Walmart patented for robot bees last year.

Discussing the feasibility of using drone-bees in large scale pollination, David Goulson, professor of biology at the University of Sussex and founder of the Bumblebee Conservation Trust in the United Kingdom, wrote a blog post last year. His back-of-the-envelope calculation revealed that if it cost just a single penny to build a single drone-bee (which is a ridiculously impossible assumption), it would cost £32 billion ($45 billion) to replace every honey bee in the world. He wrote:

While I can see the intellectual interest in trying to create robotic bees, I would argue that it is exceedingly unlikely that we could ever produce something as cheap or as effective as bees themselves… Consider just the numbers; there are roughly 80 million honeybee hives in the world, each containing perhaps 40,000 bees through the spring and summer. That adds up to 3.2 trillion bees. They feed themselves for free, breed for free, and even give us honey as a bonus. What would the cost be of replacing them with robots?

Supporting actual pollinators would be a more viable long term solution.

Bee populations are being decimated, undoubtedly through human action, and things have reached a point where whole species of bee are likely to be added to the endangered list. How could this be happening?

Bees know which flowers to pollinate and when. They stay with one species at a time so the pollen actually is the right pollen to fertilise the flower. Bees remember where flowers are and can communicate it to other bees. They also make honey and wax.

For many decades, research results showing that the natural electrical and magnetic fields and their variation are a vital precondition for the orientation and navigation of a whole range of animals, have been freely available. What has also been known to science for many decades is that we as humans depend on this natural environment for many of our vital functions. Today, however, this natural information and functional system of humans, animals and plants has been superimposed by an unprecedented dense and energetic mesh of artificial magnetic, electrical and electromagnetic fields, generated by numerous mobile radio and wireless communication technologies. The consequences of this development have also been predicted by the critics for many decades and can now no longer be ignored. Bees and other insects disappear, birds avoid certain areas and are disoriented in other locations. Humans suffer from functional disorders and diseases. And those that are hereditary are passed on to the next generation as existing defects.

Bees, Birds and Mankind, Destroying nature by electrosmog by Ulrich Warnke

The Birds, the Bees and Electromagnetic Pollution Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy May 2009

Robert O. Becker, M.D., in his book “Crosscurrents: The Perils of Electropollution” said:

“GWEN is a superb system, in combination with cyclotron resonance, for producing behavioral alterations in the civilian population. The average strength of the steady geomagnetic field varies from place to place across the United States. Therefore, if one wished to resonate a specific ion in living things in a specific locality, one would require a specific frequency for that location. The spacing of GWEN transmitters 200 miles apart across the United States would allow such specific frequencies to be ‘tailored’ to the geomagnetic-field strength in each GWEN area.”

The bees seem to be playing the role that canary birds had in the mines, warning us of impending disaster. These insects, by their unprecedented behaviour of flying off without returning to their hives, show us that something insidious is going on.

At Cornell Univ. honeybees in a hive relocated into a new building became disoriented. After extensive research ruled out other causes, someone noticed the hive was next to the building’s electric transformer. The bees were confused by 60 hz magnetism strong enough to interfere with homing and communication to gather nectar and pollen. (

Before we had all of the electro-pollution, animals could simply orient themselves to the earths electromagnetic signature. Additionally animals could store into memory at a subconscious level the discrete signatures of subtle variations in electromagnetic signalling from various regions.

So who are Walmart?

The World,s biggest corporation with 5 family members, the Walton,s classed as 5 of the 10 richest people in the world!

S.Robson Walmart is ranked number 1.

The founder of Walmart, Sam Walton worked for the US Military and was in charge (chief) over the last functioning internment camps in the United States.

He named the stores Walmart, look at the name Walmart = Martial Law backwards.

And as we know many Walmart stores closed down at short notice.
They are built like a cinder block prison, few windows, anti-ramming vehicle barricades at the front door, surrounded by dozens of cameras
Walmart did not just grow organically as some great corporate idea, they received billions of dollars that built them up as Walton worked for the CIA.

The Masonic Lodge is very connected to Walmart, the Walmart slogan is “Save Money Live Better” copied from the Masonic Lodge Slogan “Masons Live Better.” 

Walmart has been involved with Homeland Security for many years, a document shows they have been partners since 2001. Walmart top executives are the private sector partners.

Walmart were the first corporation to use pin hole facial recognition cameras in stores at the entrances and exits and they share data with the Federal Govt.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the expansion of the Department’s national “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country.

Humans and bees are affected by electromagnetic frequencies, how long before the robot bees are joined by robot humans? Well someone has to do the dirty work for those behind this destructive agenda!

The rollout of the 5G telecommunications network is being stalled by at least two years over legal wrangling about the control of millions of lampposts, the Guardian can reveal.

Lampposts have suddenly become hot property because 5G requires the installation of transmitters on a dense network of masts taller than a double-decker bus. As a result, mobile network operators (MNOs) are clamouring for access to lampposts and other tall structures in cities, and are threatening legal action to any local authorities or landlords who stand in their way.

Full Article :

Guo L, Lin JJ, Xue YZ, An GZ, Zhang JP, Zhang KY, He W, Wang H, Li W, Ding GR. Effects of 220 MHz
Pulsed Modulated Radiofrequency Field on the Sperm Quality in Rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019
Apr 10;16(7). pii: E1286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071286.

Under some occupational conditions, workers are inevitably exposed to high-intensity radiofrequency (RF) fields.

In this study, we investigated the effects of one-month exposure to a 220 MHz pulsed modulated RF field at the power density of 50 W/m2 on the sperm quality in male adult rats.

The sperm quality was evaluated by measuring the number, abnormality and survival rate of sperm cells. The morphology of testis was examined by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The levels of secreting factors by Sertoli cells (SCs) and Leydig cells (LCs) were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The level of cleaved caspase 3 in the testis was detected by immunofluorescence staining. Finally, the expression levels of the apoptosis- related protein (caspase 3, BAX and BCL2) in the testis were assessed by Western blotting.

Compared with the sham group, the sperm quality in the RF group decreased significantly. The levels of secreting factors of SCs and the morphology of the testis showed an obvious change after RF exposure. The level of the secreting factor of LCs decreased significantly after RF exposure. The levels of cleaved caspase 3, caspase 3, and the BAX/BCL2 ratio in the testis increased markedly after RF exposure.

These data collectively suggested that under the present experimental conditions, 220 MHz pulsed modulated RF exposure could impair sperm
quality in rats, and the disruption of the secreting function of LCs and increased apoptosis of testis cells induced by the RF field might be accounted for by this damaging effect.

Note: This was not Wi-Fi because the signals were not modulated.

Gupta SK, Patel SK, Tomar MS, Singh SK, Mesharam MK, Krishnamurthy S. Long-term exposure of 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation induces stress and anxiety like behavior in rats. Neurochemistry
International. Publ. online Apr 4, 2019.

Long term exposure of electromagnetic radiations (EMR) from cell phones and Wi-Fi hold greater propensity to cause anxiety disorders. However, the studies investigating the effects of chronic exposure of EMR are limited.
Therefore, we investigated the effects of repeated exposure of discrete frequency of EMR in experimental animals.

Male rats were exposed to EMR (900, 1800 and 2450 MHz) for 28 (1 h/day) days. Long term exposure of EMR (2450 MHz) induced anxiety like behaviour. It deregulated the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal
(HPA) axis in rats as observed by increase in plasma corticosterone levels apart from decreased corticotrophin releasing hormone-2 (CRH-2) and Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression in amygdala. Further, it impaired
mitochondrial function and integrity. The expression of Bcl2 showed significant decrease while Bax and ratio of Bax: Bcl2 were increased in the mitochondria and vice versa in cytoplasm indicating altered regulation of
apoptosis. EMR exposure caused release of cytochrome-c and expression of caspase-9 ensuing activation of apoptotic cell death.

Additional set of experiments performed to estimate the pattern of cell death showed necrotic and apoptotic amygdalar cell death after EMR exposure. Histopathological studies also revealed a significant decrease in neuronal cells in amygdala. The above findings indicate that long-term exposure of EMR radiation (2450 MHz) acts as a stressor and induces anxiety-like behaviors with concomitant pathophysiological changes in EMR subjected rats.

Bystander effect (radiobiology) The radiation-induced bystander effect (bystander effect) is the phenomenon in which non irradiated cells exhibit irradiated effects as a result of signals received from nearby irradiated cells.

Direct and indirect effects of exposure to 900 MHz GSM RF EMF on CHO cell line:
Evidence of bystander effect by non-ionizing radiation
Jooyan N, Goliaei B, Bigdeli B, Faraji-Dana R, Zamani A, Entezami M, Mortazavi SMJ.

Direct and indirect effects of exposure to 900 MHz GSM radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on CHO cell line: Evidence of
bystander effect by non-ionizing radiation. Environ Res. 2019 Apr 1. pii: S0013-9351(19)30197-5. doi:

• Short-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted from mobile phones may cause genotoxic effects.
• RFR has both targeted and non-targeted effects on cells.
• RFR-induced non-targeted effects include bystander effect.
• The biological effects of RFR are possibly mediated by oxidative stress.
• Extracellular ROS can trigger molecular signals in non-targeted cells.
INTRODUCTION: The rapid rise in global concerns about the adverse health effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) generated by common devices such as mobile phones has prompted scientists to further investigate the biological effects of these environmental exposures.

Non-targeted effects (NTEs) are responses which do not need a direct exposure to be expressed and are particularly significant at low energy
radiations. Although NTEs of ionizing radiation are well documented, there are scarcely any studies on non- targeted responses such as bystander effect (BE) after exposure to non-ionizing radiation. The main goal of
this research is to study possible RFR-induced BE.

Pawlak R, Krawiec P, Żurek J. On Measuring Electromagnetic Fields in 5G Technology. IEEE Access. 7:
29826-29835. March 5, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902481

At the awakening of the new 5G network as the network of services, issues related to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) will become one of the key aspects for the cost-effective establishment of the 5G infrastructure.

The new 5G services will meet the rigorous demand for bandwidth through the implementation of a large number of densely located base stations operating in the millimeter-wave range. Introduction of new emission sources, working in parallel with already existing 2G/3G/4G mobile technologies, raises concerns about exceeding the admissible EMF exposure limits. This paper analyzes issues and challenges related to EMF measurements in 5G technology, which are crucial for the assessment of EMF compliance with regulatory limits. We point out that the existing methodologies, dedicated to EMF measurements in 2G, 3G, and 4G networks, are not suitable for 5G. The reason is the use of new techniques, such as massive MIMO and precise beamforming
together with higher frequency bands so that the existing measurement methods can lead to significantly overestimated results when they will be applied to 5G networks. Such results, in conjunction with the restrictive
legislation on the EMF limits that apply in some countries, may have the negative impact on 5G network deployment, making it difficult to achieve the intended 5G network capabilities.

We also propose an alternative method of EMF exposure assessment that is based on calculations and simulations and allows obtaining an accurate estimation of the EMF distribution in the 5G environment.

Open access paper:

This study shows both from measurements and computer modeling that the specific absorption rate (SAR) reduces by 10%–15% for every millimeter separation of the cell phone on account of rapidly diminishing EM fields in the near-field region of the cell phone antenna. This rapid reduction of SAR
depending on the antenna and its location on the handset has been shown, both computationally and experimentally, regardless of the phantom model such as a flat phantom suggested for SAR compliance testing of devices in contact with the body, for a sphere phantom, and for head-shaped models used for SAR compliance testing of cell phones.

Unfortunately, our observations in the past were based on SARs of only
three cell phones. Expecting that the SARs for cell phones may exceed the safety limits for body contact, cell phone manufacturers have started to recommend that the devices can be used at 5–25 mm from the body
even though it is difficult to see how to maintain this distance correctly under mobile conditions. The National Agency ANFR of France recently released the cell phone SAR test data for 450 cell phones that measure 10-g
SARs reducing by 10%–30% for each millimeter distal placement from the planar body phantom.

Their data corroborate our findings that most cell phones will exceed the safety guidelines when held against the body by factors of 1.6–3.7 times for the European/ICNIRP standard or by factors as high as 11 if 1-g SAR values were to be measured as required by the U.S. FCC.

Gandhi OP. Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When
Touching the Body.

IEEE Access. 7:47050-47052. Apr 11, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906017

Throughout many of the articles here on EMF Academy, I talk in depth about the dangers of WiFi, a form of EMF radiation. I often recommend setting up hardwired internet in your home or at your work as a great alternative to WiFi, but haven’t ever had a great guide to show you exactly how to set this up, until now.

Hardwired internet has benefits to your health, your privacy, and your security, not to mention the fact that you often achieve higher and more consistent internet speeds!

So, in this guide, I’m going to walk you step-by-step exactly how to setup wired internet in your home. I’ll show you the simple equipment you’ll need, where to get it, and exactly how to use it.

After I walk you through setting up your new wired internet, we’ll talk a little bit about why I think this is so important for just about everybody.

Let’s get started.

Full Article :