The Drosophila is the fruit fly, this simple insect has been instrumental in genetics research from 1910 when a man called Thomas Hunt Morgan and his wife began to research this fly and discovered its links to the human genes. The understanding of genes and the connections to the fact that genes are carried on chromosomes began the basis of heredity.

It also began the whole genetics research programs  that gave two top biologists the Nobel peace prize later on in 1995 when 27,000 mutant fly lines were established of which 139 mutations affecting embryo-genesis.

The fruit fly (Drosophila) has enabled the microbiologists to use fat stem cells, harvest them,activate them and return them into the body.

There is even a Drosophila library database website which keeps info on all genes called  Fly Base.

During the Olympics, references to genetics were apparent and shared in this article 

But it still  came as a shock to see how blatant was the message just days ago. I wondered how many would know the significance to the statue that has recently popped up on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar square.

The Fourth Plinth  Commission is led by the Mayor of London’s Culture Team.

 This statute appeared in July.

An Ice-cream with a cherry on top with a fly and a drone.

The name of this?

The End

And it does not get more obvious than that folks!

Thanks to the fly, they have perfected genetics (cream) and technology introducing drones and surveillance,  is the cherry on top that spells the end. 

The Olympic imagery has not been lost on many and even back then Boris Johnson was aware of the agenda.

Past Olympic ceremonies have been just as obvious in their imagery.

My article covered this subject.

So what are we to do when such ‘in your face’ imagery such as ‘The End’ is showcased?

People are flocking to join supposed, newly formed grass roots movements were protests and demo,s have been organised.

The problem is that no one is doing their due diligence to look at who these people fronting these movements are. 

At this stage it would be wise to mention this book. 

The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, published in 1897.

Despite controversy as to the authors  there is no doubt that what was written back then has taken place and that it is blue print for the future domination of all people.

The same book which Henry Ford in 1921 wrote that “the protocols are 16 yrs old and fit in with what is going on now.”

The book also discusses the successes they arranged for Darwinism,Marxism and Nietzsche-ism  amongst others. It states:

 Before us is a plan which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labor of many centuries brought to naught.”

In Protocol 111 entitled ‘Methods of Conquest’ is states,

We shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously in all of the countries of Europe” 


When the populace has seen that all sorts of concessions and indulgences are yielded it, in the same name of freedom it has imagined itself to be sovereign lord and has stormed its way to power, but naturally like every other blind man, it has come upon a host of stumbling blocks. It has rushed to find a guide, it has never had the sense to return to the former state and it has laid down its plenipotentiary powers at OUR feet.”
“Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave it the name of “Great”: the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.

Protocol XV111

“When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.
Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances.”

“This will give the pretext for domiciliary pre requisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from the number of the GOYIM police.”

Protocol XV

 When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the the aid of COUPS D’ETAT prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist.

It clearly is obvious that an agenda has been in place for centuries, an agenda which includes getting people  all over the world to take to the streets.

And as much as it feels good to be amongst like minded people and to be actively doing something as opposed to nothing, those who have set the agenda years ago openly discuss the need to get people onto the streets in protests. 

It stands to reason that they will have anticipated the public’s anger and would also make sure that they lead from the front.

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” ― Lenin 

 Some  of those who have put themselves into prominent positions to lead will be also joining forces with others who have managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the public in past campaigns.

A typical example is the man who has managed to steer the 5G campaign despite his background, links to agencies pushing 5G technologies and even links to the council he claims to be fighting in court


 The article above shows how easy it is for the govt to use the court system to their advantage, allowing a ‘savour’ type situation so as to  give credence to the chosen saviour.

Maybe it makes no difference to some that the multi millionaire  in the govt lockdown case trial  has chosen  Philiph Havers as his barrister.  The fact that the case is being paid for by the public who have been crowdfunded to the tune of  nearly a quarter of a million pounds, gives them the right to full disclosure. 

The case is ongoing.

The barristers father is the Lord High Chancellor of the UK.

The same barristers father man was on the war cabinet of the Thatcher govt.
His father was also involved in covering up paedophile cases.
The barrister who was chosen to save us is the son of Lord Michael Havers, who was the top legal man in the UK when Sir Jimmy Savile and his politician friends were reportedly raping and murdering children throughout the UK.
His father also tried to get the ripper off with a diminished responsibility plea.Sir Michael sent the innocent Guildford Four to jail.

Lord Havers, who later served briefly as lord chancellor, backed the decision of the director of public prosecutions not to prosecute Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and subscriber to the Paedophile Information Exchange. He was caught sending paedophile literature through the post.
He intervened three times between 1981 and 1983 to stop the investigation and exposure of Establishment paedophiles, and to prevent the publication of stories which showed that Establishment figures were members of the Paedophile Information Exchange.
Michael Havers, who was also Lord Chancellor (top legal man) at the time of the Kincora Boys Home child abuse cover-up.
Havers reportedly tried to silence ‘the child abuse whistleblower’ Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.

Havers’ sister, Baroness Butler-Sloss, headed the child abuse inquiry whose own brother played such a major role in the protection of Establishment paedophiles throughout the 1980s.
She chaired the inquest into the death of Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, but resigned when it was clear that she would not have full control over it because Dodi’s father won the right to a jury.

This is the father and Aunt of the barrister fighting for Keep Britain Free.

The multi millionaire was also given a govt contract to supply the NHS with PPE during this period.

Such things may be of no importance to some but greatly important to others.

Simon Dolan owner of  Jota Aviation.

The solicitor in the case.

Anna Brees, ex BBC journalist is getting the public to share their stories about being anti masks and anti lockdown, yet tweets:

In order to stop it being ‘The End’ it is probably time to realise that every movement is ultimately used against itself, whether its agent provocateurs creating trouble to allow martial law or as the Protocols stated back in 1800.

we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.


Communication; not division. We  can only succeed by communicating with people one-on-one and refusing to comply with orders, by sharing information and encouraging others to, by refusing to wear masks or adhere to lockdowns, by understanding that we do not need to protest or beg them not to do this to us – we simply need to not do it.

Non Compliance, its that simple!

This website hosts a leaflet campaign that now has over 300 communities around the UK actively talking to people and encouraging peaceful non compliance.

FB Group.

The test is a manufacturing technique, and is NOT intended or well suited as an infection diagnostic tool.

 The test is called a RT PCR test – Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, invented by Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis in 1993.

 Its sole purpose is to replicate tiny DNA sequences millions and billions of times, through a process of amplification – in order to help with research.

 Mullis, who died last year, was VERY vocal during his lifetime that his test was NOT to be used as a diagnostic tool in detecting viruses – as the amplification process creates many integrity issues – and yet during the HIV crisis, it got commissioned for exactly that.

 If you read the  article below, you’ll see why this is a very contentious issue.

 Its made much worse by the fact the  virus HAS NOT been purified!

The gold standard for evaluating a virus and a test is to isolate a virus from all other matter, sequence it, and then make sure it passes the 4 Koch’s Postulates tests – eg that the purified virus when introduced to a non-infected person exhibits identified symptoms.

 None of this has been done. 

  Four of the most prominent research efforts on SARS CoV2 have all admitted that they have NOT purified the virus in their sequencing of the RNA, and that they have not fulfilled the Koch Postulates tests.


 The test uses a process of amplification – over 30x and the output is highly distorted and unreliable.

 There are serious noted false positive and consistency issues – eg result inconsistencies on the same patient!

 Positive and Negative results can be created by reducing or increasing the amplification.

 As the virus has not been purified, we are likely testing for debris too – other self, prior infected viruses and medical RNA make up the sequence being matched for! 

 As the virus itself has not been isolated, we’ve yet to prove clinically that it can induce the symptoms and infection.

As you can see it’s a bloody MESS!

 This is why we need to take positive cases and CV related deaths with a large pinch of salt.

 Data analysis from AdapNation and everywhere else relies on this unreliable data.

Bulgarian Pathology  Association show tests are meaningless:


The following was written by Andrew Johnson.

An Independent Investigation


The sudden imposition of mask wearing in the UK and other countries is clearly a test to see how gullible and pliable the population has become.

In the UK we were told that we went past the CV19 peak whilst shopping in supermarkets with no required masking and the Covid 19 mortality rate went down for weeks on end.

Then the non essential shops opened without required masking and we were told the CV19 mortality rate went down for weeks on end.

Then the pubs and restaurants opened and we were told the CV19 mortality rates went down for weeks on end.

Then a rule about having to wear masks in supermarkets came along and the rates have gone up since. So at best the masks by their own definition are absolutely pointless, at worst they are linked to people getting more unwell by wearing them.

The Government is slowly chipping away at out liberty and freedom until without people realising it we will be enslaved by a totalitarian state. The Government is using psychological warfare on the masses to achieve their intentions.

The government has a department called the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) staffed with psychologists. Within SAGE there is a team called the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT). The intent of BIT is to change the behaviour of the masses with fear. BIT have stated that their intent is to ramp up the fear.

BIT understand human psychology and when people are fearful it lowers a persons’ consciousness. A person with lowered consciousness can easily be manipulated and controlled with suggestions to make behavioural changes. It is all about controlling the masses.


Norwegian Public Health Study :

Doctor and nurses discusses the futility of face masks :

Video showing unsanitary conditions of mask production : 


Posted by Jim Fine on Friday, 3 April 2020

This is now a part of related future socially engineered mind controlled programs to getting the docile conformist to comply with the unlawful regulations, and eventually compulsory vaccination.

As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “ None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” 

 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission.

Denis Rancourt, PhD, has published over 100 peer-reviewed studies in his career, but ResearchGate choose to censor and remove this paper because it didn’t fit the narrative of the Great Panic of 2020 over COVID-19. Such censorship proves the existence of an alternative agenda. 

Again, this underscores the Technocrat methodology of shaming, ridiculing and censoring anybody that comes forth with real science that refutes their pseudo-science. ⁃ TN Editor

No study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public!

 Orange county in USA got rid of the mask mandate,we should follow suit. 

Well said

Posted by Eloc Cummings on Thursday, 23 July 2020

N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to.
Conclusion: if you’re in Tesco and the guy with Covid has N95 mask his covid breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Tesco (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out)

• Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are, CLOG these masks very very quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask with render it “useless” IF you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it, you become a walking virus dispenser. Every time you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non sterile environment”

By now hopefully you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything.  Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks health. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.

Ultimate Answer: N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.

The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. It’s filtration works on the exhale. (Like a vacuum bag it only works one way)

Cloth masks are WORSE than none.

The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work.

The government has betrayed us, the markets and the private sector have no reason to support ordinary people, quite the reverse, the legal system is not going to suddenly come to our aid, nor the police, who have been used time and again to stifle protest, not aid it. However you feel about it, we’re it.

The UK government has prostituted itself to the ‘free’ markets and private interests, and, as with the banking crisis, it is we, the public who get shafted. The least we can do is oppose, resist and expose.

Denis Rancourt, PhD, has published over 100 peer-reviewed studies in his career, but ResearchGate choose to censor and remove this paper because it didn’t fit the narrative of the Great Panic of 2020 over COVID-19. Such censorship proves the existence of an alternative agenda. 

Again, this underscores the Technocrat methodology of shaming, ridiculing and censoring anybody that comes forth with real science that refutes their pseudo-science. ⁃ TN Editor

Nobody knows anyone who has become unwell as a result of pubs and shops being open. But we are being threatened with a lockdown if we do not ‘obey the rules’. This is a war against us by the establishment.

When you see admissions and hospital deaths continuing to fall, and a government which is using faulty test results from healthy people which do not turn into hospital admissions to demonise ordinary people for daring to go out shopping and socialising…..there is something seriously wrong.

They are using ‘divide and rule’ tactics to split us into 2 groups. One group is fearful and believes the government.
They are being made to think that the other group (not fearful and just trying to enjoy life and do normal stuff) is the enemy. The fearful group will be persuaded to believe that people like me are causing the ‘spike in cases’, when it is down to increased testing and inaccurate tests.
This will turn into a ‘mask war’, when the ‘fearful’ group becomes convinced that anyone not wearing a mask is infected and dangerous.
This will allow them to keep increasing mask use everywhere, cracking down on dissenters and possibly throwing some of us into prison, as they are currently doing in other countries.
They will continue to wage war on all of us and make life as unbearable as possible, until the wondrous day when the miracle vaccine will come along to save us all from misery.

(Reminder: the virus has a survival rate of 99.8% so why are they so bothered about testing everyone?)

It’s called the Hegelian Dialectic – Problem, Reaction, Solution

Create a fake problem. Manufacture the reaction using the media and the Behavioural Insights Team. Introduce the pre-planned solution.

We are hurtling full speed towards totalitarianism.

Thanks to Dave Dewhurst for the following:

When the government decides that you now need to wear gloves to go on public transport and in supermarkets, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear goggles to go on public transport and in supermarkets, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear a face mask, gloves AND goggles, not only on public transport and in supermarkets, but in ALL public spaces, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to wear a face mask, gloves AND goggles, not only in public spaces, but in your own home as well, are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need to prove that you’re not an “asymptomatic carrier” (by being tested), in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need an “immunity passport”, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need “proof of vaccination”, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
When the government decides that you now need a microchip in your arm, in order to be in public spaces (including public transport and supermarkets), are you going to comply?
I guess the real question is: Is there ANY point at which you’re going to stop doing what the government tells you to do? Because until large enough numbers of people stop complying with all this nonsense, the government mandates are only going to keep getting more intrusive, more authoritarian and harder to roll back.
The “new normal” was never meant to be temporary, right from the very beginning of this manufactured crisis, it was always intended to go on indefinitely, as a means of stripping you of your freedom, privacy and autonomy, increment by increment.

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419.

Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05

bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267.

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016

Further studies :

No study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public!

We have launched a campaign to inform the public  with information questioning the official narrative of the “pandemic.”

PLEASE NOTE: FB  has removed the campaign group today (3.8.20) This website will soon have a constructed forum in which to run the campaign and communicate with others.Here is a temporary discord server which allows us to communicate about the campaign whilst a forum is set up for this on my website.You do not need an account! Just click and you are in and you can talk to me and each other: Share please.

How it works:
Firstly,the campaign will be run jointly on this website and on the FB group page. You can download various leaflets and posters from the FB ‘files’ section; print your own at home, send to printers for larger batches or request that we send you some from the campaigns own printed supply.
Both platforms will be used to show all contributions and costs and distributors, sponsors and campaign creators are urgently  needed to share  in every community.  (Please tell us if you’d like to be kept anonymous from these updates)

We have to be realistic, whilst the UK is getting primed for a ‘second wave’ and further lockdowns and restrictions by late summer Sept/Oct, we have a window of opportunity to enable us to inform our communities of facts that they may not be aware of, to make an informed decision on the authenticity of the claims being made by officials.

We encourage people to start their own more localised campaigns to spread the work load and to help bring maximum awareness, there is only a limited  amount of people that we can reach in the next few months, the job to inform is huge and needs your help. This is not someone else’s problem, this is something that will impact your life and that of your loved ones in a negative and devastating way if we do not take action.

For this reason the campaign is relying on many people downloading the link and printing their own leaflets to share or having access to a decently priced online printer which we believe we have found with Nectarine printers.

They will print 5000 leaflets for £72. The larger orders get a better deal.

The World Health Organisation, Gates Foundation and other players are behind a disinformation campaign. It is imperative that concerned citizens are willing to counter-act the false information and share facts with their community.
The leaflet campaign  has enabled us to produce leaflets for those who may not have the ability or means to create their own leaflets.
We urge those who have the means to print the leaflet themselves, to do so as this is a time for us all to take responsibility for our future and that of our children and grandchildren.
It is clear that those who we need to reach are members of the public who are sceptical yet unaware of all the facts.
We can send leaflets for FREE to those with no funds or no means of getting any printed, via the generous donations of others, you can help with these donations by using this email address via paypal.

A small contribution will cover the cost of printing and posting. If you can afford to put a bit more in then this will help to cover the free leaflets. Everything is transparent and public and carried out by trusted individuals with a track record for campaigns such as this.

This website has a 5G Mass Action Campaign running which has been up and running since March 2018, all details and contributions can be found within this site and it is openly visible on the FB group also.

The link to the FB group for CV Facts Not Fear :

A link to the printable leaflets:

What can you do?

Share links with others, start your own campaign using our leaflets and online printers, sponsor leaflets, be part of a distribution network to get more leaflets out to the public, inform as many people of the campaign as possible, be willing to go out into the community with leaflets.

If you are not comfortable talking to the public, it has been suggested that you could put them in libraries which recently re-opened (even if only as a skeleton service) + cafes, pubs and other businesses and anywhere with public noticeboards/display areas for leaflets,  and of course we can also hand them to people directly (after first asking if they’d be interested to find out what the government and corporate controlled msm aren’t telling them.

We hope that others see the urgency of the campaign and act accordingly, YOU are the person you have been waiting for.If you want some flyers to hand out please contact the FB page or email this website.To give you an idea of how much a batch of 300 costs to print and package and post its around £8

The following are fully referenced facts about Covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help our readers make a realistic risk assessment. (Regular updates

These are the links that have been shown on the leaflet for further info:


CV Facts Not Fear Campaign advertised on David Icke website.


Updates from the campaign: 

Campaign begins 4th July 2020.

So far we’ve received very generous contributions from the following people:£50 from Tasha Krett £40 from Nic Treadwell  £10 from Dave Dewhurst   £25 from Karen Georgeson  £5 from J C Silvester £5 from Lee Stead £10 from Andy Collier Total in the fund is £145

Another £5 from Andy Collier £20 from Steven Stephen Phillips £20 from Judith Crawford £50 from Kath Holdsworth  Bringing the campaign fund total to £235. 

5th July 2020
£20 from David Lawrence £10 from Gaynor Morse £30 from Patricia Kempa
£10 from Marie Pearce  £8 from Sinead Dawes £15 from Jane Janie Chichester £10 from Alan Dean £40 from Jill Kirkwood £20 from Lee Stead
£10 from Sarah Foster £15 from Dan Doe
Wow guys we’re up to £423
6th July 2020
£423 was in the fund at last update.
£30 from Robert Williams £8 from Emma Emz Lockett
£342.50 spent on 25,000 double sided A5 fliers
Total now in the PayPal account: £118.50.
Campaign update #5
7th July 2020
£118.50 was in the fund at last update…
£8 from Emz Lockett
£15 from Margaret e Wyllie
£20 from Nykii Day
£10 from Steve Hopley
£20 from Colleen Waters
£8 from Tina M McNamara
£10 from Tina Voller
Total now in the fund: £209.50
Campaign update #6
8th July 2020
£209.50 was in the fund at last update…
£20 from Robert Williams
£12 from Tina Dyer
Total now in the fund: £241.50

Campaign update #7

9th July 2020

£241.50 was in the fund at last update

£10 from R Meroza

£30 from Lee Stead

Total now in the fund is £281.50

Update #8

11th July 2020

£281.50 at last update

£50 from a very generous anonymous supporter

Now we have £331.50 in the fund!

Update #9

15th July 2020

£331.50 was in the fund at last update

Some VERY generous donations have come in recently!

£100 from Connie Walters

£8.60 from Angie Mulroy

£60 from John Sherwood

Ann Marie Carey has spent £56.95 and £118.84 (see her posts)

Total now in the fund £324.31 

Update #10

15th July 2020

More amazingly generous donations into the campaign fund today!

£72 from Kaoru Aramaki

£17.40 from Sean P Maguire – great radio show mate!

£30 from Sinead A Gogarty

£8 from Jo Silvester (have I tagged the right person?)

Second batch of 25,000 leaflets ordered today costing £332.50

Total left in the fund is now £119.21

Update #11

16th July 2020

£119.21 was in the fund at last update

 Annie  spent £40.20 (See her post from earlier today regarding postage)

Generous campaign sponsorships from the following amazing people:

£30 Joanne Boddington

£10 Eleri Potter

£10 John Thacker

£8 Joy Stockley

£10 Nick Turner

£20 Theresa Phillips

£167.01 is now in the campaign fund

Update #12

17th July 2020

£167.01 was in the fund yesterday

The campaign has received the following generous contributions today:

£20 from Adam Coleman

£15 from Intbel

£30 from Denny Berfield

Annie has spent another £29.65 on postage today

so there’s now £202.36 in the fund.

Update #13

20th July 2020

£202.36 was in the fund at last update

More generous donations from the following amazing team members:

£20 from Helena Eagles

£15 from Elena Mari

£15 from Claire Staples

£10 from AnuskaLuana Cinnamom

£15 from Janice Jacobs

£20 from Karen Green

£10 from Peter Cooke

£200 from Deliah Roth 

Bringing the campaign fund total to £507.36

Update #14

22nd July 2020

£507.36 was in the fund at last update

£7 from Cain Milburn

£10 from Corrine Edwards

£20 from Liz Keaney

£20 from Janis Roantree

£10 from Sarah West

£16 from Karen Rankin

£15 from Mark Philips

£20 from Maureen Hillier

£20 from Simon Piper

Bringing the campaign total to: £645.36

Update #15

26th July 2020

£645.36 was in the fund at last update

£15 from Claire Storch

£10 from Lisette Chesshire

£6 from Bez Catt Lee

£10 from Joanne Haynes

£15 from Rebecca Kane

£10 from Anonymous this morning

£30 from Christine Houghton

£30 from Janet Godfrey

Tina Dyer has spent £227.10 so far on postage and envelopes etc (see her postage updates)

Campaign total is now £544.26

Update #16

2nd August 2020

Apologies that it’s been so long since the last update I’ve had an extremely hectic week 

£544.26 was in the fund at last update

£100 from Anonymous

£10 from Ian Swirles

£10 from Chrissie Richardson

£25 from Pc Murphy

£20 from Andrea West

£10 from Jason Green

£10 from Daniel Thomas

£8 from Julie Croley

£30 from Margaret Sherwood

£10 from Lillian Potter

Tina Dyer has spent £77.19 on postage

3rd batch of 25 thousand leaflets has been ordered costing £332.50

Total now in the fund is £367.57

Update #17

6th August 2020

£367.57 was in the fund at last update

£10 from Lynne Barrett

£20 from Ruth Acaster

£10 from Rita Anna Carter

£20 from Steev Filleepz

£10 from Glen Allen

We’ve just ordered the 4th batch of 25 thousand leaflets which cost £332.50 so the total in the campaign fund pot is now £105.07

otal now in the fund is £367.57  



Update #18

10th August 2020

£105.07 was in the fund at last update

We’ve had a massively generous donation of £333 which covers an entire batch of 25 thousand leaflets which is absolutely amazing! from Kaoru Aramaki

and many more very generous donations from the following good people:

£30 from Nic Treadwell

£10 from Sheila Forde

£20 from Heather Kirkup

£5 from Rebecca Mackay

2 more donations are “on hold” on paypal as they weren’t sent as family and friends – Hopefully they will re-send them as family and friends which will save on fees and also land firmly in the account – These will be included in the next update when this gets sorted

Total now in the fund £503.07

Update #19

13th August 2020

£503.07 was in fund at last update

Tina Dyer was spent £361.22 posting out the last lot of leaflets

New donations and sponsorship money from the following good people:

£10 from Angela Peacock

£10 from Zed

£10 from Nick D

£15 from James Light

£25 from Dominique Anderson

£20 from Tammy Wadmore

Total now in fund is £231.85


Doctors are starting to speak out – anonymously, at the risk of losing their jobs. This is an absolute scandal. Locking down an entire city on the basis of absolutely nothing.

“I’m a doctor at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust. Many of my colleagues are angry and confused about what is happening nationally and particularly in Leicester and Leicestershire. We are reminded daily that we are not allowed to speak to journalists or on social media, which is why I am stringently anonymous and more vague than I’d like to be here. I love being a doctor, and I risk suspension for speaking out.

I’m going to use Public Health England’s own numbers for this analysis (found here) and I’m going to explain why I think the conclusions they (and the politicians) have drawn are wrong.”

Dr Q goes on to explain that there is no evidence of any increase in the rate of infection in Leicester based on Pillar 1 data – tests administered to inpatients by hospital staff.

“By May, positive cases averaged around 10 a day and deaths were continuing to fall. In late May, we started swabbing every single admission to the hospitals, and this is where things get interesting.

I work in a department that isn’t respiratory medicine.

This means that the patients who are in our area are there for other health issues that are not caused by COVID-19 (think surgery or mental health).

Of those we swabbed, just 1% tested positive and all of them were asymptomatic. That rate has been steady since May 23rd. I believe that our patients are representative of the rate in the UK population and, for what it’s worth, it’s the same story in Manchester, Leeds and Guildford, where I’ve been comparing notes with colleagues.

Unpublished data shared on an open forum from Leeds, Manchester, Sussex also confirms this – 1%, all asymptomatic when testing positive. These patients have, almost without exception, not developed any symptoms, although some have had household members with a cough.
So why the panic? Pillar 2 data. But there’s a problem with Pillar 2 data.

The point of “Lockdown” has always been to ‘flatten the curve’ in order to ‘Protect the NHS’. Given we were coping on March 31st, when we had nearly ten times the number of positive cases in hospitals, with relatively little access to testing, we are certainly coping now.

The issue and alleged cause of the “Local Lockdown” is our Pillar 2 numbers. These are the community tests outsourced to private companies. There is no guarantee that these tests are all taken from different people (unlike the Pillar 1 data, which is cross checked against a unique patient identifier). In fact, the Government accepts that the number of Pillar 2 cases is not the same as the number of people with COVID-19 because Pillar 2 data includes people who’ve been tested more than once – often because they have to re-test before they’re allowed back to work.”

In other words, the “evidence” that cases are increasing at a dangerous rate in Leicester – or were, since even the Government acknowledges that even Pillar 2 data show the number of cases is falling now – is unreliable. And Dr Q doesn’t even get into the problem of false positives with PCR tests.

Dr Q points out that even if we decide to accept the Pillar 2 data at face value it shows the average age of all these newly infected people is 39, so there’s almost zero risk of them dying from COVID-19 anyway. And he/she highlights the sheer lunacy of closing schools, given that almost no children have died of COVID-19 across the United Kingdom.

The first WHO Global Pandemic Preparedness report submitted in Sept 2019 was the result of a joint venture by WHO the former Director General of the WHO, Gro Harlem Brundtland, former PM of Norway.

The report was sponsored by WHO and the World bank who had co-convened the GPP board to follow on from  a UN based project after Ebola.

Its monitoring board members includes Fauci, Gates Foundation, Chinese CDC and Wellcome Trust. The goals of the Board are to:
• assess the world’s ability to protect itself from health emergencies
• identify critical gaps to preparedness across multiple perspectives;
• advocate for preparedness activities with national and international leaders and decision-makers.

The WHO and World bank plan encouraged countries to have a cost effective plan for a pandemic at the ready by July 2019.  That was acted upon by  59 countries who submitted a National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).

This preparedness plan was to begin from Sept 2019 and to end  Sept 2020 which also included instructions to hold two simulation exercises, one would involve a lethal pathogen that causes a global pandemic.

The progress report requires that a UN and WHO two system  wide training and simulation exercises should  take place, one of which is the release of a respiratory pathogen that causes a pandemic!

Which countries took part? Which departments were costed? How much  did each country cost a pandemic at and for what period of time did the ‘costed’ pandemic cover?  If this global pandemic plan  began in Sept 2019, when did it stop? What happened between the start of the exercise  and the WHO declaration on the 31st December? Which actions were already taken?

There is evidence that the NHS organisations  were aware of the requirement for plans to respond to a disease outbreak in February 2019

The WHO Simulation Exercise manual from 2017 states that during these sort of global exercises, they involve table top exercises such as the ones performed by the Event 201 team in New York, again, the same members of the Global Pandemic Monitoring Board attended this event, including the Chinese CDC Director-General.

Did the pandemic exercise also include a pathogen from China that causes a pandemic?
Where were the origins of the global exercise?
If the pandemic exercise began in September 2019, does this mean that the table top exercise (written about in the WHO manual, which occurs before a live event) was Event 201?

According to the WHO Simulation Exercise Manual, the table top exercises are to inform members of the preparedness community ( Event 201 states this as the purpose of the table top exercise) who can then follow with real live full scale exercises that include the use of hospitals, media broadcasts, actors, organisations, govts and others.

Event 201:

Does this mean that our govts  were involved in a global exercise for preparedness, who were the preparedness community that the Event 201 claims to be informing?  

What transpires is that the Chinese CDC and others  were chosen to be on the monitoring board of a group calling for a global pandemic exercise. Co-convened  by WHO and the World Bank, who planned to create a UN and WHO global exercise to test how each country would cope in a pandemic. WHO wrote the manual for a simulation exercise in 2017. Another was written in 2018.

That pandemic exercise plan covered in the WHO manual included the requirement to hold a table top event prior to the simulation.

And here we have the Event 201, with all the SAME people on the monitoring board involved, advertising itself as tool to inform the policy and monitoring community.

But they ARE the members of the monitoring board …So the table top exercises were part of the global preparedness simulation.

How many people are aware that  many countries had a cost effective plan already in place in case of a pandemic just 6 months prior?
How does the plan compare to the pandemic?
Are the hospitals involved in the ‘cost’ effective plans for a pandemic the same hospitals as those involved now?

Why are we not calling for  an investigation into why those making claims of a pandemic, whilst running live exercises of a pandemic will profit financially from a pandemic?

Is there any evidence of extra funding for a pandemic PRIOR to the announcement of one?

In the US, the office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response under the Dept of Health and Human Services was given an extra budget of $722 million, giving them a budget of $2.2 Billion for FY 2019.

The job of this dept is to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness. This included $145 million more than the 2018 budget to provide medical counter measures that address pandemic and emerging diseases.
And $138 million above the 2018 budget, to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness.

Budgeting extra for a pandemic before it happens,  was that for the pandemic exercise?

The Monitoring board pushes the vaccine agenda.…/GPMB%20Statement%20-%20Global%20Vacc…

The WHO Simulation Manual.…/WHO-WHE-CPI-2017.10-eng.pdf;sequence…

The framework for the global monitoring board was created by Harvard Global health Institute and the chosen reviewers include CDC, In-Q-tel (A CIA created company) HHS, World Economic Forum, John Hopkins centre,WHO and various universities.

This report claims that China has a response system for pandemic preparedness in place that has been approved by WHO.  

Public health systems. As a first step, China’s government established the necessary legal and regulatory infrastructures for preparedness activities. The resulting national system comprises of (1) a public health emergency command center to coordinate activities at the national, provincial, prefecture, and city levels with external organizations and other countries in the region (2) a nationwide reporting network for reporting infectious
diseases and public health events (3) a nationwide pathogen laboratory network and (4) an emergency medical rescue team. This national system responds to both infectious disease outbreaks and other public health
emergencies through 37 emergency medical teams distributed throughout China’s 23 provinces. In December 2016, the Shanghai team was certified using the WHO Global Emergency Medical Team processes and checklists for deployment ready teams.

Lucky it started in China then?

Monitoring will be essential because it will provide regular reports on the status of the world’s ability to reduce and respond to pandemic risk.
Because the monitoring will generate objective information, the results should provide a substantial incentive to governments, the private sector, and international organizations to sustain momentum on improving health security.
The monitoring project will be needed until such a time when:
• All countries have robust public health capacities that comply with IHR and meet OIE standards;
• Competent official agencies regularly analyse risks that weak public health capacities pose to economies and actively engage in reducing these risks;
• International organisations are positioned to rapidly and effectively support countries during major disease outbreaks and to foster development of countries’ public health capacities; and
• Diagnostics, drugs, and vaccines for new diseases are available to mitigate the spread of contagion and its impacts on economies, communities, and public health.

And from this framework on global risk assessment and the call for a monitoring committee, came the  Global Prepardness Pandemic Monitoring Committee.


The Chinese are members of the monitoring board for pandemic preparedness, have taken part in what appears to be a table top exercise for a global pandemic preparedness exercise which occurs prior to the live event, have been approved with certification from WHO to be at the forefront of a global preparedness plan. They work with the  Gates Foundation and with US pharmaceutical companies as well as working with UN on its sustainable goals.

The EU,s biggest funding body for research to implement the Smart agenda, Horizon 2020, have been involved in joint projects with China and the EU countries since 2018 with a funding budget of 100 Million Euro.

China works closely with the UN and showcased the UN during the Wuhan military games just prior to the ‘proclaimed’ pandemic.

During the military games in Wuhan that clearly paid homage to the UN, there was also another high level meeting that took place.


The EIOS system builds on a long-standing collaboration between WHO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) to develop a system for public health intelligence and responds to the need for a global initiative to bring together PHI efforts.

In September 2017, WHO accepted leadership of EIOS under the Health Emergencies Programme (WHE) with a governance structure involving multiple stakeholders. The Coordination Group is made up of twelve organizations, networks, and government bodies who serve two-year terms.

EIOS picked up the first article reporting on a cluster of pneumonia in Wuhan at 03:18am (UTC) on December 31st 2019. By the end of March, the EIOS system was collating up to 228,000 articles per day related to the outbreak, helping to sort through this information and making it available it to experts across the globe. Since the start of the outbreak, members of the EIOS community have been working on additions to the system to help manage the unprecedented volume of articles by looking at improved ways to filter, contextualize and visualize all of the content coming in.

This shows that the WHO is directly linked to the information being shared globally.

The EIOS system builds on a long-standing collaboration between WHO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission (EC) to develop a system for public health intelligence and responds to the need for a global initiative to bring together PHI efforts.

JRC is the European Commission’s science and knowledge service.

At a more international level, the JRC and the US reinforced their cooperation through several cooperation agreements to facilitate the way towards compatible standards across both sides of the Atlantic  and explored which role the EU and the US could play in the development of Smart Grids, intelligent electricity systems, and Smart Cities, efficiently organised cities based on integrated management, active citizen participation and integration of ICT systems.

JRC researchers analysed the geographic spread of the virus as well as the age and gender of the patients in view of informing the measures for gradually reopening the EU.

To help reach the objectives of the Coronavirus Global Response, approximately EUR 1 billion will be mobilised under Horizon 2020 to accelerate access to COVID-19 vaccines, medicines and tests.

The European Commission is heavily involved in research and the pushing of vaccines.They have daily updates that are followed by the international community. The update below is from June 2020.

ECDC warned against the lifting of community physical distancing and other IPC measures, as together with testing and contact tracing, they are the most important approach for controlling the spread of COVID-19 in all settings, including during travel.

Overall, following the self assessment and the external assessment process the UK has demonstrated a strong baseline position across all Action Packages. One of the key areas of strength identified in the UK is the cross Government and organizational coordination
and response. The UK will be a good resource for ideas on how to navigate some of the challenges to true implementation of the “One Health” concept in other countries. This was particularly well demonstrated within the AMR and Zoonotic disease Action Packages.
The UK has a well-practiced system of response to real outbreaks and testing the systems through simulation exercises. Few countries have this degree of experience and number of targeted exercises which serve to fine tune the system.

Which targeted exercises and simulations involving health care?

The UK has been a leading player in the preparatory work on the
WHO Global Action Plan on AMR. The Global Action Plan is a “one health” approach,

The Global Action Plan was developed in response to a request made by the Heads of Government of Germany, Ghana and Norway – and later the United Nations Secretary-General – requesting that the Director-General of WHO and heads of other multilateral agencies streamline their collaboration and develop a Global Action Plan.

The Global Action Plan broadly complements the United Nations System-wide Strategic Document, which describes the work of the United Nations Development System as a whole to support implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The Global Action Plan was  launched on September 24, 2019 on the side-lines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

The Global Action Plan was launched to coincide with the High-Level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage and the United Nations General Assembly in September 2019.

Who are the signatory agencies to the Global Action Plan?

  • The 12 signatory agencies to the Global Action Plan are Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Global Financing Facility, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, Unitaid, UN Women, World Bank Group, World Food Program and World Health Organization. Together, these agencies work to address all targets in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)  and many other health-related SDG targets.

Global Health Security Index 

The GHS Index is a project of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHU) and was developed with The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).The Index was published in October, 2019, and analyses the readiness of the world’s countries to combat pandemics

The Global Health Security (GHS) Index is the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across the 195 countries that make up the States Parties to the International Health Regulations (IHR [2005]).  These organisations believe that, over time, the GHS Index will spur measurable changes in national health security and improve international capability to address one of the world’s most omnipresent risks: infectious disease outbreaks that can lead to international epidemics and pandemics.

GHS created 140 questions for countries’ capacities, whether a capacity exists and where it is  and also whether that capacity is regularly—for example, annually—tested and shown to be functional in exercises or real-world events.

The GHS Index, NTI, JHU, and the EIU project team— was made possible with  grants from the Open Philanthropy Project, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Robertson Foundation.

We also have the Global Health Security Agenda whose  permanent adviser is WHO.

The GHSA is governed by a Steering Group comprised of approximately 15 countries, international organisations, and/or non-governmental stakeholders. The primary role of the Steering Group is to provide strategic guidance and direction, including identifying overall GHSA priorities, tracking of progress and commitments, and facilitation of target-driven multi-sectoral coordination and communication among GHSA members.

Permanent Steering Group Members (2019 – 2023)

Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Korea, Senegal, Thailand, United States, GHSA Consortium (GHSAC), Private Sector Round Table (PSRT)

Rotating Steering Group Members (2019 – 2020)

Argentina, Australia, Canada, Finland, Netherlands, World Bank.

The GHSA mandate on Immunisation.


This Action Package seeks to attain effective protection through achievement and maintenance of immunisation against measles and other epidemic-prone VPDs.


  • Maintain high vaccination coverage rates and improve optimal vaccination rates where needed
  • Strengthen systems for the safety management of adverse effects from vaccinations
  • Identify and target immunization to populations at risk of epidemic-prone VPDs of national importance and create a priority list of high-risk regions and populations in order to provide vaccinations to VPD endemic areas
  • Strengthen systems for VPD prevention and control, such as outbreak response immunization, case-based surveillance system, and access to a laboratory in a VPD laboratory network for diagnostic confirmation
  • Conduct routine or supplementary immunization activities for addressing immunity gaps for measles


Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Republic of Korea, United States

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Health Organization (WHO), World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)

According to Australia,s Action Plan For Health Security 2019 to 2023,  they and 195 other countries are part of a legally binding agreement called  International Health Regulations (2005)  including all WHO Member States.

The IHR was adopted at the 58th World Health Assembly in May 2005,
and subsequently entered into force on 15 June 2007.
The purpose and scope of the IHR are:

“to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade”.

International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation

The Framework was developed in 2016, in collaboration with related initiatives such as the Global Health Security Agenda.

  • The remaining three components of the Framework consist of:
     Annual Reporting to the World Health Assembly (mandatory):
  • Simulation Exercises:
  • After-action Review:           

A major component of the NAPHS is establishing an interoperable, interconnected electronic disease surveillance system for both human and animal sectors, coordinated at the national level and incorporating an outbreak management system.develop a Costed National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).$File/Aust-Nat-Action-Plan-Health-Security-2019-2023.pdf

The NAPHS was created with multi-sectoral engagement with involvement of International Partners including the World Health Organization (WHO), United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC), USAID.

High-level attention, risk assessment, resources, and strategic planning by  The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

All the countries signed up to the WHO National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS) are also obliged to take part in simulations.

In US, The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), which maintains the U.S. International Health regulations (IHR) NFP and performs the required monitoring and evaluation of U.S compliance with the IHR, led the development of the National Action Plan.

( This is the department mentioned in this article above which was given an  extra budget of $722 million for 2019, giving them a budget of $2.2 Billion for FY 2019.)

The job of this dept is to maintain and respond to pandemic preparedness.

The following is the initial follow-up process and timeline for the implementation of the National Action Plan:
• Beginning of the federal monitoring and evaluation process for the United States Health Security National Action Plan – November 2018.
• First interagency comprehensive National Action Plan Review and Progress Report Meeting – January 2019
• Online publication of the 2018 National Action Plan Progress Report and publication of a revised National Action Plan (if needed) – February 2019.
• Second biannual IHR Working Group Action Item Review Meeting – July 2019.
This annual schedule of activities iterates until the second JEE of the United States, tentatively planned for mid-2021.

This is from the WHO 2018 Influenza Pandemic simulation exercise manual.

And here is the simulation plan. Created in advance.

Sounds rather familiar!

Describing the development, spread and impact of the fictitious influenza pandemic will add depth and realism to the exercise, as well as events for participants to respond to.

Global pandemic phases: Changes in the severity of the global pandemic phases can be used in a scenario to stimulate discussion, trigger potential preparedness actions and add international context.

The WHO global pandemic phases describe the spread of the pandemic influenza virus around the world, and will be used by WHO to communicate the global pandemic situation.
The global pandemic phase will be based on WHO risk assessments performed on virological, epidemiological and clinical data collected internationally. Currently, there are four WHO global
pandemic phases (1):
ƒ interpandemic – the period between influenza pandemics;
ƒ alert – influenza caused by a new subtype has been identified in humans; therefore, increased vigilance and careful risk assessment will be initiated at local, national and global levels;
ƒ pandemic – global spread of human influenza caused by a new subtype, determined through global surveillance; and
ƒ transition – reduction of assessed global risk, de-escalation of global actions and reduction in response activities or movement towards recovery.

The ‘ demands’ of the NHS health care system during this pandemic in the UK  were put into the hands of Palantir.

Palantir is a US data mining company that cut its teeth working for the Pentagon and the CIA in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Palantir had 10% of their workforce work within the NHS government data project to predict surges in the NHS demands during the CV19 pandemic from  which the company  earned one pound, despite the costs of wages for the workforce

Now we can see why?

WHO 2018 Simulation Preparedness Report:

UK Government have to go through certain procedures which could take years before a vaccine can be administered to the public.

“The best way to defeat a virus is with a vaccine”

Spoken by the clueless Matt Hancock, the health secretary who has no background in such matters. There has NEVER been an effective coronavirus vaccine in history!

If there had they would have already invented it by now.
The flu shot is not  a success story either.
It seems to be a repeated failure year after year.
There are medical and academic studies that show a correlation between increased illness AND getting the flu shot in many cases.
Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus.
All being suppressed.
Where is our democratic and human right to openly discuss and question?
With all these problems wouldn’t Matt Hancock and UK Government be more cautious and at least more reserved about this fait accompli CV19 vaccine? 
The CV19 vaccine is certainly viable from a profit point of view but is it from a ‘save lives’ point of view?
This statement from Hancock is a scandal.
He said they are stock piling these vaccines BEFORE they have been APPROVED. 
This Astra Zeneca/Oxford University vaccine has NOT been APPROVED but has received A LOT of UK Government money.
Is the UK Government paying for these vaccines whether or not they are effective?
Since WHEN did a commercial organisation which is FOR-PROFIT make a drug in order to have stockpiles BEFORE it was approved?
This is a disgraceful state of affairs.
Already they are BREACHING a number of protocols with regards to safety and testing on vaccines and pharmaceuticals.
Has this vaccine passed the ‘Gold Standard” protection?
Are they going to be open and transparent with a Gold Standard testing?
In a randomised controlled trial (RCT) can be very expensive to run.
They can take many years to complete, and even then may not last long enough to assess the long-term effect of an intervention such as vaccine immunity, or to detect rare or long-term adverse effects.
Will this vaccine be monitored on an ongoing basis by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) through the Yellow Card Scheme, as is the monitoring process required by UK law before a vaccine is licensed for use in the UK?
Has this vaccine followed the UK Governments ‘UK Vaccine Network’?
The UK Government has published no information and their website has not been updated since 2019.
Working group 2: Understand how a vaccine will impact on an epidemic disease outbreak.
Working group 3: Produce a process map for vaccine development, from discovery to deployment.
Working group 4: Look at the manufacture of vaccines.
The virus is on its way out.
The majority of the population were NEVER at any serious risk.
It specifically targets one specific demographic overwhelmingly, the elderly with MULTIPLE comorbidities and within that demographic specifically targets nursing home residents thus far. 
The general population, children, middle aged people, teenagers, 20s and 30s were NEVER at any serious risk of hospitalisation to CV19.
Studies are showing there is more of a threat of the seasonal flu than CV19.
Remember this:
no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from any vaccine-related injury to your health such as brain damage or death associated with the administration of a vaccine.
Given the fact that this vaccine has not adhered to the procedures and processes of vaccine safety before being licensed to administer and has  skipped and spectacularly ignored all guidelines and  given that vaccine manufacturers are not liable for ANY damages as a result of this vaccine including death and you will have to just have to accept whatever the effects, are you willing to take a huge risk to your life and wellbeing by taking this shot and accept whatever the effects?
Will the government and globalists honour our basic human right to refuse anything that we believe or know will cause detrimental affects to our health & wellbeing?
There are strong musings if anyone uses their rights and refuse this vaccine they will have access to their bank accounts stopped. Thus stopping your ability to purchase food and water in order to live. Isn’t this not only blackmail of the most evil kind but also cold blooded murder.
Given also that the public have been misinformed about past vaccines and the CDC, a for profit company, have blatantly covered up detrimental side effects  such as denying that vaccines cause autism in babies which has only recently been admitted after many years of denial.
The CDC-  as of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.
How many people were involved in flu vaccines prior to this reported outbreak?
 According to Dr. Alex Vasquez, in September 2019, Italy rolled out an entirely new type of influenza vaccine.
This vaccine called VIQCC is different than others.
Most available influenza vaccines are produced in embryonated chicken eggs. VIQCC, however, is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs and has more of a “boost” to the immune system as a result. VIQCC also contains four types of viruses – 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses. It looks like this “super” vaccine impacted the immune system in such a way to increase coronavirus infection through virus interference that set the stage for what happened in Italy.

Is the rush to a vaccine the best solution?

According to Dr Murray the attempt to create a vaccine for SARS-CoV showed that vaccines were able to offer protection against infection, but came with a cost of disruption to the immune system. This altered immune function led to severe lung inflammation when test animals were exposed to the virus.
The final statement of the study cannot be highlighted enough: “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated. 

Despite this, the UK Flu vaccination programme has been stepped up for   2020/2021 by govt. 

How vaccines are tested, licensed and monitored

(From Oxford Uni website) How vaccines are tested, understandably, people are often concerned to know how rigorously and extensively vaccines have been tested.

This is especially true for new vaccines.

This page aims to outline the process involved in developing and licensing a vaccine for use in the UK. The standard for testing and monitoring of vaccines is higher than it is for most other medicines, because they are one of the few medical treatments given to healthy people (mainly healthy children).

This means that the level of acceptable risk is much lower than it might be for a cancer treatment, for example. It can take many years for a vaccine to pass through all the stages described. 

In the case of the MenB vaccine, for example, it took nearly 20 years from the first idea to the vaccine being licensed for use.

These are some of the stages a vaccine will have gone through before use: Literature review: looking at what has been done before. Theoretical development or innovation: coming up with a new idea, or a variation on an existing idea. Laboratory testing and development. This involves ‘in vitro’ testing using individual cells and ‘in vivo’ testing, often using mice.

The vaccine has to pass rigorous safety tests at this stage, and demonstrate that it works in animals. Phase I study – an initial trial involving a small group of adult participants (up to 100 people).

This is carried out to make sure that the vaccine does not have major safety concerns in humans, and also to work out the most effective dose. Phase II study – a trial in a larger group of participants (several hundred people).

Phase II trials check that the vaccine works consistently, and look at whether it generates an immune response.

Researchers also start looking for potential side effects.

Phase III study – a trial in a much larger group of people (usually several thousand). Phase III trials gather statistically significant data on the vaccine’s safety and efficacy (how well it works).

This means looking at whether the vaccine generates a level of immunity that would prevent disease, and provides evidence that the vaccine can actually reduce the number of cases.

It also gives a better chance of identifying rarer side effects not seen in the phase II study.

Licensing – expert review of all trial data by the UK government (through the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency  – MHRA) or European regulator (European Medicines Agency  – EMA).

At this stage the regulators check that the trials show that the product meets the necessary efficacy and safety levels. They also make sure that, for most people, the product’s advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.

Phase IV studies – post-marketing surveillance to monitor the effects of the vaccine after it has been used in the population.

These may be requested by a regulatory body, or carried out by the pharmaceutical industry. 

The vaccine and the trials used to test it must meet the regulations laid down by the following authorities: ICH-GCP  (International Conference on Harmonisation of Good Clinical Practice) – international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects.

Declaration of Helsinki  (1964; 2008) – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects EU Clinical Trials Directive  – enshrined in UK law by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations (2004) RCPCH Guidelines  for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children (2000) In addition, for trials in the UK, the vaccine and the trial must receive individual approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), while the trial itself must be approved from the following authorities: An NHS Research Ethics Committee (see more information on the NHS Health Research Authority website ) The local NHS Research and Development office, who support and advise researchers in meeting the requirements of the UK regulatory framework. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), for certain types of trials monitoring.

Although vaccines undergo  testing before they are licensed for use in the UK, it is important that the safety of vaccines is monitored on an ongoing basis, as with all licensed drugs.

In the UK this is undertaken by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) through the Yellow Card Scheme.

Reports of suspected side effects are sent to the MHRA by drug companies (who are obliged to pass on any reports of suspected side effects that are defined as serious), health professionals, and, since 2005, patients themselves.

How many times has the pharmaceutical industry been caught red handed in making false claims and misrepresenting studies? The author of this website suggests  reading informative books such as this one:

Who is responsible for monitoring vaccine safety?

What does the MHRA do with these data?

The data are evaluated each week, and the reported side effects are compared against the expected side effects as detailed in the information sheet for the vaccine.

If a previously unidentified reaction emerges, or the frequency of reactions is not in line with what is expected, then the MHRA will investigate carefully. What happens next?

This will depend on the kind of side effect identified, but options include insisting that details of the new side effect are given in the product information leaflet or giving out warnings identifying groups of patients who should not be given the vaccine. In rare circumstances, the vaccine may be withdrawn from use.

 You can find detailed information on the scheme here , and data on Yellow Card reports for individual products here . Page last updated:  Monday, October 29, 2018

Report a problem with a medicine or medical device.
Report a suspected problem (‘adverse incident’) with a medicine or medical device using the Yellow Card Scheme as soon as possible, for example if: a medicine causes side effects someone’s injured (or almost injured) by a medical device, either because its labelling or instructions aren’t clear, it’s broken or has been misused a patient’s treatment is interrupted because of a faulty device someone receives the wrong diagnosis because of a medical device a medicine doesn’t work properly a medicine is of a poor quality you think a medicine or medical device is fake or counterfeit Anyone can report a problem.
The UK Vaccine Network brings together industry, academia and relevant funding bodies to make targeted investments in specific vaccines and vaccine technology for infectious diseases with the potential to cause an epidemic.
Role of the group:
Vaccines are widely recognised as an important mechanism in controlling infectious disease outbreaks. However, outbreaks of some of the world’s deadliest diseases only occur intermittently, and often in the world’s poorest countries, meaning that there may not be a strong market incentive to for the pharmaceutical industry to develop vaccines for such diseases.
The UK government is taking concerted and coordinated action to address this market failure.
The UK has committed to invest £120 million between 2016 and 2021 for the development of new vaccines for such diseases, in line with the expert advice provided by the UK Vaccines Network.
The focus of the Network is to support the government to identify and shortlist targeted investment opportunities for the most promising vaccines and vaccine technologies that will help combat infectious diseases with epidemic potential, and to address structural issues related to the UK’s broader vaccine infrastructure.
Membership The UK Vaccine Network is made up of leading experts from academia, industry and policy. All members are invited to join the Network in a personal capacity, not as representatives of specific organisations or bodies.
Chair Chris Whitty, Chief Scientific Adviser to the Department of Health and Social Care Members Adrian Hill, Andrew Pollard, Bryan Charleston, Ceri Lyn-Adams, Charlie Weller, Charlotte Watts, Chris Whitty, Christian Schneider, Eleanor Riley, Fiona Tomley, Gary Entrican, Ian Hudson, Jean Lang, Jeffrey Almond, Joann Prior, Johan Van Hoof, John Edmunds, Jonathan Pearce, Julian Bonnerjea, Mahesh Kumar, Massimo Pamlarini, Michael Francis, Miles Carroll, Neil Ferguson, Nick Adkin, Paul Cosford, Peter Openshaw, Simon Foster, Stephen Inglis, Steve Chatfield, Sue Middleton, Tarit Mukhopadhyay, Timothy Atkins, Xiao-Ning Xu.
Working groups.
The Vaccine Network operates through a series of working groups. Each group has a specific focus and they feedback their findings to the Network. A full list of contributors for each working group is listed at the bottom of this page.
Working group 1: Identify and prioritise human and zoonotic diseases Chair: Miles Carrol, Public Health England.
Working group 1 identifies and prioritises human and zoonotic diseases with epidemic potential in human or animal populations, for which vaccines can have an outbreak altering impact.
The group also looks for gaps in knowledge about these diseases (including basic pathogen biology and host immunology), and where human and veterinary vaccinology can learn from each other.
The group’s findings are used to inform the investment strategy for the £120 million budget.
Working group 2: Understand how a vaccine will impact on an epidemic disease outbreak Chair: Eleanor Riley, The Roslin Institute.
Working group 2 aims to develop a systematic, shared understanding of under what circumstances a vaccine is likely or unlikely to have an impact on an epidemic disease outbreak.
This includes outbreaks where the pathogen is not currently known, and what vaccine technologies could play an important role in future outbreaks.
The group has created a decision tool based on this work.
Working group 3: Produce a process map for vaccine development, from discovery to deployment Chair: Tarit Mukhopadhyay, University College London.
 See the process maps.
Working group 4: Look at the manufacture of vaccines Chair: Jeffrey Almond, University of Oxford.
Working group 4 considers questions around the manufacture of vaccines, such as: where could a small scale or large scale facility make a difference in the UK? what could we build, and where/with whom could or should we collaborate with? what existing facilities are there that could support scale-up for manufacture of small stockpiles?
The Department of Health and Social Care is funding a number of projects to develop candidate vaccines for priority pathogens and to develop technologies and processes to support vaccine manufacturing and delivery in low and middle income countries (LMICs).
Fast tracked vaccines WITHOUT studies are being implemented( that could provide early warning signs of runaway immune response), partially funded by Gates and taxpayers money via govt’s.
 In the next 2-3 months dangerous vaccines are to be given to the public in a mass vaccination campaign in a way that you have no choice but to comply; you’re stuck in your house and you’ll beg for the vaccine to get back to“normal”. So the side effects are not revealed until the vaccine has already been widely distributed.
The planned vaccine will be an MRNA vaccine.
MRNA has direct coding. It will do what it is programmed to do. In this case the RNA can cause direct DNA mutation which can lead to cancer and autoimmune diseases.
On the 12th September 2019, at the joint EU-WHO “Global Vaccination Summit”,they announced the “10 Actions towards Vaccination for All”, with a “feasibility study” set to run from 2019 through 2021.
An exercise  was planned for global pandemic preparedness for a dangerous pathogen and pandemic which began in Sept
2019, created by WHO and World bank; members on its board include Chinese CDC, Fauci, Gates Foundation Wellcome trust and others.
 Many countries were given until July 2019 to submit  a cost effective plan that would allow them to be part of the global preparedness plan for a pandemic that would have two tests between Sept 2019 and Sept 2020.

How is it possible that all the same players involved in a global pandemic exercise are the same players who are involved in the CV pandemic that is happening in the same time frame?
The ultimate objective of the  Global Preparedness Plan board, which includes the Chinese CDC, Dr Goa, is to:

To create a Universal vaccine

Progress indicator(s) by September 2020 include,The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide
training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate
release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

This would explain the expansion of vaccine manufacturing worldwide that occurred just prior to the test/pandemic.

In the UK, In 2018 Imperial College formed a partnership with CEPI, the Centre for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations contributed £8.4 million to partner Imperial College to develop vaccines in 16 weeks instead of 10 years. They called this platform, ‘RapidVac’ and the disease they called Disease X.

Imperial college are responsible for flawed models of the CV 19 and also created a ‘FOR PROFIT’ offshoot of a public vaccine manufacturing initiative just a week prior to the public announcement by World Health Organisation.


What do they have in store for those who object?oria/new-covid-19-restrictions-will-be-needed-for-anti-vaxxers-20200616-p55330.html

Leaflets outlining the truth about this pandemic have been created  and are available for download on this website.

Or direct from Google Drive.

PDF link

Also linked to another informative website in the leaflets menu.


Testing for CV19

In the beginning the public were diagnosed by symptoms only, then blood test that test for antibodies was introduced, this tests any viral or bacterial antibodies that could be from any known health problem and our immune system created these antibodies when in recovery, then the PCR test were used which use saliva which has also unverifiable results.

PCR tests were claimed to be insufficient for testing diseases by the test creator.These Test kits were claimed  to be for experimental use only by the CDc,s own website.

After this came on-site test kits which have a ten minute diagnosis, unapproved yet allowed to make up the final numbers in the claims of CV19.

None of the above are capable of making a CV19 diagnosis.

This doctor explains in more detail and offers a reward for anyone who can prove that CV19 exists.


Face masks could increase risk of infection, medical chief warns…/coronavirus-news-face…

A fraction of carbon dioxide previously exhaled is inhaled at each respiratory cycle. Those two phenomena increase breathing frequency and deepness, and hence they increase the amount of inhaled and exhaled air.

This may worsen the burden of covid-19 if infected people wearing masks spread more contaminated air. This may also worsen the clinical condition of infected people if the enhanced breathing pushes the viral load down into their lungs.

The BMJ warns of the dangers:

This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. Further research is needed to inform the widespread use of cloth masks globally. However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.

Dr. Russell Blaylock is a nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, health practitioner, author, and lecturer in the U.S. He warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.…/

Many doctors report that masks are not effective for protection.

Mandatory Face Masks:

By Tasha Krett

Some key reasons to question and oppose the wearing of face masks (mandated on public transport in England from 15th June):
The Government’s mantra on Covid 19 is that they’re ‘’guided by the science’’ however it’s clear that they’re in fact guided by nefarious political agendas propped up by made to order pseudo-science and wildly exaggerated computer modelled projections (such as used by Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, London).

For example the overwhelming current (unbiased) scientific evidence indicates that not only are the majority of masks worn by the general public, ineffective but they are also detrimental to the health, as prolonged mask use can cause: Hypercapnia, Respiratory Acidosis (due to elevated C02 levels in the blood) and Hypoxia (even after only 30 minutes in some cases) which can even cause some people to faint putting them at potential risk of brain injury or even fatal brain bleeds from falls, and also putting taxi drivers and pilots who wear masks at risk of having accidents , as well as weakening the immune system which makes people more susceptible to colds and flu (which can then conveniently be attributed to an increase in alleged Covid cases in time for the pre-planned 2nd Wave (by those in power with a vested interest in padding the figures for example due to their proven financial ties to Bill Gates and Big Pharma/The Vaccine industry).

Also people with pre-existing respiratory conditions such as COPD and asthma etc are at extra risk from wearing masks, and the website actually has a Face Coverings Exemptions list which includes children under 11 years old and physical and mental health conditions etc and a Mask Exemption card can also be downloaded and printed off from that site (bearing in mind most people would technically meet the requirement of the exception:

‘’ Where a person removes their face covering to avoid harm or injury, or the risk of harm or injury, to themselves or others.’’

Also please consider how acquiescing to wearing masks on public transport/taxis is setting a dangerous precedent for masks to then be mandated in shops and even possibly in all public spaces outside of one’s own home!

As well as conditioning the public to accept even more draconian measures such as mandatory testing, mandatory use of the Track and Trace (Big Brother) App and most worryingly, leading up towards (defacto) mandatory (health and DNA destroying) experimental Covid vaccines ( which may be pushed through social and financial coercion and strict restriction of movement etc of those who don’t comply – aka medical tyranny, in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code)!

Additionally, masks are used for social control through muzzling and de-humanising people and increasing social isolation through reducing the likelihood of social interaction, as well as being symbolic of the worrying increase in censorship of those who oppose the mainstream official narrative on Covid and other topics.
Masks also serve as props to keep project fear alive through the illusion of there being a ‘pandemic’ even though the UK government’s own website admitted on 19th March that Corona 19 was no longer considered to be a Highly contagious infectious disease (HCID) and it actually doesn’t meet the criteria of a real pandemic or even of an epidemic also bearing in mind that the virus has never even been isolated.

*(please see links below for more information) *

Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don’t Protect You

The Miserable Pseudo-Science Behind Face Masks, Social Distancing And Contact Tracing

Do Masks Even Work? Can You Be Forced To Wear One? Dr. Kaufman Weighs In

I am OSHA 10&30 certified. I know some of you are too. I don’t really know WHY OSHA hasn’t come forward and stopped the nonsense BUT
I wanna cover 3 things
• N95 masks and masks with exhale ports
• surgical masks
• filter or cloth masks

Okay so upon further inspection OSHA says some masks are okay and not okay in certain situations.
If you’re working with fumes and aerosol chemicals and you give your employees the wrong masks and they get sick you can be sued.
• N95 masks: are designed for CONTAMINATED environments. That means when you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into contamination. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. They don’t filter the air on the way out. They don’t need to.
Conclusion: if you’re in Stewart’s and the guy with Covid has N95 mask his covid breath is unfiltered being exhaled into Stewart’s (because it was designed for already contaminated environments, it’s not filtering your air on the way out)

• Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGG these masks very Very quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask with render it “useless” IF you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it You become a walking virus dispenser. Everytime you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non sterile environment”

Cloth masks: today three people pointed to their masks as the walked by me entering Lowe’s. They said “ya gotta wear your mask BRO” I said very clearly “those masks don’t work bro, in fact they MAKE you sicker” the “pshh’d” me.

By now hopefully you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything. You mean the American flag one my aunt made? Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks health. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.

Ultimate Answer: N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.

The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. It’s filtration works on the exhale. (Like a vacuum bag it only works one way)

Cloth masks are WORSE than none.

The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work.

Wash your hands. Sanitize your hands. Don’t touch stuff. Wash your phone. Don’t touch people. And keep your distance. Why? Because your breath stinks, your deodorant is failing, your shoes are old and stink, that shirts not clean, I like my space. Trust me I can hear you from here. Lots of reasons. But trust me. The masks do not work.
*Occupational Safety & Health Administration sited.
The top American organization for safety.
They regulate and educate asbestos workers, surgical rooms, you name it.
If your mask gives you security wear it, just know it is a false sense of security.

If stores stopped enforcing it no one would continue this nonsense.

A doctor discusses the disastrous impact that the lockdown will have on our health, which will be far reaching and more devastating than CV.

COVID – will lockdown lead to a major health disaster

Meanwhile the main stream media is reporting on false facts and figures with no accountability.

This chart presented by the mainstream media is WRONG.

If you watched Newsnight  you were given a lot of misinformation. Broadcasting that the UK has higher daily deaths than the whole of the EU is just WRONG.

180 people died in the last 24 hours, NOT 359. . This can be easily checked by downloading the daily data provided by NHS England.

359 is the total of reported deaths, but the people died on completely different days.

20 of the deaths occurred on June 2
47 on June 1
18 on May 31
66 were between May 2 and May 30
24 were in April
4 were in March

So a total of 179 of the 359 reported did not die on the day they said they did.

Do you still believe the whole of the BBC reporting on covid-19 now? Is it not obvious they are trying to make the situation worse than it is? Why would that be? Maybe to justify continuing the lockdown and keep the fear up?

This was the chart presented on Newsnight

The second chart shows the daily hospital deaths which the media never show, but which shows the epidemic in terms of deaths is going to zero (not including care homes, which of course should be reported separately, but are not).

Can you see how data is being manipulated and presented in a way that is completely misleading?

Remember also that all these people did not die ‘of covid’. They died ‘with covid’

~Jill Kirkwood.

The World Health Organization (WHO) just made an announcement that literally dismantled the PRIMARY REASON we shut down our economy, social-distanced from family and friends for months, destroyed businesses, stopped going to church, astronomically increased mental health-related breakdowns, submitted ourselves to mandatory mask-wearing orders, forced people to bury their loved ones with no funeral, etc.

Remember how often we were told that “asymptomatic carriers of Covid-19 can spread this disease to hundreds of people before they even realise they are infected?” It didn’t matter that this defied common sense and experience, did it? Nope. We were chastised over and over again and told to “listen to the experts.”

Some of us said, “Historically, the practice is to quarantine those who are sick.” But, the answer we received was “No, this isn’t enough with this Coronavirus because you can be spreading it long before you show any symptoms. Therefore, we have to put everyone in quarantine.” And those who questioned this idea were accused of being selfish, self-centered, “caring more about money than people,” and “wanting to kill grandma.”

How convenient now for the WHO to come out with a statement telling the world that they’ve actually realized that “spread of Covid-19 by asymptomatic carriers is rare.” Rare, of course, means that IT HARDLY EVER HAPPENS.

~Dan Mcghee

Three days after the World Health Organisation issued its revised advice on wearing masks, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, Head of the World Health Organisation’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters, reported that:

‘From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual. We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.’

This is not what the UK Government or other governments around the world wanted to hear in order to justify keeping their populations under lockdown and imposing measures such as wearing masks, and the very next day Dr. Kerkhove was forced to retract her statements, and articles that had reported her remarks were rewritten in another of the increasing examples of censorship of online information that contradicts government policy.

“First, let’s handle the question of vaccination.

There is a measles vaccine, yet it kills 140,000 a year.

There is a pneumococcus vaccine, yet it kills between 2 and 2.5 million a year.

There is a hepatitis B vaccine, yet it kills 140,000. There is a tetanus vaccine, yet it kills 89,000 annually. There is a retrovirus vaccine, yet it kills 800,000. There is a HPV vaccine, yet it kills 250,000.

There is a tuberculosis vaccine, yet it kills 1.5 million.

There is an influenza vaccine, yet it kills 650,000 to 1 million deaths a year.

None of these are considered pandemics, cause entire economies to be shut down or, or call for any extraordinary measures at all.”

~Nicholas Manousos

Meanwhile in UK, CV claims  have been doubled due to testing errors.

Meanwhile, those behind the false claims openly admit to have joined forces with each other in order to produce vaccines for CV which they have already started to manufacture without waiting for any trial results!

So many unanswered questions.

How was it possible for Bill Gates to help negotiate a $100 Billion deal for contact tracing months before the reported pandemic?