๐—™๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—  ๐——๐—ฅ. ๐—š๐—”๐—•๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—˜๐—Ÿ ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ฆ*
Dear Friends,
Putting together an understanding of the COVID-19 event with all the mass hysteria, misinformation, and hyperbole is not easy. In approaching this, I’ve tried to stick with statistics and published papers; however, I’m choosing not to footnote everything because this isnโ€™t a doctoral thesis. I share here a list of facts that give us an ability to shape our own analyses. All these facts Iโ€™m presenting are backed by the scientific literature.
๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐˜€:
* There appears to be no difference in outcome between lockdown countries and non-lockdown countries. Research in comparing the two approaches did not find a significant difference in outcome. Non-lockdown countries such as Belarus, Sweden, Japan did equal to, and in some situations better, than lockdown countries.
* In countries like the US and the UK, with lockdowns, the overall mortality is in the range of a strong influenza season. In countries where social distancing was not enforced, the rate of mortality may have even been lower than countries with enforced social distancing. For example, in Taiwan, population 24 million, only 7 people have died. In Japan, population 121 million, less than 1,000 died. In Singapore, less than 12 have died, and in Iceland, 10 people have died.
* Because of its low fatality rate, COVID-19 falls into the second tier of the 5-level pandemic plan developed by US authorities. Level-2 calls for only the voluntary isolation of sick people. Further measures such as face masks, contact tracing, school closing, distance rules, vaccinations, and lockdowns of entire societies are not recommended for this tier.
* In May of 2020, Germanyโ€™s Bild newspaper wrote, โ€œLockdown was a Huge Mistakeโ€.
* JP Morganโ€™s actuarial showed that the longer the lockdown, the greater the death rate. They cite that where no lockdown, such as North Dakota, there are 5 deaths in 100,000. With a 30-day lockdown, there are 8 deaths per 100K. With a 40-day lockdown, there are 16 deaths per 100K. With a 50-day lockdown, there are 20 deaths per 100K. In lockdowns greater than 2 months, there are 32 deaths per 100K. The longest lockdown had 5 times higher fatality compared to the shortest lockdown duration.
* In countries without curfews and contact bans, such as Japan, Belarus, Sweden, South Korea, and Taiwan, there was no increased mortality compared to those with curfews and contact bans.
* Stanford professor and Nobel laureate in chemistry, Michael Levitt, points out that the lockdown didn’t save lives but cost many.
* Experts in virology and infectious disease and epidemiology, such as Stanford professor Scott Atlas, who said in an interview with CNN, โ€œThe idea of having to stop COVID has created a catastrophic healthcare situation.โ€
* British Chief medical officer Chris Whitty stated, โ€œThere is no danger to the vast majority of the population.โ€
* Professor Yoram Lass, former director-general of Israel’s ministry of health suggests the lockdown measures have been disproportionate and represent a serious threat to hundreds of millions of people. He suggests that people have been intimidated and “brainwashed”.
* The German Ministry of the Interior, responsible for disaster protection, in a 100-page analysis on COVID management, described the pandemic as a global false alarm and that the collateral damage caused by the lockdown is significantly higher than the lockdownโ€™s benefit and far exceeds the risk potential of the virus.
* Professor Sucharit Bhakdi who founded the Association of Physicians and Scientists of Health, Freedom, and Democracy with over 16,000 supporters made a statement to the Federal Government and state governments to immediately and completely lift the COVID-19 measures. He is also the author of the book Corona โ€“ A False Alarm.
* One of the worldโ€™s most renowned epidemiology experts, Johan Giesecke, former first chief scientist of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, said, “Measures we should take against the pandemic should be evidence-based. When you start looking at the measures now taken by different countries, very few have a shred of evidence.”
* In perspective, the COVID-19 pandemic is less deadly than the 1919 Spanish Flu, the 1958 Asian Flu, and the 1968 Hong Kong Flu.
* The overall deaths and hospitalizations have decreased although numbers testing positive have increased.
* In general, there are over 250 experts worldwide who disagree with the governmental and international attempted enforced COVID-19 dogmas. For example, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons sued the FDA for โ€œirrational interference of access to life saving hydroxychloroquineโ€. [June 14, 2020] In their lawsuit they say, โ€œHydroxychloroquine is the first choice in a study of 6,000 doctors in treating the coronavirus.โ€
* The lockdown has created lethal levels of unemployment with greatly increased levels of suicide, child abuse, spousal abuse, drug abuse, and depression.
* Already, there are reports that isolation measures are triggering more domestic violence in some areas. Prolonged school closings are preventing special needs children from receiving treatment and could presage a rise in dropouts and delinquency. Public health centers will lose funding, causing a decline in their services and the health of their communities. A surge in unemployment to 20% โ€“ a forecast now common in Western economies โ€“ could cause an additional 20,000 suicides in Europe and the United States among those out of work or entering a near-empty job market.
* During the last recession, from 2007-2009, the bleak job market helped spike suicide rates in the United States and Europe, claiming the lives of 10,000 more people than before the downturn.
* A 1% increase in unemployment can result in 39,000 deaths of despair over the next 5 years. Unemployment rates of 15% create an increased rate of suicide up to 800,000 additional deaths. These deaths are labeled “deaths of despair”, which include socially isolated people facing an increased risk of death from heart disease.
* The YWCA of Northern New Jersey, in another example, told Reuters its domestic violence calls have risen 24%.
* Mandatory quarantines have been shown to have devastating impacts on the social, economic, psychological, physical, and spiritual wellbeing of healthy individuals.
* First-time job hunters seeking work during periods of high unemployment live shorter, unhealthier lives, research shows. An extended freeze of the economy could shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million Americans entering the job market by an average of about two years, said Hannes Schwandt, a health economics researcher at Northwestern University, who conducted the study with von Wachter. This would be 12.8 million years of life lost.
* In 2015 a study showed that men have up to an 85% increased risk of all-cause mortality after losing their jobs.
* In 2019, WHOโ€™s study on public health measures against pandemics of influenza found that contact tracing is not recommended in any circumstances.
* In the history of pandemics, there’s never been any quarantine of healthy people. This quarantine of healthy people is a dangerous approach with no scientific validity.
* Is the cure worse than the disease, where fear and anxiety have kept people focused on the small picture rather than the big picture, such as 130 million people in Africa starving to death from the effects of the lockdown in the US?
* The sage Dr. Alan Keys said, โ€œI raise the question that individual fear for life is disproportionate to losing our way of life and our very nation and freedom.โ€
———————-
๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐˜€:
* Worldwide research on mask efficacy showed no difference in outcome whether one wears a mask or not.
* A cross country study published by the University of East Anglia concluded that the mask requirement has no benefit and may increase the risk of infection.
* Two US professors in respiratory protection from the University of Illinois explain in an essay that the masks do not affect self-protection or protection of third parties. As noted in the news, masks didn’t prevent the outbreak of the virus in Wuhan.
* The Annals of Internal Medicine published a study in April 2020 stating that neither fabric masks nor surgical masks could prevent the spread of COVID-19 by coughing.
* In the New England Journal of Medicine (May 2020), an article appeared that concluded that masks offer little or no protection in everyday life. The call for a mask requirement was described as โ€œirrational fear reflexโ€.
* In searching the worldwide literature, there is no peer-reviewed study showing the efficacy of face masks amongst healthy or asymptomatic individuals. Research suggests that people who are physically sick should wear facemasks to protect those around them. In emergency and surgery rooms, facemasks prevent saliva and nasal secretions from falling onto the ill and operated upon and are not necessarily for prevention against viral disease.
* Wearing a mask may be detrimental to your health.
* It’s not natural to rebreathe exhaled air. Masks increase levels of CO2 which raises it in the blood to potentially harmful levels. Excess CO2 is associated with mental confusion, unclear thinking, visual disturbances, headaches, and nausea. If you insist on wearing a mask, don’t do it while driving as it decreases one’s ability to drive safely.
* Wearing a mask may further compromise those with existing lung conditions such as asthma, emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis, and COPD
* Facemasks cause people to rebreathe exhaled viruses, increasing the number of viruses in the nose, giving these access to the brain via olfactory nerves.
* N95 masks have been shown to lower blood oxygen up to 20% below the normal levels, which may cause blackout or death in those already oxygen compromised.
———————-
๐—ก๐—ผ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—”๐˜€๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€:
* WHO declared in June 2020 that the transmission of disease from asymptomatic people is rare.
* WHO has issued a statement saying, โ€œNo evidence of asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission, so no need for restrictions if youโ€™re not sick.โ€ This statement suggests that asymptomatic people are not contagious and implies that only symptomatic people should wear masks.
* Up to 80% of all who tested positive remain symptom-free.
* Those of the age group of 70-79, 60% who tested positive remain symptom-free.
* 95% of people who contracted COVID-19 either had no symptoms or a mild degree of illness and quickly recovered. 5% suffered from a more serious illness.
* A study in respiratory medicine, May 13, 2020, done in China on the infectivity of asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers closely followed 450 contacts exposed to asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers, which included 35 patients, 196 family members, and 224 hospital staff, who were exposed for at least 4 days, showed that none of the 455 people exposed contracted COVID-19.
———————-
๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต:
* The latest immunological studies show the overall fatality at approximately 0.1%. Other studies suggest it’s as low as 0.03%.
* The median age of mortality is over 80 years, with somewhere between 96-99% having at least 1 co-morbidity factor and 50% having at least 3 co-morbidity factors, including type-2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, and heart disease and cancer.
* On average, around the world, up to 2/3s of deaths occurred in nursing homes.
* The death rate in healthy elderly people is around 1%. 99% of those infected, recover.
* Dr. John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and health research policy at Stanford stated, โ€œIf COVID-19 deaths were added to the flu deaths from last seasons, we would see no noticeable difference from normal deaths from flu.โ€
* Dr. John Ioannidis stated that among people under the age of 65, the death rate is 6 per million. This is .0006% of those infected.
* The risk of the lethality of COVID-19 in the general population of school and working-age people is the same as the risk of death during one’s daily car ride to work.
* Dr. John Ioannidis showed that people under 45 years of age had an almost 0% risk of mortality.
* Both COVID-19 and influenza, in general, may cause venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. It’s been known for 50 years that influenza increases the risk of these pathologies.
———————-
๐‚๐Ž๐•๐ˆ๐ƒ-๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐š๐ง๐ ๐‚๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ง:
* There’s no scientific evidence to suggest a medical reason for the closure of schools as the risk of disease and transmission in children is close to zero.
* Countries that had reopened their schools in May of 2020 saw no increases in cases of infection. Sweden, which never closed its primary schools had no increase in the incidence of COVID-19 cases in children.
* The German Medical Association has stated that COVID-19 is a minimal or mild risk to children and the middle schools and daycares should be open without restriction.
* There are no medical reasons for smaller classes and social distancing in schools. The chance of a child dying of COVID-19 is less than that of them being struck by lightning.
———————-
๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜-๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต ๐—”๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€
(๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜†):
* A study in the Journal of Nature Medicine suggests that the antibodies against COVID-19 post-infection may be lost after 2 months [and may not offer any validity to herd immunity].
* Research also showed that asymptomatic people still produced antibodies, but they fell to undetectable levels in 40% of asymptomatic people compared with 13% of those with symptoms.
* In the MIT Technology Review, in a study between 2016 and 2018, Columbia University scientists, in studying 4 coronaviruses (HKU-1, NL-63, C-229-E, OC-42), found that people frequently became reinfected with the same coronavirus even in the same year and sometimes more than once. (Note: This is distinctly different from infections like measles and chickenpox in which after recovery one had lifelong immunity.) Study co-author Jefferey Shaman warned that unlike some viruses, in COVID-19, immunity seems to wane quickly. This again raises a huge question about the idea of a vaccine for COVID-19 having lifelong protection.
* The results of these studies certainly cast doubt on the idea of immunity passports.
* Research from the Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital and the University of Texas showed that more than 10% of people in their study lost antibody protection within 30 days. Dr. Wang stated, โ€œThe idea of immune certification for recovered COVID-19 patients is invalid.โ€ The study supports statements from the WHO that immunity from 1-time infection is unproven. Currently, there is no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and who have antibodies are protected from a second infection.
* The South China Morning Post notes that scientists said that 25% of workers could have been infected at some point but only 4% developed antibodies.
โ€ข The research reported by the New York Times suggests that antibodies against COVID-19 can fade away in 2-3 months especially if itโ€™s a mild case. Immunity passports make no sense if this is true.
———————-
๐‚๐Ž๐•๐ˆ๐ƒ-๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐•๐š๐œ๐œ๐ข๐ง๐ž:
* Many medical experts feel that the proposed coronavirus vaccine is unnecessary or even dangerous.
* An increasing number of scientific evidence suggests that vaccination may increase the risk of harmful or deadly overreaction (such as cytokine storm) to the virus, or simply severe lung damage.
* A Pentagon study showed those vaccinated against the flu are 36% more likely to contract COVID-19.
* One study found children younger than 18 who received the flu vaccination had a higher risk of developing viral pneumonia.
* An Australia study showed a 55% greater risk of developing a lung infection after vaccination.
* Vaccinated children had a 4.4-time greater risk of developing a serious viral lung infection.
* Preliminary research at MODERNA on developing the RNA vaccine showed that 20% of participants in the high dose group had serious side effects.
* A study in China, April 18, 2020, showed that COVID-19 had mutated into at least 30 different variations. This raises questions about any potential usefulness of a vaccine designed against one particular variation.
* As we review all these scientific facts and thoughtful opinions, from the spiritual and prophetic perspective, COVID-19 could be seen as a direct message to humanity to return to God, reconnect to the soul, and return to living in harmony on all levels with the living planet. Itโ€™s time to start living life and wake up to God.
———————-
๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐—–๐—ข๐—ฉ๐—œ๐——-๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต:
* In Northern Italy, the death rate among healthy elderly was 0.8%.
* For those who are committed to optimal holistic health, research shows that if youโ€™re healthy at any age (up to 106 years old) your rates of infection remain equal to that of those aged 50 and younger.
* The main protection against COVID-19 is being healthy and cultivating a healthy terrain, which includes a healthy body, immune system, emotions, and spiritual practice.
Information from the UK government website on the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine:
1. The vaccine is not safe for pregnant women.
2. The vaccine is not safe for women planning on becoming pregnant within a few months of taking the vaccine.
3. The vaccine is not safe for those who are immune suppressed (experience allergic reactions).
4. No testing or trials have been performed to determine long-term side effects.
5. No testing or trials have been performed to determine the side effects if taken with other prescribed medications.
6. It is unknown if the vaccine will cause infertility.
7. Taking the vaccine will not stop you from getting COVID-19.
8. Taking the vaccine will not prevent you from spreading the virus.
9. You cannot breastfeed if you have had the vaccine.
10. The vaccine has not been tested or trialled on children and is not suitable for persons under the age of 16.
11. Neither the UK government nor the vaccine manufacturers accept responsibility for death or personal injury resulting from taking the vaccine.
In fact both Pfizer & Biotech sought explicit immunity from prosecution in the case of deaths or personal harm from taking the vaccine.
ย 
ย 
In the meantime, WHO publishes ‘Best practice guidance’ โ€“ How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public. This guidance document provides basic broad principles for a spokesperson of any health authority on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. The suggestions are based on psychological research on persuasion, on research in public health, communication studies and on WHO risk communication guidelines.
ย 
ย 
Explains why the mayor of London had a fake photo shoot of accepting a vaccine which still had its cap on, I wonder why?
ย 
ย 
Just so you know…
This crisis was named ‘ONE UN’
On 6 February 2020 UN Development Coordination Office (UNDCO) hosted a call with WHO to brief all Resident Coordinators and UN Country Teams (UNCTs) to provide updates on the COVID-19 epidemiological situation
and introduce the COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan (SPRP),1 emphasising the importance of responding to the crisis as One UN.
ย 
https://theresistance.video/watch?id=5febc6a8c3c5ce1ce2f5f8d7&fbclid=IwAR13-tX_JhndrXmv0FvrhiibGW0sSXGvv2-hLQLiudM_MTgjNb9nXApQnns
ย 
What about Moderna?
ย 
  • We do not have access to the complete clinical DATA. Thus there is NO DATA TRANSPARENCY
  • Data transparency is not a โ€œnice to have.โ€ Claims made without access to the dataโ€”whether appearing in peer reviewed publications or in preprints without peer reviewโ€”are not scientific claims.
  • Doctors and Professional Societies should publicly state that, without complete data transparency, they will refuse to endorse covid-19 products as being based on science. The first critical risk is that of an exaggerated estimate of a productโ€™s benefits. The second critical risk is underestimating a productโ€™s side effects.
  • Copious evidence already shows that adverse event data collected in trials are under-reported in journal publications.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccineโ€™sย abilityย to prevent Death
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccineโ€™sย abilityย to prevent infection
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccineโ€™sย abilityย to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission person to person. In fact evidence is already emergingย  that it may not.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccineโ€™sย efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly)
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccineโ€™sย important endpoints like prevention of severe disease and transmission in high risk people
  • We know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months or two or three years. The existing โ€œtrialsโ€ will likely END with NO follow up results tabulated. It took seven yearsโ€”and a lawsuitโ€”to unearth the vast dangers, narcolepsy et al, of the Pandemrix H1N1 โ€œvaccineโ€
  • We Know very little about the vaccineโ€™s effects onย pregnant women, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals who wereย largely excludedย from the trials.
  • The Moderna trials went to great lengths to assure no trial participant got pregnant before, during and after the trial. Couple this with no multi-generational testing at all and you can make a good case for premeditated Malice should this vaccine pass on very negative DNA to their offspring.

In June 2020 the UN published a report claiming that Iran was responsible for attacks on Saudi Arabia in September 2019. The weapons used were said to be of Iranian origin according to the UN and Iran were accused of using weapons to destabilise the middle east.

Despite the denials of the Iranians, who were one of the original members of the UN, that they were responsible, the UN supported the US and declared the weapons embargo to now be indefinite.ย 

https://www.state.gov/un-report-exposes-irans-defiance-of-the-united-nations/ย 

The UN found no evidence of military or financial link from the Iranians to the Yemen rebels known as Houthi previously but claimed that they had been given fuel by the Iranians to raise funds for their cause.

Link to reported claims of who Houthi rebelsย  are.https://www.dw.com/en/yemens-houthi-rebels-who-are-they-and-what-do-they-want/a-50667558

The UN claimed that arms were also seized off the Iranian coast which they claim also proved that Iran have violated the arms embargo.

On the 23rd November 2020, a report claimed that a Saudi Arabian oil field had been targeted by the Houthi.ย https://www.ft.com/content/9bf62d06-5bdb-4d73-8820-bd72956eb9b4

On the 27th November 2020, a senior Iranian scientist was reportedly assassinated and blame has been given to Israel and USA.

ย 

ย 

Interesting date for the attack and number plate : 9.11

ย 

Mohsen Fakhrizadeh who was shot in an ambush by a reported 12 assailants and died later from his injuries.

The murdered Fakhrizadeh has been discussedย  in the past by the Isreali leadership as someone to watch.

Although he was known to be the man at the helm of the nuclear programmes, Fakhrizadeh was also at the forefront of the testing CV19 test and trace applications and the vaccine production with tests being carried out in Iran in November, the same month in which it was claimed that he was shot.

https://www.chron.com/news/article/Iran-scientist-linked-to-military-nuclear-program-15757852.php

The Times of Israel reports on the attack.ย https://www.timesofisrael.com/a-truck-bomb-then-a-hail-of-bullets-iranian-media-describes-hit-on-fakhrizadeh/

https://www.timesofisrael.com/a-truck-bomb-then-a-hail-of-bullets-iranian-media-describes-hit-on-fakhrizadeh/

Curiously, many known false flag attacks that have been perpetrated on the public by the national security agencies have used the same brand of car for the storyline.

Reports that the Iranian scientist was driving in a Nissan car have emerged,ย  Nissan is reportedly also the brand of the truck that was left at the scene with a bomb attached that caused the Nissan car being driven by the scientist, to slow down. This reportedly led to the gun fight that occurred afterwards.

After past reports of attacks that have been obviously created by NSA and the constant mention of Nissan cars being involved, I was of the firm belief that it was a code to let those in the know, know.

NISSAN = NiSsAn. NSA

The 7/7 false flag attack that occurredย  blamed patsies and reports claimed that one of the perpetrator’s, Tanweer had left his Nissan Micra at Luton station.

The Manchester bomb reports claimed that the bomber also drove a Nissan Micra, in this article the car was said to hold a sports bag with the name of an American football team.https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/06/manchester-attack-police-release-images-of-bombers-carย 

The man claimed to be responsible for 9-11 was also named Mohamed Atta’s Nissan Altima.

The reports of the 2010 Times Square car bomb was a Nissan.https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/nyregion/02timessquare.html

This article appeared some time later stating that an American Football club had been home to a terror drill at their Nissan stadium exactly a year ago. In November 2019. https://www.newschannel5.com/news/explosions-sirens-could-be-heard-thursday-during-mock-terrorist-attack-at-nissan-stadium

In the reported cyber attack of 2017, the attack hit the NHS and the Nissan car factory?https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nissan-sunderland-cyber-attack-ransomware-nhs-malware-wannacry-car-factory-a7733936.html

The Columbian car bomb in 2019 was a Nissan too.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-46904683

A top Pentagon spokesperson Dana W White, who was the former assistant to the Secretary of Defence for public affairs was also a former director of policy and strategic communications for Nissan.

https://www.defense.gov/Our-Story/Biographies/Biography/Article/1170857/dana-w-white/

Coding in the media using names and places etc is nothing new and has been called predictive programming in many instances in the past. The Olympic ceremony imagery was used to convey the future plans, a link to my video on the subject:ย https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pt-2_-zYbrc&t=16s

Below is a picture of the ceremony showingย  a chinese woman in front of an image that resembled the Wuhan market images.

The fact that Fakhrizadeh was head of the CV19 vaccines and testing operations means that Iran are in line with the global agenda of the UN and WHO.

My belief is that this is a major false flag at work.

If we cast our minds back to January 2020, another Iranian scientist was reportedly assassinated and claims made that this was the work of USA.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/03/iran-cyberattacks-experts-us-suleimani

In this report, it makes claims that US assassinated an Iranian scientist and that:

The revenge would come in the form of attacks on the power grid, banks and communications networks as well as health facilities.

This appears to be a case of problem-reaction-solution.

Although no such revenge was enacted at the beginning of the year, it seems obvious to me that the targeting of the power grid, banks, healthcare and communications will fall exactly in line with Agenda 20/30 and the UN goals.

The UN joined in on the condemnation of Iran in June 2020 when they published a report claiming that Iran was responsible for an attack on Saudia Arabia in Sept 2019. Because the UN claimed that the weapons used were of Iran origin.

The report also claimed that they would call for an indefiniteย  weapons embargo instead of the 13 years ban that the US had called for.https://www.state.gov/un-report-exposes-irans-defiance-of-the-united-nations/

So we can see that the UN along with USA were involved in the reported dispute. But as we know, all the world is a stage and the world stage now is being used to play out a multitude of scenarios in order to bring about a conclusion that will usher in the ‘4th Industrial Revolution’ or ‘Reset’.

The revenge could be exactly what they claimed could happen a year ago.

If banks were targeted it would bring about the planned digital currency agenda. The health system would be steered in the direction required by the UN and the power grids have long since been ‘a threat’ that we could be facing.

Problem-Reaction-Solution works every time.

Theย  picture does NOT represent evidence of a truck bomb and a shoot out by several people with many deaths nor is it evidence that this is what actually happened.

ย 

Within days, the story has been changed to alter the original version.ย https://www.rt.com/news/508170-iran-assassination-remote-gun/

ย