On this week’s OUT OF THE BAG…LIVE on

For the first 2 hours of the show I was LIVE with Ann Marie Carey
Annie has been an activist for 15 years and has created many campaigns to highlight unfair welfare reforms, chemtrails, 5G and the smart agenda, epidemics and vaccines. She achieves this by sharing information on her website Annielogical Uncensored, social media and within communities by organising events and creating leaflet campaigns. Annie has created a campaign to highlight the false information being given about CV19 and the ensuing pandemic claims. Annie believes that it is only by sharing important information with our communities that the public can make an informed decision and put an end to the insidious agenda behind the claims of a pandemic.
In this interview she spoke about how people can get involved in the campaign and shares some of her accumulated research.  Plus MUCH MORE! 
Details of the campaign can be found on the FB group CV19 ~ Facts Not Fear Campaign or on the website Annie Logical Uncensored. 
​The leaflets can be downloaded from this link:

The Pandemic preparedness plans that were put into place by the monitoring board and due to begin in September 2019 shows  correlation with countries in Africa who submitted preparedness plans years earlier.

The following is a graph of the countries in Africa who submitted pandemic plans to WHO.

Compare it to the ‘claims’ made about the cases in Africa and we can see that the  countries with early preparedness plans coincide exactly with the countries claiming to be affected.

The WHO link

This shows the countries claiming to be affected.

How is it possible that the countries with the first and largest claims of CV are the same ones who have created early preparedness plans for a pandemic? 

Algeria, Egypt and Nigeria were the first countries to claim there were CV cases in Africa, all the countries with early pandemic preparedness plans that satisfied the WHO.

Burkina Faso, Egypt is also on the WHO map as being  one of the early  providers of a pandemic preparedness plan. 

Egypt has played an active role in the implementation of WHO and UN frameworks.

Some of the ministers took to FB to announce they were CV positive.

Egypt has collaborated with WHO to create the UN Sustainable goals agenda.

Nigeria, also one of the countries that have an early preparedness plan submitted to WHO, claimed that the first death from CV was from a patient who had returned from the UK and was being treated for cancer and diabetes, yet supposedly died from CV.

The Nigerian CDC also shared that information via a tweet. 

Algeria are also well prepared and were reportedly one of the first countries in Africa to have a patient who had travelled from another country.


Is it coincidence that those who were most eager to have created pandemic preparedness plans to WHO were the same countries that were hit?

South Africa may not have submitted a pandemic preparedness plan before 2014 but they will have been highly involved in later pandemic preparedness planning.

The Global preparedness planning board convened by the WHO and others would have made it compulsory to take part in all exercises for global preparedness prior to September 2019, they will have all 197 WHO countries  committed to an exercise in global preparedness.




South Africa claimed to have its first CV case on 5th March 2020 without even a confirmation from labs. Then declared a national state of disaster on the 15th March 2020 even though noone was reported to have died until 27th March 2020.

Which begs the question, if a global pandemic exercise began in September 2019, when did it stop?

This article claims that cases have been found in areas called Sandton, Alexandra, Wynberg, Houghton and  Orange grove.

Which oddly spells out SA WHO.

Deliver as one

A UN report from 2006 discussed delivering a ‘One United Nations’


On September 11th 2020, a partnership was formed in which the Nigerian UN coordinator states that CV is:

An X-ray that has revealed the fractures of the fragile skeleton of society

Which has:

Helped build the UN agenda


Dr Stephen Redd is the CDC,s Director of Public Health Preparedness and Response

Dr Redd was a member of the Global Pandemic Preparedness event called Event 201, held in October 2019. A few Months before the news of CV was made public.

This event was a table top exercise created to put all the players involved in global pandemics together to trouble shoot how a pandemic would operate and how they would deal with it.

What a huge coincidence that such an event even occurred? What are the odds?

Except this is a pattern that Dr Stephen Redd has also been involved with in other ‘claimed’ pandemic events, making the odds of it being a coincidence, unfathomable.


According to reports, Dr Redd was wrapping up a flu pandemic planning meeting on April 15th 2009 when the phone call came in that a virus had infected a 10 yr old.

Two days later the CDC conformed the diagnosis and a week later, Redd had been made incident commander of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

So we are to believe that he was chairing a meeting for  pandemic preparation at the same time as he got the call that a ‘possible’ real pandemic might occur? Really?

The following was reported on the CDC website:

Coincidence would have it?

Claims were made by the CDC that this would kill millions. It never happened.

Five years later in August 2014, Dr Redd was due to be involved in an exercise for planning of pandemic preparedness once again. 

Coincidentally, at that exact time, the exercise was overshadowed by the claims of an Ebola outbreak that meant that all those involved were now working on Ebola.

This information was shared by Dr Redd himself during an interview in 2016 with CDC Museum, Global Health Chronicles.

The Ebola event then led to the creation of the Global Health Security Agenda.

 Five years later again and the Director was now in the driving seat of another pandemic preparedness event which became a ‘reported’ real event.

 What are the odds that this man would be involved in and heading, not one but THREE separate exercises for pandemic preparedness  that all go live at the exact same time as the exercise?

Redd also stated during the Ebola event that:

The same man claimed he was given a job working in the White House during Ebola and days later was a given a list of vaccines to be used to treat Ebola. And of course, the USA were claiming to have a case.

Fool me once!

The WHO Simulation Exercise manual from 2017 states that during these sort of global exercises, they involve table top exercises such as the ones performed by the Event 201 team in New York, again, the same members of the Global Pandemic Monitoring Board attended this event, including the Chinese CDC Director-General.

There is also evidence of simulations from within the health care departments.

The Drosophila is the fruit fly, this simple insect has been instrumental in genetics research from 1910 when a man called Thomas Hunt Morgan and his wife began to research this fly and discovered its links to the human genes. The understanding of genes and the connections to the fact that genes are carried on chromosomes began the basis of heredity.

It also began the whole genetics research programs  that gave two top biologists the Nobel peace prize later on in 1995 when 27,000 mutant fly lines were established of which 139 mutations affecting embryo-genesis.

The fruit fly (Drosophila) has enabled the microbiologists to use fat stem cells, harvest them,activate them and return them into the body.

There is even a Drosophila library database website which keeps info on all genes called  Fly Base.

During the Olympics, references to genetics were apparent and shared in this article 

But it still  came as a shock to see how blatant was the message just days ago. I wondered how many would know the significance to the statue that has recently popped up on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar square.

The Fourth Plinth  Commission is led by the Mayor of London’s Culture Team.

 This statute appeared in July. The drone is rigged with a camera to survey the audience which can be accessed via an app on a smart phone. Trafalgar square was the site of the first ever surveillance cameras installed in the UK in 1960.

The monument at Trafalgar square, renown for holding protests, is the tallest so far. The 13th to appear and is 31 ft tall. The steps of  the square were covered with fake blood in protests involving Extinction Rebellion recently, a known co-opted movement.

Cream with a cherry on top with a fly and a drone.

The name of this?

The End

And it does not get more obvious than that folks!

Thanks to the fly, they have perfected genetics (cream) and technology introducing drones and surveillance,  is the cherry on top that spells the end. 

The Olympic imagery has not been lost on many and even back then Boris Johnson was aware of the agenda.

Past Olympic ceremonies have been just as obvious in their imagery.

My article covered this subject.

So what are we to do when such ‘in your face’ imagery such as ‘The End’ is showcased?

People are flocking to join supposed, newly formed grass roots movements were protests and demo,s have been organised.

The problem is that no one is doing their due diligence to look at who these people fronting these movements are. 

At this stage it would be wise to mention this book. 

The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, published in 1897.

Despite controversy as to the authors  there is no doubt that what was written back then has taken place and that it is blue print for the future domination of all people.

The same book which Henry Ford in 1921 wrote that “the protocols are 16 yrs old and fit in with what is going on now.”

The book also discusses the successes they arranged for Darwinism,Marxism and Nietzsche-ism  amongst others. It states:

 Before us is a plan which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labor of many centuries brought to naught.”

In Protocol 111 entitled ‘Methods of Conquest’ is states,

We shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously in all of the countries of Europe” 


When the populace has seen that all sorts of concessions and indulgences are yielded it, in the same name of freedom it has imagined itself to be sovereign lord and has stormed its way to power, but naturally like every other blind man, it has come upon a host of stumbling blocks. It has rushed to find a guide, it has never had the sense to return to the former state and it has laid down its plenipotentiary powers at OUR feet.”
“Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave it the name of “Great”: the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.

Protocol XV111

“When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.
Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances.”

“This will give the pretext for domiciliary pre requisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from the number of the GOYIM police.”

Protocol XV

 When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the the aid of COUPS D’ETAT prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist.

It clearly is obvious that an agenda has been in place for centuries, an agenda which includes getting people  all over the world to take to the streets.

And as much as it feels good to be amongst like minded people and to be actively doing something as opposed to nothing, those who have set the agenda years ago openly discuss the need to get people onto the streets in protests. 

It stands to reason that they will have anticipated the public’s anger and would also make sure that they lead from the front.

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” ― Lenin 

 Some  of those who have put themselves into prominent positions to lead will be also joining forces with others who have managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the public in past campaigns.

A typical example is the man who has managed to steer the 5G campaign despite his background, links to agencies pushing 5G technologies and even links to the council he claims to be fighting in court


 The article above shows how easy it is for the govt to use the court system to their advantage, allowing a ‘savour’ type situation so as to  give credence to the chosen saviour.

Maybe it makes no difference to some that the multi millionaire  in the govt lockdown case trial  has chosen  Philiph Havers as his barrister.  The fact that the case is being paid for by the public who have been crowdfunded to the tune of  nearly a quarter of a million pounds, gives them the right to full disclosure. 

The case is ongoing.

The barristers father is the Lord High Chancellor of the UK.

The same barristers father man was on the war cabinet of the Thatcher govt.
His father was also involved in covering up paedophile cases.
The barrister who was chosen to save us is the son of Lord Michael Havers, who was the top legal man in the UK when Sir Jimmy Savile and his politician friends were reportedly raping and murdering children throughout the UK.
His father also tried to get the ripper off with a diminished responsibility plea.Sir Michael sent the innocent Guildford Four to jail.

Lord Havers, who later served briefly as lord chancellor, backed the decision of the director of public prosecutions not to prosecute Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and subscriber to the Paedophile Information Exchange. He was caught sending paedophile literature through the post.
He intervened three times between 1981 and 1983 to stop the investigation and exposure of Establishment paedophiles, and to prevent the publication of stories which showed that Establishment figures were members of the Paedophile Information Exchange.
Michael Havers, who was also Lord Chancellor (top legal man) at the time of the Kincora Boys Home child abuse cover-up.
Havers reportedly tried to silence ‘the child abuse whistleblower’ Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.

Havers’ sister, Baroness Butler-Sloss, headed the child abuse inquiry whose own brother played such a major role in the protection of Establishment paedophiles throughout the 1980s.
She chaired the inquest into the death of Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, but resigned when it was clear that she would not have full control over it because Dodi’s father won the right to a jury.

This is the father and Aunt of the barrister fighting for Keep Britain Free.

The multi millionaire was also given a govt contract to supply the NHS with PPE during this period.

Such things may be of no importance to some but greatly important to others.

Simon Dolan owner of  Jota Aviation.

The solicitor in the case.

Anna Brees, ex BBC journalist is getting the public to share their stories about being anti masks and anti lockdown, yet tweets:

In order to stop it being ‘The End’ it is probably time to realise that every movement is ultimately used against itself, whether its agent provocateurs creating trouble to allow martial law or as the Protocols stated back in 1800.

we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.


Communication; not division. We  can only succeed by communicating with people one-on-one and refusing to comply with orders, by sharing information and encouraging others to, by refusing to wear masks or adhere to lockdowns, by understanding that we do not need to protest or beg them not to do this to us – we simply need to not do it.

Non Compliance, its that simple!

This website hosts a leaflet campaign that now has over 300 communities around the UK actively talking to people and encouraging peaceful non compliance.

FB Group.


In 2014, an article revealed that the Georgia Guidestones had accidentally revealed a capstone which revealed the following.

This happened when someone reportedly ‘broke’ the original stone to reveal this.

The top says “MM” The Bottom says “JAM” The four sides show 20, 14, 8, and 16.
I believed that this date was pointing towards 14.8.20.

I think the breaking of the stone which revealed this new date was also symbolic of Zeus, as the story goes he fooled Cronus into believing he was inside that which Cronus swallowed but it was a stone.
Of course Zeus,s missus was Hera symbolised by rainbows and we have seen them a lot lately.
This event happened on the 25th September 2016. So that date is also significant.
Of course 28 days later from 14.8.20 its 9.11.
Strange that the film 28 days later which was about a virus, had athletes as the infected actors.
And the director was supposedly responsible for the Olympics ceremonies with all their obvious symbology and the athletic connection.
The Olympics being in honour of Zeus.

August 14th is also the most hated day by the Freemasons, they see it as the date that society turned against them when they were in danger of being exposed in 1826.
Of course the dates August 14 1826 can also be found in that code As MM = 8 so 1826 (drop the zero,  famous speech said by Christine Lagarde) and JAM is Judicie Anno Mundi. AKA Judgement day.

What is also interesting is that the man who infiltrated the freemasons was named William Morgan. So the MM could also be significant AND he was a stoneworker. He was jailed under trumped up charges, bailed out by the masons and never seen again. This was 11th Sept 1826.

Some time later, members of the Freemasons were charged with his disappearance, even though his body was not found,  they were given very lenient sentences.

 This writer expected a False Flag incident to occur on the 14th August and that the incident would be connected to what is occurring in the world today with the fake ‘pandemic’.

Sure enough that (F)alse (F)lag occurred in the form of (F)rozen (F)ood.

On the 14th August 2020, it was reported that a 41 yr old yoghurt salesperson in Guangdong province in China had been contaminated with CV19 from frozen food.

The article goes on to report 14 imported cases and 8 cases reported on that day. Claiming that the case had prompted a supermarket chain  to close all its  stores.

The article :

An article in China from the previous day claims that frozen Chicken and Shrimp are also positive for CV19.

Images from Olympic ceremonies:

The test is a manufacturing technique, and is NOT intended or well suited as an infection diagnostic tool.

 The test is called a RT PCR test – Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, invented by Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis in 1993.

 Its sole purpose is to replicate tiny DNA sequences millions and billions of times, through a process of amplification – in order to help with research.

 Mullis, who died last year, was VERY vocal during his lifetime that his test was NOT to be used as a diagnostic tool in detecting viruses – as the amplification process creates many integrity issues – and yet during the HIV crisis, it got commissioned for exactly that.

 If you read the  article below, you’ll see why this is a very contentious issue.

 Its made much worse by the fact the  virus HAS NOT been purified!

The gold standard for evaluating a virus and a test is to isolate a virus from all other matter, sequence it, and then make sure it passes the 4 Koch’s Postulates tests – eg that the purified virus when introduced to a non-infected person exhibits identified symptoms.

 None of this has been done. 

  Four of the most prominent research efforts on SARS CoV2 have all admitted that they have NOT purified the virus in their sequencing of the RNA, and that they have not fulfilled the Koch Postulates tests.


 The test uses a process of amplification – over 30x and the output is highly distorted and unreliable.

 There are serious noted false positive and consistency issues – eg result inconsistencies on the same patient!

 Positive and Negative results can be created by reducing or increasing the amplification.

 As the virus has not been purified, we are likely testing for debris too – other self, prior infected viruses and medical RNA make up the sequence being matched for! 

 As the virus itself has not been isolated, we’ve yet to prove clinically that it can induce the symptoms and infection.

As you can see it’s a bloody MESS!

 This is why we need to take positive cases and CV related deaths with a large pinch of salt.

 Data analysis from AdapNation and everywhere else relies on this unreliable data.

Bulgarian Pathology  Association show tests are meaningless:


The following was written by Andrew Johnson.

An Independent Investigation

COVID-19 Statistics

There are two fundamental points often ignored when referring to “the death toll from COVID-19.”

There is no evidence or proof offered by any scientist, pathologist, or virologist that confirms COVID-19 as the “cause” of death in the certification process.
An expanded definition of a “COVID-19 death” was enacted by the CDC on March 24th, to include probable cases. This conflates and clusters test results creating a source of both under and overestimation. “COVID-19 deaths are identified using a new ICD-10 code. When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death or when it is listed as a ‘probable’ or ‘presumed’ cause, it is coded as UO7.1 This can include cases with or without laboratory confirmation.” [emphasis added]
All deaths of patients with a linkage to COVID-19 are now classified as “COVID-19 deaths regardless of cause or underlying health issues that could have contributed to loss of life.” – Dr. Deborah Birx

So far we have:

– thousands wiped off covid deaths total due to counting anyone and everyone
– faulty tests with reports of unopened ones testing positive
– tests that don’t appear to be reliable at all and result in a high number of false positives
– reports of people getting positive results without having been tested
– now we have double counted tests being revised down

How much more will people put up with? Is there only a small number of us who are looking at this closely? Our entire futures, our freedom, our jobs, our right to travel, our right to congregate and to just be human are all being based on the dodgiest data imaginable and shaky/flaky science. Oh yes, and reports of Quarantine Centres being used to put anyone testing positive for the virus, as well as all members of the same household.


The sudden imposition of mask wearing in the UK and other countries is clearly a test to see how gullible and pliable the population has become.

In the UK we were told that we went past the CV19 peak whilst shopping in supermarkets with no required masking and the Covid 19 mortality rate went down for weeks on end.

Then the non essential shops opened without required masking and we were told the CV19 mortality rate went down for weeks on end.

Then the pubs and restaurants opened and we were told the CV19 mortality rates went down for weeks on end.

Then a rule about having to wear masks in supermarkets came along and the rates have gone up since. So at best the masks by their own definition are absolutely pointless, at worst they are linked to people getting more unwell by wearing them.

The Government is slowly chipping away at out liberty and freedom until without people realising it we will be enslaved by a totalitarian state. The Government is using psychological warfare on the masses to achieve their intentions.

The government has a department called the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) staffed with psychologists. Within SAGE there is a team called the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT). The intent of BIT is to change the behaviour of the masses with fear. BIT have stated that their intent is to ramp up the fear.

BIT understand human psychology and when people are fearful it lowers a persons’ consciousness. A person with lowered consciousness can easily be manipulated and controlled with suggestions to make behavioural changes. It is all about controlling the masses.


Norwegian Public Health Study :

Doctor and nurses discusses the futility of face masks :

Video showing unsanitary conditions of mask production : 


Posted by Jim Fine on Friday, 3 April 2020

This is now a part of related future socially engineered mind controlled programs to getting the docile conformist to comply with the unlawful regulations, and eventually compulsory vaccination.

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” 

 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

Denis Rancourt, PhD, has published over 100 peer-reviewed studies in his career, but ResearchGate choose to censor and remove this paper because it didn’t fit the narrative of the Great Panic of 2020 over COVID-19. Such censorship proves the existence of an alternative agenda. 

Again, this underscores the Technocrat methodology of shaming, ridiculing and censoring anybody that comes forth with real science that refutes their pseudo-science. ⁃ TN Editor

No study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public!

 Orange county in USA got rid of the mask mandate,we should follow suit. 

Well said

Posted by Eloc Cummings on Thursday, 23 July 2020

N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to.
Conclusion: if you’re in Tesco and the guy with Covid has N95 mask his covid breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Tesco (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out)

• Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are, CLOG these masks very very quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask with render it “useless” IF you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it, you become a walking virus dispenser. Every time you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non sterile environment”

By now hopefully you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything.  Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks health. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.

Ultimate Answer: N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.

The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. It’s filtration works on the exhale. (Like a vacuum bag it only works one way)

Cloth masks are WORSE than none.

The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work.

The government has betrayed us, the markets and the private sector have no reason to support ordinary people, quite the reverse, the legal system is not going to suddenly come to our aid, nor the police, who have been used time and again to stifle protest, not aid it. However you feel about it, we’re it.

The UK government has prostituted itself to the ‘free’ markets and private interests, and, as with the banking crisis, it is we, the public who get shafted. The least we can do is oppose, resist and expose.

Denis Rancourt, PhD, has published over 100 peer-reviewed studies in his career, but ResearchGate choose to censor and remove this paper because it didn’t fit the narrative of the Great Panic of 2020 over COVID-19. Such censorship proves the existence of an alternative agenda. 

Again, this underscores the Technocrat methodology of shaming, ridiculing and censoring anybody that comes forth with real science that refutes their pseudo-science. ⁃ TN Editor

Nobody knows anyone who has become unwell as a result of pubs and shops being open. But we are being threatened with a lockdown if we do not ‘obey the rules’. This is a war against us by the establishment.

When you see admissions and hospital deaths continuing to fall, and a government which is using faulty test results from healthy people which do not turn into hospital admissions to demonise ordinary people for daring to go out shopping and socialising…..there is something seriously wrong.

They are using ‘divide and rule’ tactics to split us into 2 groups. One group is fearful and believes the government.
They are being made to think that the other group (not fearful and just trying to enjoy life and do normal stuff) is the enemy. The fearful group will be persuaded to believe that people like me are causing the ‘spike in cases’, when it is down to increased testing and inaccurate tests.
This will turn into a ‘mask war’, when the ‘fearful’ group becomes convinced that anyone not wearing a mask is infected and dangerous.
This will allow them to keep increasing mask use everywhere, cracking down on dissenters and possibly throwing some of us into prison, as they are currently doing in other countries.
They will continue to wage war on all of us and make life as unbearable as possible, until the wondrous day when the miracle vaccine will come along to save us all from misery.

(Reminder: the virus has a survival rate of 99.8% so why are they so bothered about testing everyone?)

It’s called the Hegelian Dialectic – Problem, Reaction, Solution

Create a fake problem. Manufacture the reaction using the media and the Behavioural Insights Team. Introduce the pre-planned solution.

We are hurtling full speed towards totalitarianism.

Thanks to Dave Dewhurst for the following:

When the government decides that you now need to wear gloves to go on public transport and in supermarkets, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear goggles to go on public transport and in supermarkets, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear a face mask, gloves AND goggles, not only on public transport and in supermarkets, but in ALL public spaces, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear a face mask, gloves AND goggles, not only in public spaces, but in your own home as well, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to prove that you’re not an “asymptomatic carrier” (by being tested), in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need an “immunity passport”, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need “proof of vaccination”, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need a microchip in your arm, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
I guess the real question is: Is there ANY point at which you’re going to stop doing what the government tells you to do? Because until large enough numbers of people stop complying with all this nonsense, the government mandates are only going to keep getting more intrusive, more authoritarian and harder to roll back.
The “new normal” was never meant to be temporary, right from the very beginning of this manufactured crisis, it was always intended to go on indefinitely, as a means of stripping you of your freedom, privacy and autonomy, increment by increment.

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419.

Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05

bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267.

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016

Further studies :

No study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public!

We have launched a campaign to inform the public  with information questioning the official narrative of the “pandemic.”

You can request leaflets with this form:

How it works:
Firstly,the campaign will be run jointly on this website and on the FB group page. You can download various leaflets and posters from the FB ‘files’ section; print your own at home, send to printers for larger batches or request that we send you some from the campaigns own printed supply.
Both platforms will be used to show all contributions and costs and distributors, sponsors and campaign creators are urgently  needed to share  in every community.  (Please tell us if you’d like to be kept anonymous from these updates)

We have to be realistic, whilst the UK is getting primed for a ‘second wave’ and further lockdowns and restrictions by late summer Sept/Oct, we have a window of opportunity to enable us to inform our communities of facts that they may not be aware of, to make an informed decision on the authenticity of the claims being made by officials.

We encourage people to start their own more localised campaigns to spread the work load and to help bring maximum awareness, there is only a limited  amount of people that we can reach in the next few months, the job to inform is huge and needs your help. This is not someone else’s problem, this is something that will impact your life and that of your loved ones in a negative and devastating way if we do not take action.

For this reason the campaign is relying on many people downloading the link and printing their own leaflets to share or having access to a decently priced online printer which we believe we have found with Nectarine printers.

They will print 5000 leaflets for £72. The larger orders get a better deal.

The World Health Organisation, Gates Foundation and other players are behind a disinformation campaign. It is imperative that concerned citizens are willing to counter-act the false information and share facts with their community.
The leaflet campaign  has enabled us to produce leaflets for those who may not have the ability or means to create their own leaflets.
We urge those who have the means to print the leaflet themselves, to do so as this is a time for us all to take responsibility for our future and that of our children and grandchildren.
It is clear that those who we need to reach are members of the public who are sceptical yet unaware of all the facts.
We can send leaflets for FREE to those with no funds or no means of getting any printed, via the generous donations of others, you can help with these donations by using this email address via paypal.

A small contribution will cover the cost of printing and posting. If you can afford to put a bit more in then this will help to cover the free leaflets. Everything is transparent and public and carried out by trusted individuals with a track record for campaigns such as this.

This website has a 5G Mass Action Campaign running which has been up and running since March 2018, all details and contributions can be found within this site and it is openly visible on the FB group also.

The link to the FB group for CV Facts Not Fear :

A link to the printable leaflets:

What can you do?

Share links with others, start your own campaign using our leaflets and online printers, sponsor leaflets, be part of a distribution network to get more leaflets out to the public, inform as many people of the campaign as possible, be willing to go out into the community with leaflets.

If you are not comfortable talking to the public, it has been suggested that you could put them in libraries which recently re-opened (even if only as a skeleton service) + cafes, pubs and other businesses and anywhere with public noticeboards/display areas for leaflets,  and of course we can also hand them to people directly (after first asking if they’d be interested to find out what the government and corporate controlled msm aren’t telling them.

We hope that others see the urgency of the campaign and act accordingly, YOU are the person you have been waiting for.If you want some flyers to hand out please contact the FB page or email this website.To give you an idea of how much a batch of 300 costs to print and package and post its around £8

The following are fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates

These are the links that have been shown on the leaflet for further info:


CV Facts Not Fear Campaign advertised on David Icke website.


Updates from the campaign: 

Campaign begins 4th July 2020.

So far we’ve received very generous contributions from the following people:£50 from Tasha Krett £40 from Nic Treadwell  £10 from Dave Dewhurst   £25 from Karen Georgeson  £5 from J C Silvester £5 from Lee Stead £10 from Andy Collier Total in the fund is £145

Another £5 from Andy Collier £20 from Steven Stephen Phillips £20 from Judith Crawford £50 from Kath Holdsworth  Bringing the campaign fund total to £235. 

5th July 2020
£20 from David Lawrence £10 from Gaynor Morse £30 from Patricia Kempa
£10 from Marie Pearce  £8 from Sinead Dawes £15 from Jane Janie Chichester £10 from Alan Dean £40 from Jill Kirkwood £20 from Lee Stead
£10 from Sarah Foster £15 from Dan Doe
Wow guys we’re up to £423
6th July 2020
£423 was in the fund at last update.
£30 from Robert Williams £8 from Emma Emz Lockett
£342.50 spent on 25,000 double sided A5 fliers
Total now in the PayPal account: £118.50.
Campaign update #5
7th July 2020
£118.50 was in the fund at last update…
£8 from Emz Lockett
£15 from Margaret e Wyllie
£20 from Nykii Day
£10 from Steve Hopley
£20 from Colleen Waters
£8 from Tina M McNamara
£10 from Tina Voller
Total now in the fund: £209.50
Campaign update #6
8th July 2020
£209.50 was in the fund at last update…
£20 from Robert Williams
£12 from Tina Dyer
Total now in the fund: £241.50

Campaign update #7

9th July 2020

£241.50 was in the fund at last update

£10 from R Meroza

£30 from Lee Stead

Total now in the fund is £281.50

Update #8

11th July 2020

£281.50 at last update

£50 from a very generous anonymous supporter

Now we have £331.50 in the fund!

Update #9

15th July 2020

£331.50 was in the fund at last update

Some VERY generous donations have come in recently!

£100 from Connie Walters

£8.60 from Angie Mulroy

£60 from John Sherwood

Ann Marie Carey has spent £56.95 and £118.84 (see her posts)

Total now in the fund £324.31 

Update #10

15th July 2020

More amazingly generous donations into the campaign fund today!

£72 from Kaoru Aramaki

£17.40 from Sean P Maguire – great radio show mate!

£30 from Sinead A Gogarty

£8 from Jo Silvester (have I tagged the right person?)

Second batch of 25,000 leaflets ordered today costing £332.50

Total left in the fund is now £119.21

Update #11

16th July 2020

£119.21 was in the fund at last update

 Annie  spent £40.20 (See her post from earlier today regarding postage)

Generous campaign sponsorships from the following amazing people:

£30 Joanne Boddington

£10 Eleri Potter

£10 John Thacker

£8 Joy Stockley

£10 Nick Turner

£20 Theresa Phillips

£167.01 is now in the campaign fund

Update #12

17th July 2020

£167.01 was in the fund yesterday

The campaign has received the following generous contributions today:

£20 from Adam Coleman

£15 from Intbel

£30 from Denny Berfield

Annie has spent another £29.65 on postage today

so there’s now £202.36 in the fund.

Update #13

20th July 2020

£202.36 was in the fund at last update

More generous donations from the following amazing team members:

£20 from Helena Eagles

£15 from Elena Mari

£15 from Claire Staples

£10 from AnuskaLuana Cinnamom

£15 from Janice Jacobs

£20 from Karen Green

£10 from Peter Cooke

£200 from Deliah Roth 

Bringing the campaign fund total to £507.36

Update #14

22nd July 2020

£507.36 was in the fund at last update

£7 from Cain Milburn

£10 from Corrine Edwards

£20 from Liz Keaney

£20 from Janis Roantree

£10 from Sarah West

£16 from Karen Rankin

£15 from Mark Philips

£20 from Maureen Hillier

£20 from Simon Piper

Bringing the campaign total to: £645.36

Update #15

26th July 2020

£645.36 was in the fund at last update

£15 from Claire Storch

£10 from Lisette Chesshire

£6 from Bez Catt Lee

£10 from Joanne Haynes

£15 from Rebecca Kane

£10 from Anonymous this morning

£30 from Christine Houghton

£30 from Janet Godfrey

Tina Dyer has spent £227.10 so far on postage and envelopes etc (see her postage updates)

Campaign total is now £544.26

Update #16

2nd August 2020

Apologies that it’s been so long since the last update I’ve had an extremely hectic week 

£544.26 was in the fund at last update

£100 from Anonymous

£10 from Ian Swirles

£10 from Chrissie Richardson

£25 from Pc Murphy

£20 from Andrea West

£10 from Jason Green

£10 from Daniel Thomas

£8 from Julie Croley

£30 from Margaret Sherwood

£10 from Lillian Potter

Tina Dyer has spent £77.19 on postage

3rd batch of 25 thousand leaflets has been ordered costing £332.50

Total now in the fund is £367.57

Update #17

6th August 2020

£367.57 was in the fund at last update

£10 from Lynne Barrett

£20 from Ruth Acaster

£10 from Rita Anna Carter

£20 from Steev Filleepz

£10 from Glen Allen

We’ve just ordered the 4th batch of 25 thousand leaflets which cost £332.50 so the total in the campaign fund pot is now £105.07

otal now in the fund is £367.57 



Update #18

10th August 2020

£105.07 was in the fund at last update

We’ve had a massively generous donation of £333 which covers an entire batch of 25 thousand leaflets which is absolutely amazing! from Kaoru Aramaki

and many more very generous donations from the following good people:

£30 from Nic Treadwell

£10 from Sheila Forde

£20 from Heather Kirkup

£5 from Rebecca Mackay

2 more donations are “on hold” on paypal as they weren’t sent as family and friends – Hopefully they will re-send them as family and friends which will save on fees and also land firmly in the account – These will be included in the next update when this gets sorted

Total now in the fund £503.07

Update #19

13th August 2020

£503.07 was in fund at last update

Tina Dyer was spent £361.22 posting out the last lot of leaflets

New donations and sponsorship money from the following good people:

£10 from Angela Peacock

£10 from Zed

£10 from Nick D

£15 from James Light

£25 from Dominique Anderson

£20 from Tammy Wadmore

Total now in fund is £231.85

Update #20

17th August 2020

£251.85 was in the fund at last update

I spent £102.30 today on postage.

33 packages @ £3.10 is £102.30

Total now in the campaign fund is £195.55

Update #20

17th August 2020

£251.85 was in the fund at last update

 £102.30 today on postage

33 packages @ £3.10 is £102.30

£10 in from Heather Doyle

£8 from James Bray

£10 from Kevin Butler

£8 from Frideborg Eddy

£10 from Di Coley

Total now in the campaign fund is £195.55

Update #21

18th August 2020

£195.55 was in the fund yesterday

 1 package of 1000 leaflets to George Sandhu costing £8.90 and

20 packages of 300 leaflets at £3.10 

Total cost today £70.90

Kind donations from the following people:

£10 from Tracey Harris

£8 from Vesna Petar

£30 from Keely Spicer

£30 from George Sandhu

Total in the fund is now £202.65


Update #22

19th August 2020

£202.65 was in the fund yesterday

£10 in from Ness Del Rio

Another amazing sponsorship of £333 from K.A Thank you so much! 

£30 from Steve Canning

£10 from Maureen Raybould

Total now in the fund is £585.65

Update #23
25th August 2020
£585.65 was in the fund at last update
 £332.50 on the 5th batch of 25 thousand leaflets  £86.80 at the post office.
Kind donations from the following good people:
£30 from Sarah Lindsay
£30 from anonymous
£8 from Peter Cooke
£20 from Heather Kirkup
£10 from Emilia Cole
Total now in the campaign fund is £272.35

Doctors are starting to speak out – anonymously, at the risk of losing their jobs. This is an absolute scandal. Locking down an entire city on the basis of absolutely nothing.

“I’m a doctor at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust. Many of my colleagues are angry and confused about what is happening nationally and particularly in Leicester and Leicestershire. We are reminded daily that we are not allowed to speak to journalists or on social media, which is why I am stringently anonymous and more vague than I’d like to be here. I love being a doctor, and I risk suspension for speaking out.

I’m going to use Public Health England’s own numbers for this analysis (found here) and I’m going to explain why I think the conclusions they (and the politicians) have drawn are wrong.”

Dr Q goes on to explain that there is no evidence of any increase in the rate of infection in Leicester based on Pillar 1 data – tests administered to inpatients by hospital staff.

“By May, positive cases averaged around 10 a day and deaths were continuing to fall. In late May, we started swabbing every single admission to the hospitals, and this is where things get interesting.

I work in a department that isn’t respiratory medicine.

This means that the patients who are in our area are there for other health issues that are not caused by COVID-19 (think surgery or mental health).

Of those we swabbed, just 1% tested positive and all of them were asymptomatic. That rate has been steady since May 23rd. I believe that our patients are representative of the rate in the UK population and, for what it’s worth, it’s the same story in Manchester, Leeds and Guildford, where I’ve been comparing notes with colleagues.

Unpublished data shared on an open forum from Leeds, Manchester, Sussex also confirms this – 1%, all asymptomatic when testing positive. These patients have, almost without exception, not developed any symptoms, although some have had household members with a cough.
So why the panic? Pillar 2 data. But there’s a problem with Pillar 2 data.

The point of “Lockdown” has always been to ‘flatten the curve’ in order to ‘Protect the NHS’. Given we were coping on March 31st, when we had nearly ten times the number of positive cases in hospitals, with relatively little access to testing, we are certainly coping now.

The issue and alleged cause of the “Local Lockdown” is our Pillar 2 numbers. These are the community tests outsourced to private companies. There is no guarantee that these tests are all taken from different people (unlike the Pillar 1 data, which is cross checked against a unique patient identifier). In fact, the Government accepts that the number of Pillar 2 cases is not the same as the number of people with COVID-19 because Pillar 2 data includes people who’ve been tested more than once – often because they have to re-test before they’re allowed back to work.”

In other words, the “evidence” that cases are increasing at a dangerous rate in Leicester – or were, since even the Government acknowledges that even Pillar 2 data show the number of cases is falling now – is unreliable. And Dr Q doesn’t even get into the problem of false positives with PCR tests.

Dr Q points out that even if we decide to accept the Pillar 2 data at face value it shows the average age of all these newly infected people is 39, so there’s almost zero risk of them dying from COVID-19 anyway. And he/she highlights the sheer lunacy of closing schools, given that almost no children have died of COVID-19 across the United Kingdom.

The first WHO Global Pandemic Preparedness report submitted in Sept 2019 was the result of a joint venture by WHO the former Director General of the WHO, Gro Harlem Brundtland, former PM of Norway.

The report was sponsored by WHO and the World bank who had co-convened the GPP board to follow on from  a UN based project after Ebola.

Its monitoring board members includes Fauci, Gates Foundation, Chinese CDC and Wellcome Trust. The goals of the Board are to:
• assess the world’s ability to protect itself from health emergencies
• identify critical gaps to preparedness across multiple perspectives;
• advocate for preparedness activities with national and international leaders and decision-makers.

The WHO and World bank plan encouraged countries to have a cost effective plan for a pandemic at the ready by July 2019.  That was acted upon by  59 countries who submitted a National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).

This preparedness plan was to begin from Sept 2019 and to end  Sept 2020 which also included instructions to hold two simulation exercises, one would involve a lethal pathogen that causes a global pandemic.

The progress report requires that a UN and WHO two system  wide training and simulation exercises should  take place, one of which is the release of a respiratory pathogen that causes a pandemic!

Which countries took part? Which departments were costed? How much  did each country cost a pandemic at and for what period of time did the ‘costed’ pandemic cover?  If this global pandemic plan  began in Sept 2019, when did it stop? What happened between the start of the exercise  and the WHO declaration on the 31st December? Which actions were already taken?

There is evidence that the NHS organisations  were aware of the requirement for plans to respond to a disease outbreak in February 2019

The WHO Simulation Exercise manual from 2017 states that during these sort of global exercises, they involve table top exercises such as the ones performed by the Event 201 team in New York, again, the same members of the Global Pandemic Monitoring Board attended this event, including the Chinese CDC Director-General.

Did the pandemic exercise also include a pathogen from China that causes a pandemic?
Where were the origins of the global exercise?
If the pandemic exercise began in September 2019, does this mean that the table top exercise (written about in the WHO manual, which occurs before a live event) was Event 201?

According to the WHO Simulation Exercise Manual, the table top exercises are to inform members of the preparedness community ( Event 201 states this as the purpose of the table top exercise) who can then follow with real live full scale exercises that include the use of hospitals, media broadcasts, actors, organisations, govts and others.

Event 201:

Does this mean that our govts  were involved in a global exercise for preparedness, who were the preparedness community that the Event 201 claims to be informing?  

What transpires is that the Chinese CDC and others  were chosen to be on the monitoring board of a group calling for a global pandemic exercise. Co-convened  by WHO and the World Bank, who planned to create a UN and WHO global exercise to test how each country would cope in a pandemic. WHO wrote the manual for a simulation exercise in 2017. Another was written in 2018.

That pandemic exercise plan covered in the WHO manual included the requirement to hold a table top event prior to the simulation.

And here we have the Event 201, with all the SAME people on the monitoring board involved, advertising itself as tool to inform the policy and monitoring community.

But they ARE the members of the monitoring board …So the table top exercises were part of the global preparedness simulation.

How many people are aware that  many countries had a cost effective plan already in place in case of a pandemic just 6 months prior?
How does the plan compare to the pandemic?
Are the hospitals involved in the ‘cost’ effective plans for a pandemic the same hospitals as those involved now?

Why are we not calling for  an investigation into why those making claims of a pandemic, whilst running live exercises of a pandemic will profit financially from a pandemic?

Is there any evidence of extra funding for a pandemic PRIOR to the announcement of one?

In the US, the office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response under the Dept of Health and Human Services was given an extra budget of $722 million, giving them a budget of $2.2 Billion for FY 2019.

The job of this dept is to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness. This included $145 million more than the 2018 budget to provide medical counter measures that address pandemic and emerging diseases.
And $138 million above the 2018 budget, to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness.

Budgeting extra for a pandemic before it happens,  was that for the pandemic exercise?

The Monitoring board pushes the vaccine agenda.…/GPMB%20Statement%20-%20Global%20Vacc…

The WHO Simulation Manual.…/WHO-WHE-CPI-2017.10-eng.pdf;sequence…

The framework for the global monitoring board was created by Harvard Global health Institute and the chosen reviewers include CDC, In-Q-tel (A CIA created company) HHS, World Economic Forum, John Hopkins centre,WHO and various universities.

This report claims that China has a response system for pandemic preparedness in place that has been approved by WHO.  

Public health systems. As a first step, China’s government established the necessary legal and regulatory infrastructures for preparedness activities. The resulting national system comprises of (1) a public health emergency command center to coordinate activities at the national, provincial, prefecture, and city levels with external organizations and other countries in the region (2) a nationwide reporting network for reporting infectious
diseases and public health events (3) a nationwide pathogen laboratory network and (4) an emergency medical rescue team. This national system responds to both infectious disease outbreaks and other public health
emergencies through 37 emergency medical teams distributed throughout China’s 23 provinces. In December 2016, the Shanghai team was certified using the WHO Global Emergency Medical Team processes and checklists for deployment ready teams.

Lucky it started in China then?

Monitoring will be essential because it will provide regular reports on the status of the world’s ability to reduce and respond to pandemic risk.
Because the monitoring will generate objective information, the results should provide a substantial incentive to governments, the private sector, and international organizations to sustain momentum on improving health security.
The monitoring project will be needed until such a time when:
• All countries have robust public health capacities that comply with IHR and meet OIE standards;
• Competent official agencies regularly analyse risks that weak public health capacities pose to economies and actively engage in reducing these risks;
• International organisations are positioned to rapidly and effectively support countries during major disease outbreaks and to foster development of countries’ public health capacities; and
• Diagnostics, drugs, and vaccines for new diseases are available to mitigate the spread of contagion and its impacts on economies, communities, and public health.

And from this framework on global risk assessment and the call for a monitoring committee, came the  Global Prepardness Pandemic Monitoring Committee.


The Chinese are members of the monitoring board for pandemic preparedness, have taken part in what appears to be a table top exercise for a global pandemic preparedness exercise which occurs prior to the live event, have been approved with certification from WHO to be at the forefront of a global preparedness plan. They work with the  Gates Foundation and with US pharmaceutical companies as well as working with UN on its sustainable goals.

The EU,s biggest funding body for research to implement the Smart agenda, Horizon 2020, have been involved in joint projects with China and the EU countries since 2018 with a funding budget of 100 Million Euro.

China works closely with the UN and showcased the UN during the Wuhan military games just prior to the ‘proclaimed’ pandemic.

During the military games in Wuhan that clearly paid homage to the UN, there was also another high level meeting that took place.


The EIOS system builds on a long-standing collaboration between WHO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) to develop a system for public health intelligence and responds to the need for a global initiative to bring together PHI efforts.

In September 2017, WHO accepted leadership of EIOS under the Health Emergencies Programme (WHE) with a governance structure involving multiple stakeholders. The Coordination Group is made up of twelve organizations, networks, and government bodies who serve two-year terms.

EIOS picked up the first article reporting on a cluster of pneumonia in Wuhan at 03:18am (UTC) on December 31st 2019. By the end of March, the EIOS system was collating up to 228,000 articles per day related to the outbreak, helping to sort through this information and making it available it to experts across the globe. Since the start of the outbreak, members of the EIOS community have been working on additions to the system to help manage the unprecedented volume of articles by looking at improved ways to filter, contextualize and visualize all of the content coming in.

This shows that the WHO is directly linked to the information being shared globally.

The EIOS system builds on a long-standing collaboration between WHO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) to develop a system for public health intelligence and responds to the need for a global initiative to bring together PHI efforts.

JRC is the European Commission’s science and knowledge service.

At a more international level, the JRC and the US reinforced their cooperation through several cooperation agreements to facilitate the way towards compatible standards across both sides of the Atlantic  and explored which role the EU and the US could play in the development of Smart Grids, intelligent electricity systems, and Smart Cities, efficiently organised cities based on integrated management, active citizen participation and integration of ICT systems.

JRC researchers analysed the geographic spread of the virus as well as the age and gender of the patients in view of informing the measures for gradually reopening the EU.

To help reach the objectives of the Coronavirus Global Response, approximately EUR 1 billion will be mobilised under Horizon 2020 to accelerate access to COVID-19 vaccines, medicines and tests.

The European Commission is heavily involved in research and the pushing of vaccines.They have daily updates that are followed by the international community. The update below is from June 2020.

ECDC warned against the lifting of community physical distancing and other IPC measures, as together with testing and contact tracing, they are the most important approach for controlling the spread of COVID-19 in all settings, including during travel.

Overall, following the self assessment and the external assessment process the UK has demonstrated a strong baseline position across all Action Packages. One of the key areas of strength identified in the UK is the cross Government and organizational coordination
and response. The UK will be a good resource for ideas on how to navigate some of the challenges to true implementation of the “One Health” concept in other countries. This was particularly well demonstrated within the AMR and Zoonotic disease Action Packages.
The UK has a well-practiced system of response to real outbreaks and testing the systems through simulation exercises. Few countries have this degree of experience and number of targeted exercises which serve to fine tune the system.

Which targeted exercises and simulations involving health care?

The UK has been a leading player in the preparatory work on the
WHO Global Action Plan on AMR. The Global Action Plan is a “one health” approach,

The Global Action Plan was developed in response to a request made by the Heads of Government of Germany, Ghana and Norway – and later the United Nations Secretary-General – requesting that the Director-General of WHO and heads of other multilateral agencies streamline their collaboration and develop a Global Action Plan.

The Global Action Plan broadly complements the United Nations System-wide Strategic Document, which describes the work of the United Nations Development System as a whole to support implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The Global Action Plan was  launched on September 24, 2019 on the side-lines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

The Global Action Plan was launched to coincide with the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage and the United Nations General Assembly in September 2019.

Who are the signatory agencies to the Global Action Plan?

  • The 12 signatory agencies to the Global Action Plan are Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Financing Facility, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank Group, World Food Program and World Health Organization. Together, these agencies work to address all targets in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)  and many other health-related SDG targets.

Global Health Security Index 

The GHS Index is a project of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHU) and was developed with The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).The Index was published in October, 2019, and analyses the readiness of the world’s countries to combat pandemics

The Global Health Security (GHS) Index is the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across the 195 countries that make up the States Parties to the International Health Regulations (IHR [2005]).  These organisations believe that, over time, the GHS Index will spur measurable changes in national health security and improve international capability to address one of the world’s most omnipresent risks: infectious disease outbreaks that can lead to international epidemics and pandemics.

GHS created 140 questions for countries’ capacities, whether a capacity exists and where it is  and also whether that capacity is regularly—for example, annually—tested and shown to be functional in exercises or real-world events.

The GHS Index, NTI, JHU, and the EIU project team— was made possible with  grants from the Open Philanthropy Project, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Robertson Foundation.

We also have the Global Health Security Agenda whose  permanent adviser is WHO.

The GHSA is governed by a Steering Group comprised of approximately 15 countries, international organisations, and/or non-governmental stakeholders. The primary role of the Steering Group is to provide strategic guidance and direction, including identifying overall GHSA priorities, tracking of progress and commitments, and facilitation of target-driven multi-sectoral coordination and communication among GHSA members.

Permanent Steering Group Members (2019 – 2023)

Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Korea, Senegal, Thailand, United States, GHSA Consortium (GHSAC), Private Sector Round Table (PSRT)

Rotating Steering Group Members (2019 – 2020)

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, World Bank.

The GHSA mandate on Immunisation.


This Action Package seeks to attain effective protection through achievement and maintenance of immunisation against measles and other epidemic-prone VPDs.


  • Maintain high vaccination coverage rates and improve optimal vaccination rates where needed
  • Strengthen systems for the safety management of adverse effects from vaccinations
  • Identify and target immunization to populations at risk of epidemic-prone VPDs of national importance and create a priority list of high-risk regions and populations in order to provide vaccinations to VPD endemic areas
  • Strengthen systems for VPD prevention and control, such as outbreak response immunization, case-based surveillance system, and access to a laboratory in a VPD laboratory network for diagnostic confirmation
  • Conduct routine or supplementary immunization activities for addressing immunity gaps for measles


Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Korea, United States

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Health Organization (WHO), World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)

According to Australia,s Action Plan For Health Security 2019 to 2023,  they and 195 other countries are part of a legally binding agreement called  International Health Regulations (2005)  including all WHO Member States.

The IHR was adopted at the 58th World Health Assembly in May 2005,
and subsequently entered into force on 15 June 2007.
The purpose and scope of the IHR are:

“to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade”.

International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation

The Framework was developed in 2016, in collaboration with related initiatives such as the Global Health Security Agenda.

  • The remaining three components of the Framework consist of:
     Annual Reporting to the World Health Assembly (mandatory):
  • Simulation Exercises:
  • After-action Review:           

A major component of the NAPHS is establishing an interoperable, interconnected electronic disease surveillance system for both human and animal sectors, coordinated at the national level and incorporating an outbreak management system.develop a Costed National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).$File/Aust-Nat-Action-Plan-Health-Security-2019-2023.pdf

The NAPHS was created with multi-sectoral engagement with involvement of International Partners including the World Health Organization (WHO), United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC), USAID.

High-level attention, risk assessment, resources, and strategic planning by  The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

All the countries signed up to the WHO National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS) are also obliged to take part in simulations.

In US, The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), which maintains the U.S. International Health regulations (IHR) NFP and performs the required monitoring and evaluation of U.S compliance with the IHR, led the development of the National Action Plan.

( This is the department mentioned in this article above which was given an  extra budget of $722 million for 2019, giving them a budget of $2.2 Billion for FY 2019.)

The job of this dept is to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness.

The following is the initial follow-up process and timeline for the implementation of the National Action Plan:
• Beginning of the federal monitoring and evaluation process for the United States Health Security National Action Plan – November 2018.
• First interagency comprehensive National Action Plan Review and Progress Report Meeting – January 2019
• Online publication of the 2018 National Action Plan Progress Report and publication of a revised National Action Plan (if needed) – February 2019.
• Second biannual IHR Working Group Action Item Review Meeting – July 2019.
This annual schedule of activities iterates until the second JEE of the United States, tentatively planned for mid-2021.

This is from the WHO 2018 Influenza Pandemic simulation exercise manual.

And here is the simulation plan. Created in advance.

Sounds rather familiar!

Describing the development, spread and impact of the fictitious influenza pandemic will add depth and realism to the exercise, as well as events for participants to respond to.

Global pandemic phases: Changes in the severity of the global pandemic phases can be used in a scenario to stimulate discussion, trigger potential preparedness actions and add international context.

The WHO global pandemic phases describe the spread of the pandemic influenza virus around the world, and will be used by WHO to communicate the global pandemic situation.
The global pandemic phase will be based on WHO risk assessments performed on virological, epidemiological and clinical data collected internationally. Currently, there are four WHO global
pandemic phases (1):
ƒ interpandemic – the period between influenza pandemics;
ƒ alert – influenza caused by a new subtype has been identified in humans; therefore, increased vigilance and careful risk assessment will be initiated at local, national and global levels;
ƒ pandemic – global spread of human influenza caused by a new subtype, determined through global surveillance; and
ƒ transition – reduction of assessed global risk, de-escalation of global actions and reduction in response activities or movement towards recovery.

The ‘ demands’ of the NHS health care system during this pandemic in the UK  were put into the hands of Palantir.

Palantir is a US data mining company that cut its teeth working for the Pentagon and the CIA in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Palantir had 10% of their workforce work within the NHS government data project to predict surges in the NHS demands during the CV19 pandemic from  which the company  earned one pound, despite the costs of wages for the workforce.

This gave the CIA created company the ability to inform the public of the severity by reporting back to the WHO.

For full disclosure of the links to Palantir,  the PM and Dominic Cummings  read my research article here.

Now we can see why?

WHO 2018 Simulation Preparedness Report: