“In one paper,” Crowe says, “I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.”
I asked him to pause so I could exclaim my astonishment. And yet, it was Déjà vu all over again. Just like in the HIV battle—people were never told that the “HIV test” had different standards in different countries, and within countries, from lab to lab. The highest bar (the greatest number of HIV proteins) was in Australia: five. The Lowest was Africa: 2. In the US it is generally 3-4.
We used to joke that you could rid yourself of an “HIV diagnosis” by flying from either the US or Australia, to Africa. But for many years, “AIDS” in Africa was diagnosed without any tests whatsoever. Just a short list of symptoms that tracked precisely with symptoms of most tropical diseases, such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath.
David, in his quiet Canadian way, dropped a bombshell in his next statement:
“I think if a country said, “You know, we need to end this epidemic,” They could quietly send around a memo saying: “We shouldn’t be having the cutoff at 37. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.”
Yes, you read that right. Labs can manipulate how many “cases’ of Covid-19 their country has. Is this how the Chinese made their case load vanish all of a sudden?
Evidence shows us that Wuhan, central China’s most populous city , has been used as a test bed for smart city studies since 2018. It has also been a strategic ‘Independent Innovation Model Area’ since 2009.
Wuhan has been the pioneer of smart city projects since 2010 and is seen as the indicator of planned future development at a national level.
Many of the pilot projects are described on WRISC’s website which include RFID chips, video cameras across the city into a centralised traffic information system and a surveillance system connected to all the city’s police stations.
Wuhan is a pilot location in the China-wide ‘863 Smart Cities’ programme.
Many countries have consulates in Wuhan including France, South Korea,UK,US while the Netherlands opened a trade office in Wuhan as early as 1996, several other countries have followed suit since 2010, including Singapore, Japan, Canada and Australia.
Wuhan’s smart city agenda is directly influenced by a longstanding and active ‘twin city’ arrangement with Manchester. Wuhan works on smart cities with Manchester’s flagship smart city area – ‘Corridor Manchester.’’
The national government has a long standing interest in using new smart technologies in health.
Not only is this CV pandemic convenient for the smart agenda roll out, but it happens in an area that has been at the forefront of smart technology testing.
The consequences of this pandemic created by the measures in place, will cause massive economic problems that can be solved by the smart agenda and the use of digital money.
The pandemic will also help to introduce the strict security measures proposed and the smart technology will be welcomed.
The pandemic gives birth to AI and the Smart agenda…
Meanwhile companies such as Moderna are set to become very rich from the new vaccines. Partnered with NIH, with no name for 9 months and just a number.
Moderna had been collaborating for several years with NIAID on developing coronavirus vaccines, and even had been preparing for a 2020 “pandemic test” whereby it would see how quickly it could design, develop, and mass manufacture a global vaccine.
Moderna calls mRNA “the software of life.” Cells use mRNA to translate DNA into the proteins the body uses to function. Moderna believes it can use mRNA to spur the body to produce its own therapeutic proteins, essentially putting a drug factory inside of the patient.
As one might guess, it’s not an easy task. Moderna’s scientists have a big job ahead of them: For each potential drug, they need to figure out how to safely get the mRNA therapy into the appropriate cells, make sure the mRNA actually yields sufficient amounts of protein to have a therapeutic effect and ensure the therapies won’t trigger an immune reaction in patients.
No mRNA-based drug has ever been approved by the FDA nor any other regulatory agency.
Bancel, who has been CEO since 2011 and previously worked at Eli Lilly & Co. LLY, 1.804% , owns 10%of the company ahead of the IPO. He has the second-largest stake in Moderna, behind venture investor Flagship Pioneering Inc., which owns 19.5% of pre-IPO shares. AstraZeneca PLC is the third-largest investor, with a pre-IPO stake of 8.4%, and also has a collaboration agreement with Moderna.
Imperial College has been working on its mRNA vaccine since the middle of January when Chinese scientists released the genetic information about the virus. Yet it is the same University that is at the forefront of all the facts and measures associated to the pandemic.
The same University who formed the new UK vaccine manufacturer, VMIC due to be up and running soon.
THE LEADERS OF TWO CONTROVERSIAL PANDEMIC SIMULATIONS THAT TOOK PLACE JUST MONTHS BEFORE THE CORONAVIRUS CRISIS – EVENT 201 AND CRIMSON CONTAGION – SHARE A COMMON HISTORY, THE 2001 BIOWARFARE SIMULATION DARK WINTER. DARK WINTER NOT ONLY PREDICTED THE 2001 ANTHRAX ATTACKS, BUT SOME OF ITS PARTICIPANTS HAD CLEAR FOREKNOWLEDGE OF THOSE ATTACKS.
Answer – Imperial College. But why is Boris taking advice from Neil Ferguson from Imperial College? A man who has continually produced falsely inflated and alarmist predictions about viruses in the past which have been totally debunked?
Ferguson was the man behind alarmist research that sparked an unnecessary mass culling of farm animals during the 2001 epidemic of foot and mouth disease – which cost Britain billions of pounds.
Ferguson will not open up the model for scrutiny, but our government is using the same model to justify the lockdown!!! First of all he predicted 500,000 deaths. Then he suddenly changed his figures DRASTICALLY, and said that the UK should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. – more than 1/2 of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case because they were so old and sick.
We are being told about covid-19 deaths, but not the number of deaths which would be expected to occur under normal circumstances. Are covid deaths over and above what would normally be expected? Are they over and above the expected number of deaths from flu or pneumonia? PHE says that the number is not statistically significant: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/…/Weekly_all_cause…
When the number of deaths from covid is announced, there is the implication that they died as a direct result of covid. However this is not the case. A ‘corona death’ is where a corona infection was proven. But also all those with underlying health problems infected by Covid-19 but for whom it’s not possible to say what killed them. Finally, those not tested before death but suspected of Covid-19 are tested post-death, and if covid is found = corona death.
The distinction between dying ‘with’ Covid-19 and dying ‘due to’ Covid-19 is not just splitting hairs. Take these examples to illustrate the point – an 87-year-old woman with dementia in a nursing home; a 79-year-old man with metastatic bladder cancer; a 29-year-old man with leukaemia treated with chemotherapy; a 46-year-old woman with motor neurone disease for 2 years. All develop chest infections and die. All test positive for Covid-19. Yet all were vulnerable to death by chest infection from any infective cause (including the flu). Covid-19 might have been the final straw, but it has not caused their deaths. Yet they will all be included in the ‘covid deaths’. So a lockdown of the population is justified on the basis of couitnting every death as a covid death,even if the patients were going to die anyway. Unless we tighten the criteria for recording death due only to the virus (as opposed to it being present in those who died from other conditions), the official figures may show a lot more deaths apparently caused by the virus than is actually the case https://www.spectator.co.uk/…/how-to-understand-and-report-…
The media reporting is another issue. Everyone knows that the media is bought and paid for, and that they lie, deceive and manipulate the public. But for some reason, everyone seems to believe every they are reporting the exact truth when it comes to a ‘pandemic’. Why would it be any different with a pandemic? There is an agenda now to push the story that young people can die who have no underlying conditions. The Guardian MADE UP a story about a 21 year old woman, and had to retract the story, explaining that she had actually died of a heart attack and that it had nothing to do with covid. They have now pulled it completely. An 18 year old boy was also falsely reported of dying with the virus. But even after retracting these stories, the damage has been done in the eyes of the public. The ‘fear porn’ has worked.
We hear reports on the news of hospitals being overrun and under pressure, and of course this is no doubt the case. But reports are coming in about many hospitals that are empty, and staff are wondering where the cases are. This video shows a reporter in Germany going to hospitals which were claimed to be inundated with cases, but finds there are none. And in one of them, staff have been told that they are not allowed to talk to the media.
Since when was the government bothered about your health and well-being? They have allowed thousands of people to die while waiting for benefits. For years they have deliberately covered up serious health risks to the public – asbestos, tobacco, glyphosate…..why would they suddenly care now? Since when was the government bothered about protecting the NHS? It’s been completely decimated for years.
So for what other reasons would a pandemic be declared? Money, corruption, power and control. To bring forward agendas which have been planned for decades. Collapse the global economy = poverty for all. Get people policing their neighbours – already started. The cashless society. A Universal Basic Income where everyone is dependent on the state (when millions lose their homes and businesses, this can be rolled out). A police state – has anyone noticed yet that we are now no longer living in a democracy? Mandatory vaccinations which can only be acceptable if the public are petrified of ‘killer viruses’. Next we will see the introduction of tracking of everyone via mandatory phone apps, censorship of anyone who does not go along with the official narrative. .And microchipping is not far down the line either. This shutdown of the world is also being used by Telecomms companies to install 5G in schools where they know that they would get opposition. This is actually going on right now in various parts of the UK. A ‘pandemic’ can be declared for many reasons, but none of them are to do with the health and well-being of any of us.
Firstly, in this atmosphere of uncertainty, conflicting views and downright lies, govt have NO RIGHT to declare the possibility that any anti vaccine discussions on social media could result in prosecution!
People have every right to question the safety of anything that is being forced on them, especially when many of those corporations who are in the race for CV vaccines have been shown to have links to unscrupulous practises, that in-itself requires our attention and not a blinding ‘faith’ in anything that we are told.
So let us see who is in the running for making a profit.
In the U.S., many of the companies that are initiating development have received funding from two organisations: the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which is a division of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a division of the National Institutes of Health. Some companies have also received funding from Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), a global organization based in Oslo. Other companies are funding trials by themselves or through partnerships with other life sciences companies.
In the UK, largest single project in Wave 1 of the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund Medicines Manufacturing portfolio – the Vaccines Manufacturing and Innovation Centre (VMIC) – was under way since 2018.
A £66m investment has been led by a new company: Vaccine Manufacturing and Innovation Centre UK Ltd (VMIC). The management Board now has representatives from all the collaborators: comprising leading UK commercial and academic organisations.
All of the data and the guidelines on this virus,the suggestions on lock downs, all come from the same team at Imperial college. Which has been used as the template for all the world wide lock downs!
So the SAME Govt Institute that are on the board of a new UK vaccine industry are responsible for the ‘evidence’ that drives the massive changes that we are seeing on the back of the CV.
This is a scandal! How can the same people who are involved in the UK s plans to produce vaccines and become vaccination manufacturers be in any position to be the ‘leading voice’ of the world in this pandemic?
This is something that needs to be addressed as a total conflict of interest!
This organisation has members who are also involved in the Pirbright Institute that is responsible for creating the Corona virus.
Here is Adrian Hill discussing his links to Pirbright!
And before we see this as a non profit making deal and purely for the good of the people, then check out this fact.
A WEEK BEFORE the first reports of the Corona virus outbreak on 31st December 2019, this organisation created a new company called VMIC UK services Ltd.
An organisation, govt affiliated, that is supposedly’ not for profit’ for two years suddenly creates a private company, a week before the news? ?
The CEO of this new company is named Dr Matthew Duchars who is also the CEO of the UK’s Vaccines Manufacturing Innovation Centre (VMIC).
So shall we put this into perspective!
A new UK vaccine manufacturer was established two years prior, involving the same University who are leaders in this pandemic. Which then creates a private company a week before the news is released of this virus!
Has the penny dropped yet?
“To play those millions of minds, to watch them slowly respond to an unseen stimulus, to guide their aspirations without their knowledge – all this whether in high capacities or in humble – is a big and endless game of chess of ever extraordinary excitement.”
– Sidney Webb, former leader of Fabian Society****
Not been on the internet much because I want to enjoy each day whilst it is still enjoyable. There is no doubt in my mind what is going on with the CV BS, this will play out in stages.
Firstly they are putting into force, plans they have had for some time, for instance, the idea of no groups of people being allowed to be together in any one place, this is something that have been after for a long time, imagine, no more protests or the possibility of any uprising!
I mean, how is rationing the amount of people who come into any big shop supposed to have any effect? If what they say is true then it is on surfaces for up to 28 days? Which means that keeping the numbers down is to get people used to being in queues for everything. Its all BS. CV will be used as an excuse to get rid of many of the small and medium businesses so that everything becomes produced and created by a very small group of people.
They have been wanting to crash the economy for ages but not wanting to blame the real culprits, the banks, this is the ideal time and with the stupid oaf in number 10 claiming that they only need 12 weeks, er excuse me what? Has he somehow gained powers of clairvoyance? Or is this a slip up that they expect to put all their changes into place by 12 weeks? Apparently, its now impossible to find out how many people die of flu in the UK? Why would that be? Is it because they do want to admit that more die of the flu than CV? Or will they claim that flu deaths are CV?
This hysteria is being spearheaded by the WHO – part of the UN. They have wanted their agenda 20/30 for a long time. Are you not in the least bit suspicious that on the last day of 2019, WHO declare this CV so that 2020 begins with the start of the changes that will bring in the long written agenda?
G. Brock Chisholm was the first Director General of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Here’s a quote. “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas.”
A cashless society is also on the cards… no pun intended! Helped by claims that money spreads disease! What about the poor elderly people who are being forced to stay at home? How many are going unchecked with no way to access food etc This is NOT the way to react to a cold/flu folks!
And then there is the vaccine agenda! They said some 20 years back that the only way for people to accept mandatory vaccination is by world pandemic panicking and that vaccine is now being plugged and will soon be mandatory. We will all have a certificate to show we have become a fully fledged cattle branded slave to the matrix, if we survive the vaccine that is!