The person being hailed as the mastermind behind the CV models has been in the media lately after claims that he resigned.

Neil Ferguson of Imperial College was reportedly breaking the quarantine rules by going out to meet his married ‘lover’.

But many are asking the question, ” Is Ferguson the fall guy for measures that will be shown to be disastrous, in the near future?”

According to his own studies, taken from a 2004 report, Ferguson claims that:

Effective isolation of symptomatic patients is sufficient to control an outbreak.


The aim of this study is to identify general properties of emerging infectious agents that determine the likely success of two simple public health measures in controlling outbreaks, namely (i) isolating symptomatic individuals and (ii) tracing and quarantining their contacts. Because these measures depend on the recognition of specific disease symptoms, we investigate the relative timing of infectiousness and the appearance of symptoms by using a mathematical model.

Given the infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 and the high proportion of transmissions from presymptomatic individuals, controlling the epidemic by manual contact tracing is infeasible. 

So according to those responsible for CV models, this particular virus is  the easiest to control WITHOUT the need for  contact tracing, quarantining of healthy people or Lockdown measures? 

Imperial college who are claiming responsibility for the data and consequent actions such as ‘Lockdown’ are also involved in creating the solution to the problem, namely a vaccine.

The UK government have recently given Imperial college £22.5 million to fast track a CV vaccine, with another £20 million to Oxford University.

In 2018 Imperial College formed a partnership with CEPI, the Centre for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations contributed £8.4 million to partner Imperial College to develop vaccines in 16 weeks instead of 10 years. They called this platform, ‘RapidVac’ and the disease they called Disease X.

 Oslo, Norway15 October 2019—The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) has today launched a call for proposals to invite funding applications for innovative platform technologies that can be used to develop vaccines and other immunoprophylactics to rapidly respond to future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases and unknown pathogens, known as “Disease X”.

Just 3 days before Bill Gates, WHO, CDC and others held a CV pandemic exercise. 

Meanwhile a report from September 2019 from the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board co-convened by WHO and the World Bank. With Involvement from Oxford University and others. With   financial support provided to the GPMB Secretariat from the Government of Germany, the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and Resolve to Save Lives claimed that:

Progress indicator(s) by September 2020 include,The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide
training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate
release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.

Are we involved in a training exercise created by WHO and the UN?

The report also goes on to state that :

Ultimate objectives:
The tools and systems needed to respond effectively to a fast-moving and lethal respiratory pathogen are in place: A universal influenza vaccine is effective and routinely used to protect the global population; new
therapeutics and broad-spectrum antivirals are widely available to treat and reduce mortality from a range of viruses; novel pathogens are routinely identified and sequenced, and the sequences are shared on a globally accessible website. Distributed manufacturing of vaccines (including nucleic acid types) begins within days of obtaining the new sequences and effective vaccines are pre-tested and approved for use within weeks.

The Secretary General of the United Nations convenes a high-level
dialogue with health, security and foreign affairs officials to determine
how the world can address the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen
pandemic, as well as for managing preparedness for disease outbreaks
in complex, insecure contexts.

So, we have WHO reporting just months BEFORE they declare a pandemic that they need to conduct two training exercises of a respiratory pathogen.

Is this the second wave that we keep hearing about?

Members of that Global Preparedness Monitoring Board include Dr George Gao, the Director General  of the Chinese CDC,  Anthony Fauci,  the Gates Foundation, Wellcome trust  and others.

This means that all the same people involved, months prior to the CV pandemic,  preparing for a pandemic with the goals of a vaccine in weeks, are the same people involved in the pandemic today. The same organisations and people who have invested millions in rapid diagnostics and rapid vaccines just prior to the pandemic claims.

The  Chinese Director General of the CDC, led the China CDC team in the  Ebola pandemic and  was also a member of the EVENT 201, a global pandemic exercise which occurred a month after the  preparedness report.

The description for  Dr Goa at  Event 201 lists his history and connections but omits to mention that he is also involved in the Global Preparedness monitoring board.

CEPI is also involved in  the Global Preparedness report.

As of June 2019, CEPI has raised US$ 750 million to develop vaccines for  epidemics 

CEPI members include the Chief Scientific adviser to the UK govt on International development. (DFID) Professor Watts.

Professor Charlotte Watts advising the govt is also a member of SAGE. (The Science Advisory group on Emergencies.)

Is it coincidence that a collaboration  involving govt scientific advisers, is funding  Imperial college to create a fast track vaccine for an epidemic  of disease X in 16 weeks, should then  be claiming to have be involved in creating  a vaccine for the current emergency in the same amount of time AND be declaring the severity of the reported emergency.

Other members of CEPI include senior advisers to WHO, UN and Govts.

Why the need for vaccines? 

 Neil Ferguson testimony that NewScientist article is based on.

There’s an interesting quote about “excess deaths”. He thinks up to 1/2 – 2/3 of all COVID-19 deaths could be people who would die this year regardless of COVID-19.

“We don’t know what the level of excess deaths will be in this epidemic. By “excess deaths” I mean – by the end of the year, what proportion of those people who died from COVID-19 would have died anyhow. But it might be as high as half to two thirds of the deaths we are seeing from COVID-19. Because it’s affecting people particularly either at the end of their lives or who have other conditions.” (10:43:00)

Even after admitting that those who died, up to 2/3 would have died anyway. Admitting that the majority of those infected  will have NO symptoms. And having no evidence of the level of excess deaths, yet pushing a world wide vaccination programme that stands to make a fortune with no accountability or safety studies needed.

 The pre planning  and the funding applied to create a fast track vaccine from the same sources  as those delivering the ‘facts’ cannot be ignored.

 Contact Tracing 

Another mathematical study was performed in May 2020, a study funded by the Wellcome trust, which determined that :Digital contact tracing could play a critical role in avoiding or leaving lockdown.

The Wellcome Trust study also used  the original study by Ferguson in its appraisal and concluded that contact tracing alongside social distancing and quarantine were required to combat the virus.

Epidemic control with instant digital contact tracing

A mobile phone app can make contact tracing and notification instantaneous upon case confirmation. By keeping a temporary record of proximity events between individuals, it can immediately alert recent close contacts of diagnosed cases and prompt them to self-isolate.

Apps with similar aims have been deployed in China. Public health policy was implemented using an app that was not compulsory but was required to move between quarters and into public spaces and public transport. The app allows a central database to collect data on user movement and coronavirus diagnosis and displays a green, amber, or red code to relax or enforce restrictions on movement. The database is reported to be analyzed by an artificial intelligence algorithm that issues the color codes (25). The app is a plug-in for the WeChat and Alipay apps and has been generally adopted.

In this study it claims that: Digital contact tracing could play a critical role in avoiding or leaving lockdown.

Funding: This work was funded by the Li Ka Shing Foundation. A.N. is funded by the ARTIC Network (Wellcome Trust Collaborators Award 206298/Z/17/Z). The funders played no role in study conception or execution.

For Prof. Michael Parker, director of the Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities in the U.K., and one of the paper’s authors, “With transparent and inclusive ethical oversight to ensure genuine public trust, it is possible to both save lives and protect civil liberties.

The study paper is clearly influenced by Wellcome trust despite the claims in the study that it had no conception or execution of the study.

15,000 calls centres are set to be opened up with a days training for staff for the new Corona phone app.

Whilst Apple and Google have joined forces to create an app for contact tracing, others have warned of the dangers. 

An open letter, published on 19 April and signed by professors from 26 countries, urges governments and public health authorities to evaluate the potential dangers of developing contact-tracing technology.

Some of the Bluetooth-based proposals would enable (via mission creep) a form of government or private sector surveillance. 

Phil Booth, coordinator at privacy group medConfidential, which has previously called on NHSX to be upfront about how the app will be used, said: “It’s time for them [NHSX] to stop talking and blogging about being transparent, and actually be transparent. Where are the DPIAs, the other Impact Assessments, the Data Sharing Agreements, the contracts? We were promised they would be published over a month ago, and still nothing.

“The lack of transparency is beyond an embarrassment. The real danger is that this undermines trust – for if they can’t show that they are and have been competent, honest and reliable throughout, then NHSX just failed the three pillars of trustworthiness. Not good for an experimental app that demands 60% of the population risk their lives to it.”

It comes as the privacy and security of contact-tracing apps has been called into question by a number of experts. 

As of 1 July 2019, NHSX, which brings teams from the Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and NHS Improvement together into one unit, is responsible for driving digital transformation and leading policy, implementation and change in this area.

The Open Rights group are campaigning for more transparency on the centralised app being built by govt.

In the UK a centralised app will mean that anyone reporting symptoms will go into a database and that will use AI to decide who to alert amongst contacts.

Health authority’s servers and the government could end up with an enormous database cataloguing everyone’s social interactions.

 According to the Spectator :

For the app to be useful, it needs to be running on our phones all the time so that it continues to transmit and receive the Bluetooth signals that determine who we have been in contact with. The problem is that both Apple’s iOS operating system, which runs on iPhones, and Google’s Android operating system, which runs on almost every other smartphone, are not designed to work like this.

Here is a list to all the countries using the contact trace apps.

The proposed system by the UK involves Oxford University who have also been funded by the UK govt. They also founded a vaccine manufacturing in initiative with Imperial college.

Oxford and Imperial are both founders of VMIC.

A week before the WHO announced the CV to the public, members of Imperial College created a private, for profit offshoot of the VMIC UK called VMIC UK SERVICES LTD.

In the meantime, the NHS duties are being transferred to private sector.


Letter provided by Carl Sayle.

Matt Hancock Secretary for Health and Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU
Your Name and Address
Affidavit of truth

No Consent to coronavirus Act 2020 and the unlawful Authority it Assumes: “Legis construction non facit injuriam”

Matt Hancock:
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle, Notice to Principle is Notice to Agent

I, the living sovereign wo/man [FIRST NAME IN SMALL CAPS]: come in peace, and in honour:

I present this affirmation as a declaration and affidavit of truth as evidence of the facts for and on the record:

I do solemnly swear that the facts contained herein are true, correct and certain:

I reserve all rights and waive all privileges:

I do not consent to mandatory vaccinations: My right to consent can never be removed under unalienable rights: Maxim: “Consensus facit legem”

Informed consent is an absolute and unalienable: No entity has the power to remove that freedom and right, and no power or authority can be granted by any entity whatsoever, under any circumstances. Any transgressions shall be deemed Tort and Trespass: “Consensus facit legem”

Any and all of my :private: data is and shall always be :private: and confidential: and no entity including medical personnel has the right to share it in any manner whatsoever without my prior specifically written consent. Any transgressions shall be deemed Tort and Trespass: Maxim: “Legitime imperanti parere necesse est”

No entity other than myself has the right to make any decisions about my medical/medication needs and requirements in any manner/matter without my prior specifically written consent. Any transgressions shall be deemed Tort and Trespass: Maxim: “Vani timoris justa excusatio non est”

No medication/vaccination/examination shall be forced against my will on me. I am the sole owner of my body granted by my creator: if any entity feels they have claim to it, I hereby give 14 [fourteen] days to bring forth your claim for immediate rebuttal. Maxim: “Qui facit per alium facit per se”

I do not consent to be taken against my will from wherever I may be, for any reason whatsoever, including but not limited to, medical tests of any kind/questioning/interrogation or quarantine over health matters. I am of sound mind and am competent and capable of self-quarantine should I do so deem necessary; no entity has the power/authority to make any decisions over-ruling my own. Any transgressions shall be deemed abduction, any medical tests conducted without prior specific written consent shall be deemed an Assault/Tort and Trespass: Maxim: “Qui per alium facit per seipsum facere videtur”…. “Nullus liber homo capiatur, aut imprisonetur”

No roadside or home visit induced medical test shall be conducted without prior specific written consent. Any medical tests conducted without prior specific written consent shall be deemed an Assault/Tort and Trespass: Maxim: “Nihil consensui tam contrarium est quam vis atque metus”

No entity has the right to detain myself under any act/statute or any medical emergency powers granted by any entity, limited corporation or otherwise. Any transgressions shall be deemed an Assault/Tort and trespass: Maxim: “Ubi non est lex, ibi non est transgression quoad mundum”

I do not consent now or at anytime in the future to undergo any de-contamination procedures forced against my will upon me, any transgressions shall be deemed an Assault/Tort and trespass: Maxim: “Maxim: “Consensus facit legem”

I do not consent to any and all restrictions pertaining to where I shall freely roam/travel, nor do I consent to any/all restrictions on whom I may associate with nor how many shall associate. No entity has the power or authority to remove my inalienable rights to travel or associate: Any transgressions shall be deemed a Tort and trespass: Maxim: “Jus non habenti tute non paretur”

No entity has the right to take/seize/move/remove/decontaminate or destroy my property/conveyance or other, in any manner under any terminology without my prior specifically written consent. Any transgressions shall be deemed theft/assault/tort and trespass: Maxim: “Spoliatus debet ante omnia restitui”…..” A piratis et latronibus copta dominium non mutant”…. “Dominium non potest esse in pendenti”

No consent is given to any entity, including but not limited to Justice of the Peace to order/authorise my arrest pertaining to any issues pertaining to any assumed/presumed medical issues: Any transgressions shall be deemed abduction/assault/tort and trespass: Maxim: “Lex est norma recti”

I do not consent to any entity creating an “offence” in any manner/matter in order to attain assumed/presumed or wrongly informed of power/authority over me: There is no law on the landmass of England that considers an offence a breach of the law: The very thought that any entity could presume such authority over myself is utterly repugnant and reprehensibly unconscionable: Any transgressions shall be deemed fraud/assault/tort and trespass: Maxim: “Lex non oritur ex injuria”…. “Deceptis, non decipientibus, jura subveniunt”

No judge has the power/authority to over-rule my unalienable rights/freedoms. If any judge wishes to pass judgement/make decisions on my behalf, he/she must first hear me defend my unalienable rights and freedoms in a true court de jour in front of a jury of 12 of my living peers, after a successful claim of harm, injury or loss, with an injured party in presence attesting to such, has been served on myself: Maxim: “Non jus ex regula, sed regula ex jure”:

My free will shall and can never be construed as obstruction, wilful or otherwise: Any entity denying myself of my free will shall be suffering myself direct tort and trespass: Maxim: “Ejus est nolle, qui potest velle”

Under Motu Proprio delivered by Pope Fracsis July 11th 2013, any and all immunity from justice has been removed. No entity shall be immune from myself seeking justice in any matters including any and all within this document. Any attempt to avoid justice from myself shall be deemed a direct tort/trespass: Maxim: “Idem est scire aut scire debere aut potuisse”:….

“Ignorantia juris non exusat”…. “Justitia nemini neganda est”
I do not consent to any vaccination, “mandatory” or otherwise: Maxim: “Peccata contra naturam sunt gravissima”

I do not consent to be given mandatory advice, I am completely capable of handling my own affairs by way of personal research in order to be informed, and am no danger to others based on the true clear data being blurred by the mainstream media pertaining to any medical issues arising from any current pandemic claims: Maxim: “Rerum suarum quilibet est moderator et arbiter”

Neither the public health control of disease act 1984/coronavirus act 2020, nor any other act/any changes to them shall remove any of my unalienable rights. Any attempt to hold me to account of any changes to legislation without my prior specifically written consent shall be deemed Tort and Trespass: Maxim: “Jura naturae sunt immutabilia”

Maxim: “Les fictions naissent de la loi, et non la loi des fictions”: All acts/statutes apply to consenting “PERSONS” which I am not, I am wo/man: so by very definition do not apply: Maxim: “Homo vocabulum est naturae; persona juris civilis”.

I do declare and affirm that I am of no danger to others pertaining to anything that may arise from presumptions/assumptions of the above And no entity has the power/authority to declare me so: Maxim: “Potentia debet sequi justitium, non antecedere”

All men are equal, if any man/woman has a right or freedom, so do I. Maxim: “Injura servi dominum pertingit”
No civil law shall diminish my unalienable rights/freedoms: Maxim: “Libertinum ingratum leges civiles in pristinam servitutem redignunt; sed leges Angliae semel manumissum semper liberum judicant”

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within 14 [fourteen] days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under oath or attestation, by living flesh and blood wo/man upon full commercial and private liability and under threat of penalty of perjury, and received at the care of address provided no later than 14 [fourteen] days from the date of receipt of this notice. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges against myself, the sovereign wo/man :first name: beneficiary to the all caps trust/estate ALL CAPS NAME, for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties. I hereby affirm all herein to be true and certain

The truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit:

Do unto others as one would have done to you:
Witnessed by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost:

Subscribed and sworn under the threat of perjury,
without prejudice,
all mistakes accepted

with all rights reserved,
In peace and in good faith,

Date:___________________ Autograph:__________________

Those with long term memory problems would do well to cast their minds back to a time when the government informed them via the media, that Iraq had ‘weapons of mass destruction’.

We were scared into the false belief that they had the power to kill us all in half an hour!

This campaign of lies helped along by the TV in the corner or the newspaper at our breakfast table, created the myth to allow millions of Iraqis to be murdered.

All for the greed of those who wanted the resources in Iraq but also wanted to be able to control the people in the future.

Those who were at the forefront of those lies included govt agencies, think tanks, universities, politicians, scientists, etc all in agreement that there actually was  a threat.

These same people had vested interests in companies that would profit from a massacre and a take over of resources.

There was much profit to be made from the lies being spouted from those with titles before their names,  people believed, purely because they put their blind trust in anyone attached to the establishment. 

The mouthpieces who made claims in favour of death and destruction yet profited, have never been brought to task.

This is the reality of those we put trust in.

The CV is no different.

Those who are pushing the narrative of this new ‘weapon of mass destruction’ in the form of a virus, also have vested interests in the solution.


From those who are behind the pandemic models at Imperial college, to govt health agency members, to politicians, the list is endless.

Just as those who profited from the massacre that took place in Iraq claimed war was needed, so do those who claim a pandemic is happening, have the solution in the form a vaccine that they will profit from.

Meanwhile all the infrastructure for the smart new world is being laid out before us, the  destruction of what we know as the world we live in.

This means millions of jobs will go, millions will be working in poverty. The control system will get tighter and before long it will all just be the norm. Maybe at some distant point in the future, the TV will blurt out how experts made a mistake in calculations. 

Those who have lost millions of loved ones over a mass deception would know all too well how painfully inadequate that apology would be. 

This is a global  lesson in mass deception.

Now it is  us they want to control and it is our resources they will steal.

If this was a real pandemic, they would have no need to be inflating  the number of cases and creating a completely new system to define the uncertainty.

Nor would the ‘scientific advice’ be coming from Imperial college, which formed a vaccination manufacturing centre. 

A pandemic made possible from the announcements of the UN group, World Health Agency whose past false claims, corruptions and revelations of the agency being completely compromised have all been forgotten by those with long term memory problems. 

Fool me once?

For evidence of  this corruption please read articles published on this website.

“In one paper,” Crowe says, “I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered “indeterminate.” And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.”

I asked him to pause so I could exclaim my astonishment. And yet, it was Déjà vu all over again. Just like in the HIV battle—people were never told that the “HIV test” had different standards in different countries, and within countries, from lab to lab. The highest bar (the greatest number of HIV proteins) was in Australia: five. The Lowest was Africa: 2. In the US it is generally 3-4.

We used to joke that you could rid yourself of an “HIV diagnosis” by flying from either the US or Australia, to Africa. But for many years, “AIDS” in Africa was diagnosed without any tests whatsoever. Just a short list of symptoms that tracked precisely with symptoms of most tropical diseases, such as fever, cough, and shortness of breath.

David, in his quiet Canadian way, dropped a bombshell in his next statement:

“I think if a country said, “You know, we need to end this epidemic,” They could quietly send around a memo saying: “We shouldn’t be having the cutoff at 37. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.”

Yes, you read that right. Labs can manipulate how many “cases’ of Covid-19 their country has. Is this how the Chinese made their case load vanish all of a sudden?

From Article : 

By Celia Farber

There is an old saying,”follow the money!”

In 2020 it would be wise to say, ” follow  the money, technology and the over all plans!”

No time has been lost during this ‘plandemic’ as many companies flex their muscles and showcase their equipment, thanks to CV.

Robots are covering for humans in hospitals, helping to track cases, whilst facial recognition is tracking people even in masks,  whilst  drones are used to spray the public.

Futuristic technology powered by artificial intelligence is helping to identify coronavirus symptoms, find new treatments, and track the spread of the disease.

Self-driving vehicles are even delivering supplies to medical workers in Wuhan.

One company in S. Korea claimed that the testing kits were created using AI with no actual Covid-19 just generic coronavirus. 

The same tests being used in Italy and Germany.

What else has CV enabled?

In  China  it has created  a mass experiment in remote work and showcase  of digital tools and networks.

Whilst the cessation of real live events for entertainment will be a chance to push virtual reality as the way forward.

Google gets a chance to roll out its new advanced conference videoing capabilities.

And what about Wuhan?

Evidence shows us that Wuhan, central China’s most populous city , has been used as a test bed for smart city studies since 2018. It has also been a strategic ‘Independent Innovation Model Area’ since 2009.

Wuhan has been the pioneer of smart city projects since 2010 and is seen as the indicator of planned future development at a national level.

Implementation has been coordinated by the Wuhan Research Institute for Smarter Cities (WRISC), established in 2012 by Wuhan Information Industry Office (a government agency) and the city’s Land Resources and Planning Bureau.

With a smart health initiative since 2014/15.

Many of the pilot projects are described on WRISC’s website which include RFID chips, video cameras across the city into a centralised traffic information system and a surveillance system connected to all the city’s police stations.

Wuhan is a pilot location in the China-wide ‘863 Smart Cities’ programme.

Many countries have consulates in Wuhan including France, South Korea,UK,US while the Netherlands opened a trade office in Wuhan as early as 1996, several other countries have followed suit since 2010, including Singapore, Japan, Canada and Australia.

Wuhan’s smart city agenda is directly influenced by a longstanding and active ‘twin city’ arrangement with Manchester. Wuhan works on smart cities with Manchester’s flagship smart city area – ‘Corridor Manchester.’’

The national government has a long standing interest in using new smart technologies in health.

On November 1, 2019, Chinese Minister of Science and Technology Wang Zhigang presided over the World Laureates Symposium in Shanghai.

And of course that technology includes AI and Smart cities.


The EU funding and research group that is behind smart technology, Horizon 2020, is also working with China to implement the new world of technology and security.

Now the question is, what are the odds that a pandemic would come along just when all the smart technology Industries in the world are ready to showcase the technology  and work together world wide?

Even the test kits that are being used by Italy and Germany were created in South Korea using AI but no actual Covid 19 virus!

Not only is this CV pandemic convenient for the smart agenda roll out, but it happens in an area that has been at the forefront of smart technology testing.

The consequences of this pandemic created by the measures in place, will cause massive economic problems that can be solved by the smart agenda and the use of digital money.

The pandemic will also help to introduce the strict security measures proposed and the smart technology will be welcomed.

The pandemic gives birth to AI and the Smart agenda…

Meanwhile companies such as Moderna are set to become very rich from the new vaccines. Partnered with NIH, with no name for 9 months and just a number.

Moderna had been collaborating for several years with NIAID on developing coronavirus vaccines, and even had been preparing for a 2020 “pandemic test” whereby it would see how quickly it could design, develop, and mass manufacture a global vaccine.

This company has many ex Pharma executives, bankers and FDA members on its board. Even a former member of the NIH.

The company claimed to have created a vaccine two days after being given the genetic sequence.

Moderna calls mRNA “the software of life.” Cells use mRNA to translate DNA into the proteins the body uses to function. Moderna believes it can use mRNA to spur the body to produce its own therapeutic proteins, essentially putting a drug factory inside of the patient.

As one might guess, it’s not an easy task. Moderna’s scientists have a big job ahead of them: For each potential drug, they need to figure out how to safely get the mRNA therapy into the appropriate cells, make sure the mRNA actually yields sufficient amounts of protein to have a therapeutic effect and ensure the therapies won’t trigger an immune reaction in patients.

No mRNA-based drug has ever been approved by the FDA nor any other regulatory agency.

The company has an ex FDA member on its board.

Bancel, who has been CEO since 2011 and previously worked at Eli Lilly & Co. LLY, 1.804% , owns 10%of the company ahead of the IPO. He has the second-largest stake in Moderna, behind venture investor Flagship Pioneering Inc., which owns 19.5% of pre-IPO shares. AstraZeneca PLC is the third-largest investor, with a pre-IPO stake of 8.4%, and also has a collaboration agreement with Moderna.

This is the company that is injecting vaccines for human trials even before animal trials. .

This company started trials on using mRNA vaccines on healthy adults in November 2017 and the trail will continue till July 2020. The trials involved Exclusion Criteria.

Imperial College has been working on its mRNA vaccine since the middle of January when Chinese scientists released the genetic information about the virus. Yet it is the same University that is at the forefront of all the facts and measures associated to the pandemic.

The same University who formed the new UK vaccine manufacturer, VMIC due to be up and running soon.

Imperial College scientist Professor Robin Shattock said his team and others are creating vaccines ‘at a speed that’s never been realised before’.

All a bit too convenient really!

A private vaccine company was also created just a week before claims of CV were mentioned by members of the VMIC.


Why would a ‘Not for profit’ organisation create a ‘for profit’ company a week before the CV was made public?

And then, after being given the free reign to draft in measures of a pandemic on behalf of the govt, show themselves to be working on a vaccine, whilst a private vaccine company stands to gain.

I think we can deduce that there is far more to this than meets the eye.

Whilst the figures being claimed as factual of the actual cases of CV have been changed by the WHO and CDC to allow ‘assumptions’ of the possibility to be recorded as factual.

Add that to the CV being used to test out many technological ‘Smart’ programmes and applications, surveillance, security and themes.

Changes in laws to allow less freedoms.

Curiously, Moderna, the vaccine company have sponsors |Horizon2020, the biggest EU funding R&D programme to usher in the ‘Smart Agenda’.

One could be forgiven for wandering if there is more to this pandemic than meets the eye.

For instance the link between Imperial and WHO.

The woman responsible for pandemic graphs at Imperial is this woman who is also working for the WHO.


In America, the telehealth is proving a big hit with the CV. According to the Centre for connected health policy.


Changes to include waivering Medicaid to allow home telehealth.

This was clearly proposed very shortly before a national emergency was proclaimed.

Proposed 30th October 2019



Written by Jill Kirkwood

𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒄𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅-19 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒅𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𝒎𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒂

𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 ‘𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲’ 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻?

Answer – Imperial College. But why is Boris taking advice from Neil Ferguson from Imperial College? A man who has continually produced falsely inflated and alarmist predictions about viruses in the past which have been totally debunked?

Ferguson was the man behind alarmist research that sparked an unnecessary mass culling of farm animals during the 2001 epidemic of foot and mouth disease – which cost Britain billions of pounds.

Ferguson will not open up the model for scrutiny, but our government is using the same model to justify the lockdown!!! First of all he predicted 500,000 deaths. Then he suddenly changed his figures DRASTICALLY, and said that the UK should have enough ICU beds and that the coronavirus will probably kill under 20,000 people in the U.K. – more than 1/2 of whom would have died by the end of the year in any case because they were so old and sick.

So he is saying that we should be expecting 10,000 deaths from covid-19. Boris is saying that 20,000 deaths would be a ‘good’ result, but this is misleading, because he is including the 10,000 who would be expected to die anyway.…/the-scientist-whose-doomsday-p…/

𝗡𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗛𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱

We are being told about covid-19 deaths, but not the number of deaths which would be expected to occur under normal circumstances. Are covid deaths over and above what would normally be expected? Are they over and above the expected number of deaths from flu or pneumonia? PHE says that the number is not statistically significant:…/Weekly_all_cause…

𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 ‘𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵’ 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁?

When the number of deaths from covid is announced, there is the implication that they died as a direct result of covid. However this is not the case. A ‘corona death’ is where a corona infection was proven. But also all those with underlying health problems infected by Covid-19 but for whom it’s not possible to say what killed them. Finally, those not tested before death but suspected of Covid-19 are tested post-death, and if covid is found = corona death.

The distinction between dying ‘with’ Covid-19 and dying ‘due to’ Covid-19 is not just splitting hairs. Take these examples to illustrate the point – an 87-year-old woman with dementia in a nursing home; a 79-year-old man with metastatic bladder cancer; a 29-year-old man with leukaemia treated with chemotherapy; a 46-year-old woman with motor neurone disease for 2 years. All develop chest infections and die. All test positive for Covid-19. Yet all were vulnerable to death by chest infection from any infective cause (including the flu). Covid-19 might have been the final straw, but it has not caused their deaths. Yet they will all be included in the ‘covid deaths’. So a lockdown of the population is justified on the basis of couitnting every death as a covid death,even if the patients were going to die anyway. Unless we tighten the criteria for recording death due only to the virus (as opposed to it being present in those who died from other conditions), the official figures may show a lot more deaths apparently caused by the virus than is actually the case…/how-to-understand-and-report-…

𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲:

Two articles with opinions from experts, drowned out or disregarded by the mainstream narrative, offering their take on the coronavirus outbreak:…/12-experts-questioning-the-coro…/…/10-more-experts-criticising-the…/

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮 – 𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗺, 𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀

The media reporting is another issue. Everyone knows that the media is bought and paid for, and that they lie, deceive and manipulate the public. But for some reason, everyone seems to believe every they are reporting the exact truth when it comes to a ‘pandemic’. Why would it be any different with a pandemic? There is an agenda now to push the story that young people can die who have no underlying conditions. The Guardian MADE UP a story about a 21 year old woman, and had to retract the story, explaining that she had actually died of a heart attack and that it had nothing to do with covid. They have now pulled it completely. An 18 year old boy was also falsely reported of dying with the virus. But even after retracting these stories, the damage has been done in the eyes of the public. The ‘fear porn’ has worked.

𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘆?

We hear reports on the news of hospitals being overrun and under pressure, and of course this is no doubt the case. But reports are coming in about many hospitals that are empty, and staff are wondering where the cases are. This video shows a reporter in Germany going to hospitals which were claimed to be inundated with cases, but finds there are none. And in one of them, staff have been told that they are not allowed to talk to the media.…/video-saying-there-is…/

𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻𝘀

Since when was the government bothered about your health and well-being? They have allowed thousands of people to die while waiting for benefits. For years they have deliberately covered up serious health risks to the public – asbestos, tobacco, glyphosate…..why would they suddenly care now? Since when was the government bothered about protecting the NHS? It’s been completely decimated for years.

So for what other reasons would a pandemic be declared? Money, corruption, power and control. To bring forward agendas which have been planned for decades. Collapse the global economy = poverty for all. Get people policing their neighbours – already started. The cashless society. A Universal Basic Income where everyone is dependent on the state (when millions lose their homes and businesses, this can be rolled out). A police state – has anyone noticed yet that we are now no longer living in a democracy? Mandatory vaccinations which can only be acceptable if the public are petrified of ‘killer viruses’. Next we will see the introduction of tracking of everyone via mandatory phone apps, censorship of anyone who does not go along with the official narrative. .And microchipping is not far down the line either. This shutdown of the world is also being used by Telecomms companies to install 5G in schools where they know that they would get opposition. This is actually going on right now in various parts of the UK. A ‘pandemic’ can be declared for many reasons, but none of them are to do with the health and well-being of any of us.


Firstly, in this atmosphere of uncertainty, conflicting views and downright lies, govt have NO RIGHT to declare the possibility that any anti vaccine discussions on social media could result in prosecution!

People have every right to question the safety of anything that is being forced on them, especially when many of those corporations who are in the race for CV vaccines have been shown to have links to unscrupulous practises,  that in-itself requires our attention and not a blinding  ‘faith’ in anything that we are told.

 So let us see who is in the running for making a profit.




In the U.S., many of the companies that are initiating development have received funding from two organisations: the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which is a division of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a division of the National Institutes of Health. Some companies have also received funding from Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), a global organization based in Oslo. Other companies are funding trials by themselves or through partnerships with other life sciences companies.

In the UK, largest single project in Wave 1 of the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund Medicines Manufacturing portfolio – the Vaccines Manufacturing and Innovation Centre (VMIC) – was under way since 2018.

A £66m investment has been  led by a new company: Vaccine Manufacturing and Innovation Centre UK Ltd (VMIC). The management Board now has representatives from all the collaborators: comprising leading UK commercial and academic organisations. 

Three academic institutions founded VMIC:

  1. University of Oxford
  2. Imperial College
  3. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

All of the data and the guidelines on this virus,the suggestions on lock downs, all come from the same team at Imperial college. Which has been used as the  template for all the world wide lock downs! 

So the SAME Govt Institute that are on the board of a new UK vaccine industry are responsible for the ‘evidence’ that drives the massive changes that we are seeing on the back of the CV.

This is a scandal! How can the same people who are involved in the UK s plans to produce vaccines and become vaccination manufacturers be in any position to be the ‘leading voice’ of the world in this pandemic?

This is something that needs to be addressed as a total conflict of interest!

This organisation has members who are also involved in the Pirbright Institute that is responsible for creating the Corona virus.

Here is Adrian Hill discussing his links to Pirbright!

In this interview Hill mentions the partnership between Jenner and Pirbright at 40 mins in.

And before we see this as a non profit making deal and purely for the good of the people, then check out this fact.

A WEEK BEFORE the first reports of the Corona virus outbreak on 31st December 2019, this organisation created a new company called VMIC UK services Ltd.

An organisation, govt affiliated, that is supposedly’ not for profit’ for two years suddenly creates a private company, a week before the news? ?

The CEO of this new company is named Dr Matthew Duchars  who is also the CEO of the UK’s Vaccines Manufacturing Innovation Centre (VMIC).

So shall we put this into perspective!

A new UK vaccine manufacturer was established two years prior, involving the same University who are leaders in this pandemic. Which then creates a private company a week before the news is released of this virus!

Has the penny dropped yet?

“To play those millions of minds, to watch them slowly respond to an unseen stimulus, to guide their aspirations without their knowledge – all this whether in high capacities or in humble – is a big and endless game of chess of ever extraordinary excitement.”

– Sidney Webb, former leader of Fabian Society****