Steele was chosen as a researcher BEFORE 5G was allocated a spectrum, before Ofcom sold off the spectrum and before UK funded councils in trials and tests. (Page 33 of a 36 page PDF)… Proof that Steele,s company Reevu, was chosen by the council as partners to prepare funding for the Smart programme. (Page 55)… Proof that Horizon2020 fund 2300 UK agencies.… Link to YT video with evidence that Baker is running all 5G groups… Link to Steele video claiming that he was unable to like a (removed post) claiming that that proves it is the cabal trying to to stop him.… Link to Steele video claiming to have invented things that he has not whilst claiming to be a messenger chosen by a prophet.… Links to all research on my website.…

Spot the odd one out?

Transition Towns: Extinction Rebellion: Anti 5G

The answer is obviously Anti 5G.

It is clear that  Transition Towns and Extinction Rebellion are both part of a ‘Global’ action plan of a global initiative to advocate for public policy that will promote use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) as a catalyst for the transition to smart sustainable cities.

Of which 5G technology is essential.

All who value their health, privacy, liberty, security and the very survival of humanity as we know it, along with the protection of all animals, trees and all organic life on our beautiful planet should  REJECT 5G/ The Internet of Things/The Smart Grid/Smart Cities (as are being pushed through the Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 21/2030 and the Green New Deal).The 5G network is primary to this apparatus, an essential component for the ‘scientific management’ global society; as envisioned and now being assembled all around us by an international oligarchy of techno-industrial and financial elites – the very same people who stand behind the UN, and are positioned to become its beneficiaries. Tasha Krett

‘Fast Forward Together’ graphic from the International Telecommunications Union expanding on UN SDG number 11, ‘Sustainable Cities and Communities’

They’re getting away with pushing 5G and the ‘smart-grid’ surveillance hardware, by wrapping it up in platitudes about ‘Sustainable Development’.

Claims by Transition Towns founder: Transition towns are local communities proactively preparing for an oil-scarce future in a warming world and helping  mitigate climate change.

There is no evidence showing that CO2 level has EVER had any impact on the global temperature, not even over geologic periods when CO2 level was 10 to 20 times higher than now. In fact,  the only correlation between temperature and CO2 variation which tracks both up and down trends shows the opposite. It is temperature variation which occurs FIRST and only hundreds of years later do similar variations show up in CO2 level. So you don’t even have a correlation, let alone any evidence. By Denis Ables.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is what its name suggests: an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. Because we are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, we are able to look at evidence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ignores. Because we do not work for any governments, we are not biased toward the assumption that greater government activity is necessary.

NIPCC has produced 14 reports to date:
  • Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate
  • Climate Change Reconsidered: The 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)
  • Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts
  • Scientific Critique of IPCC’s 2013 ‘Summary for Policymakers’
  • Commentary and Analysis on the Whitehead & Associates 2014 NSW Sea-Level Report
  • Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming
  • Written Evidence Submitted to the Commons Select Committee of the United Kingdom Parliament
  • NIPCC vs. IPCC
  • Chinese Translation of Climate Change Reconsidered
  • Global Warming Surprises: Temperature data in dispute can reverse conclusions about human influence on climate
  • Data versus Hype: How Ten Cities Show
    Sea-level Rise Is a False Crisis
  • Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels
  • Link to website:

Piers Corbyn latest Presentations (power Point Links in Right column of this home page) and go to:-…/ncdc-breaks-their-own…/

So who is behind these claims of a fake crisis?

The goal was advanced, most notably, by The Club Of Rome (Consultants to the UN) – a group of mainly European scientists and academics, who used computer modelling to warn that the world would run out of finite resources if population growth were left unchecked.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill.. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself….” – Club Of Rome

Many in the green movement are obsessed with the notion of “overpopulation” with the Club of Rome one of their favourite think tanks.

“Earth has a cancer and the cancer is man.” Club of Rome


The goal was established by the Club of Rome whose member, Maurice Strong transmitted and translated it into world government policy through the United Nations.

In 1993 the Club’s co-founder, Alexander King with Bertrand Schneider wrote The First Global Revolution stating,

The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. the threat of global warming.. would fit the bill…. the real enemy, then, is humanity itself….we believe humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realise world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or….one invented for the purpose.” — Club of Rome

The Club of Rome  ideas all ended up in the political activities of the Rio 1992 conference organised by Maurice Strong (a TCOR member) under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

The assumptions and objectives became the main structure of Agenda 21, the master plan for the 21st Century. The global warming threat was confronted at Rio through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It was structured to predetermine scientific proof that human CO2 was one contribution of the common enemy.

Their calculations predetermine that, because human CO2 production is directly linked to population increase. A population increase guarantees a CO2 increase. It is another of their circular arguments that has no basis in science. Dr Tim Ball.

The trap was partially sprung in climate research when a number of the relevant scientists began to enjoy the advocacy business. The enjoyment was based on a considerable increase in funding and employment opportunity. The increase was not so much on the hard-science side of things but rather in the emerging fringe institutes and organisations devoted, at least in part, to selling the message of climatic doom.

The trap was fully sprung when many of the world’s major national academies of science (such as the …  Australian Academy of Science) persuaded themselves to issue reports giving support to the conclusions of the IPCC. The reports were touted as national assessments that were supposedly independent of the IPCC and of each other, but of necessity were compiled with the assistance of, and in some cases at the behest of, many of the scientists involved in the IPCC international machinations. In effect, the academies, which are the most prestigious of the institutions of science, formally nailed their colours to the mast of the politically correct.

So depopulation is termed ‘“sustainable development” and  this is a “comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organisations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups, in every area in which they claim  humans impact on the environment.” 

U.N. Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a corporate manipulation using the Green Mask of environmental concern to forward a globalist plan.

This agenda is run by the United Nations via an NGO called “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives,” commonly known as ICLEI (pronounced Ik-lee). It is implemented locally by municipalities of major cities worldwide, including London, Berlin, Rome. This U.N. Agenda 21 is responsible for the development programs in our cities and towns.

The true agenda of Agenda 21[/2030] is to establish a global government, global economic system, and global religion.

Thom Forester

Agenda2030 goals…
Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
Translation: The central banks continue to control finance globally.
Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition, promote sustainable agriculture.
Translation: GMOs, regulations that make food a political weapon
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives, promote well-being for all.
Translation: Mass vaccination programs, Codex Alimentarius, depopulation
Goal 4: Ensure inclusive, quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
Translation: Compulsory education, brainwashing from cradle to grave
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality, empower women and girls.
Translation: Population control, forced “Family Planning”
Goal 6: Ensure availability, sustainably manage water.
Translation: Privatize all water sources, add fluoride
Goal 7: Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable energy.
Translation: Smart grid, 5G, smart meters, fuel-poverty
Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.
Translation: Corporate slavery, free trade for global mega-corps.
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.
Translation: Regulate travel until only the wealthy can drive
Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries.
Translation: Use mass-migration as a weapon to further consolidate political and economic power, globally
Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.
Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption, production patterns.
Translation: Forced austerity, universal poverty-level income
Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change.
Translation: CO2 breathing taxes/credits, ecological footprint taxes, a revival of historical technocracy, continue geo-engineering projects, mass-medication of humanity via stratospheric aerosol injection into the air the breathe.

Justin Walker, a British Green, whose uncle was closely associated with Aurelio Peccei, recounts how, in 1972,  Peccei invited him to work in his office in Rome, stating that ‘it would be at a very exciting and challenging time’. Justin, editor of ‘New Chartist’, states in the present edition “His words were, and I remember them very well

We are creating a huge global environmental problem that will frighten people into wanting a World Government run by us.

Peccie then went on to elaborate as to how they were seeking to fund the research needed in order to unite the scientists who, in turn, would influence the national decision-makers into accepting this new scientific theory of increasing human-caused CO2 levels, triggering what has become known as Man-made or Anthropogenic Global Warming.”


Nowhere in the Green New Deal/Climate Action agenda is there any mention of the most blatantly human and environmentally destructive activities currently being fast forwarded on the planet:

  • the illegal roll-out of 5G microwave radiation;
  • the advancement of research, development and application of a new range of genetically modified organisms (GMO) 

And the ubiquitous application of atmospheric aerosol geoengineering on a global scale.

The planned system change by reducing energy consumption is undermined today by the plans for a massive development of the most energy-intensive high-tech dimensions in everyday life, which should lead to the digitisation of all areas of life, the project of the corresponding “Smart Cities” and the installation of the necessary electromagnetic radiation at 5G level. It also wants to enforce a policy that benefits neither the earth nor its weather or climate, but the future and the profits of certain investors and corporations, as well as the demolition of social structures and existences that no longer bring any profits.

Both Transition Towns and Extinction Rebellion are created  to “infiltrate from within” allowing objectives to be met. 

The ‘Climate Change’ policies Extinction Rebellion are pushing for Agenda21/ 2020 ARE the survival strategies of the oligarchs in the post-oil, ‘sustainable’ future they have planned for us. Smart-grid compact Cities, 5G connected to everything, monitoring us and controlling those who misbehave, much of the land becoming an ‘eco-reserve’/ no-go-zone… it ain’t gonna pretty, that is for sure!
(research & text by Thom Forester)

Since the announcement that “The Big Society” would train Change Agents to use Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals the nature of “protest” is now in the hands of Corporate Governance and  Globalist Stake Holders.  The government organised protests such as “The People Assembly” have made sure the narrative of public opinion is tightly controlled. The recent corporate funded “Womens March” and all other controlled groups who promote the UN Climate Change Agenda for  are relying on the roll out of full spectrum dominance and control of population through the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN.

The Global Action Plan needs Fake Protestors who demand enslavement through Climate Change Policy and their latest Direct Action group “Extinction Rebellion” aimed at gaining mass publicity by sitting in roads and taking over public spaces is the latest in a long line of tried and tested controlled opposition publicity stunts.

It would stand to reason therefor that opponents of the smart city/5G agenda would be in opposition to Transition Towns and Extinction Rebellion.

Change Agents masquerade as campaigners

It would  make no sense that any anti 5G/EMF aware campaigners would support any of these groups who are pushing the smart agenda and yet that is exactly what is happening.


Totnes is of  significance in this article, it is the home to EMF Aware, a local group who strangely are also linked to Transition Town Totnes and Extinction Rebellion, not only linked but actively taking part in shared campaigns.

A local campaign called called ‘Totnes Alive’ which claims that those who take part should be those concerned about the climate emergency.

And yet is joined by not only these campaigns; 


But also this group:


Transition Towns is heavily linked to Totnes, the co founder is Rob Hopkins from Totnes. 

In July 2019 an event was held which brought together local Transition, XR and other local groups to ask how best to respond to local government ‘climate emergency’ declarations. 

Those attending included members of EMF Aware, Green Party members and councillors.


A campaigner named John Kiston from Totnes who is a part of the EMF Aware Totnes campaign was given main stream media coverage just lately in which claims were made that 5G had been halted in Totnes due to his involvement.

We had headlines like these:

And This;

This was reported to have been a breakthrough for the banning of 5G, the problem with this action is that there were claims that it was brought about via a moratorium that the council had imposed.


This action gave confidence to many who opposed 5G and was seen as a real chance to stop the 5G roll out with the help of local councillors.

A strategy advisory committee was organised some time later to implement the moratorium.

It then became apparent that the council claiming this, had done so knowing full well that they had no jurisdiction in Govt Planning Policy and that they did not even have plans for 5G in that area.

Suddenly this started to appear to be a time consuming distraction to the fight against 5G.

Given that the man who was supposedly responsible is connected to EMF Aware who have ties with Totnes Transition Town and Extinction Rebellion, this is now a questionable endeavour.

This video explains how the local council reacted to their own decision to call a halt to 5G, admitting that they did not have any power to do so. 


There are individuals who are being hailed as ‘leaders’ of the 5G campaign in the UK. One of whom is the man in Totnes who was given main stream media coverage for stopping 5G in his town which turned out to be false.

Kitson is known to share platforms and support Mark Steele and Chris Baker.

Steele has given false information about Gateshead lampposts having been 5G enabled back in November 2017. This was 6 months BEFORE any country had even decided which bandwidths/spectrums  were to be agreed upon.

 He has also shared videos on social media in which he falsely makes claims about LED lights, supposedly using his expertise to explain how simple capacitors costing pennies are in fact directed energy weapons.

He has claimed in interviews that the lampposts in question are also targeting the orthodox Jewish population in Gateshead.

Whilst information and research has shown the same man to be connected to the council he supposedly is fighting as well as all the agencies that are pushing the smart agenda.

Another man who is involved with this trio is Chris Baker who also supports and shares the stage with Kitson and Steele.

He has publicly claimed to be the Stop5G National and European coordinator. Are you aware that the Stop5G campaign was being coordinated and by whom? Local anti 5G groups were set up on FB and all the admins are the same bunch of people, all promote this trio of Travelling Shillburys and ban anyone who questions them.

This man also sabotaged the 5G campaign in Glastonbury by refusing to hand in petition signatures, refusing to speak even though he had been chosen by the council as a spokesperson, claiming that the campaigners had chosen him which proved to be untrue as shown in the video.

Chris Baker also stated in public that he  was going to coordinate a national and international 5G umbrella awareness event in November with the Worldshift group.European Alliance and 5GCrisis.

 Worldshift movement launched globally in 2012, to declare a global state of emergency,  leading representatives are the Club of  Budapest.


This is a clear attempt to use infiltrators in the 5G campaigns to steer the narrative under the watchful eyes of those who have clearly set the Smart agenda.

Kitson and his moratorium agenda.

 The scrutiny meeting was held at Exeter Council Scrutiny meeting and the council, did not declare a Moratorium. This was also a reply via a FOI request:

In the article claiming that Kitson had succeeded in banning the 5G roll out it states: 

So one hand the main stream media is reporting that this man has succeeded in halting the roll out of 5G in his town, whilst also reporting that the council does not have the power to do such a thing and all the while the said council admits they have no plans pending to roll it out yet?

Steele claims to be fighting the local council via courts, when evidence has shown that this is not true. When court cases appeared to be nothing more than advocacy training with links to the judges chambers and the local council.

This meant that the cases were never listed as any normal case yet Steele claimed a year later that this is because they were removed by the council or the govt.

There is an organisation named EKLIPSE who are involved in ‘identifying research needs’ on behalf of govts, planning depts and others and they are funded by Horizon2020 which is the biggest EU funding body for research to implement the smart agenda.

A deadline was set of October 23rd 2017 for the first round for applicants to apply to which a number of capacity building events were to be held between 2017 and 2020.

According to this organisation these events could be facilitated by Town hall meetings.

This included Transversal research needs, one of which was identified as :

Initiate research into 5G technology and LED lamps.

Given that the deadline was 23rd October 2017, this was 6 months before any agreed spectrum/bandwidth had been agreed upon nationally or internationally. 

One of the people chosen to take part was Mark Steele.

Page 33 of 36 page PDF

So according to the research document, those chosen would be informed by mid November 2017 and the research could include the inclusion of Town hall council meetings.

Steele makes his debut just a week later at a council chamber meeting.

It is imperative that we remain open minded and aware of the tricks and actions that will be played on us via agencies like the UN and the Horizon2020 research funding body that aims to push the smart agenda upon us. 

This would explain why Steele openly advertises Horizon2020 on his linked in profile, whilst his education is listed as  a college course and an open university. Hardly the scientist he claims to be.

Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing! 

Both Kitson and Steele are promoting joining a political group to stop the roll out of 5G. 

The European Medicines Agency approved an Ebola vaccine on Nov. 11, and on Nov. 12 the World Health Organisation prequalified the vaccine, paving the way for its use by other United Nations agencies and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

On November 11th, the vaccine received a “conditional marketing authorisation,” a distinction typically designated for medicines that treat unmet medical needs.

Merck’s ERVEBO is the product of a unique collaboration between the Public Health Agency of Canada and the US Army over ten years ago. Merck acquired the rights to develop the vaccine in 2014. 

A vaccine coming from a company with a long list of questionable business practices including   tax fraud, price gouging, misleading shareholders and lying under oath.

Merck’s Vioxx was blamed for more than 3,400 deaths.

Lawsuits were  brought by 47,000 people and about 265 potential class-action cases. 

Another drug, Januvia has been linked to pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and severe joint pain. According to lawsuits, some former Januvia users died after using the drug.

Another drug produced by  Merck is called Fosamax.  Merck paid millions in settlements and jury verdicts to thousands of people who say Fosamax caused their injuries.

Patients injured by Merck’s drugs have filed thousands of lawsuits against the Big Pharma company. The drug maker has paid out billions of dollars in damages to patients and their families as a result.

Despite their horrendous track record, we are now to accept that a vaccine is safe to use because the WHO and the European Commission say so?

In 2009, Professor Chossudovsky, a former employee of the World Health Organisation (WHO) exposed the corruption of the WHO over the Swine flu campaign and stated that WHO is a political body and not a health organisation.

Showing that H1N1 data was fabricated and exaggerated, including occurrence rates and deaths, whilst any independent testing was discouraged.

Another accusation that has been levelled against WHO, a critical component of the UN, is that of stifling press freedoms. In response to growing concerns over the UN’s treatment of the media, more than 50 journalists, editors, columnists and thought leaders from 18 countries joined to sign a coalition letter – on UN-designated World Press Freedom Day in May – demanding the UN abide by the same principles of press freedom it expects from its member nations.

More than half the population on planet Earth is more or less influenced by the advice and recommendations given by WHO.

In 1988 Halfdan Mahler (WHO director general during 1973- 1988) in the daily Danish newspaper Politiken warned the world against the power the pharmaceutical industry had over WHO: “the industry is taking over WHO”, he said. But nobody believed him, because it was too difficult for the public to understand the complicated power games he talked about. Unfortunately he was right.

In 2010 a number of representatives from governments all over the world as well as a number of international organisations i.e. the Council of Europe agreed that WHO had caused an international panic and disaster by declaring the mildest flu ever, the A/H1N1“Swine flu” influenza, to be a pandemic threatening mankind.

The Council of Europe pointed in a dire report to the problem of WHO going private as the true cause of all the trouble.

Close and secret links between the WHO and the pharmaceutical industry producing the vaccines was exposed.

The Danish newspaper “Information” found that five researchers involving in advising WHO during the scandal had been paid around seven million EURO from the vaccine industry.

Meanwhile millions of dollars  of contributions from the pharma companies are hidden by WHO.

The vaccines and the anti-influenza medicine were in Cochrane reviews documented to be totally without value and burdening its users with a long list of adverse effects. 

Scientists who advised the World Health Organization on its influenza policies and recommendations—including the decision to proclaim the so-called swine flu a “pandemic” had close ties to companies that manufacture vaccines and antiviral medicines like Tamiflu, a fact that WHO did not publicly disclose.

The links between the advisors and the companies that make money from vaccines and flu treatments were detailed in a report published online by the British medical journal BMJ, which investigated the advisors’ role in WHO’s policy.

In an interview the Polish health minister revealed everything about the horrible industrial contracts, where the pharmaceutical companies – helped by WHO – sold vaccines that were not even properly tested! The minister pointed to the fact that the test groups were extraordinary small – so small that the adverse effects of the vaccines could not even be evaluated.

The pharmaceutical industry has gained control over the WHO system, leading to an extreme bias towards the use of not only ineffective and unnecessary vaccines and drugs by allowing a large number of people from the industry to be placed in secret advisory groups for WHO.

According to WHO, all SAGE members are required to disclose all financial interests, including funding from pharmaceutical companies, consulting fees and other professional involvement. Yet   WHO does not report all financial interests.

All links and Info from ;

Lets us talk about Ebola!

Dr David Nabarro was appointed the senior UN system coordinator for Ebola. He was also the  UN senior system coordinator for the Swine flu virus and on his first day in office in 2005 he proclaimed that it could kill 150 million people. Over 200 million birds were killed and 10 billion dollars was spent. The total number of deaths was 379. 

The Ebola lab based in Sierra Leone is a US Bioweapon facility owned by  George Soros and Bill Gates, giving them control of the narrative of how many cases of Ebola were occurring in the last fake pandemic.

The Ebola outbreak in  Africa coincided with three separate vaccination campaigns countrywide: a cholera oral vaccine effort by Medicins Sans Frontieres under the WHO; and UNICEF-funded prevention programs against meningitis and polio.

American chief of the UN children’s agency. UNICEF executive directory Anthony Lake has an ideal career background for the post of protector of children worldwide. Tony Lake was National Security Advisor to President Bill Clinton responsible for US military interventions, including: the Bosnia-Herzegovina war against the Yugoslav federation; the Battle of Mogadishu in Somalia better known as “Blackhawk Down”; and Operation Uphold Democracy in Haiti.

An ardent Zionist convert to Judaism, he is the perfect boss to dispense risky vaccines in Muslim-majority Guinea.While posturing as principled ethical “witnesses” to human misery, the functional role of MSF role is as a conveyor belt dumping vaccines from major pharmaceuticals onto low-income and poorly educated populations of the developing world.

MSF corporate sponsors include the Bill Gates-founded behemoth Microsoft, Goldman Sachs, AIG, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, BlackRock, Bloomberg and the French advertising giant Havas. The Guinea outbreak was not reported by WHO until 6 weeks after the initial round of infections in February, which is quite odd considering the armies of medical workers afield in the countryside during those three vaccine campaigns.

The reason for suspecting a vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier is due to the fact that the Ebola contagion did not start at a single geographic centre and then spread outward along the roads. Instead. simultaneous outbreaks of multiple cases occurred in widely separated parts of rural Guinea, indicating a highly organised effort to infect residents in different locations in the same time-frame.

After rural West Africans realised that vaccination programs coincided with the outbreak of Zaire Ebola, foreign-funded medical staffers were assaulted by angry mobs and an Ebola treatment centre in Sierra Leone was burned to the ground.

No sooner is the vaccine announced then two weeks later reports of Ebola like virus in the UK is reported.

This was reportedly the cousin of Ebola called Lassa fever  which has had  a 40 million  grant offered for a suitable vaccine on the 2nd November 2019 which ends on the 7th April 2020.

Perfect timing for some fake claims of Lassa fever victims.

At the same time that the UK Government are considering mandatory vaccinations.

The public are being subjected to trauma-based mind control – an intensive form of the brainwashing technique known as coercion, described in a book by Douglas Rushkoff of the same name. Trauma-based mind control uses extreme fear or horror to shape the subconscious minds of its victims. It is a highly effective technique for making people submit to authority without realising what they are doing or why.

By using a spectacular disease that gains a lot of attention, but is incapable of killing a large number of people, is ideal for false-flag manipulations of public opinion. One of the leading indicators of a false flag is disproportion between the event’s massive public relations impact and the feeble reality of the alleged threat.

Here’s how this con job goes and although it repeats itself under different names, year after year (AIDS, SARS, Ebola, mad cow etc etc) most of the uninformed public react as programmed, simply because fear is PROVEN to trigger a narrowing of the mind, a lowering of IQ, a stimulation of the child ego (that looks for an adult to save it) and a reflexive obedience toward perceived authority.
The con job goes like this.
Step 1) poison the population purposely to create disease that does not and would never occur naturally
Step 2) parlay the purposely created disease as being caused by something invisible, outside the realm of control or knowledge of the average person
Step 3) create a toxic vaccine or medication that was always intended to further poison the population into an early grave
Step 4) parlay the vaccine or medication poisoning as PROOF the disease, which never existed, is much worse than anticipated
Step 5) increase the initial poisoning, which is marketed as a fake disease, and also increase the vaccine and medication poisoning, to start piling the bodies into the stratosphere
Step 6) repeat as many times as possible upon an uninformed population because killing a population this way (the art of having people line up to kill themselves with poison……known as a “soft kill” method) is the only legal way to make sure such eugenic operations can be executed on mass and in plain sight.
If you don’t think fake news, fear and reliance on fabricated authority can make people line up to kill themselves and their own children……’re not paying attention.”






Abstract; April 2019
This in-depth analysis was prepared by Policy Department A at
the request of the ITRE Committee. It compares 5G deployment
in the EU with other leading economies – the USA, China, Japan,
the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. On a range of
indicators, the EU compares well. However, this is not a short term race.

5G is more complex than previous wireless
technologies and should be considered as a long-term project to
solve technical challenges and develop a clear business case.

Full Article :

A war of words has erupted in the wireless industry as Verizon and T-Mobile lash out against AT&T over its new marketing term “5G E,” which suggests devices are connected to a 5G network.

Executives from the two carriers have publicly criticized AT&T for marketing an upgrade to its existing 4G LTE network with a 5G moniker, when the service doesn’t actually use the company’s 5G network or comply with 5G standards. They’ve called AT&T’s efforts confusing and deliberately misleading in an effort to get consumers to think they’re using AT&T’s 5G service when they aren’t.