Number 63 is NOT Neptune but Britannia, which also,coincidently has a thistle emblem for the Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
Number 63 is NOT Neptune but Britannia, which also,coincidently has a thistle emblem for the Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
We can stop them
They will come you know, if you don’t stop them
Right now they are polishing their fascist boots and loading their taser guns with electricity
A single brain washed cell receiving shouted orders from demonic sergeant majors who think they know the plan
A that plan will eventually take their children too, as well the non-conformist’s children
Not loaded onto trucks like in the decaying footage of a world war two film, much craftier than that
You will be taken with full blessing of the E.U. UN, NAFTA and NATO
Placed in the concentration camps which are already waiting, cold and menacing for the people daring to question government policy, which now apparently, makes you a terrorist
War on terror is war on freedom
When you look closely it all works in reverse
Whatever is said the opposite is meant
And freedom has become a curse
Soon we will hear the marching of the robots, not in Iran or Iraq but in your village and mine
They have collected all your data on the internet and labelled you dangerous because you bought homeopathic medicine two years ago
How dare you deny the pharmaceutical companies there lion share
How dare you choose what’s right for your body
This is how easily you will be took
They will sit and study your facebook account with its connection to the C.I.A.
Have your laugh then take a look
This is fascism the modern way
The crafty manipulators and naïve enforcers are false friends in this master plan
User and used they will march gallantly into your family home and remove you and your beliefs, you and your terrorist aroma therapist lifestyle
You and your bag of aborted dreams
And this is not an apocalyptic apology from a despondent doomsday theorist
I have merely opened my eyes and seen what is here now
Not what is coming in some far off period of time so it won’t affect you
What is already in place as we sit watching the X factor and the ironically named Big Brother
Today it is not too late
The end is not written yet
Something can be still be done
And it can all be done by you, in one day
Switch off the T.V. and see how mesmerised we have become
Switch on to the powerful, multi dimensional being you are capable of becoming
Let a momentum gather to show where the power lies
Drip by drip till it tips
No more talk of cultural, religious, political differences
Let’s talk about the things that connect us
The beautiful children we have, the wonder of nature, oceans and sunsets, animals and mountains, we share them all don’t we?
Show them that we love each other and we will not be divided
Show them that we know what their game is and that we refuse to play anymore
Stand united, arm in arm, without any labels or barriers
Loosen the gruesome grip of identity
Be peaceful in protest, never violent
Tell them they are forgiven and they can leave quietly
Love, peace, freedom and paradise are only one thought away
By Graham Maley
By Jacob Puliyel
The writer, a doctor, is the Head of Pediatrics, St Stephen’s Hospital, Delhi, and a member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation. The views expressed are personal.
Before a new vaccine is introduced it is first studied in a randomised controlled trial where some are given the drug and others are given an inert substance to check the effects and adverse effects among those given the new drug. Last week, Slate published a cover story on the investigation of the randomised trials of human papillomavirus (HPV ) vaccines before approval. The science editor conducted an eight-month long investigation, interviewed study participants and studied 2,300 pages of documents obtained through freedom-of-information requests from hospitals and health authorities.
Slate found that during the year-long study data on potential side effects were collected for only two weeks. The rest of the time individual trial investigators used their personal judgment to decide whether or not to report medical problems as adverse events. An oxymoronic instruction to investigators was to list new problems as ‘new medical history’. There is no evidence the confidential study protocol was submitted to regulators for approval. The worksheet investigators used allotted just one line per entry for new medical history, with no measurement of symptom severity, duration, outcome, or overall seriousness. Trial participants complained to Slate that repeated complaints of debilitating symptoms were not even registered in the study as potential side effects. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is the regulator in Europe. In an internal 2014 EMA report about Gardasil 9 – a leading HPV vaccination – obtained through a freedom-of-information request, senior experts called the company’s approach “unconventional and suboptimal” and said it left some “uncertainty” about the safety results. In the EMA’s public assessment Gardasil 9, all mention of the safety concerns had been scrubbed.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Not all recipients of the vaccine developed serious adverse effects. But there are numerous reports of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS ) otherwise known as myalgic encephalomyelitis which is characterized by long-term fatigue that limits a person’s ability to carry out ordinary daily activities. Dr Jose Montoya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University explains that the condition usually starts with an insult to the immune system—a severe infection, a car crash, a pregnancy. The first symptoms are flu-like, but months go by and the patient realizes she isn’t getting better.’ In a few genetically predisposed individuals, Montoya told the Slate editor, it is “biologically plausible” that the vaccine, which mimics a natural infection, could also trigger an immune response powerful enough to lead to CFS. To find out if that is the case, trial investigators would need to carefully track participants’ symptoms “for at least one year.” CFS is not the only serious adverse effect reported. The American College of Pediatrics has suggested one of the HPV vaccines could possibly be associated with the very rare but serious condition of premature ovarian failure (POF), also known as premature menopause. In Japan, use of the vaccine in adolescents has been associated with such serious adverse events that it has been withdrawn from the immunisation programme.
Usefulness of Vaccine
HPV spreads only through sexual contact and therefore is not communicable in a casual manner. There are about 100 strains of HPV, and the vaccine only protects against 2, 4, or 9 of them, depending on the brand and 95% of HPV infections heal by themselves – potentially granting the individual lifetime immunity against the particular strain. Perhaps to improve uptake of the vaccine the manufacturers promote it as an anticancer vaccine rather than a vaccine against sexually transmitted disease. But while there is evidence that the vaccine reduces infection with the vaccine strains of the virus, non-vaccine strains have been known to replace the vaccine strain and these could produce cancer. There is currently no scientific study that shows the vaccine reduces cervical cancer in the women who are vaccinated. The efficacy of the vaccine against cancer is unknown
Cost-effectiveness READ MORE HERE.
Also published, 12/25 in the Tribune India was the following:
CN Purandare, Alka Kriplani & Neerja Bhatla IN India, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, accounting for nearly one-fourth of the global burden of cervical cancer, with an estimated 122,800 new cases and 67,500 deaths annually, which is more than the number of deaths due to maternal mortality. Since these women are usually in their 40s and 50s, it is estimated that the years of life lost are greater in cervical cancer. Globally, cervical cancer accounts for 528,000 cases including 445,000 cases in low and middle income countries (LMICs).
The age-standardised incidence rate of cervical cancer varies between 5.6 and 24.3 per 100,000 women in different regions of India. Although a gradually declining trend in the cervical cancer incidence has been observed in different regions of India over the last two decades, the rates still remain significantly higher than in other Asian countries. In fact, the absolute numbers of both cervical cancer cases and deaths are on the increase due to population growth. In the West, repeated testing by Pap smear and consequent treatment of precancerous lesions led to a substantial decline in the numbers of cervical cancer cases. In India, with very limited resources to introduce and sustain effective population-based cervical cancer screening programs, there was not much progress in preventing this very preventable cancer. The discovery by Nobel laureate Harald zur Hausen that persistent infection with one of the oncogenic, high-risk types of human papillomaviruses (HPV) is the ‘necessary’ cause of cervical cancer; enabled the development of primary prevention using HPV vaccination. Presently available vaccines target the two types that are responsible for 70 per cent of cervical cancers worldwide. HPV 16 and HPV 18 and can prevent over 90 per cent of high-grade precancerous lesions caused by these types. In India, there is a greater proportion of these types, making it likely that the impact of vaccination will be better than has been observed already in research studies and in countries that have implemented the vaccine program.
Efficacy of doses
Fewer than three doses of HPV vaccine would substantially reduce costs, improve compliance, ease logistics and facilitate scale up in national immunization programs. Data to support this has emerged from trials. WHO, after reviewing the available evidence on less than 3-doses, has recommended a two-dose schedule for girls (at an interval of 6 months, which may be extended to 12 months to facilitate vaccination) if vaccination is initiated prior to 15 years of age and a three-dose schedule (at 0, 1-2, and 6 months) if vaccination is initiated after the 15th birthday and for immunocompromised individuals, including those infected with HIV.
Countries implementing Immunisation
More than 80 countries have introduced HPV vaccine in the national immunisation programs (NIPs), of which 33 are LMICs; in addition, 25 LMICs have introduced HPV vaccination in pilot demonstration programs as a prelude to national scaling up in NIPs. In most programs a school-based approach is predominantly used to deliver the vaccine to the targeted adolescents with additional efforts using field clinics, and primary health centres to cover girls who missed vaccination and do not attend schools. Gavi The Vaccine Alliance has been able to markedly reduce the procurement price of both vaccines to Rs $5. While Australia, Denmark, USA and Canada were the first high-income countries to introduce HPV vaccination in NIPs in 2007, Panama (2008) in Latin America, Bhutan (2009) in Asia and Rwanda (2010) in Africa were the first LMICs that introduced HPV vaccination. Early reports of protection offered by the vaccine at the population level against vaccine targeted HPV infections, genital warts and cervical premalignant lesions have already started coming from countries that introduced the vaccine between 2007 and 2010.
HPV vaccine safety
Extensive data on the safety of HPV vaccines are now available from clinical trials and the population programs. Globally more than 270 million doses have been administered with no serious adverse events linked to the HPV vaccine and with an excellent safety profile. A meta-analysis of vaccine trials concluded that the frequency of serious adverse events (OR 0.99; 95%CI 0.87-1.14) and death (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.39-2.14) were similar in the vaccinated and control groups. The majority of deaths reported were accidental in nature, and none was attributable to the vaccines. Various rare syndromes have also been studied and none found to be related to the vaccine. A recently published study from India reported no serious adverse event attributable to the vaccine after administering 34,856 doses of the quadrivalent vaccine to 10-18 year old girls and following them over four year.
Regulators froze the Philippines’ world-first public dengue immunisation programme last week and suspended all sales of the vaccine on Monday after Sanofi said Dengvaxia could worsen symptoms for vaccinated people who contracted the disease for the first time.
“Eventually it’s the court of law that is going to decide in so far as the liability of Sanofi is concerned,” Health Secretary Francisco Duque said on ABS-CBN television
The previous administration of President Benigno Aquino launched the vaccination programme last year, making the Philippines the first nation to use Dengvaxia on a mass scale.
About 830,000 schoolchildren had received at least one dose of the vaccine, Duque said on Thursday. Previously the government said more than 733,000 people had been vaccinated.
Sanofi’s announcement last week caused great concern in the Philippines – where the mosquito-born disease is extremely prevalent.
Federal officials on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal.
Such work can now proceed, said Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, but only if a scientific panel decides that the benefits justify the risks.
Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine.
Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.
Now, a government panel will require that researchers show that their studies in this area are scientifically sound and that they will be done in a high-security lab.
The pathogen to be modified must pose a serious health threat, and the work must produce knowledge — such as a vaccine — that would benefit humans. Finally, there must be no safer way to do the research.
“We see this as a rigorous policy,” Dr. Collins said. “We want to be sure we’re doing this right.”
In October 2014, all federal funding was halted on efforts to make three viruses more dangerous: the flu virus, and those causing Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
But the new regulations apply to any pathogen that could potentially cause a pandemic. For example, they would apply to a request to create an Ebola virus transmissible through the air, said Dr. Collins.
There has been a long, fierce debate about projects — known as “gain of function” research — intended to make pathogens more deadly or more transmissible.
In 2011, an outcry arose when laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands revealed that they were trying to mutate the lethal H5N1 bird flu in ways that would let it jump easily between ferrets, which are used to model human flu susceptibility.
Tensions rose in 2014 after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accidentally exposed lab workers to anthrax and shipped a deadly flu virus to a laboratory that had asked for a benign strain.
That year, the N.I.H. also found vials of smallpox in a freezer that had been forgotten for 50 years.
When the moratorium was imposed, it effectively halted 21 projects, Dr. Collins said. In the three years since, the N.I.H. created exceptions that funded ten of those projects. Five were flu-related, and five concerned the MERS virus.
That virus is a coronavirus carried by camels that has infected about 2,100 peoplesince it was discovered in 2012, and has killed about a third of them, according to the World Health Organization.
Critics of such research had mixed reactions. “There’s less than meets the eye,” said Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist and bioweapons expert at Rutgers University.
Although he applauded the requirement for review panels, he said he would prefer independent panels to government ones.
He also wanted the rules to cover all such research rather than just government-funded work, as well as clearer minimum safety standards and a mandate that the benefits “outweigh” the risks instead of merely “justifying” them.
Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist who directs the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard School of Public Health, called review panels “a small step forward.”
Recent disease-enhancing experiments, he said, “have given us some modest scientific knowledge and done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic.”
Therefore, he said, he hoped the panels would turn down such work.
Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said he believed some laboratories could do such work safely, but wanted restrictions on what they could publish.
“If someone finds a way to make the Ebola virus more dangerous, I don’t believe that should be available to anybody off the street who could use it for nefarious purposes,” he said.
“Physicists long ago learned to distinguish between what can be publicly available and what’s classified,” he added, referring to nuclear weapons research. “We want to keep some of this stuff on a need-to-know basis.”https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih.html
This is a must-watch 4 part series for anyone wanting to understand how culture and counter-culture are manufactured.
This particular video (the 3rd in the series) covers the mid-60’s to early 70’s – the “Chaos Era” – which was a key period in setting the stage for the decades to follow…
IS SPRAYING OUR SKIES AFFECTING US?
WHAT ARE CHEMTRAILS?
Have you noticed airplanes leaving long white plumes in the sky that do not dissipate like normal vapour trails? Look up at the sky daily and you will soon notice that planes are spraying the sky leaving trails that at first might look like the exhaust trails left by jets. Often in grids, these trails with toxic chemicals linger, and expand out across the skies creating a layer that looks like clouds. Soon the previously blue sky is hazy from chemicals and metallic particles in the atmosphere. These are called chemtrails.
This spraying is known as Geo-engineering and can also drastically change weather patterns across the globe such as we’ve been witnessing in recent years.
CHEMTRAILS contain biological agents, ALUMINIUM and BARIUM. The agents are poisonous to humans, plants, and animals and are being deliberately sprayed into the environment around the world. Several Scientists have linked recent plant & animal deaths to aluminium, barium and heavy metals poisoning. (Currently spraying the public is legal under U.S. Public Law 105-85. This law allows chemical & biological agents to be sprayed on civilian populations, even if they are harmful)
Soil is now testing off the chart for Aluminium and arsenic. Food producing farmland is currently being sprayed. Long term local farmers in NZ are noticing crops ailing.Over time, the toxic spray will have a devastating effect on the food supply chain as it changes the pH levels needed to produce good food crops. Many trees will die and fruit bearing trees will not produce good fruit, which is already happening worldwide.
The known medical side effects of Aluminium and Barium are liver disease, meningitis, breathing disorders, (including Pneumonia & Bronchitis), significant increase in asthma especially children and Alzheimer’s disease. The short term effects are allergies, anxiety, brain fog, unexplained breathing difficulties, chronic sore or raspy throat, dizziness, eye and skin irritations, flatulence (gas), flu-like symptoms, headaches, itching (unexplained), nausea and vomiting, unexplained nose bleeds, panic attacks, persistent coughing, respiratory problems, stomach aches, tinnitus (distant ringing in ears or high pitched sound after spraying).
Presently we do not know the reason for this our environment being deliberately altered. Governments and military are not telling us anything, however these programs are going on without our informed consent.
Have you seen the unusually persistent jet trails, often in parallel or X-shapes, a hazy, metallic-looking sky at sunrise and sunset, odd-shaped or rainbow-coloured clouds, or experiencing abnormal tiredness and illness?
Have you looked at the various websites and seen the extent of documented evidence and video footage that supports the theory of these chemical and geo-engineering aerosol spraying operations are taking place?
If all the facts presented have convinced you of the truth, then please become involved in putting pressure on our governments to halt any further degradation of public health and the environment.
DEPOPULATION OF A PLANET
This document written in 1995 is one of the most important ever written on the subject of how this world is controlled. Why do we have wars? Why is there mass unemployment? Who promotes world ‘crises’, ‘religious cults’, drugs and terrorism then promotes their solutions? Who appoints the leaders of nations? Why do you get flu? Find out who created the AIDS virus Where did all these new diseases come from? How vaccination spreads disease PREPARE TO BE SHOCKED! This document was scanned from the original newsprint and corrected for software misinterpretation but if errors have gone unnoticed we apologise and would appreciate if any are brought to our attention.
Reprinted February, 2001 Report by Rick Martin NOVEMBER 28th 1995 Depopulation of a Planet Thinning Out The “Useless Eaters” An Unspoken NWO Agenda Part I: Historical Perspective Part II: What you can’t see will hurt you! Part III: No easy Answers! Part IV: A Picture Emerges Part V: U.N. Rings the Alarm Part VI: The Final Chapter.
Part 1: Historical Perspective 11/19/95 RICK MARTIN
Many writers have spoken of intentional plans by certain Elite to thin-out the world’s population; it’s a recurring theme among so-called conspiracy theorists. There are frequent references to “useless eaters”, which includes the bulk of mankind. Most, when hearing of plots to depopulate the planet, simply say under their breath, “Yeah, right,” or more often, while shaking their head, “You’re nuts.” But when there is a careful examination of writings by prominent authors of this century, pieces of the puzzle certainly do fall into place – pieces which support the contention that there are certain individuals, if not entire governments, who have implemented a program of global genocide in an effort to salvage and corner “resources”.
What you will be reading in this series on Depopulation Of A Planet are selected writings from a wide cross-section of viewpoints and political leanings. I will be using “their” own documents, their own words, to weave a fabric which, in the end, will be a tapestry of undeniable clarity for those with eyes to see. Without the historical foundation upon which to base understanding, writing about current efforts at depopulation, through the use of viruses and microorganisms, would have far less significance. So please stay with it as you read and it will come together. I realise that some of this initial material may seem dry, but it is important for a broader understanding of this critical and timely issue.