Shocking Truth About CV Vaccines
UK Government have to go through certain procedures which could take years before a vaccine can be administered to the public.
“The best way to defeat a virus is with a vaccine”
Spoken by the clueless Matt Hancock, the health secretary who has no background in such matters. There has NEVER been an effective coronavirus vaccine in history!
Where is our democratic and human right to openly discuss and question?
no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from any vaccine-related injury to your health such as brain damage or death associated with the administration of a vaccine.
2020 Pentagon study: Flu vaccines increase risk of coronavirus by 36%
Is the rush to a vaccine the best solution?
According to Dr Murray the attempt to create a vaccine for SARS-CoV showed that vaccines were able to offer protection against infection, but came with a cost of disruption to the immune system. This altered immune function led to severe lung inflammation when test animals were exposed to the virus.
The final statement of the study cannot be highlighted enough: “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”
Despite this, the UK Flu vaccination programme has been stepped up for 2020/2021 by govt. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/national-flu-immunisation-programme-2020-2021.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0hPgrf9uaBKOrsRht0LaVay0aASW87kRyx5cBJplVt5Nsd_mqppYU345U
How vaccines are tested, licensed and monitored
(From Oxford Uni website) https://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vk/vaccine-development How vaccines are tested, understandably, people are often concerned to know how rigorously and extensively vaccines have been tested.
This is especially true for new vaccines.
This page aims to outline the process involved in developing and licensing a vaccine for use in the UK. The standard for testing and monitoring of vaccines is higher than it is for most other medicines, because they are one of the few medical treatments given to healthy people (mainly healthy children).
This means that the level of acceptable risk is much lower than it might be for a cancer treatment, for example. It can take many years for a vaccine to pass through all the stages described.
In the case of the MenB vaccine, for example, it took nearly 20 years from the first idea to the vaccine being licensed for use.
These are some of the stages a vaccine will have gone through before use: Literature review: looking at what has been done before. Theoretical development or innovation: coming up with a new idea, or a variation on an existing idea. Laboratory testing and development. This involves ‘in vitro’ testing using individual cells and ‘in vivo’ testing, often using mice.
The vaccine has to pass rigorous safety tests at this stage, and demonstrate that it works in animals. Phase I study – an initial trial involving a small group of adult participants (up to 100 people).
This is carried out to make sure that the vaccine does not have major safety concerns in humans, and also to work out the most effective dose. Phase II study – a trial in a larger group of participants (several hundred people).
Phase II trials check that the vaccine works consistently, and look at whether it generates an immune response.
Researchers also start looking for potential side effects.
Phase III study – a trial in a much larger group of people (usually several thousand). Phase III trials gather statistically significant data on the vaccine’s safety and efficacy (how well it works).
This means looking at whether the vaccine generates a level of immunity that would prevent disease, and provides evidence that the vaccine can actually reduce the number of cases.
It also gives a better chance of identifying rarer side effects not seen in the phase II study.
Licensing – expert review of all trial data by the UK government (through the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency – MHRA) or European regulator (European Medicines Agency – EMA).
At this stage the regulators check that the trials show that the product meets the necessary efficacy and safety levels. They also make sure that, for most people, the product’s advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
Phase IV studies – post-marketing surveillance to monitor the effects of the vaccine after it has been used in the population.
These may be requested by a regulatory body, or carried out by the pharmaceutical industry.
The vaccine and the trials used to test it must meet the regulations laid down by the following authorities: ICH-GCP (International Conference on Harmonisation of Good Clinical Practice) – international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects.
Declaration of Helsinki (1964; 2008) – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects EU Clinical Trials Directive – enshrined in UK law by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations (2004) RCPCH Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children (2000) In addition, for trials in the UK, the vaccine and the trial must receive individual approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), while the trial itself must be approved from the following authorities: An NHS Research Ethics Committee (see more information on the NHS Health Research Authority website ) The local NHS Research and Development office, who support and advise researchers in meeting the requirements of the UK regulatory framework. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), for certain types of trials monitoring.
Although vaccines undergo testing before they are licensed for use in the UK, it is important that the safety of vaccines is monitored on an ongoing basis, as with all licensed drugs.
In the UK this is undertaken by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) through the Yellow Card Scheme.
Reports of suspected side effects are sent to the MHRA by drug companies (who are obliged to pass on any reports of suspected side effects that are defined as serious), health professionals, and, since 2005, patients themselves.
How many times has the pharmaceutical industry been caught red handed in making false claims and misrepresenting studies? The author of this website suggests reading informative books such as this one:
Who is responsible for monitoring vaccine safety?
What does the MHRA do with these data?
The data are evaluated each week, and the reported side effects are compared against the expected side effects as detailed in the information sheet for the vaccine.
If a previously unidentified reaction emerges, or the frequency of reactions is not in line with what is expected, then the MHRA will investigate carefully. What happens next?
This will depend on the kind of side effect identified, but options include insisting that details of the new side effect are given in the product information leaflet or giving out warnings identifying groups of patients who should not be given the vaccine. In rare circumstances, the vaccine may be withdrawn from use.
You can find detailed information on the scheme here , and data on Yellow Card reports for individual products here . Page last updated: Monday, October 29, 2018 https://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vk/vaccine-development
Report a suspected problem (‘adverse incident’) with a medicine or medical device using the Yellow Card Scheme as soon as possible, for example if: a medicine causes side effects someone’s injured (or almost injured) by a medical device, either because its labelling or instructions aren’t clear, it’s broken or has been misused a patient’s treatment is interrupted because of a faulty device someone receives the wrong diagnosis because of a medical device a medicine doesn’t work properly a medicine is of a poor quality you think a medicine or medical device is fake or counterfeit Anyone can report a problem.
An exercise was planned for global pandemic preparedness for a dangerous pathogen and pandemic which began in Sept
2019, created by WHO and World bank; members on its board include Chinese CDC, Fauci, Gates Foundation Wellcome trust and others.
To create a Universal vaccine
Progress indicator(s) by September 2020 include,The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide
training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate
release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
This would explain the expansion of vaccine manufacturing worldwide that occurred just prior to the test/pandemic.
In the UK, In 2018 Imperial College formed a partnership with CEPI, the Centre for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations contributed £8.4 million to partner Imperial College to develop vaccines in 16 weeks instead of 10 years. They called this platform, ‘RapidVac’ and the disease they called Disease X.
Imperial college are responsible for flawed models of the CV 19 and also created a ‘FOR PROFIT’ offshoot of a public vaccine manufacturing initiative just a week prior to the public announcement by World Health Organisation.
What do they have in store for those who object?oria/new-covid-19-restrictions-will-be-needed-for-anti-vaxxers-20200616-p55330.html
Leaflets outlining the truth about this pandemic have been created and are available for download on this website.https://www.vigiliae.org/coronavirus-leaflets-for-download/?preview=true
Or direct from Google Drive.
Also linked to another informative website in the leaflets menu.
Testing for CV19
In the beginning the public were diagnosed by symptoms only, then blood test that test for antibodies was introduced, this tests any viral or bacterial antibodies that could be from any known health problem and our immune system created these antibodies when in recovery, then the PCR test were used which use saliva which has also unverifiable results.
PCR tests were claimed to be insufficient for testing diseases by the test creator.These Test kits were claimed to be for experimental use only by the CDc,s own website.
After this came on-site test kits which have a ten minute diagnosis, unapproved yet allowed to make up the final numbers in the claims of CV19.
None of the above are capable of making a CV19 diagnosis.
This doctor explains in more detail and offers a reward for anyone who can prove that CV19 exists. https://www.awakeningchannel.com/post/dr-offers-5000-for-proof-that-the-cv19-exists?fbclid=IwAR3e4q0Ov0oO-FLEYMIgaUGhRzhNg6PHNRoGDy3funTKRKaFdxHUcaQ5EAg