General Information

In 2013, the Rockefeller Foundation launched the 100 Resilient Cities project, in the UK the cities were Bristol, Belfast, Manchester, Glasgow and London. All areas have adopted the 5G roll out.

According to the Rockefeller Foundation website, the Rockefeller Foundation partnered with the global design firm Arup to create a City Resilience Framework (CRF).http://100resilientcities.org/resources/#section-1

Arup had been appointed  the £1 billion Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme from the Home Office,in 2015.https://www.consultancy.uk/news/2592/home-office-picks-arup-to-digitalise-emergency-services

Working with manufacturers Jaguar Land Rover, Ford, and Tata, Arup led connected and autonomous vehicle trials on the streets of Milton Keynes and Coventry. The largest trials conducted in the UK to date, they explored the benefits of cars ‘talking’ to each other and their surroundings – with connected traffic lights, emergency vehicle warnings, and emergency braking alerts among the technologies tested. Further trials have now been given the green light.https://placetech.net/analysis/inside-arups-mission-to-keep-pace-with-exponential-impact-of-digital-age/.

In 2016,Ericsson joined forces with Arup to transform a pilot district in Hong Kong into its first smart and sustainable neighborhood. https://www.ericsson.com/en/news/2016/4/arup-and-ericsson-partner-for-hong-kongs-smart–sustainable-city-project

The 100 resilient cities is clearly a tool to create Smart cities. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/a-smart-city-must-learn-to-be-resilient-too/

According to reports, Bristol became part of the 100 resilient cities in 2014, one of the aims was to manage flood responses.

In Rio de Janeiro what started off as a  a tool to predict rain and manage flood response morphed into a high-precision control panel for the entire city. With the mayor bragging that “The operations centre allows us to have people looking into every corner of the city, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.”

This blogger describes how his area is funded by the 100 cities initiative and how his local council have used climate change to put pressure on 18,000 private properties which are believed (by the Local Government) to be “in danger of inundation in 100 years time” .

That action was based upon a report commissioned by his City Council which assures  that there will probably/most likely be a 1000mm sea level rise within that 100 years.

The blogger than goes to great lengths to find the evidence of this, which is not forthcoming and recognises that this will not only restrict the living of the affected property owners but is the first step to start “legally” clearing residents out of these areas.https://thedemiseofchristchurch.com/

In July 2019, the Rockefeller Foundation decided to disband the 100 cities initiative in favour of a new project called the  Climate and Resilience initiative.The climate and resilience initiative is one arm of the three separate pathways to which the Rockefeller Foundation announced it would transition its urban resilience efforts.

They claim they have made those 100 cities resilient to climate change issues, but, Sher Edling, the law firm representing a number of the litigants in the climate suits, including Baltimore and the state of Rhode Island, used the list of 100 Resilient Cities participants as a target list when pitching their climate suit.

“Emails have shown that plaintiffs’ attorneys used the 100 Resilient Cities as a roadmap of which cities to target as they shopped around their climate liability lawsuits,” Walrath continued. “In some cases, the lawyers were working directly with the Rockefeller-funded Chief Resilience Officers to gain access to city officials.”

That’s going to put some cities, including Boulder, New York City, Oakland, and San Francisco, in a tough spot, as they now have to explain to a judge why they’re suing oil and gas companies to pay for infrastructure upgrades even after they’ve been declared ‘resilient’ to climate change,” says Spencer Walrath, research director for for Energy In Depth, a project of the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

https://www.insidesources.com/rockefeller-donations-key-to-keeping-climate-change-lawsuits-afloat/

How ironic that the Rockefeller charities were spending large sums to take down a corporation descended from Standard Oil, the very firm that made them rich. The pulling out of the 100 cities initiative will now impact those lawsuits. Job,s a good un! https://eidclimate.org/how-the-rockefellers-manufactured-the-climate-liability-campaign/ 

ATLANTIC COUNCIL

Funding is now shifted to the Atlantic Council, a Washington based think tank. When asked why they had shut down the initiative they replied that it had achieved its objectives. What were the objectives?  To create a network of cities to push the climate change agenda apparently. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-01/rockefeller-announces-end-of-major-climate-resilience-initiative

Atlantic Council Executive Vice Chair Adrienne Arsht  endowed the Adrienne Arsht Center for Resilience. The Center, which recently received a $30-million grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, will be renamed the Adrienne Arsht-Rockefeller Foundation Resilience Center effective May 1.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/the-case-for-getting-serious-about-resilience

This report shows the Atlantic Council plotting false flags against Russia. https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/08/08/you-cant-make-this-stuff-up-nato-linked-atlantic-council-is-plotting-false-flags-in-russia/

On the website of the Atlantic Council, with the tag Renewing the Alliance for the 21st Century, among the links to other sites provided are those under the heading of think tanks, which are:

 American Enterprise Institute
 American Foreign Policy Council
 Aspen Institute
 Brookings Institution
 Carnegie Endowment
 Cato Institute
 Center for a New American Security
 Center for Strategic and International Studies
 Center for Transatlantic Relations/Johns Hopkins Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
 Council on Foreign Relations
 Foreign Policy Research Institute
 German Marshall Fund of the United States
 Heritage Foundation
 Hudson Institute
 New America Foundation
 Nixon Center
 Rand Corporation
 United States Institute of Peace
 Wilson Center International Center for Scholars

The above organisations contain what was formerly described in the corporate and financial worlds as interlocking directorates; officials and members of one are often also those of several others.

The roster of the Atlantic Council is packed with former Pentagon, State Department and Central Intelligence Agency veterans. Its chairman is former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel. Its president and chief executive officer is Frederick Kempe, a journalist with the Wall Street Journal for thirty years who is now a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and who serves on the Senior Advisory Group of Admiral James Stavridis, commander of U.S. European Command and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

Its senior adviser on international security is Kurt Volker, U.S. ambassador to NATO from 2008-2009 until he was replaced by the Brookings Institution’s Ivo Daalder, and also former analyst at the Central Intelligence Agency, deputy director of NATO Secretary-General George Robertson’s private office, acting director for European and Eurasian Affairs for the National Security Council, and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

The board of directors includes: (with former titles) 

 Defense Secretaries Harold Brown and William Perry
 R. Nicholas Burns
 Former NATO top military commanders Joseph Ralston, Wesley Clark and Bantz John Craddock
 Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs from 2001-2009 Paula Dobriansky (an Eastern Europe and former post-Soviet states hand)
 Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman
 Deputy Secretary of the Treasury and U.S. ambassador to the European Union Stuart Eizenstat
 Clinton administration envoy to the Balkans Robert Gelbard
 Special Envoy for European Affairs
 Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy and ambassador to the European Union C. Boyden Gray
 Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs and Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman
 National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley
 Richard Holbrooke
 National Security Council Director of West European Affairs & Director of Middle East Affairs, ambassador to NATO & RAND Corporation Senior Advisor Robert E. Hunter
 Henry Kissinger
 Assistant Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Deputy U.S. Representative to NATO General Barry McCaffrey
 Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command Charles Wald
 Central Intelligence Agency Director R. James Woolsey
 U.S. Central Command chief Anthony C. Zinni

The Atlantic Council receives funding from numerous foundations, including the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Institute, the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Cuba Policy Foundation. It also receives support from the U.S. Departments of the Air Force, Army, Navy and Energy and from the U.S. Mission to NATO and the U.S. Mission to the European Union.

Its corporate members consist of almost 100 companies which include arms manufacturers Boeing, EADS North America, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon, and other concerns as varied as AT&T, Chevron U.S.A., Daimler, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, MSNBC, Sony, Textron, Time Warner, Toyota and Viacom.

And having given leadership awards to war mongers like Bush and Blair, it is obviously part of the globalists agenda.

The Rockefellers plan to use climate change as a weapon https://www.globalresearch.ca/rockefeller-familys-covert-climate-

change-plan/5678775

The Rockefellers finance any group that will help them achieve their goal.
http://www.rbf.org  have a search facility which enables one to quickly see where at least some of their funding’s are directed.

By Anna Stormcrow

A while ago I wrote about Extinction Rebellion and the support of some core team members of the agenda 21 smart city 5g roll out. And last week I wrote about their connections to money laundering boiler rooms.

“A connection between Charlie Waterhouse (who was responsible for the Extinction Rebellion name and logo and marketing) and Temple secretaries registered at 788-790 Finchley Rd and the infamous Barbara Kahan of 2 Woodberry grove (same address Blairs Windrush ventures was at)..

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06903369/officers

Well here’s something to add.. Charlie Waterhouse has another company called Aqueduct Design and Advertising ltd which has Brighton directors as one of its directors. 
Now I’ve been looking into the company CIVICA which has its finger in many pies.. Software and data management for government, local authorities, national security, public safety and law enforcement. 
This is a NWO agenda 21 company if ever there was! They are the company that delivered you the Brexit referendum, NHS data, social housing payouts, libraries, pensions, education defense, DVLA and fines and used by 90% of the police force. ANPR and facial recognition tech . 
But the most important thing to note is their involvement in the roll out of smart cities and 5G! 
There are many branches and over 20 CIVICA companies with mostly the same directors including CIVICA CONNECT LTD. 
Which guess what? Also has on its board of directors Brighton Directors 🤔

This is another conduit money laundering boiler room acting as director for over 9,000 companies!

Another thing to note is that Mathew Paul Jowett a director of many Civica companies including CIVICA SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS is also a director of many of the U Ks major theme parks and attractions…. Alton towers, Thorpe park, Chessington world of adventures, London planetarium and aquarium, London eye, Warwick castle, Madame Tussaud’s… And many more. (In fact he has 192 positions in all these companies!🤔)
Places where many people get their photo taken whilst on rides etc…
places with CCTV everywhere..
Where it would be perfect to trial facial recognition software perhaps? 
How strange that he should have his finger in both those pies !

Ok now here’s another connection to Civica software solutions and the following shady dealings as researched by Gareth Williams ) As they also have Swift Incorporations as a director!!!!

“Hugo James Rifkind, Times Journalist and son of ex Tory MP Sir Malcolm Rifkind is keeping it in the family with his links to Swift Incorporations and Instant Companies (linked to 1 Mitchell Lane, Bristol) I see:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05607440/officers

It’s all a distraction, of course, this Brexshit thingymajig. Just a cover for the dodgy handshake brigade.

Here is Sir Malcolm linked to the Dulverton Trust at 5 St. James’s Place:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07991677/officers

He shares the Directorship with Tara John Douglas-Home from the fox-hunting group the Countryside Alliance, which had Lady Heseltine and Lady Dulverton on it:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/…/b4iLZEP8_…/appointments

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05669451/officers

Also at the Dulverton Trust there is also Lord Charles Andrew Hemphill linked to 21 St. James’s Square:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/…/ZMkE5xcSc…/appointments

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08457411/officers

The Dulverton Trust also links it to Dr. Catherine Mary Hamilton Wills and Chipping Norton…David Cameron territory:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00599389/officers

It also links it to Dominic Grieve MP:

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/…/ClsvxqYvw…/appointments

https://www.theguardian.com/…/parliament-brexit-second-refe…

I wouldn’t trust any of them.”

Video created by Annie Logical on the subject of Civica and Brexit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLhsrVJqODY&t=4s

“Establishment Rebellion” – why the protest movement is fullheartedly embraced by governments, big money and celebrities

An establishment rebellion
Why the elite loves the eco-warriors.

Fraser Myers
FRASER MYERS 
STAFF WRITER
8th August 2019
An establishment rebellion

London’s Victoria and Albert Museum has acquired a number of artefacts associated with Extinction Rebellion (XR), the protest group campaigning to reduce Britain’s carbon emissions to ‘net zero’ by 2025. Apparently, just nine months since Extinction Rebellion’s first public stunt, its paraphernalia deserves to be housed alongside some of the world’s best art and design works of the past 5,000 years.

It is hard to think of any supposedly radical protest movement in history that has been so readily embraced by the establishment as Extinction Rebellion. And the love-bombing isn’t just coming from the usual luvvies like Dame Emma Thompson and activist celebs like Lily Cole and Charlotte Church. Recently, XR attracted the attention of wealthy philanthropists. Last month, three wealthy Americans (one of whose family wealth comes from the oil industry) donated nearly £500,000 to XR and vowed to raise millions more. Other wealthy backers include a hedge-fund manager, who remains anonymous.

Then, there is the literary establishment – from heavyweight authors like Margaret Atwood and Phillip Pullman to big-name publishers like Penguin, it has thrown its weight behind Extinction Rebellion, too. This Is Not A Drill, XR’s protest handbook, was recently rushed out for release by Penguin. Penguin’s editor breathlessly declared that climate change was so pressing that XR’s book needed to be published several months before its initial release date: ‘This is an emergency, and we have to react like it’s an emergency.’ The book even features a contribution from Rowan Williams, former archbishop of Canterbury – the former head of the established church.

The reason for this establishment love-in is that Extinction Rebellion represents no rebellion at all. It has the appearance of a rebellion, certainly – protesters glue their hands to buildings, block roads and get themselves arrested. But the message is one that affirms and flatters establishment opinion rather than challenging it.

Parliament, for instance, was quick to heed XR’s demand to declare a ‘climate emergency’. More significantly, the group’s main aim of reducing UK emissions to ‘net zero’ is one that is shared not only by the Conservative government, but also by MPs of all stripes. The ‘net zero’ target for 2050 was nodded through parliament with just an hour and a half of debate and without a single vote needing to be cast. XR is only more impatient in its demand, calling for a 2025 deadline.

Many have tried to compare Extinction Rebellion’s climate crusade with past movements for progressive change. Justifying the V&A’s decision to acquire Extinction Rebellion artefacts, senior curator Corinna Gardner compared their punchy colour palette to that of the Suffragettes. Similarly, XR leader Roger Hallam claims his protesting is in the ‘tradition of Gandhi and Martin Luther King’.

These comparisons are delusional, pretentious and insulting. But they unwittingly highlight something important. Whether it was the Chartists, the Suffragettes, the civil-rights movement, or the gay-rights movement, these genuinely progressive campaigns were all despised by the elite at the time. These were campaigns that sought to expand human freedom, to wrest rights and resources from the establishment. By contrast, environmentalist campaigns like Extinction Rebellion are, by their very nature, against freedom. They seek to place new limits on human activity: on industry, on economic growth, on our travel, on our diets, and on childbirth.

For many years, the great and the good have been in broad agreement that something must be done about climate change. But they also seem to agree that the bulk of the costs should not be shouldered by them. Only last week, celebrities, business leaders and politicians descended on Sicily for the 7th annual Google Camp, which this year was dedicated to tackling climate change. After arriving in their private jets, mega yachts and sports cars, delegates were treated to a lecture on climate change by Prince Harry, who delivered it in his bare feet. Earlier this year, 1,500 individual private jets flew to Davos. The highlight of the summit was a conversation between Prince William and Sir David Attenborough… on climate change.

The establishment only seems to care about ‘pollution’ when it is ordinary people doing the polluting. It is always cheap flights, cheap food and cheap fashion which cause the most consternation among environmentalists. In turn, climate change presents the establishment with an opportunity to manage the little people’s habits, tastes and aspirations.

Extinction Rebellion merely provides a faux-radical gloss to this depressing and stultifying prospect.

Fraser Myers is a staff writer at spiked and host of the spiked podcast. Follow him on Twitter: @FraserMyers.

What are DEW? 

A directed-energy weapon (DEW) is a ranged weapon that damages its target with highly focused energy including laser,microwave and millimetre waves, particle beams and has the potential to target people,missiles, vehicles and many other devices.

According to Inside Defense website, the Air Force Research Laboratory was looking to contract with industry for research on the bioeffects of radio frequency, high-power microwaves and particle-beam, directed-energy technologies and weapons in March 2019.

AFRL says it is looking to award a contract on August 30 worth $44 million, which will be distributed between fiscal year 2019 and FY-25. The program is being run by AFRL’s Radio Frequency Bioeffects Branch.

https://insidedefense.com/insider/afrl-seeks-44m-contract-de-bioeffects-research?fbclid=IwAR1tGOFHmoRJ4StTfPx16j172o72Uoepk5cOTMsrFdSq8Wh8fq0-YQep2bs

Here is a detailed copy of the AFRL research : https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=6ee858c17251e99aa0994b51a5036c8b&tab=core&_cview=1

PDF document showing that the US Govt are studying  the full RF Spectrum, full spectrum of bioeffects. 

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/BRDEE_BAA_Questions_and_Answers_3_May_2019.pdf

In the UK,  In 2017, the MoD awarded £30 million (US$37 million) to the British Dragonfireconsortium to build a Laser Directed Energy Weapon (LDEW) Capability Demonstrator, which is expected to begin testing this year, and now three more demonstrator projects have been given the green light.

As well as lasers that can destroy targets with heat and thermal shock waves, the new contracts will include radio-frequency weapons that can disrupt electronics and disable computers. According to the MoD, Britain has been researching radio frequency DEWs for over 30 years and is a world leader in the necessary power generation technologies.

https://newatlas.com/uk-laser-radio-frequency-dew-weapon-demonstrators/60501/

In July 2019, the MOD announced it is seeking to develop three new DEW demonstrators to explore the potential of the technology and accelerate its introduction onto the battlefield.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mod-to-develop-cutting-edge-laser-and-radio-frequency-weapons

Considering that the development of remote wireless ultrasound and microwave internal voice transmission, human tracking technologies and the use of such technologies against humans has been substantiated then remote manipulation techniques are in need of scientific and legal investigation with protection.

Whilst the effects have been fully understood and practised for many years,  one has to wonder to what aim is research to the tune of $44 Million between now and the next 5/6 years actually for?

Lowrey patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or as directed at an individual.

Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort.” Entrainment technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness”, as accomplished by an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG.  Interstate Industries licensed this patent.

The Norris patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method” produces sound particularly within cavities such as the ear canal.  An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from surfaces.

Rowan Patent # 4893815 “Interactive transector device commercial and military grade” describes the acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets. Stated therein: “Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained.” The capability of “isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group” is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilised to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. Tracking data automatically aims weapons, and the system even provides remote physiological stress assessment during attack. Granted 16.1.1990.

Given the quote by the US Airforce Lt Col John Forsythe reported in the Defense Daily that ” we are not in a war against nations or big armies, we are in a war against individuals” and the spoken words from the former CIA Director David Patraeus who declared at the CIA venture capital firm In-Q-tel conference in 2012, ” items of interest will be, located, monitored and remotely controlled through radio frequencies” and how it will allow them have to have, “near continuous monitoring virtually anywhere they choose which has made them diabolically clever”… then one can only assume that it is the public themselves who are the intended victims of such powerful and dangerous weaponry.https://www.vigiliae.org/759-2/

Allowing a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behaviour without hindrance.

Dangerous times indeed! 

And in the words of Edmund Burke “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” 

In recent articles, I have pointed out the links between ‘reports’ of mass shooting and the link to the testing or implementation of 5G in its many forms.

Here is a link to that article : https://www.vigiliae.org/false-flags-undeniable-links-to-5g-testing/

Despite concerns from Virginia Beach  leaders about 5G  antennas,dozens of small cell tower applications are currently being approved each month in Virginia Beach. More are expected.

Virginia Beach has five wireless provider franchises and was one of the first cities to adopt laws to allow the roll out.https://www.govtech.com/network/Virginia-Beach-Leaders-Have-Concerns-About-5G-Antennas.html

The office that oversees the applications and permits for the roll out of the small cell towers has 60/90 days to allow the permit for small cell towers and after this any delay means that it can be granted under state law.

Cue the need to stall for time!

The very office that grants the permits was reported to have a mass shooting that slowed down the process for some time afterwards.

The lengths they will go to, to get 5G rolled out?

 https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/31/us/virginia-beach-shooting/index.html

And we have the obligatory drill taking place at the same time! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmT_T2_Mzuk&fbclid=IwAR2zMq_yl0WmROCCa0Ma0muRt2MBXbn6wjjBbLsqW961O2LYN9cJJvoCfSs

Meanwhile the top 3 executives of the Virginia state government were being investigated at the same time. Avoiding resignation in order to be complicit in a false flag event. And using the media to  put more coverage and attention on mass shootings to help them push their anti-gun agenda?

Clearly the timing of this event was crucial for political reasons but the venue? An obvious bonus for the 5G pushers !

In this Ofcom document, they clearly state that the dangerous Millimetre waves technology using 26 GHz will NOT mention what applications it will be used for.

Enabling 5G in the UK
4
1.15 High-frequency (mmWave) spectrum which, to date, has not been used to deliver mobile services, is likely to be used to support new 5G applications, in particular those that require high capacity and very low latency by both MNOs and other players.

6 Latency is the amount of time between a command and its corresponding action, 5G will make this delay unnoticeable.
1.16 While responses to our 26 GHz call for input indicated that the band is likely to be become important for 5G, many suggested that it is too early to say how the band will be used, and for what purposes. We will continue to collate evidence from stakeholders across different
sectors and continue our engagement internationally to inform our understanding given the wide international interest in using high frequency spectrum for mobile. We are particularly keen to encourage trials at 26 GHz, the 5G mmWave pioneer band.

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/111883/enabling-5g-uk.pdf