During the years leading up to the CV pandemic claims, many top level meetings took place. Pandemic preparedness was discussed in detail and the need for all countries to ‘be prepared’ for a possible pandemic.

It was clear that an agreement had been reached that a preparedness exercise BEFORE a pandemic was cost effective and necessary.

In this document dated July 2018, a meeting took place for global health security at the John Hopkins Centre which was attended by 70 organisations, all of whom were asked for input into global health security strategy .https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2018/180820-us-global-health-security-strategy-meeting.pdf

 

During this meeting it was stated that although concentrating efforts on a ‘dangerous pathogen’ was limiting, it allowed  for the DoD to work with other partners and countries, which would not be ordinarily permitted and that it would be cost effective to have plans in place BEFORE a real pandemic.

 

 

Proof that the plans for global preparedness needed to involve a ‘dangerous pathogen’ so that the DoD could have full control.

This was no ordinary meeting, it was attended by the following:

 

 

They discuss how it enables them to identify what does and does not work. And allows the DoD involvement helping share several military goals.

 

So it is clear that in July 2018, the decision was made in a global health security meeting at the John Hopkins Centre,  for the need to test run a security risk. This would have to involve a lethal ‘pathogen’ to enable the DoD to have full involvement and allow global health security to be coordinated in all countries.

The John Hopkins Centre  is at the forefront of the claims being made about this CV pandemic.

On 18th September 2019, the John Hopkins Centre created this document on behalf of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board.

 

This report states:

A report presented to a Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, by the JHC months before the reported outbreak, which discusses how preparedness plans should be followed. 

 The  GPMB is a monitoring board that has members who are  involved in all aspects of the ‘reported’  CV pandemic, including the Chinese CDC Director General and others such as Fauci, Gates Foundation and Wellcome trust. 

The GMPB 

 

The GMPB recommended:

Calling for the UN and WHO to conduct two training and simulation exercises on the release of a lethal  respiratory pathogen to help mobilise national, international and multilateral action. Between September 2019 and September 2020.

The WHO and World bank plan encouraged countries to have a cost effective plan for a pandemic at the ready by July 2019.  That was acted upon by  59 countries who submitted a National Action Plan for Health Security (NAPHS).

This preparedness plan was to begin from Sept 2019 and to end  Sept 2020 which also included instructions to hold two simulation exercises, one would involve a lethal pathogen that causes a global pandemic.

https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf

My full article explains in depth links to agencies and their involvement. 

https://www.vigiliae.org/what-happened-to-the-planned-pandemic-exercise-and-which-countries-were-involved/

The Global Action Plan broadly complements the United Nations System-wide Strategic Document, which describes the work of the United Nations Development System as a whole to support implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The Global Action Plan was  launched on September 24, 2019 on the side-lines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

 

How is possible for a high level ‘Pandemic Preparedness Plan ‘ exercise to be called for and initiated  involving agencies such as WHO, UN, CDC, National Academy of Medicine, Wellcome Trust, Gates Foundation, NIH, Chinese CDC,  FDA, BMJ, DHHS, Dept of Defence, Homeland Security, National Security Council, John Hopkins Centre,  DARPA and many International agencies and departments, at the SAME TIME as a reportedly genuine pandemic?

It is obviously apparent that they are one and the same.

The John Hopkins Centre at the forefront of preparedness for global health,  with the input of many agencies, agreed upon the need to create plans to establish the shortcomings of all WHO countries to react to future pandemics.

KEY INFORMANTS

• Jarbas Barbosa da Silva Jr., Pan American Health Organization
• Rick Bright, US Department of Health and Human Services
• Elizabeth Cameron, Nuclear Threat Initiative
• Gail Carson, University of Oxford
• Jeremy Farrar, Wellcome Trust
• Keiji Fukuda, University of Hong Kong
• Bruce Gellin, Sabin Vaccine Institute
• Julie Lyn Hall, International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies
• William Hall, Wellcome Trust
• Keith Hamilton, World Organisation for Animal Health
• Anne Huvos, World Health Organization
• Chikwe Ihekweazu, Nigeria Centre for Disease Control
• Bruce Innis, PATH
• Daniel Jernigan, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
• Kerri-Ann Jones, Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework Advisory Group
to the World Health Organization
• Rebecca Katz, Georgetown University
• Lawrence Kerr, US Department of Health and Human Services
• Marie-Paule Kieny, INSERM
• Marion Koopmans, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, The Netherlands
• Amanda McClelland, Resolve to Save Lives
• Hilary Marston, National Institutes of Health
• Claudia Nannei, World Health Organization
• Toomas Palu, World Bank Group
• Diane Post, National Institutes of Health
• Eduard Salahov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
• Ethan Settembre, Seqirus
• Cecilia Mundaca Shah, Forum on Microbial Threats, National Academies of
Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, USA
• Beverly Taylor, Seqirus
• Jonathan Van-Tam, Department of Health and Social Care, England
• Netsanet Workie, World Bank Group
• Members of the World Health Organization Strategic & Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards

The same John Hopkins Centre involved in the planning of a simulation for pandemic preparedness has been given the task of convincing the public that a real pandemic exists.

This fact alone should be enough for members of the public to question the authenticity of this pandemic.

John Hopkins Centre at the forefront 

 

The document shared above from the John Hopkins Centre, which included recommendations for preparedness planning (GMPB) to implement simulations for pandemic preparedness was led by Jennifer Nuzzo.

 

Member of CFR

Jennifer Nuzzo is also heavily involved in the ‘reported’ pandemic.

 

In this report Nuzzo states:

In her article on social distancing Nuzzo states that in order to resolve the problem of social distancing, there needs to be a nationwide surveillance program using different agencies and governments, mocking the fact that that is exactly what is occurring.https://www.politico.com/news/agenda/2020/03/30/social-distancing-game-plan-154915

Nuzzo is heavily involved in global health security. 

On the 18th September 2019, the same day that reports were published about the intentions for pandemic preparedness, the media were also notified world wide.

 

 

Note the dates.

We were informed via the media on the 18th September 2019 that the GPMB had created  Pandemic Preparedness in order to determine how the world would function during a real pandemic.

The National Security Act of 1947 was a law enacting major restructuring of the United States government’s military and intelligence agencies following World War II. The majority of the provisions of the Act took effect on September 18, 1947.

This coincides with the anniversary of that act and marked the first day of operations for the Dept of Defence.

Organisations and agencies  are involved in the pandemic preparedness exercise on the anniversary of this date, some 72 years later.

Under the guise of a respiratory pathogen that causes a pandemic which then enables the DoD to get involved. 

So happy birthday to the CIA, DoD and all the agencies involved in the creation of the National Security Act, a pandemic exercise took place to commemorate.

A pandemic exercise that has been created not  just to test the world wide reactions to pandemic planning but to usher in the UN,s agenda of security, control and the Smart Specialisation programme.

September  2019 also saw the first Infectious Diseases
Strategy 2020-2025 created by Public Health England.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/831439/PHE_Infectious_Diseases_Strategy_2020-2025.pdf

 

September 2019 also saw recommendations by the Biodefence science board.

Another article  in which Nuzzo expresses the need, along with other collaborators, to discuss what needs to be done to undermine national capability to counter biological threats.

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/hs.2019.0147

Countries that have submitted a preparedness plan in Africa coincide with the claimed cases of CV.

The Pandemic preparedness plans that were put into place by the monitoring board and due to begin in September 2019 shows  correlation with countries in Africa who submitted preparedness plans years earlier.

The following is a graph of the countries in Africa who submitted pandemic plans to WHO.

Compare it to the ‘claims’ made about the cases in Africa and we can see that the  countries with early preparedness plans coincide exactly with the countries claiming to be affected by CV.

The WHO link

This shows the countries claiming to be affected.

How is it possible that the countries with the first and largest claims of CV are the same ones who have created early preparedness plans for a pandemic? 

Algeria, Egypt and Nigeria were the first countries to claim there were CV cases in Africa, all the countries with early pandemic preparedness plans that satisfied the WHO.

Burkina Faso, Egypt is also on the WHO map as being  one of the early  providers of a pandemic preparedness plan. 

Egypt has played an active role in the implementation of WHO and UN frameworks.

Some of the ministers took to FB to announce they were CV positive.

Egypt has collaborated with WHO to create the UN Sustainable goals agenda.

Nigeria, also one of the countries that have an early preparedness plan submitted to WHO, claimed that the first death from CV was from a patient who had returned from the UK and was being treated for cancer and diabetes, yet supposedly died from CV.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/23/africa/nigeria-coronavirus-death-intl/index.html

The Nigerian CDC also shared that information via a tweet. 

Algeria are also well prepared and were reportedly one of the first countries in Africa to have a patient who had travelled from another country. http://saharareporters.com/2020/02/26/who-confirms-coronavirus-algeria

Those who were most eager to have created pandemic preparedness plans to WHO were the same countries that were hit?

https://extranet.who.int/sph/influenza-plan

South Africa may not have submitted a pandemic preparedness plan before 2014 but they will have been highly involved in later pandemic preparedness planning.

There is clear evidence that the world is not in the grip of a pandemic but in the grip of a world wide global health security exercise. An exercise that  the security services and the UN are using as a front to bring about the changes needed to build their new world.

It is seen as progress for the greater good.

There are no data or details on the human suffering that has taken place during this exercise and the aftermath will be one of hardships and chaos for the population, meanwhile the future generations of the rich and privileged will be prepared for a real pandemic, which they know will never happen anyway because they created them.

Why else has pandemic planning gone live, not once but THREE times!

Dr Stephen Redd is the CDC,s Director of Public Health Preparedness and Response

Dr Redd was a member of the Global Pandemic Preparedness event called Event 201, held in October 2019. A few Months before the news of CV was made public.

This event was a table top exercise created to put all the players involved in global pandemics together to trouble shoot how a pandemic would operate and how they would deal with it. 

Dr Stephen Redd has also been involved  in other ‘claimed’ pandemic events.

 

According to reports, Dr Redd was wrapping up a flu pandemic planning meeting on April 15th 2009 when the phone call came in that a virus had infected a 10 yr old.

Two days later the CDC conformed the diagnosis and a week later, Redd had been made incident commander of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

So we are to believe that he was chairing a meeting for  pandemic preparation at the same time as he got the call that a ‘possible’ real pandemic might occur? Really?

The following was reported on the CDC website:

Coincidence would have it?

Claims were made by the CDC that this would kill millions. It never happened.

Five years later in August 2014, Dr Redd was due to be involved in an exercise for planning of pandemic preparedness once again. 

Coincidentally, at that exact time, the exercise was overshadowed by the claims of an Ebola outbreak that meant that all those involved were now working on Ebola.

This information was shared by Dr Redd himself during an interview in 2016 with CDC Museum, Global Health Chronicles.

https://globalhealthchronicles.org/ohms-viewer/viewer.php?cachefile=StephenReddXML.xml

The Ebola event then led to the creation of the Global Health Security Agenda.

 Five years later again and the Director was now in the driving seat of another pandemic preparedness event which became a ‘reported’ real event.

 What are the odds that this man would be involved in and heading, not one but THREE separate exercises for pandemic preparedness  that all go live at the exact same time as the exercise?

Redd also stated during the Ebola event that:

The same man claimed he was given a job working in the White House during Ebola and days later was a given a list of vaccines to be used to treat Ebola. And of course, the USA were claiming to have a case.

The WHO Simulation Exercise manual from 2017 states that during these sort of global exercises involve table top exercises such as the ones performed by the Event 201 team in New York, again, the same members of the Global Pandemic Monitoring Board attended this event, including the Chinese CDC Director-General.

There is also evidence of simulations from within the health care departments.

 

The question is why? The answers are explained in amazing detail in this report by Alison McDowell.

https://wrenchinthegears.com/2020/03/12/human-capital-markets-digital-identity-the-united-nations-sustainable-development-goals/

 

 

 

 

http://outofthebagradio.weebly.com/podcasts/podcast-sean-maguire-ann-marie-carey-rebellion-hour-15072020

On this week’s OUT OF THE BAG…LIVE on http://healingoracle.ch/healing-oracle-radio/

For the first 2 hours of the show I was LIVE with Ann Marie Carey
Annie has been an activist for 15 years and has created many campaigns to highlight unfair welfare reforms, chemtrails, 5G and the smart agenda, epidemics and vaccines. She achieves this by sharing information on her website Annielogical Uncensored, social media and within communities by organising events and creating leaflet campaigns. Annie has created a campaign to highlight the false information being given about CV19 and the ensuing pandemic claims. Annie believes that it is only by sharing important information with our communities that the public can make an informed decision and put an end to the insidious agenda behind the claims of a pandemic.
In this interview she spoke about how people can get involved in the campaign and shares some of her accumulated research.  Plus MUCH MORE! 
Details of the campaign can be found on the FB group CV19 ~ Facts Not Fear Campaign or on the website Annie Logical Uncensored. 
​The leaflets can be downloaded from this link: 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RnOtU0bn2z1PzHGJemJRDLFZZmuXmb-x/view?usp=sharing

The Pandemic preparedness plans that were put into place by the monitoring board and due to begin in September 2019 shows  correlation with countries in Africa who submitted preparedness plans years earlier.

The following is a graph of the countries in Africa who submitted pandemic plans to WHO.

Compare it to the ‘claims’ made about the cases in Africa and we can see that the  countries with early preparedness plans coincide exactly with the countries claiming to be affected.

The WHO link

This shows the countries claiming to be affected.

How is it possible that the countries with the first and largest claims of CV are the same ones who have created early preparedness plans for a pandemic? 

Algeria, Egypt and Nigeria were the first countries to claim there were CV cases in Africa, all the countries with early pandemic preparedness plans that satisfied the WHO.

Burkina Faso, Egypt is also on the WHO map as being  one of the early  providers of a pandemic preparedness plan. 

Egypt has played an active role in the implementation of WHO and UN frameworks.

Some of the ministers took to FB to announce they were CV positive.

Egypt has collaborated with WHO to create the UN Sustainable goals agenda.

Nigeria, also one of the countries that have an early preparedness plan submitted to WHO, claimed that the first death from CV was from a patient who had returned from the UK and was being treated for cancer and diabetes, yet supposedly died from CV.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/23/africa/nigeria-coronavirus-death-intl/index.html

The Nigerian CDC also shared that information via a tweet. 

Algeria are also well prepared and were reportedly one of the first countries in Africa to have a patient who had travelled from another country. http://saharareporters.com/2020/02/26/who-confirms-coronavirus-algeria

 

Is it coincidence that those who were most eager to have created pandemic preparedness plans to WHO were the same countries that were hit?

https://extranet.who.int/sph/influenza-plan

South Africa may not have submitted a pandemic preparedness plan before 2014 but they will have been highly involved in later pandemic preparedness planning.

The Global preparedness planning board convened by the WHO and others would have made it compulsory to take part in all exercises for global preparedness prior to September 2019, they will have all 197 WHO countries  committed to an exercise in global preparedness.

 

 

 

South Africa claimed to have its first CV case on 5th March 2020 without even a confirmation from labs. Then declared a national state of disaster on the 15th March 2020 even though noone was reported to have died until 27th March 2020.

Which begs the question, if a global pandemic exercise began in September 2019, when did it stop?

This article claims that cases have been found in areas called Sandton, Alexandra, Wynberg, Houghton and  Orange grove.

Which oddly spells out SA WHO.

https://ewn.co.za/2020/04/23/here-s-the-district-breakdown-of-covid-19-infections-in-gauteng

Deliver as one

A UN report from 2006 discussed delivering a ‘One United Nations’ https://undocs.org/en/A/61/583

 

On September 11th 2020, a partnership was formed in which the Nigerian UN coordinator states that CV is:

An X-ray that has revealed the fractures of the fragile skeleton of society

Which has:

Helped build the UN agenda

https://www.afro.who.int/news/un-and-bauchi-state-sign-partnership-agreement-under-delivery-one-initiative-coordinated-who

 

Dr Stephen Redd is the CDC,s Director of Public Health Preparedness and Response

Dr Redd was a member of the Global Pandemic Preparedness event called Event 201, held in October 2019. A few Months before the news of CV was made public.

This event was a table top exercise created to put all the players involved in global pandemics together to trouble shoot how a pandemic would operate and how they would deal with it.

What a huge coincidence that such an event even occurred? What are the odds?

Except this is a pattern that Dr Stephen Redd has also been involved with in other ‘claimed’ pandemic events, making the odds of it being a coincidence, unfathomable.

 

According to reports, Dr Redd was wrapping up a flu pandemic planning meeting on April 15th 2009 when the phone call came in that a virus had infected a 10 yr old.

Two days later the CDC conformed the diagnosis and a week later, Redd had been made incident commander of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

So we are to believe that he was chairing a meeting for  pandemic preparation at the same time as he got the call that a ‘possible’ real pandemic might occur? Really?

The following was reported on the CDC website:

Coincidence would have it?

Claims were made by the CDC that this would kill millions. It never happened.

Five years later in August 2014, Dr Redd was due to be involved in an exercise for planning of pandemic preparedness once again. 

Coincidentally, at that exact time, the exercise was overshadowed by the claims of an Ebola outbreak that meant that all those involved were now working on Ebola.

This information was shared by Dr Redd himself during an interview in 2016 with CDC Museum, Global Health Chronicles.

https://globalhealthchronicles.org/ohms-viewer/viewer.php?cachefile=StephenReddXML.xml

The Ebola event then led to the creation of the Global Health Security Agenda.

 Five years later again and the Director was now in the driving seat of another pandemic preparedness event which became a ‘reported’ real event.

 What are the odds that this man would be involved in and heading, not one but THREE separate exercises for pandemic preparedness  that all go live at the exact same time as the exercise?

Redd also stated during the Ebola event that:

The same man claimed he was given a job working in the White House during Ebola and days later was a given a list of vaccines to be used to treat Ebola. And of course, the USA were claiming to have a case.

Fool me once!

The WHO Simulation Exercise manual from 2017 states that during these sort of global exercises, they involve table top exercises such as the ones performed by the Event 201 team in New York, again, the same members of the Global Pandemic Monitoring Board attended this event, including the Chinese CDC Director-General.

There is also evidence of simulations from within the health care departments.

The Drosophila is the fruit fly, this simple insect has been instrumental in genetics research from 1910 when a man called Thomas Hunt Morgan and his wife began to research this fly and discovered its links to the human genes. The understanding of genes and the connections to the fact that genes are carried on chromosomes began the basis of heredity.

It also began the whole genetics research programs  that gave two top biologists the Nobel peace prize later on in 1995 when 27,000 mutant fly lines were established of which 139 mutations affecting embryo-genesis.

The fruit fly (Drosophila) has enabled the microbiologists to use fat stem cells, harvest them,activate them and return them into the body.

There is even a Drosophila library database website which keeps info on all genes called  Fly Base.

https://www.sdbonline.org/sites/fly/neural/mirnda1.htm

During the Olympics, references to genetics were apparent and shared in this article https://www.vigiliae.org/genetics-and-imagery-by-annie-logical/ 

But it still  came as a shock to see how blatant was the message just days ago. I wondered how many would know the significance to the statue that has recently popped up on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar square.

The Fourth Plinth  Commission is led by the Mayor of London’s Culture Team.

 This statute appeared in July. The drone is rigged with a camera to survey the audience which can be accessed via an app on a smart phone. Trafalgar square was the site of the first ever surveillance cameras installed in the UK in 1960.

The monument at Trafalgar square, renown for holding protests, is the tallest so far. The 13th to appear and is 31 ft tall. The steps of  the square were covered with fake blood in protests involving Extinction Rebellion recently, a known co-opted movement.

Cream with a cherry on top with a fly and a drone.

The name of this?

The End

And it does not get more obvious than that folks!

Thanks to the fly, they have perfected genetics (cream) and technology introducing drones and surveillance,  is the cherry on top that spells the end. 

The Olympic imagery has not been lost on many and even back then Boris Johnson was aware of the agenda.

Past Olympic ceremonies have been just as obvious in their imagery.

My article covered this subject. https://www.vigiliae.org/genetics-and-imagery-by-annie-logical/

So what are we to do when such ‘in your face’ imagery such as ‘The End’ is showcased?

People are flocking to join supposed, newly formed grass roots movements were protests and demo,s have been organised.

The problem is that no one is doing their due diligence to look at who these people fronting these movements are. 

At this stage it would be wise to mention this book. 

The Protocols of The Elders of Zion, published in 1897.

Despite controversy as to the authors  there is no doubt that what was written back then has taken place and that it is blue print for the future domination of all people.

The same book which Henry Ford in 1921 wrote that “the protocols are 16 yrs old and fit in with what is going on now.”

The book also discusses the successes they arranged for Darwinism,Marxism and Nietzsche-ism  amongst others. It states:

 Before us is a plan which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labor of many centuries brought to naught.”

In Protocol 111 entitled ‘Methods of Conquest’ is states,

We shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously in all of the countries of Europe” 

and

When the populace has seen that all sorts of concessions and indulgences are yielded it, in the same name of freedom it has imagined itself to be sovereign lord and has stormed its way to power, but naturally like every other blind man, it has come upon a host of stumbling blocks. It has rushed to find a guide, it has never had the sense to return to the former state and it has laid down its plenipotentiary powers at OUR feet.”
“Remember the French Revolution, to which it was we who gave it the name of “Great”: the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands.

Protocol XV111

“When it becomes necessary for us to strengthen the strict measures of secret defense we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.
Round these speakers will assemble all who are sympathetic to his utterances.”

“This will give the pretext for domiciliary pre requisitions and surveillance on the part of our servants from the number of the GOYIM police.”

Protocol XV


 When we at last definitely come into our kingdom by the the aid of COUPS D’ETAT prepared everywhere for one and the same day, after definitely acknowledged (and not a little time will pass before that comes about, perhaps even a whole century) we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist.

It clearly is obvious that an agenda has been in place for centuries, an agenda which includes getting people  all over the world to take to the streets.

And as much as it feels good to be amongst like minded people and to be actively doing something as opposed to nothing, those who have set the agenda years ago openly discuss the need to get people onto the streets in protests. 

It stands to reason that they will have anticipated the public’s anger and would also make sure that they lead from the front.

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” ― Lenin 

 Some  of those who have put themselves into prominent positions to lead will be also joining forces with others who have managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the public in past campaigns.

A typical example is the man who has managed to steer the 5G campaign despite his background, links to agencies pushing 5G technologies and even links to the council he claims to be fighting in court

.https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-is-controlled-opposition/

 The article above shows how easy it is for the govt to use the court system to their advantage, allowing a ‘savour’ type situation so as to  give credence to the chosen saviour.

Maybe it makes no difference to some that the multi millionaire  in the govt lockdown case trial  has chosen  Philiph Havers as his barrister.  The fact that the case is being paid for by the public who have been crowdfunded to the tune of  nearly a quarter of a million pounds, gives them the right to full disclosure. 

The case is ongoing.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lockdownlegalchallenge/

The barristers father is the Lord High Chancellor of the UK.

The same barristers father man was on the war cabinet of the Thatcher govt.
His father was also involved in covering up paedophile cases.
The barrister who was chosen to save us is the son of Lord Michael Havers, who was the top legal man in the UK when Sir Jimmy Savile and his politician friends were reportedly raping and murdering children throughout the UK.
His father also tried to get the ripper off with a diminished responsibility plea.Sir Michael sent the innocent Guildford Four to jail.

Lord Havers, who later served briefly as lord chancellor, backed the decision of the director of public prosecutions not to prosecute Sir Peter Hayman, a diplomat and subscriber to the Paedophile Information Exchange. He was caught sending paedophile literature through the post.
He intervened three times between 1981 and 1983 to stop the investigation and exposure of Establishment paedophiles, and to prevent the publication of stories which showed that Establishment figures were members of the Paedophile Information Exchange.
Michael Havers, who was also Lord Chancellor (top legal man) at the time of the Kincora Boys Home child abuse cover-up.
Havers reportedly tried to silence ‘the child abuse whistleblower’ Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.

Havers’ sister, Baroness Butler-Sloss, headed the child abuse inquiry whose own brother played such a major role in the protection of Establishment paedophiles throughout the 1980s.
She chaired the inquest into the death of Lady Diana, Princess of Wales, but resigned when it was clear that she would not have full control over it because Dodi’s father won the right to a jury.


This is the father and Aunt of the barrister fighting for Keep Britain Free.

The multi millionaire was also given a govt contract to supply the NHS with PPE during this period.

Such things may be of no importance to some but greatly important to others.

Simon Dolan owner of  Jota Aviation.

The solicitor in the case.

Anna Brees, ex BBC journalist is getting the public to share their stories about being anti masks and anti lockdown, yet tweets:

In order to stop it being ‘The End’ it is probably time to realise that every movement is ultimately used against itself, whether its agent provocateurs creating trouble to allow martial law or as the Protocols stated back in 1800.

we shall arrange a simulation of disorders or some manifestation of discontents finding expression through the cooperation of good speakers.

 

Communication; not division. We  can only succeed by communicating with people one-on-one and refusing to comply with orders, by sharing information and encouraging others to, by refusing to wear masks or adhere to lockdowns, by understanding that we do not need to protest or beg them not to do this to us – we simply need to not do it.

Non Compliance, its that simple!

This website hosts a leaflet campaign that now has over 300 communities around the UK actively talking to people and encouraging peaceful non compliance. https://www.vigiliae.org/cv-facts-not-fear-leaflet-campaign/

FB Group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2626568380915131/

UPDATE

In 2014, an article revealed that the Georgia Guidestones had accidentally revealed a capstone which revealed the following.

This happened when someone reportedly ‘broke’ the original stone to reveal this.

The top says “MM” The Bottom says “JAM” The four sides show 20, 14, 8, and 16.
I believed that this date was pointing towards 14.8.20.

I think the breaking of the stone which revealed this new date was also symbolic of Zeus, as the story goes he fooled Cronus into believing he was inside that which Cronus swallowed but it was a stone.
Of course Zeus,s missus was Hera symbolised by rainbows and we have seen them a lot lately.
This event happened on the 25th September 2016. So that date is also significant.
Of course 28 days later from 14.8.20 its 9.11.
Strange that the film 28 days later which was about a virus, had athletes as the infected actors.
And the director was supposedly responsible for the Olympics ceremonies with all their obvious symbology and the athletic connection.
The Olympics being in honour of Zeus.

August 14th is also the most hated day by the Freemasons, they see it as the date that society turned against them when they were in danger of being exposed in 1826.
Of course the dates August 14 1826 can also be found in that code As MM = 8 so 1826 (drop the zero,  famous speech said by Christine Lagarde) and JAM is Judicie Anno Mundi. AKA Judgement day.

What is also interesting is that the man who infiltrated the freemasons was named William Morgan. So the MM could also be significant AND he was a stoneworker. He was jailed under trumped up charges, bailed out by the masons and never seen again. This was 11th Sept 1826.

Some time later, members of the Freemasons were charged with his disappearance, even though his body was not found,  they were given very lenient sentences.

 This writer expected a False Flag incident to occur on the 14th August and that the incident would be connected to what is occurring in the world today with the fake ‘pandemic’.

Sure enough that (F)alse (F)lag occurred in the form of (F)rozen (F)ood.

On the 14th August 2020, it was reported that a 41 yr old yoghurt salesperson in Guangdong province in China had been contaminated with CV19 from frozen food.

The article goes on to report 14 imported cases and 8 cases reported on that day. Claiming that the case had prompted a supermarket chain  to close all its  stores.

The article :  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-toll-idUSKCN25B04E

An article in China from the previous day claims that frozen Chicken and Shrimp are also positive for CV19.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-food/chinese-cities-find-coronavirus-in-frozen-food-imports-who-downplays-infection-risk-idUSKCN259330

Images from Olympic ceremonies: