External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

Pieter Borger(1), Bobby Rajesh Malhotra(2) , Michael Yeadon(3) , Clare Craig(4), Kevin McKernan(5) , Klaus Steger(6) , Paul McSheehy(7) , Lidiya Angelova(8), Fabio Franchi(9), Thomas Binder(10), Henrik Ullrich(11) , Makoto Ohashi(12), Stefano Scoglio(13), Marjolein Doesburg-van Kleffens(14), Dorothea Gilbert(15), Rainer Klement(16), Ruth Schruefer(17), Berber W. Pieksma(18), Jan Bonte(19), Bruno H. Dalle Carbonare(20), Kevin P. Corbett(21), Ulrike Kämmerer(22)



In the publication entitled “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020) the authors present a diagnostic workflow and RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV (now known as SARS-CoV-2), which they claim to be validated, as well as being a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings. 

In light of all the consequences resulting from this very publication for societies worldwide, a group of independent researchers performed a point-by-point review of the aforesaid publication in which 1) all components of the presented test design were cross checked, 2) the RT-qPCR protocol-recommendations were assessed w.r.t. good laboratory practice, and 3) parameters examined against relevant scientific literature covering the field. 

The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally, the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality.  We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws.

Considering the scientific and methodological blemishes presented here, we are confident that the editorial board of Eurosurveillance has no other choice but to retract the publication.

Full Article for Further reading: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

Meanwhile, the two individuals responsible for claims about PCR tests and their ability to determine CV19, which the WHO enforced, one appears to be  under investigation for faking their expertise and the other stands to gain financially from the tests.


An appeals court in Lisbon, Portugal ruled on Nov. 11th that the PCR test of Dr. Christian Drosten and the WHO was not valid to detect coronavirus infection and that it was no basis to order nationwide or partial lockdowns.




In 2003, the same lab in Germany under Drosten, came up with the SARS test in just 11 days after WHO announced an alert.




1) The CDC announced a couple of months ago that this flu season they would not being doing their NORMAL FLU SEASON TRACKING. To my knowledge they have NEVER done this. Now why would the CDC not perform their normal flu season surveillance? Why this year?

2) Hospitals are reporting they are not sending disease samples suspected as “flu” into the CDC for analysis.

3) The figures for influenza deaths and cases have been so LOW as to be ludicrous. How can anyone KNOW?

The “COVID-19 Deaths” Have Been mostly a Massive Fraud

“Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University, critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country. According to study, In contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”   Covid-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data


CDC Data: Total Mortality from 02/01/2020 to 09/05/2020  Note please observe the Total Mortality has remained almost exactly the SAME. Although we supposedly had over 130,000 “COVID-19 deaths”

“After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.”   Covid-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data


“Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same… .”   Covid-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data

“When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph … , this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.”   Covid-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data

US Total Mortality remained the SAME before and after the “COVID-19 deaths”
In simple terms for each new “COVID-19 death” added to the Total Mortality number one death was SUBTRACTED from one of the categories of the Total Mortality number.
People receiving this UNTESTED “experimental vaccine” do not understand how FEW people (5% of “COVID-19 deaths”) are actually dying of the SARS-CoV-2 virus these “vaccines” are said to “protect” against.


COVID 19, and the subsequent governmental responses, appear to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud. It seems there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19.

Sometimes you have to go with your gut. I am not an expert in genetics and, as ever, stand to be corrected. However my attention was drawn to some research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists lends further credibility to their research. Their claim is astounding.


Full Article : https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/?fbclid=IwAR2L8ztGrOSLHzUASnU47NCgELO1s1sGK574LFijExd-JYNDt9-RjQRUlH4


They forgot motor oil and Spanish river water also tested positive!

But how is this possible?

This year I’ve made 8 films reaching so far over 2 million people, working with world famous doctors, virologists and citing the work of other virologists and molecular biologists on both sides of germ “theory” and terrain theory, so I can pass on to you what I’ve learned from them.

For those who know me and troll me from my current chosen profession over the one I gave up for life satisfaction, what you don’t know about me is that I’ve written esoteric biochemistry blogs for a decade and used to professionally liaise with medical underwriters and doctors back in my days at United HealthCare and large group medical insurance agencies, my job then was to convince them they might be wrong and overcautious based on real facts, not superstition.
So no, I’m not a doctor or virologist.

This information is what the world renowned doctors and virologists I worked on these films with have showed me and what I researched painstakingly myself to check if there is any validity to this and there is. If you’ve seen our films, they speak for themselves. If you haven’t, I’m speaking for them now.

I will give screen shots from the CDC, WHO and Pub Med (the number one peer reviewed medical scientific publishing platform) below, so you can see for yourself what I am about to reveal to you and not take my word for anything, as I’d never ask you to.

This doesn’t come from me, it comes from what you and I are not privy to unless we are in the scientific medical circles that know this.

A so called PCR “test” is NOT a test.

It’s Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, himself was furious that it was being used for any such nonsense as it can neither “test” for anything nor prove how much of any detected genetic material is inside anybody, let alone tell anyone if whatever it does detect is the cause of any illness or disease or not.

Firemen are always at the scene of fires, therefore they are the cause of those fires. Windows are always in airplanes and helicopters, therefore windows are how they can fly.
This is the logical fallacy of virology in a nutshell.

A PCR test is just a chemical and mechanical process that doubles exponentially any given genetic material in a swab sample of body fluids that is normally too small to be seen or even possibly detectable, until everything in that swab sample is exponentially amplified so large it can be detected…like a cold penis under a huge magnifying glass.

Put one grain of sand on a chess board square and double that on the next square, and double that on the next and by the 40th square you’ll have 68.8 trillion grains of sand on that square, double that on the next and so on and you’ll have the Sahara desert by the time you fill the entire 64 squares on the chess board.

This is what PCR does, it keeps doubling the genetic material in your saliva or mucous sample until everything they are purposely looking for in that sample is large enough to actually detect.

If you “spin” or double those sand grains or genetic material less than 25 times, the machine can detect nothing, or in other words, gets a negative “test”or genetic material detection result.

If you spin or double it 40 times, you get a close to 100% “positive” result for whatever you are testing for or in other words, even the invisible contamination rates of the entire procedure show up…

But why?

And what are you testing for exactly, and why are so many labs admitting they are spinning or doubling at 40 times, despite being told this is guaranteed to bring a false “positive” result?

First of all, you are trying to detect what they call a “primer”which is a small expected genetic sequence of nucleotides from an already made computer database of assumed, but not proven, sequence of nucleotides from an alleged “virus” that has never had it’s full nucleotide sequence isolated or proven to exist.

We’re looking for corn in your puke because that’s what we think made you puke, not the two quarts of Vodka you drank right after dinner. We only patented corn, not Vodka.

A cat and human share an 85% genetic match..we sequenced 0.5% nucleotides from a cat and found that same 0.5% sequence in a human, therefore that human is obviously a cat, not a human.

It was just plugged into the database ahead of time based on a nucleotide pattern sequence that was already patented years before, 2004 and 2015 in the case of Sars Covaids 2.

Really “PCR primers are short single-stranded DNA sequences which help in the amplification of DNA during PCR reaction.”

So they say, “we’re purposely looking for this short sequence that we’ve already patented and put into the data base years and years ago, so we only chemically amplify those nucleotide sequences that we have patented out of the millions of possible sequences that we could look for in the sample. “

“We’re not interested in detecting the millions of nucleotide sequences we haven’t patented, as we make zero money off of those.”

NucleoSides are just 5 carbon sugar molecules and when they attach to various organic or inorganic phosphates, you get a nucleoTide…
So they are testing for a small sequence of 5 carbon sugar molecules attached to phosphates in a row.
Not a virus, just a small genetic sequence of different sugars and phosphates.
But how then can river water, motor oil, fruits, goats, birds, Coca Cola or even test kits that haven’t swabbed any genetic material at all still test positive for these nucleotide sequences?

How can they test for a hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of nucleotide sequence long viruses if they can’t isolate or detect such a long complex sequence?

The CDC is using 12 different computer data base “primer” sequences, varying from 17 to 21 nucleotide sequences in a row to look for Covaids, the same sequence found in goats, papayas, river water, motor oil, etc.

The WHO was using human Chromosome 8 as their test database “primer” sequence to detect Covaids, which was looking for the 18 in a row nucleotide sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt, which is found on the 8th out of the 23 pairs of chromosomal trees on all humans.

The same small sequence found in goats, papayas, your pyjamas and the wank sock you keep under your bed, etc etc!

But keep in mind that chromosome 8 is a chain of 145 million base pairs, so nobody knows how many times this little 18 sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt shows up in a sequence of 145 million chained molecule.

Keep in mind we are 85-95 genetically related to cats, pigs, monkeys, earth worms, etc so how many of those things also have this same nucleotide sugar phosphate sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt showing up in their own genetic material hundreds of thousands of times in any given nucleotide chain in their own genetic material?

You’re 90% genetically related to an earthworm, therefore, you are an earthworm? Okey dokey!

Take a random large number 145 million numbers long and how many times do the same sequence of 18 numbers in a row turn up within that large number sequence?

Now take millions of other different large numbers that are also each 145 million numbers long and how many times does that same sequence of 18 numbers in a row turn up in THOSE millions of other large numbers?

Does that mean those other millions of insanely large numbers are the exact same number as or related to the first insanely large number because they all share that same 18 number sequence in a row at some point within them?

Do you see how this works?

These same 18 in a row molecule nucleotide sequences are everywhere and in everything, and if you amplify any sample enough times and are looking for a minuscule nucleotide sequence, there’s a damn good chance it will turn up, even in Coca Cola, fruits and motor oil.

You don’t have Covaids, you have been TOLD you have Covaids!

Yep, if you have the flu any year or time you are actually dying and rightly feel like you are dying while you detox those foreign poisons from your body, otherwise sweating, urination, kidney, liver and diarrhea would have eliminated your body toxins without severely extreme measures, like the worst man flu you’ve ever had in your life.

You just forgot how bad your last flu detox was and love the attention of telling people you survived the Covaids, because you are an attention seeking wanker!

And that’s fine…aren’t we all?

Now this PCR procedure only tells you if it’s detected your pre-determined, patented, computer nucleotide “primer” sequence, it doesn’t tell you how much of that genetic material is actually in your body outside of that saliva or mucous swab sample, or if that material is even the cause of any sickness or disease!

it can only say, “Yep, after amplifying it 68 trillion times we can see it, there it is, exactly what we were looking for, firemen at the scene of a fire, windows in an airplane.”

“We have no clue how much of this genetic material is there or if it even does anything to actually cause illness, we just know it’s in your sample. That’s it.”

So now doctors and scientists have been writing to the health authorities of the world and their own countries, saying ok, show me the documentation for this alleged isolated nucleotide sequence of what you are calling the Covaids 19 virus, and claiming is contagious and causing illness.

As you’ll see below, you get a letter back saying “we don’t have such a thing, it doesn’t exist, it’s never been isolated. We have no proof.”

All attempts so far to isolate Covaids have failed all 4 of Koch’s postulates and 5 out of 6 of River’s postulates.

Which means that:

  1. the alleged virus must be found in abundance (which PCR can’t detect) in ALL organisms suffering from the disease, which means you can’t be asymptomatic.
  2. the alleged virus organism must cause disease, you can’t have it and not have the disease. Meaning you can’t test positive and not be sick in bed and dying from a disease that allegedly makes you sick and dying.
  3. The virus must be completely isolated from all other genetic material in the sample and grown in a pure culture with no other added poisons or genetic material. You should be able to inject that genetic material into other healthy organisms and make every single one of them sick, which has never been done even once in even one subject, let alone all of them.
  4. and then you must be able to re-isolate that same material from someone who has been injected with it and made sick.
    There are 7.2 million dollars in rewards out there for any Virologist, molecular biologist or janitor who can prove this! So far in 230 years of germ “theory” not one has been able to do so!

If YOU can with your bartender training, PM me and I’ll send you links, I just want a 5% finders fee, if you know something the world’s top Virologists don’t even know. If not, quit trolling me and learn something.

What virologists actually do is put a sample of that tiny partial genetic mucous or saliva material, PLUS the rest of the material in the saliva, mucous or whatever sample they swab, ALL of it, into a petri dish full of the living cells of monkey or cow cells that are already acidic, diseased and sick with self-made CANCER, the final stages of cellular bacterial and fungal pleomorphism detoxification defence.

Then they pump other poisonous chemicals into that same petri dish, and those already sick and self-healing monkey and cow cancer cells create exosomes to handle the extra poisons these virologists just pumped into their petri dish and they say: “See! That genetic material we just put into that cell culture started killing or making those cells sick!”

No, those cells were already sick, acidic and cancerous and you just pumped a shitload of poisonous chemicals in them to make them even more sick and now dying, not self healing, plus the extra human genetic material in the mucous and saliva sample that does not come from monkeys or cows, which all bodies reject any non-self material.

Then they claim it was the non-isolated genetic human nucleotide partial material they just put in the petri dish, more specifically the tiny part they already patented!

Never-mind that they just put a shitload of other human genetic material in there along with it, never bothering to isolate the exact nucleotide sequencing they put in there from the God knows how many other human genetic materials were in that saliva or mucous sample, to make sure they ONLY put that into their animal tissue culture petri dish and no other poisons or human genetic material,
and then they make the “assumption” that it must be the “virus” partial sequence material they put in and not the other poisons, chemicals and genetic material they also had to put in there to make those cells sick and produce an exosome cellular defence response to those poisons and other non-self animal genetic material in the sample.

It’s like you kissing your girlfriend, then eating 15 candy bars, drinking two bottles of vodka, snorting two grams of cocaine, eating a loaf of mouldy bread topped with poisoned raw shellfish, chugging down a glass of bacteria ridden milk that’s been sitting on your counter for two months, having an anxiety attack releasing stress hormones that shut down your body’s toxin removal abilities and then claiming your girlfriend’s kiss must be the reason you are sick now!

That’s “virology” in a nutshell.

“We can’t make cancerous monkey or cow cells even more sick with a kiss or candy bar, so we add all of the others poisonous things and foreign genetic material into the petri dish until it starts an exosome cellular defensive response and then we can blame the kiss…and then claim we can vaccinate you against kisses, even though that’s not why you’re really sick.”

But what are Exosomes?

As Dr. James Hildreth, professor at Johns Hopkins and CEO of Meharry Medical College said “the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word.”
You do NOT catch them.
Your cells create them to remove all foreign poisons, toxins and any genetic material inside your body that was not made by your body for your body to use. All NON-SELF.

12 people go to a dinner party, eat the same thing and only 8 get food poisoning. You send your kids to a chicken pox party but they don’t all get chicken pox. Some kids are tissue damaged at the same age from growth and it’s time to detox and remove dead tissue, some adults have diets abundant in potassium chloride and ferrum phosphate and can’t be poisoned that easily.
There is nothing contagious going on there.

I’ll give you one guess as to what are exactly the same shape and size as what we are told are contagious viruses?

That’s right, pat yourself on the back.

Self-made, inter-cellular created, non-contagious exosomes for removing non-self toxins detected in the body.

Please watch Dr Tim O’Shea explain the difference between Germ Theory & Terrain Theory here:

Germ theory is still a “theory” after 230 years for a reason.
It has never been proven for good reason.
It has been only disproven time and time again.

As Dr. Rosenau showed you in the 1918 Spanish Flu experiments, and many others after him.
Why haven’t you been told? We’ll get to that.

Big Pharma makes tens of billions a year selling you vaccines, antibiotics to kill your own body’s bacteria from trying to heal the tissue YOU damaged by poisoning yourself and cold and flu medication, so they will stop at nothing to keep you in the dark about exosomes and bacterial somatid cleaning cycles going on in your own body.

They also think you’re too stupid, distracted and too brainwashed into trusting white lab coated doctors trained by their big Pharma reps, working on huge commissions to pay off their med school and clinic equipment bills to research this yourself.

Are they right?

It seems to me if you really had proof of a non-fictional virus that was making people ill, you’d be genetically testing for that virus and not a tiny sand grain of patented generic genetic material found in nearly anything and everything, but that’s none of my business.

Now the next logical question is:

Hang on, if you’ve never isolated a full multi thousands or millions nucleotide sequence of what you claim is a disease causing Covaids 19 virus & have never proven it either exists, causes illness or even is transmittable, and your test primer is looking for tiny sequences that are found in almost anything, including fruits, motor oil, river water and goats and your tests are being over-amplified to the point that almost anything will show up in any sample…….

How on earth can you manufacture a Vaccine to protect people against something you don’t even know, nor can even prove in 230 years is real or exists, that cannot make other humans in close contact or even by injection from sick people’s fluids sick, as Dr Rosenau and others tried and failed to do?
Something that cannot make animal cellular tissues in a petri dish sick unless they are already sick cancer cells and you have to add a shitload of other chemical poisons and non-animal genetic material to that petri dish to make it sick?

If you’re really smart you might even ask yourself how there can possibly be a new “mutated strand” of pink flying unicorns if pink flying unicorns don’t even exist in the first place?

If you can’t possibly make such a vaccine against pink flying unicorns that don’t exist, the next logical question is:

Then what the hell is really going on here and what is the real purpose for this mandatory RNA/DNA modification injection to genetically modify you to protect you from something that doesn’t actually exist?

Could there be some other nefarious reason you aren’t being told?

If you are still so thick that you cannot figure out the answer to that last question yourself by now, I’m sorry, there is nothing more I haven’t already showed you this last decade that can help you at this point.

Some people are just destined to become nothing more than statistics in future history books.
You can’t say people didn’t put their necks out on the line to warn you. It is what it is.
But hey, you’ll be able to get on an airplane with the last two airlines who haven’t gone out of business and be able to drink or eat in one of the last two pub or restaurant chains that aren’t out of business when the dust settles.

If you’re still alive.

So aren’t YOU the lucky one?



Plague of Fear 2020 has taken all year to complete.
Here are the previous 6 parts:

In Part I of this series of articles, I described the shocking effects we all experienced during the first half of 2020. The surprises, lockdowns & fearmongering in the media over the so-called Coronavirus outbreak.

In Part 2 I diarised the events & clues we were amassing during July 2020. The pandemic we now call #COVID19 began to be better understood & I was able to introduce the accumulation of EMFs as a potential cause.

In Part 3 I built on all that we know with daily updates & news items as they arose.

Part 4 discussed the psychological tools that have been used to terrorise the world & their impact.

In Part 5 I lifted the lid on the players behind the scene & their entire GLOBAL RESET PLAN.

Disturbing Addendum (part 6) introduced a secret plan shared by those in the know.

As I write on this the last day of 2020 I sincerely wish us all a better year ahead, one in which the truth batters seven barrels of shit out of the mountain of lies we have been fed by the international criminal mafia known as the Black Nobility.
A year in which we see those criminals reduced to inmates in Guantanamo Bay, because they truly are TERRORISTS & we deserve some real justice at last.

Let’s make it so.

Original  Link: https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/plague-of-fear-2020-part-7-the-nail-in-covid-s-coffin?fbclid=IwAR30DLRQeLlBXPsVq-pOGz8qMM63eD9lYYeOAeMlbV_L_hzIRs1ZbzMKmEA

Dear Friends,
Putting together an understanding of the COVID-19 event with all the mass hysteria, misinformation, and hyperbole is not easy. In approaching this, I’ve tried to stick with statistics and published papers; however, I’m choosing not to footnote everything because this isn’t a doctoral thesis. I share here a list of facts that give us an ability to shape our own analyses. All these facts I’m presenting are backed by the scientific literature.
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀:
* There appears to be no difference in outcome between lockdown countries and non-lockdown countries. Research in comparing the two approaches did not find a significant difference in outcome. Non-lockdown countries such as Belarus, Sweden, Japan did equal to, and in some situations better, than lockdown countries.
* In countries like the US and the UK, with lockdowns, the overall mortality is in the range of a strong influenza season. In countries where social distancing was not enforced, the rate of mortality may have even been lower than countries with enforced social distancing. For example, in Taiwan, population 24 million, only 7 people have died. In Japan, population 121 million, less than 1,000 died. In Singapore, less than 12 have died, and in Iceland, 10 people have died.
* Because of its low fatality rate, COVID-19 falls into the second tier of the 5-level pandemic plan developed by US authorities. Level-2 calls for only the voluntary isolation of sick people. Further measures such as face masks, contact tracing, school closing, distance rules, vaccinations, and lockdowns of entire societies are not recommended for this tier.
* In May of 2020, Germany’s Bild newspaper wrote, “Lockdown was a Huge Mistake”.
* JP Morgan’s actuarial showed that the longer the lockdown, the greater the death rate. They cite that where no lockdown, such as North Dakota, there are 5 deaths in 100,000. With a 30-day lockdown, there are 8 deaths per 100K. With a 40-day lockdown, there are 16 deaths per 100K. With a 50-day lockdown, there are 20 deaths per 100K. In lockdowns greater than 2 months, there are 32 deaths per 100K. The longest lockdown had 5 times higher fatality compared to the shortest lockdown duration.
* In countries without curfews and contact bans, such as Japan, Belarus, Sweden, South Korea, and Taiwan, there was no increased mortality compared to those with curfews and contact bans.
* Stanford professor and Nobel laureate in chemistry, Michael Levitt, points out that the lockdown didn’t save lives but cost many.
* Experts in virology and infectious disease and epidemiology, such as Stanford professor Scott Atlas, who said in an interview with CNN, “The idea of having to stop COVID has created a catastrophic healthcare situation.”
* British Chief medical officer Chris Whitty stated, “There is no danger to the vast majority of the population.”
* Professor Yoram Lass, former director-general of Israel’s ministry of health suggests the lockdown measures have been disproportionate and represent a serious threat to hundreds of millions of people. He suggests that people have been intimidated and “brainwashed”.
* The German Ministry of the Interior, responsible for disaster protection, in a 100-page analysis on COVID management, described the pandemic as a global false alarm and that the collateral damage caused by the lockdown is significantly higher than the lockdown’s benefit and far exceeds the risk potential of the virus.
* Professor Sucharit Bhakdi who founded the Association of Physicians and Scientists of Health, Freedom, and Democracy with over 16,000 supporters made a statement to the Federal Government and state governments to immediately and completely lift the COVID-19 measures. He is also the author of the book Corona – A False Alarm.
* One of the world’s most renowned epidemiology experts, Johan Giesecke, former first chief scientist of the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, said, “Measures we should take against the pandemic should be evidence-based. When you start looking at the measures now taken by different countries, very few have a shred of evidence.”
* In perspective, the COVID-19 pandemic is less deadly than the 1919 Spanish Flu, the 1958 Asian Flu, and the 1968 Hong Kong Flu.
* The overall deaths and hospitalizations have decreased although numbers testing positive have increased.
* In general, there are over 250 experts worldwide who disagree with the governmental and international attempted enforced COVID-19 dogmas. For example, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons sued the FDA for “irrational interference of access to life saving hydroxychloroquine”. [June 14, 2020] In their lawsuit they say, “Hydroxychloroquine is the first choice in a study of 6,000 doctors in treating the coronavirus.”
* The lockdown has created lethal levels of unemployment with greatly increased levels of suicide, child abuse, spousal abuse, drug abuse, and depression.
* Already, there are reports that isolation measures are triggering more domestic violence in some areas. Prolonged school closings are preventing special needs children from receiving treatment and could presage a rise in dropouts and delinquency. Public health centers will lose funding, causing a decline in their services and the health of their communities. A surge in unemployment to 20% – a forecast now common in Western economies – could cause an additional 20,000 suicides in Europe and the United States among those out of work or entering a near-empty job market.
* During the last recession, from 2007-2009, the bleak job market helped spike suicide rates in the United States and Europe, claiming the lives of 10,000 more people than before the downturn.
* A 1% increase in unemployment can result in 39,000 deaths of despair over the next 5 years. Unemployment rates of 15% create an increased rate of suicide up to 800,000 additional deaths. These deaths are labeled “deaths of despair”, which include socially isolated people facing an increased risk of death from heart disease.
* The YWCA of Northern New Jersey, in another example, told Reuters its domestic violence calls have risen 24%.
* Mandatory quarantines have been shown to have devastating impacts on the social, economic, psychological, physical, and spiritual wellbeing of healthy individuals.
* First-time job hunters seeking work during periods of high unemployment live shorter, unhealthier lives, research shows. An extended freeze of the economy could shorten the lifespan of 6.4 million Americans entering the job market by an average of about two years, said Hannes Schwandt, a health economics researcher at Northwestern University, who conducted the study with von Wachter. This would be 12.8 million years of life lost.
* In 2015 a study showed that men have up to an 85% increased risk of all-cause mortality after losing their jobs.
* In 2019, WHO’s study on public health measures against pandemics of influenza found that contact tracing is not recommended in any circumstances.
* In the history of pandemics, there’s never been any quarantine of healthy people. This quarantine of healthy people is a dangerous approach with no scientific validity.
* Is the cure worse than the disease, where fear and anxiety have kept people focused on the small picture rather than the big picture, such as 130 million people in Africa starving to death from the effects of the lockdown in the US?
* The sage Dr. Alan Keys said, “I raise the question that individual fear for life is disproportionate to losing our way of life and our very nation and freedom.”
𝗜𝗻𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀:
* Worldwide research on mask efficacy showed no difference in outcome whether one wears a mask or not.
* A cross country study published by the University of East Anglia concluded that the mask requirement has no benefit and may increase the risk of infection.
* Two US professors in respiratory protection from the University of Illinois explain in an essay that the masks do not affect self-protection or protection of third parties. As noted in the news, masks didn’t prevent the outbreak of the virus in Wuhan.
* The Annals of Internal Medicine published a study in April 2020 stating that neither fabric masks nor surgical masks could prevent the spread of COVID-19 by coughing.
* In the New England Journal of Medicine (May 2020), an article appeared that concluded that masks offer little or no protection in everyday life. The call for a mask requirement was described as “irrational fear reflex”.
* In searching the worldwide literature, there is no peer-reviewed study showing the efficacy of face masks amongst healthy or asymptomatic individuals. Research suggests that people who are physically sick should wear facemasks to protect those around them. In emergency and surgery rooms, facemasks prevent saliva and nasal secretions from falling onto the ill and operated upon and are not necessarily for prevention against viral disease.
* Wearing a mask may be detrimental to your health.
* It’s not natural to rebreathe exhaled air. Masks increase levels of CO2 which raises it in the blood to potentially harmful levels. Excess CO2 is associated with mental confusion, unclear thinking, visual disturbances, headaches, and nausea. If you insist on wearing a mask, don’t do it while driving as it decreases one’s ability to drive safely.
* Wearing a mask may further compromise those with existing lung conditions such as asthma, emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis, and COPD
* Facemasks cause people to rebreathe exhaled viruses, increasing the number of viruses in the nose, giving these access to the brain via olfactory nerves.
* N95 masks have been shown to lower blood oxygen up to 20% below the normal levels, which may cause blackout or death in those already oxygen compromised.
𝗡𝗼 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵 𝗯𝘆 𝗔𝘀𝘆𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀:
* WHO declared in June 2020 that the transmission of disease from asymptomatic people is rare.
* WHO has issued a statement saying, “No evidence of asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission, so no need for restrictions if you’re not sick.” This statement suggests that asymptomatic people are not contagious and implies that only symptomatic people should wear masks.
* Up to 80% of all who tested positive remain symptom-free.
* Those of the age group of 70-79, 60% who tested positive remain symptom-free.
* 95% of people who contracted COVID-19 either had no symptoms or a mild degree of illness and quickly recovered. 5% suffered from a more serious illness.
* A study in respiratory medicine, May 13, 2020, done in China on the infectivity of asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers closely followed 450 contacts exposed to asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers, which included 35 patients, 196 family members, and 224 hospital staff, who were exposed for at least 4 days, showed that none of the 455 people exposed contracted COVID-19.
𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗴𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵:
* The latest immunological studies show the overall fatality at approximately 0.1%. Other studies suggest it’s as low as 0.03%.
* The median age of mortality is over 80 years, with somewhere between 96-99% having at least 1 co-morbidity factor and 50% having at least 3 co-morbidity factors, including type-2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, and heart disease and cancer.
* On average, around the world, up to 2/3s of deaths occurred in nursing homes.
* The death rate in healthy elderly people is around 1%. 99% of those infected, recover.
* Dr. John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and health research policy at Stanford stated, “If COVID-19 deaths were added to the flu deaths from last seasons, we would see no noticeable difference from normal deaths from flu.”
* Dr. John Ioannidis stated that among people under the age of 65, the death rate is 6 per million. This is .0006% of those infected.
* The risk of the lethality of COVID-19 in the general population of school and working-age people is the same as the risk of death during one’s daily car ride to work.
* Dr. John Ioannidis showed that people under 45 years of age had an almost 0% risk of mortality.
* Both COVID-19 and influenza, in general, may cause venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. It’s been known for 50 years that influenza increases the risk of these pathologies.
𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝟏𝟗 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧:
* There’s no scientific evidence to suggest a medical reason for the closure of schools as the risk of disease and transmission in children is close to zero.
* Countries that had reopened their schools in May of 2020 saw no increases in cases of infection. Sweden, which never closed its primary schools had no increase in the incidence of COVID-19 cases in children.
* The German Medical Association has stated that COVID-19 is a minimal or mild risk to children and the middle schools and daycares should be open without restriction.
* There are no medical reasons for smaller classes and social distancing in schools. The chance of a child dying of COVID-19 is less than that of them being struck by lightning.
𝗦𝗵𝗼𝗿𝘁-𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗘𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵 𝗔𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗯𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀
(𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗰𝘆):
* A study in the Journal of Nature Medicine suggests that the antibodies against COVID-19 post-infection may be lost after 2 months [and may not offer any validity to herd immunity].
* Research also showed that asymptomatic people still produced antibodies, but they fell to undetectable levels in 40% of asymptomatic people compared with 13% of those with symptoms.
* In the MIT Technology Review, in a study between 2016 and 2018, Columbia University scientists, in studying 4 coronaviruses (HKU-1, NL-63, C-229-E, OC-42), found that people frequently became reinfected with the same coronavirus even in the same year and sometimes more than once. (Note: This is distinctly different from infections like measles and chickenpox in which after recovery one had lifelong immunity.) Study co-author Jefferey Shaman warned that unlike some viruses, in COVID-19, immunity seems to wane quickly. This again raises a huge question about the idea of a vaccine for COVID-19 having lifelong protection.
* The results of these studies certainly cast doubt on the idea of immunity passports.
* Research from the Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital and the University of Texas showed that more than 10% of people in their study lost antibody protection within 30 days. Dr. Wang stated, “The idea of immune certification for recovered COVID-19 patients is invalid.” The study supports statements from the WHO that immunity from 1-time infection is unproven. Currently, there is no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and who have antibodies are protected from a second infection.
* The South China Morning Post notes that scientists said that 25% of workers could have been infected at some point but only 4% developed antibodies.
• The research reported by the New York Times suggests that antibodies against COVID-19 can fade away in 2-3 months especially if it’s a mild case. Immunity passports make no sense if this is true.
𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝟏𝟗 𝐕𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞:
* Many medical experts feel that the proposed coronavirus vaccine is unnecessary or even dangerous.
* An increasing number of scientific evidence suggests that vaccination may increase the risk of harmful or deadly overreaction (such as cytokine storm) to the virus, or simply severe lung damage.
* A Pentagon study showed those vaccinated against the flu are 36% more likely to contract COVID-19.
* One study found children younger than 18 who received the flu vaccination had a higher risk of developing viral pneumonia.
* An Australia study showed a 55% greater risk of developing a lung infection after vaccination.
* Vaccinated children had a 4.4-time greater risk of developing a serious viral lung infection.
* Preliminary research at MODERNA on developing the RNA vaccine showed that 20% of participants in the high dose group had serious side effects.
* A study in China, April 18, 2020, showed that COVID-19 had mutated into at least 30 different variations. This raises questions about any potential usefulness of a vaccine designed against one particular variation.
* As we review all these scientific facts and thoughtful opinions, from the spiritual and prophetic perspective, COVID-19 could be seen as a direct message to humanity to return to God, reconnect to the soul, and return to living in harmony on all levels with the living planet. It’s time to start living life and wake up to God.
𝗕𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵:
* In Northern Italy, the death rate among healthy elderly was 0.8%.
* For those who are committed to optimal holistic health, research shows that if you’re healthy at any age (up to 106 years old) your rates of infection remain equal to that of those aged 50 and younger.
* The main protection against COVID-19 is being healthy and cultivating a healthy terrain, which includes a healthy body, immune system, emotions, and spiritual practice.
Information from the UK government website on the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine:
1. The vaccine is not safe for pregnant women.
2. The vaccine is not safe for women planning on becoming pregnant within a few months of taking the vaccine.
3. The vaccine is not safe for those who are immune suppressed (experience allergic reactions).
4. No testing or trials have been performed to determine long-term side effects.
5. No testing or trials have been performed to determine the side effects if taken with other prescribed medications.
6. It is unknown if the vaccine will cause infertility.
7. Taking the vaccine will not stop you from getting COVID-19.
8. Taking the vaccine will not prevent you from spreading the virus.
9. You cannot breastfeed if you have had the vaccine.
10. The vaccine has not been tested or trialled on children and is not suitable for persons under the age of 16.
11. Neither the UK government nor the vaccine manufacturers accept responsibility for death or personal injury resulting from taking the vaccine.
In fact both Pfizer & Biotech sought explicit immunity from prosecution in the case of deaths or personal harm from taking the vaccine.
In the meantime, WHO publishes ‘Best practice guidance’ – How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public. This guidance document provides basic broad principles for a spokesperson of any health authority on how to respond to vocal vaccine deniers. The suggestions are based on psychological research on persuasion, on research in public health, communication studies and on WHO risk communication guidelines.
Explains why the mayor of London had a fake photo shoot of accepting a vaccine which still had its cap on, I wonder why?
Just so you know…
This crisis was named ‘ONE UN’
On 6 February 2020 UN Development Coordination Office (UNDCO) hosted a call with WHO to brief all Resident Coordinators and UN Country Teams (UNCTs) to provide updates on the COVID-19 epidemiological situation
and introduce the COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan (SPRP),1 emphasising the importance of responding to the crisis as One UN.
What about Moderna?
  • We do not have access to the complete clinical DATA. Thus there is NO DATA TRANSPARENCY
  • Data transparency is not a “nice to have.” Claims made without access to the data—whether appearing in peer reviewed publications or in preprints without peer review—are not scientific claims.
  • Doctors and Professional Societies should publicly state that, without complete data transparency, they will refuse to endorse covid-19 products as being based on science. The first critical risk is that of an exaggerated estimate of a product’s benefits. The second critical risk is underestimating a product’s side effects.
  • Copious evidence already shows that adverse event data collected in trials are under-reported in journal publications.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent Death
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent infection
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s ability to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission person to person. In fact evidence is already emerging  that it may not.
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly)
  • We Know NOTHING about the vaccine’s important endpoints like prevention of severe disease and transmission in high risk people
  • We know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months or two or three years. The existing “trials” will likely END with NO follow up results tabulated. It took seven years—and a lawsuit—to unearth the vast dangers, narcolepsy et al, of the Pandemrix H1N1 “vaccine”
  • We Know very little about the vaccine’s effects on pregnant women, children, adolescents, and immunocompromised individuals who were largely excluded from the trials.
  • The Moderna trials went to great lengths to assure no trial participant got pregnant before, during and after the trial. Couple this with no multi-generational testing at all and you can make a good case for premeditated Malice should this vaccine pass on very negative DNA to their offspring.


In June 2020 the UN published a report claiming that Iran was responsible for attacks on Saudi Arabia in September 2019. The weapons used were said to be of Iranian origin according to the UN and Iran were accused of using weapons to destabilise the middle east.

Despite the denials of the Iranians, who were one of the original members of the UN, that they were responsible, the UN supported the US and declared the weapons embargo to now be indefinite. 


The UN found no evidence of military or financial link from the Iranians to the Yemen rebels known as Houthi previously but claimed that they had been given fuel by the Iranians to raise funds for their cause.

Link to reported claims of who Houthi rebels  are.https://www.dw.com/en/yemens-houthi-rebels-who-are-they-and-what-do-they-want/a-50667558

The UN claimed that arms were also seized off the Iranian coast which they claim also proved that Iran have violated the arms embargo.

On the 23rd November 2020, a report claimed that a Saudi Arabian oil field had been targeted by the Houthi. https://www.ft.com/content/9bf62d06-5bdb-4d73-8820-bd72956eb9b4

On the 27th November 2020, a senior Iranian scientist was reportedly assassinated and blame has been given to Israel and USA.



Interesting date for the attack and number plate : 9.11


Mohsen Fakhrizadeh who was shot in an ambush by a reported 12 assailants and died later from his injuries.

The murdered Fakhrizadeh has been discussed  in the past by the Isreali leadership as someone to watch.

Although he was known to be the man at the helm of the nuclear programmes, Fakhrizadeh was also at the forefront of the testing CV19 test and trace applications and the vaccine production with tests being carried out in Iran in November, the same month in which it was claimed that he was shot.


The Times of Israel reports on the attack. https://www.timesofisrael.com/a-truck-bomb-then-a-hail-of-bullets-iranian-media-describes-hit-on-fakhrizadeh/


Curiously, many known false flag attacks that have been perpetrated on the public by the national security agencies have used the same brand of car for the storyline.

Reports that the Iranian scientist was driving in a Nissan car have emerged,  Nissan is reportedly also the brand of the truck that was left at the scene with a bomb attached that caused the Nissan car being driven by the scientist, to slow down. This reportedly led to the gun fight that occurred afterwards.

After past reports of attacks that have been obviously created by NSA and the constant mention of Nissan cars being involved, I was of the firm belief that it was a code to let those in the know, know.


The 7/7 false flag attack that occurred  blamed patsies and reports claimed that one of the perpetrator’s, Tanweer had left his Nissan Micra at Luton station.

The Manchester bomb reports claimed that the bomber also drove a Nissan Micra, in this article the car was said to hold a sports bag with the name of an American football team.https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jun/06/manchester-attack-police-release-images-of-bombers-car 

The man claimed to be responsible for 9-11 was also named Mohamed Atta’s Nissan Altima.

The reports of the 2010 Times Square car bomb was a Nissan.https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/nyregion/02timessquare.html

This article appeared some time later stating that an American Football club had been home to a terror drill at their Nissan stadium exactly a year ago. In November 2019. https://www.newschannel5.com/news/explosions-sirens-could-be-heard-thursday-during-mock-terrorist-attack-at-nissan-stadium

In the reported cyber attack of 2017, the attack hit the NHS and the Nissan car factory?https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/nissan-sunderland-cyber-attack-ransomware-nhs-malware-wannacry-car-factory-a7733936.html

The Columbian car bomb in 2019 was a Nissan too.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-46904683

A top Pentagon spokesperson Dana W White, who was the former assistant to the Secretary of Defence for public affairs was also a former director of policy and strategic communications for Nissan.


Coding in the media using names and places etc is nothing new and has been called predictive programming in many instances in the past. The Olympic ceremony imagery was used to convey the future plans, a link to my video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pt-2_-zYbrc&t=16s

Below is a picture of the ceremony showing  a chinese woman in front of an image that resembled the Wuhan market images.

The fact that Fakhrizadeh was head of the CV19 vaccines and testing operations means that Iran are in line with the global agenda of the UN and WHO.

My belief is that this is a major false flag at work.

If we cast our minds back to January 2020, another Iranian scientist was reportedly assassinated and claims made that this was the work of USA.


In this report, it makes claims that US assassinated an Iranian scientist and that:

The revenge would come in the form of attacks on the power grid, banks and communications networks as well as health facilities.

This appears to be a case of problem-reaction-solution.

Although no such revenge was enacted at the beginning of the year, it seems obvious to me that the targeting of the power grid, banks, healthcare and communications will fall exactly in line with Agenda 20/30 and the UN goals.

The UN joined in on the condemnation of Iran in June 2020 when they published a report claiming that Iran was responsible for an attack on Saudia Arabia in Sept 2019. Because the UN claimed that the weapons used were of Iran origin.

The report also claimed that they would call for an indefinite  weapons embargo instead of the 13 years ban that the US had called for.https://www.state.gov/un-report-exposes-irans-defiance-of-the-united-nations/

So we can see that the UN along with USA were involved in the reported dispute. But as we know, all the world is a stage and the world stage now is being used to play out a multitude of scenarios in order to bring about a conclusion that will usher in the ‘4th Industrial Revolution’ or ‘Reset’.

The revenge could be exactly what they claimed could happen a year ago.

If banks were targeted it would bring about the planned digital currency agenda. The health system would be steered in the direction required by the UN and the power grids have long since been ‘a threat’ that we could be facing.

Problem-Reaction-Solution works every time.

The  picture does NOT represent evidence of a truck bomb and a shoot out by several people with many deaths nor is it evidence that this is what actually happened.


Within days, the story has been changed to alter the original version. https://www.rt.com/news/508170-iran-assassination-remote-gun/