it is for Govt and Industry to implement Smart meters as a necessity to implement the Smart grid/city  roll out.

The benefits of Smart meters are being addressed in the above document as:

1.9 Taking into account the quantifiable costs and benefits to Great Britain from the roll-out of smart metering, a dual fuel household could on average see bill savings of £25 per annum by 2020, rising to £40 by 2030. For small and non-domestic sites, bill savings are expected to be approximately £190 per annum by 2020, rising to over £200 by 2030.

  • Smart meters will for the first time put consumers in control of their energy use, helping them to adopt energy efficiency measures that can help save money.

There are already Energy Monitoring devices that can be purchased, some for as little as £25 which can be attached to wiring to monitor your energy use. 

  • Smart meters will provide accurate energy consumption information bringing an end to estimated billing.

£20 Billion costs to end estimated bills? 

The roll-out of smart meters will play an important role in Britain’s transition to a low-carbon economy and help us meet some of the long-term challenges we face in ensuring an affordable, secure and sustainable energy supply.

According to researchers,the communications industry could use 20% of all the world’s electricity by 2025, hampering attempts to meet climate change targets and straining grids as demand by power-hungry server farms storing digital data from billions of smartphones, tablets and internet-connected devices grows exponentially.

The Smart Grid and Smart Cities that they are so eager to roll out will require massive amounts of data centres which will drain the energy supply.

Britain’s foremost data centre expert and a visiting professor at the University of Leeds, says the amount of energy used by data centres is doubling every four years – despite the innovations in hardware that massively increase their capacity to store data. As a result, analysts forecast that data centres will consume roughly treble the amount of electricity in the next decade.

Smart meters  will facilitate the Smart Grid, which in turn  will involve massive amounts of electricity, so far from helping to sustain the energy supply, it will be helping to drain it in the near future. What will be the consequences of a limited energy supply? Electricity Quotas, so in pushing for the roll out of Smart meters, to enable a Smart City/grid,the Govt and Industry will be adding to the draining of our energy.

Having Smart meters  will allow them to remotely cut off anyone who has fulfilled their quota or even switch of whole neighbourhoods who have fulfilled their area quotas. Hmm… this is not looking like such a good idea after all, is it?

1.7 For energy suppliers, access to more accurate data, accompanied by improved industry-wide data management systems, will release efficiency savings that should flow through to consumers who will receive a better service at reduced cost.

Hardly a better service If we have to endure Electricity black outs and Quotas!

So far, we have seen that they will not save money as they will  pass on the vast costs to the consumer, when enough people have them installed, obviously! Let us be honest, they are not going to hit the public with higher prices in the midst of trying to roll out this scam, now are they!?

They do not save energy at all, they facilitate the draining of the energy supply in the future, with massive amounts of energy needed to operate data centres, creating possible energy blackouts and quotas.

And they are not required to allow us to keep a check on our consumption as there are already devices on the market that are cheap and can fulfil that task.

What about Health Risks?

6.10 Smart meters use radio waves to allow remote readings to be taken from gas and electricity meters. Radio waves are very common in the environment and are used in radio and television broadcasts, wireless computer networks, pagers, radar, cordless and mobile phones. Smart meters are covered by UK and EU product safety legislation, which requires manufacturers to ensure that any product placed on the market is safe. Manufacturers comply with the legislation by assessing and, if necessary, testing equipment according to agreed EU standards. The standards follow guidelines drawn up by the independent International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

There are thousands of peer reviewed studies that show the dangers of radio waves, many of which can be found on this  website.The guidelines by the ICNIRP were first set back in the 80,s (before the roll out of existing technology)rejecting any studies that shown the dangers on Non Ionizing Radiation, not surprising when the man who was responsible, Dr Rapocholi, was a known Industry insider. 

No surprise either that the threshold between the two groups of radiation was decided amongst physicists and engineers with no input from the medical profession.

Despite the enormous body of evidence and proof that exists showing the damage from NIR, Govts and Industry  refuse to accept the evidence.

70% of tests carried out by Non Industry studies have shown ‘adverse  affects’  from NIR whilst Industry led studies have shown the exact opposite  with 70% claiming ‘No adverse affects’.

It does not take a genius to work out -which group would stand to lose financially?  Which group had no financial involvements?  Who should we trust? 

There are no safe levels and our exposure is 20,000 times greater than it was in the 80,s.

Cordless phones, Wi-fi and Smart meters operate on the 2.4GHz frequency which is the frequency that water molecules vibrate on their axis and of course our bodies are 70% water. 

According to studies, 3% of the population are severely sensitive to EMF, 35% are moderately sensitive and 80% are suffering health problems which has been magnified greatly with the introduction of Smart meters.

Smart meters produce 500 to 8000 times more radiation than a mobile phone and they are on constantly.

We are electromagnetic beings, and we are affected by electricity in our environment.  The increasing saturation of wireless radiation (cell towers, cell and cordless phones, wi-fi and smart meters) pollutes our air and living environments

What about Security?

The lack of security in the smart utilities raises the prospect of a single line of malicious code cutting power to a home or even causing a catastrophic overload leading to exploding meters or house fires, according to Netanel Rubin, co-founder of the security firm Vaultra.

If a hacker took control of a smart meter they would be able to know “exactly when and how much electricity you’re using”.  An attacker could also see whether a home had any expensive electronics.

“He can do billing fraud, setting your bill to whatever he likes … The scary thing is if you think about the power they have over your electricity. He will have power over all of your smart devices connected to the electricity. This will have more severe consequences: imagine you woke up to find you’d been robbed by a burglar who didn’t have to break in“But even if you don’t have smart devices, you are still at risk. An attacker who controls the meter also controls the meter’s software, allowing him to cause it to literally explode.”

In 2009 Puerto Rican smart meters were hacked en masse, leading to widespread billing fraud.

Worse still, all the meters from one utility use the same hardcoded credentials. Access to one meter means access to ALL!

What about Safety?

In some smaller houses, ‘Smart’ Meters will be located in very close proximity to where people spend a lot of their time – including areas where they sleep. 

The EMF Safety Network  this year reported fires, explosions and burned-out appliances due to ‘Smart’ Meter installations in Australia, Canada and the US.

But with the fact that the UK’s 53mn electricity and gas meters are usually located indoors rather than on exterior walls, the risks with fires here are far more serious.

So despite the fact that they are health risks, fire risks, security risks and have the potential to facilitate the draining of the  the energy supply, whilst costing the consumer excessive  financial costs, the Govt is still trying to force the public to accept them, so much so that they have resorted to ridiculously pathetic media stories.

It is no surprise that the South Wales Evening Post resorted to these features in order to push the ‘Smart Agenda’. They were one of the six areas given a Government grant to push the Smart City/5G Agenda.

Smart meter propaganda 3

Smart meter propaganda 2

Smart meter propaganda 1

Smart meter propaganda 4

To claim that the public are ‘ drawn to bad news’ and that this is the reason why some are wary of smart meters, which they claim are fears that are  unfounded, is pure psychological propaganda. To then go on to produce a competition/questioner with the pushing of this technology and a £500 prize for the winner, is beyond pathetic.

It should be noted that despite the amount of harassment or propaganda that Govts with the aid of the media, are willing to go to, or the underhand levels they are willing to sink to, in order to get this Smart-Control-Surveillance grid off the ground, it is NOT compulsory!

Only by refusing Smart meters can we halt the rolling out  of dangerous, unhealthy and costly technologies which include AI, VR and 5G, technologies  that do not favour us in the short or long term.

Refuse Smart meters, put an end to this madness. 

Links to the Govt publication must include the following;© Crown copyright 2012 Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design rests with the Crown. This publication (excluding logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reused accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified.