Spread the word far and wide.
Information from the UK government website on the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine:
1. The vaccine is not safe for pregnant women.
2. The vaccine is not safe for women planning on becoming pregnant within a few months of taking the vaccine.
3. The vaccine is not safe for those who are immune suppressed (experience allergic reactions).
4. No testing or trials have been performed to determine long-term side effects.
5. No testing or trials have been performed to determine the side effects if taken with other prescribed medications.
6. It is unknown if the vaccine will cause infertility.
7. Taking the vaccine will not stop you from getting COVID-19.
8. Taking the vaccine will not prevent you from spreading the virus.
9. You cannot breastfeed if you have had the vaccine.
10. The vaccine has not been tested or trialled on children and is not suitable for persons under the age of 16.
11. Neither the UK government nor the vaccine manufacturers accept responsibility for death or personal injury resulting from taking the vaccine.
In fact both Pfizer & Biotech sought explicit immunity from prosecution in the case of deaths or personal harm from taking the vaccine.
 
 
In the meantime, WHO publishes ‘Best practice guidance’ – How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public. This guidance document provides basic broad principles for a spokesperson of any health authority on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. The suggestions are based on psychological research on persuasion, on research in public health, communication studies and on WHO risk communication guidelines.
 
 
Explains why the mayor of London had a fake photo shoot of accepting a vaccine which still had its cap on, I wonder why?
 
 
Just so you know…
This crisis was named ‘ONE UN’
On 6 February 2020 UN Development Coordination Office (UNDCO) hosted a call with WHO to brief all Resident Coordinators and UN Country Teams (UNCTs) to provide updates on the COVID-19 epidemiological situation
and introduce the COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan (SPRP),1 emphasising the importance of responding to the crisis as One UN.
 
https://theresistance.video/watch?id=5febc6a8c3c5ce1ce2f5f8d7&fbclid=IwAR13-tX_JhndrXmv0FvrhiibGW0sSXGvv2-hLQLiudM_MTgjNb9nXApQnns
 
What about Moderna?
 
  • We do not have access to the complete clinical DATA. Thus there is NO DATA TRANSPARENCY
  • Data transparency is not a “nice to have.” Claims made without access to the data—whether appearing in peer reviewed publications or in preprints without peer review—are not scientific claims.
  • Doctors and Professional Societies should publicly state that, without complete data transparency, they will refuse to endorse covid-19 products as being based on science. The first critical risk is that of an exaggerated estimate of a product’s benefits. The second critical risk is underestimating a product’s side effects.
  • Copious evidence already shows that adverse event data collected in trials are under-reported in journal publications.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent Death
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission person to person. In fact evidence is already emerging  that it may not.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly)
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s important endpoints like prevention of severe disease and transmission in high risk people
  • We know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months or two or three years. The existing “trials” will likely END with NO follow up results tabulated. It took seven years—and a lawsuit—to unearth the vast dangers, narcolepsy et al, of the Pandemrix H1N1 “vaccine”
  • We Know very little about the vaccine’s effects on pregnant women, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals who were largely excluded from the trials.
  • The Moderna trials went to great lengths to assure no trial participant got pregnant before, during and after the trial. Couple this with no multi-generational testing at all and you can make a good case for premeditated Malice should this vaccine pass on very negative DNA to their offspring.

0 Comments

Post your comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>